Top Banner

of 74

JRLC Libel

Apr 08, 2018

Download

Documents

mharward7
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    1/74

    Libel-Defamation

    Dangerous for all media

    All media professions

    Expensive

    Cases protect political speech sp 09

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    2/74

    Libel-Defamation

    Plaintiff

    Defendant

    Burden of Proof

    Preventing Libel suits

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    3/74

    Libel

    Define

    Elements

    defamationidentification

    publication

    harm

    fault

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    4/74

    Libel

    Terms

    Public Official

    Public FigurePrivate Person

    Actual Malice

    Negligence

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    5/74

    Libel

    Defenses

    Truth

    OpinionQualified Privilege

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    6/74

    Libel

    Internet

    Slapp Suits

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    7/74

    Libel v. Slander

    Libel: written

    Slander: spoken

    But terms merge in broadcasting, on internet.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    8/74

    Libel

    Historically

    Libel

    more widely disseminatedthan slander

    more permanent

    more deliberate

    more harmful

    But also true of broadcast and internet

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    9/74

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    10/74

    Criminal Libel

    Historically

    Based on breach of the peace theory

    The greater the truth the greater the libelSedition laws

    Now

    No breach of the peace punishment

    Truth a compete defense

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    11/74

    Criminal Libel

    Ashton v. Kentucky

    Unconstitutional to punish criticism of

    officials calculated to create adisturbances of the peace.

    SCOTUS: Criminal libel law too vaguePlaintiff must prove malice

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    12/74

    Libel: Plaintiff

    Living Individuals

    Businesses

    Organizations

    Products

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    13/74

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    14/74

    Libel Defined

    A false and unprivileged

    statement

    offactthat harms

    a persons

    reputation.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    15/74

    Libel Definition

    Harm to reputation

    causes hatred, ridicule or contempt

    (Restatement (Second) of Torts)

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    16/74

    Libel defined

    Types of libel

    False statements that say or imply

    immoralitymental illness

    contagious disease

    criminal activity

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    17/74

    Libel defined

    False charge of criminality, e.g.,

    Guilty when only a charge was filed

    Guiltywhen person is acquitted.Arrested when person is only questioned

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    18/74

    Libel defined

    Be precise:

    False report: Driver charged with driving an

    uninsured automobileFact: Driver without proof of insurance

    was summoned to prove car is

    insured.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    19/74

    Libel defined

    Loaded criminal words

    ambulance chaser

    cheats

    collusion

    deadbeat

    embezzler

    fraud

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    20/74

    Libel Defined

    Business Libel

    loaded words

    cheat customerscompany is insolvent

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    21/74

    Libel defined

    Business libel

    false report: tobacco company advertised

    illicit pleasure to childrenBrown & Williamson

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    22/74

    Libel defined

    Product disparagement

    False report: Sound from Bose speakers wanderedabout the room.

    Violin appeared to be

    10 feet wide, and a piano stretched from

    wall to wall.

    Financial harm: Publication caused 9-month decline insales growth.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    23/74

    Libel defined

    Veggie Libel

    Oprah vowed to eat no more hamburgers,

    to avoid mad cow disease;Expert guest proclaimed danger to

    American beef.

    .

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    24/74

    Libel defined

    Veggie libel

    Court: Oprah did not violate Texas food

    disparagement statute prohibiting falseinformation about safety of perishable food

    products.

    Why? . . .

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    25/74

    Libel defined

    Veggie libel

    Court: Texas beef not perishable.

    First Amendment issuewhetherstatute is constitutionalwas avoided.

    Question: Can disagreeing, expert scientistscreate false facts?

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    26/74

    Libel defined

    R & B Villa West Page 1

    r&b villa west.djvu

    r&b villa west.djvu

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    27/74

    Libel: R & B Villa West text

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    28/74

    Libel Villa West

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    29/74

    R & B Villa West Correction

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    30/74

    Libel defined

    Alcohol Abuse

    Carol Burnett

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    31/74

    Libel defined

    Incompetence

    Libelous or opinion?

    The easiest five credits at Stanford.The professor travels without a full

    set of luggage.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    32/74

    Libel defined

    Libelous? Professor Buttlick

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    33/74

    Libel defined

    Direct quotations

    Fabricated quotes not defamatory per se.

    Fabricated quotes defamatory if fabricationdefames. New Yorker-Masson case

    Innocent construction rule.

    Journalist cant escape liability with quotes:e.g., The professor was drunk in class.

    The quote is defamatory if false.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    34/74

    Libel defined

    Loaded words

    Communist

    Nazi

    HomosexualPlagiarist

    Sold out

    Obscene

    Substandard

    Fired

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    35/74

    Elements of libel

    Defamation

    Publication

    IdentificationHarm

    Fault

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    36/74

    Libel publication

    Any format

    Newspaper

    Book

    BroadcastInternet

    PR release

    Headline

    Cutline

    Advertisement

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    37/74

    Libel publication. Advertisement

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    38/74

    Libel Identification

    of or concerning

    Not always necessary that name be published

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    39/74

    Libel Identification - Cartoon

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    40/74

    Libel Publication - Cartoon Correction

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    41/74

    Libel Identification

    Panning camera

    Houses in drug story

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    42/74

    Libel Identification

    Group Libel

    No KFC restaurant identified from among 5,000

    No owner of burned building identified

    from among 160 owners.

    But, identification established when all tenmembers of fraternity are libeled.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    43/74

    Libel Publication

    Publication needed to a third party

    Newspaper

    Broadcast

    Internet posting

    Including FacebookLetter of recommendation

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    44/74

    Libel: Whos Responsible?

    EVERYONE

    Reporter-writer

    EditorPublisher

    Broadcaster

    Sources

    But, not Internet service provider, section 230

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    45/74

    Libel Publication

    Internet Service Provider

    Section 230ISP not liable for defamation as carrier

    Kenneth Zeran

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    46/74

    Libel Publication

    Internet service provider, sec. 230

    But no immunity for ISP under sec. 230 ifprovider induces defamation

    on interactive site.

    E.g., Roommates.com

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    47/74

    Libel Publication

    Foreign Jurisdictions

    Libel tourism

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    48/74

    Fault

    Strict Liability(No longer)

    Malicepublic officials and figuresNegligenceprivate plaintiffs for compensatory

    damages

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    49/74

    Fault

    New York Times v. Sullivan

    End of seditious libelSedition Act 1798

    Truth a defense

    Juries determine lawLeonard Levy

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    50/74

    Fault

    New York Times v. Sullivan

    See, Brief

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    51/74

    Fault

    New York Times v. Sullivan

    Significance

    Constitutionalizes libel law

    Burden on plaintiff

    Malice requirement for public officials

    Protection for paid editorial ads

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    52/74

    Public Officials

    Public Officials

    Sullivan

    Police officialRosenblatt v. Baer

    Government employees who have,

    or appear to the public to have, substantialresponsibility for or control over the conduct

    of governmental affairs.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    53/74

    Public Officials

    Mayor?

    Governor?

    Tax AssessorHigh School Principal?

    Football coach?

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    54/74

    Public Figures

    Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts

    Gertz v. Welchvortex limited. voluntarily inject self into

    controversial issue of public importance

    all purpose. pervasive power andinfluence

    Public Figures

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    55/74

    Public Figures

    Involuntary public figure?

    Is there such an animal?

    Rosenbloom v. MetromediaMaximum extension of public figure

    malice requirements to:

    The involuntary public figureSupreme Court retrenchment

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    56/74

    Public Figure

    Supreme Court retrenchment

    Gertz v. WelchTime v. Firestone

    Hutchinson v. Proxmire

    Wolston v. Readers Digest

    Public Figures-Private Persons

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    57/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    All-purpose public figure

    Wield pervasive power or influence;

    enjoy wide fame or notoriety.household name

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    58/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    All-Purpose Public Figures

    Wally Butts

    National television celebrityNational political writer

    Film stars

    Not: Mary Alice Firestone.Prominent only in Palm Beach

    society

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    59/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    Limited or Vortex Public Figures

    Inject selves into controversial issues

    of public importance to affect theoutcome

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    60/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    Limited or Vortex Public Figures

    Not Gertz: No attempt to influencepublic opinion on issues of police

    brutalityNot Firestone: No controversial public

    issue

    Not Hutchinson: No thrust

    into public controversy

    Not Wolston: Didnt seek subpoena

    to testify

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    61/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    Vortex Public FiguresYes: Waldbaum. Executive entered

    controversies on supermarket practices,energy legislation, fuel allocation.

    Attracted news coverage-

    Yes. Monitor Patriot v. Roy

    Losing candidate thrust self into political

    issues; private life exposed in campaign

    (called a bootlegger)

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    62/74

    Public Figures-Private Persons

    Public Figures

    Richard Jewell?

    Damon Evans?Ted Turner?

    Greg McGarity?

    Vince Dooley

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    63/74

    Fault

    Actual Malice

    Knowing falsehood or reckless disregard

    for the truth -- Sullivan

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    64/74

    Fault

    Reckless Disregard

    Garrison: high degree of awareness of their

    probably falsity.

    St. Amant: entertained serious doubts

    about truth. Story was inherently

    improbable.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    65/74

    Fault

    Reckless disregard

    Combination of factors

    Unreliable source. Butts,Connaughton

    Failure to interview or check

    Butts, Connaughton

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    66/74

    Fault

    Reckless disregard

    Intentionally avoiding the truth

    ConnoughtonAvoiding contradictions

    Avoiding warnings

    Story improbableBias

    Ill will

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    67/74

    Fault

    Reckless disregard

    Not in AP v. Walker

    Usually reliable sourceNo reason to doubt

    Journalistic speed sometimes needed

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    68/74

    Fault

    Knowing Falsehood

    Fabrication. Cantrell v. Forrest City Pub.

    Fabricated dialogFabricated excessive poverty

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    69/74

    Fault

    Knowing Falsehood

    Not knowing falsehood:

    Changing quotes in quotation marks,unless the change creates

    defamation. Masson

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    70/74

    Fault

    Negligence

    Failure to do what average professional

    [person?] would doMay be single error.

    Failure to check. Sullivan

    Wrong name from phonebook. Liquori

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    71/74

    Fault

    Negligence

    Wire service defense

    Not negligent to publish wire storyunless story is inherently

    improbable

    Not negligent if there is no reasonto know story is defamatory

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    72/74

    Fault

    NegligenceGeorgia Broadcasters

    O.C.G.A. 51-5-10. Liability for defamatory

    statements in visual or sound broadcast;

    damages

    (a) The owner, licensee, or operator of a

    visual or sound broadcasting stationis not liable for defamatory broadcasts

    . . . [continued]

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    73/74

    Fault

    O.C.G.A. 51-5-10 (continued)

    By guests or sources

    Unless plaintiff can prove stations has

    failed to exercise due care to prevent the . .

    .broadcast.

  • 8/7/2019 JRLC Libel

    74/74

    Fault

    Do broadcasters need time delay to avoid

    Negligence?