The journey of ACHYUT KANVINDE 1
Nov 02, 2014
The journey of ACHYUT KANVINDE
1
HISTORY 2
Kanvinde was born in Achara,
in the Konkan region of
Maharashtra, in 1916 in a large
family. His mother died when he was
two and his father was an arts
teacher in Bombay. He was raised
by his large extended family in the
seclusion of the village, his father
being away in Bombay where he
was an art teacher in schools.
EARLY LIFE
Kanvinde had the calling of a painter and did enrol in
an art school but the family decided that architecture
would be a better profession for him, a living could be
earned more easily. so entered the Architecture
Department at Sir J.J. School of Art in 1935, the first of
the three existing architecture programs in the country
then. It was then headed by Claude Batley, who was also
the premier architect of the country.
Kanvinde graduated with distinction in 1941, but with
the tumults of the World War and the rapidly spreading
national struggle for independence, didn’t get a steady job
till 1943 when he joined the newly formed CSIR as an
architect. Achyut Kanvinde attended Harvard Graduate
school of Design in 1945 becoming the first Indian
architect to have studied in America.
EDUCATION Kanvinde
3
EXPERIENCE UNDER CLAUDE BATLEY -TRADITIONAL INDIAN ARCHITECTURE
Claude Batley introduced Kanvinde to the world of
architecture. This was the period when Kanvinde learned to
appreciate the values of Indian architecture. He was familiarized
with •its origins •Architecture based on the exigencies of local climate, building materials and social conditions •literate fusion of Western classical order with Indian building traditions •climatological principles
Batley in his teaching and his active practice maintained
this new ideal of Architecture: it was a universal craft tailored
rationally to regional parameters. In 1934, he published a
volume of measured drawings of traditional ‘Indian’ building
and in his lectures he tried for an informed appreciation of the
similarities and differences of Indian and European classical
buildings. In his practice he avoided the loud, revolutionary
eclat of the machine-age imagery popular in the west in
favour of an archeologically literate fusion of Western
classical order with Indian building traditions and coupled with
sound climatological principles. His works and his thinking
were obvious models for his students
BATLEY’S TEACHINGS
IIM Ahemdabad
4
Batley on Indian architecture,"…its origins,
developments and decadence had followed the perfectly
normal course of all the other world architectures and
was inevitably based on the exigencies of local climate,
building materials and social conditions".
Kanvinde remembers him as "a very important
man in shaping the outlook of many architects of my
generation, also of the earlier generation"
Starting from 1930s Indian pioneers anticipating the
inevitable independent Indian Republic, were planning an
ambitious series of Scientific and Technical institutions.
This culminated in CSIR being formed in 1942. Plans were
made to have the trained persons to translate these
dreams to reality; technical education having been kept
under much control in the colonial state in contrast with
scientific or humanistic education, there were no Indian
architects and engineers qualified to take these roles.
Hence from CSIR, Kanvinde was chosen to do studies in
planning and design of laboratory buildings as the first
group of people under the Government of India fellowship.
Kanvinde joined Harvard Master’s programme of
Architecture program in 1945 which was then being much
acclaimed for its new fountainhead of functional and social
promise of Modern Architecture under its émigré director
Walter Gropius
A TURNING POINT IN KANVINDE’ S LIFE-
5
Experience under WALTER GROPIUS – THE BAUHAUS STYLE
Studying under walter gropius, kanvind developed a
whole new outlook towards architecture. He was greatly
influenced by the Bauhaus style, which later on was
adopted in his various buildings.
Kanvinde was initially
unprepared for the space
concepts taught in Gropius’s
school. Having studied under
Batley, he was not conversant
with the progressive imagery
and techniques of the
International style. But
progressively what he was
much affected by was the social
order and the optimism implied
by the Modernist paradigm.
Gropius’s insistence for using
space as a tool for expressing
universal human values was
what left most lasting influence
on his mind.
Thus, Kanvinde adopted the progressive imagery and techniques of the International style
6
He graduated with a thesis on science laboratories, on
which he had worked for most of his two years of study
and as planned, returned to India in 1947 and was
appointed as the Chief Architect of CSIR.
Chief Architect of CSIR, 1947 Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
During this period as the chief
architect of CSIR, Kanvinde was
influenced by many famous
personalities including Vikram
Sarabhai. He had a wide multi-
disciplinary vision, with his wife
Mrinalini, a renowned exponent of
classical dances he had even started
Darpana, an institution of the
performing arts.
During the construction of PRL,
he met Kanvinde and became a
close friend. He had helped found the
ATIRA to do applied research of
direct interest to industry and was its
director. Kanvinde, naturally was the
person chosen to build this institute
which made him come in contact with
the Ahmedabad textile- industrial
society
Vikram Sarabhai
VERGHESE KURIEN 7
The first buildings to come up as the chief architect were
• ATIRA at Ahmedabad, completed in 1952
• CSIR Headquarters at New Delhi, completed in 1953
•PRL at Ahmedabad, completed in 1953
•CEERI at Pilani, completed in 1955
ATIRA
CSIR
PRL
CEERI
8
The new potential of pursuing his own architectural
vision made Kanvinde resign from his job in 1955 to found
his practice with Rai. Sarabhai and others ensured a
steady flow of works. The first buildings from this
association were
Private practice with architect Shaukat Rai
Kanvinde and Rai, 1955
•Darpana Dance School, at Ahmedabad, completed in 1962
•Hariballabhdas House, at Ahmedabad, completed in 1968
With Mallika and Dr. Sarabhai, Kanvinde
gradually developed a common vision of
architectural profession in the young nation
tied with the other arts and humanities
University of Agricultural
Sciences, Bangalore
National science
centre, New Delhi
9
The relation with Sarabhai having so deepened;
Kanvinde was now being consulted on various matters.
Dr.Sarabhai had helped to found the IIM in Ahmedabad in
1962, and worked as its honorary director. In this
ideologically charged context, Kanvinde had an important
role in Louis Kahn’s selection as the architect.
Dr. Sarabhai died in 1971 and a quarter of a century of
a memorable association came to an end. . Between 1947
to 1971, Dr. Sarabhai was responsible for creating more
than 25 institutions in various fields of science,
management, education, research and performing arts and
Kanvinde was intimately involved with shaping most of
those. Dr. Sarabhai was largely responsible in making
Indian Space program as strong as it is today . The fact that
Kanvinde earned the confidence and respect of such men
reveals as much about the architect as about the patrons.
KANVINDE’S WORKS WITH DR. SARABHAI
IIM in Ahmedabad
10
Verghese Kurien, another of the ‘nation builders’,
began working with the farmers in 1949, after
returning to India from Michigan State University, He
organised a cooperative organization to help market
milk directly to the consumers. After years of
struggle, the cooperative began to produce dramatic
results. In 1965 the NDDB was created replicate the
program on a nationwide basis
KANVINDE WORKS with VERGHESE
KURIEN
For his institution's
headquarters in Anand, Kurien
turned to Kanvinde who started
this major complex in 1967. In
1974, a major production
facility at Mehsana was
constructed In both the places,
with an efficient functional
organisation, a major concern
was to respond to the socio-
cultural matrix of the users of
the cooperative complex, who
were poor farmers in a
predominantly agrarian
economy. VERGHESE KURIEN
11
In addition to leading NDDB in its quest to
improve world nutrition, Dr. Kurien played a key role
in many other organizations. He is the chairman of
the IRMA, which Kanvinde constructed from 1978.
Currently a new phase in NDDB is being designed.
With Kurien’s patronage, Kanvinde had a lifetime
involvement with this industry demonstrating how
architects of vision need visionary clients to realise
their ideas.
Milk processing plant, Mehsana
12
THE0RY & PHILOSOPHY 13
The ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETER
India attained independence on
August15, 1947 with the new
Prime Minister thundering from the
constituent assembly session the
new national agenda "to create a
new nation…unfettered by the
traditions of the past…"Though
with the absolutist promise of
Nehru’s rapid industrialisation,
mechanisation, and growth of the
new country, the modernist
vocabulary was often
synonymous, it had to contend
with Gandhi’s idealist vision of
reliance on traditional technology,
rural economy, frugality and
moderation. Thus Kanvinde
strategy became a
CSIR became the important vehicle for realising the Prime
Minister’s vision of a new India where science and technology
played a central role. Kanvinde, in turn, became the architectural
interpreter of the vision. The building programme was ambitious;
targets were even set for turnovers of industries to be set up
based on research carried out in the laboratories.
Strict modernist vocabulary
while preserving and reinterpreting Indian tradition
Mahatma Gandhi
Jawaharlal Nehru
14
the Bauhaus-international modern style
800px-BauhausType
The aim of the Bauhaus was a
"unity of art and technology" to give
artistic direction to industry, which was
as lacking in 1919 as in the mid-19th
century, when the Arts and Crafts
movement began. Kanvinde was
introduced to Bauhaus by non other
than Walter Gropius.
Among his most important
ideas was his belief that all
design — whether of a chair, a
building, or a city — should be
approached in essentially the
same way: through a
systematic study of the
particular needs and problems
involved, taking into account
modern construction materials
and techniques without
reference to previous forms or
styles
Functionalists believed that
•the shape and form of a building should emerge out of the
logical arrangement of spaces inside and not from any
predetermined idea like symmetry.
•a building should only have features that were functionally
necessary, and no non-functional decoration.
•Use of the latest technologies and industrial products in
construction such as RCC and industrial doors and windows. 15
• asymmetry • severe • blocky
• cubic shapes • smooth, flat plain, undecorated
surfaces •complete elimination of all mouldings
and ornament • ‘flat’ roofs
• very free planning • adoption of steel-framed or
reinforced-concrete post-and-slab
The various Bauhaus characteristics
visible in Kanvinde's works would be
16
GANDHI KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA,1913
latest technologies products in construction
such as RCC
NATIONAL SCIENCE CENTRE, DELHI
asymmetrical, cuboid forms
ATIRA at Ahmedabad, 1952
repetitive
arrangements of
windows
17
IIT KANPUR
The
lightness
of logic
Rationalist that he was, Kanvinde liked to reveal the
internal functions in a building (for example, office block,
walkway, auditorium) as separate masses. These were
then arranged in ways that were functional from inside
and elegant from outside.
This analytical approach is evident in the buildings
at IIT Kanpur that he designed in the 1950s.
• Here he clearly separates parts of buildings according
to their material, and also achieves a delicacy of effect.
The library, for instance, is a Reinforced Cement
Concrete (RCC) frame with infill walls in exposed brick.
•By inserting gaps and shadows between the concrete
and brick components, Kanvinde was able to make rough
and heavy materials look light.
18
The
lightness
of logic
National Insurance Academy, pune
That lightness spoke of the primacy of ideas over
matter, of logic over contingency. It was a theme that
never really left his architecture.
•It appears at the National Insurance Academy at Pune
late in his career. On the one hand, the elevated
walkways speak of a desire to float above the irregularity
of the ground condition. On the other, they speak of
efficient movement almost like on a conveyor belt.
• Either way, it is possible to
detect a persistent reluctance
to embrace a site or a context
wholeheartedly in much of
Kanvinde’s work.
•Yet, his work is often
responsive to subtle needs of
dwellers even if within the
terms of a given problem.
19
Milk processing plant, Mehsana
Function with
feeling-
Rational yet
humane
He was a self-effacing person, but his work helped
shape some of the things we automatically expect in
buildings today —
Kanvinde himself achieved this by seeking
sculptural ideas in the functional needs of a building. For
instance, Mehsana near Ahmedabad, he arranged
ventilation shafts into an elegant arrangement of towers
that make this industrial facility look elegant.
•spaces were ‘humane’ •you felt welcome and comfortable. •efficient function ,no wastage of space, elegant
20
IIT KANPUR
b-iit-kanpur, httpwww.admissiondiary.com
Rational yet
humane
size and scale
At one level, the humaneness is about size and
scale. Even in more technologically-oriented projects,
Kanvinde always tried to bring buildings down to a
human scale.
•At IIT Kanpur, it was the slenderness of concrete
members and the lightness of brick forms that helped
• The comfort of the
people in the working
environment was of
utmost importance to
Kanvinde. The building
block was broken down
into small office spaces
opening into private
terraces which acted as
relaxation spaces.
21
Sense of place-
connection to the
built heritage in a
locality
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT
(NIBM) Pune, 1985.
At another level, humaneness can be about a
sense of place, and a connection to the built heritage in
a locality. Both emerge together at NIBM, perhaps
uniquely in Kanvinde’s body of work.
•There, Kanvinde chose to build in the local basalt
stone (Deccan trap), common in older architecture in
Maharashtra.
•He also spread the low rhythmic buildings across a
well landscaped site in such a way that walking from
one set of spaces to another involves passing by (or
through) gardens. From inside and out, the campus
offers a series of comforting continuities across
domains that are usually separated in urban life. The
building thus redeems some of the promise of early
modernism that had fired the young Kanvinde.
22
IIT KANPUR 23
Places of Interaction
THE ACADEMIC BLOCK
Kanvinde believed in
healthy interaction between
the students and the
teachers and within
students. He provided
various courtyards and
informal spaces which
encouraged interaction.
The Indian Institute
of Technology was set up
in industrial city of Kanpur
in 1959. IIT Kanpur has a
sprawling campus spread
over an area of approx. 4.3
square km, just north-west
of the city. Among all IITs,
IIT Kanpur has the second
largest campus (1,055
acres).
The campus is a self-
contained community, with
residences for students,
faculty, and regular staff.
24
IIT KANPUR- SITE PLAN
•ACADEMIC BLOCK WAS centrally located by Kanvinde
•He provided Segregated Pedestrian and Vehicular traffic. The yellow marked pathways depict the vehicular traffic whereas the blue marked pathways are pedestrian. •The pedestrian pathways form a network through the entire academic complex •The vehicular traffic is segregated from the academic block to avoid noise.
•Single entity- elevated pedestrian walkway
25
Elevated pedestrian walkway •Sheltered and yet openness
•Protection from hot sun yet allowing breezes
Pedestrian movement system
ELEVATED PATHWAYS are the typical features
provided in the campus of IIT Kanpur. They connect various
building blocks in the campus. They emerge and end in the
building itself. The pathways have been designed keeping in
mind the hot climate of kanpur so as to provide shelter and
protection
26
FACULTY BUILDING
LIBRARY
LECTURE HALL COMPLEX
The common characteristics in the buildings for example- •Exposed red and brick curtain walls
•Exposed concrete frames
provide uniformity to the buildings
The Bauhaus
influence in Kanvinde’s
style is clearly visible in
the buildings of IIT
Kanpur.
•cubic shapes • smooth, flat plain,
undecorated surfaces •complete elimination of all mouldings and ornament
• ‘flat’ roofs
27
BUILDING
STRUCTURES-
sheltered spaces
Kanvinde always respected the local climate of
the site in consideration. He created various sheltered
spaces around and within the buildings to provide
shade against the harsh summer sun
Respecting the climatological
conditions
A view of the library
in IIT Kanpur showing
the sheltered pathways
and the spaces which
could also be used as
interaction spaces
28
Comput
er
Key
punch
Conf
erenc
e
Research
Researc
h
terrace
Compute
r
Computer
Research
resear
ch terrace
•revealed the internal functions in a building as
separate masses.
•arranged in ways that were functional from inside
and elegant from outside.
Computer centre, IIT Kanpur
First floor PLAN Ground floor PLAN
Elevation Kanvinde strongly
believed that the
elevation of a structure
should be defined by the
functions inside.
Unnecessary
ornamentation were
avoided.
29
Environment Science dept of IIT Kanpur- Five star rated building by GRIHA
Sustainability-Local
Climate
The Environment Science dept of IIT Kanpur, a five star rated building is the crown of Kanvinde's works in the field of sustainability.
•Sun path analysis •Appropriate design of external shades •Efficient glazing •81 % area is daylight
The various
building blocks are
arranged in a zigzag
pattern keeping in
mind the position of
the sun during
different times in a day
so that every block
receives maximum
sunlight
30
ACHYUT KANVINDE-
The Architect
31
when we approach the prevalent
interpretations and descriptions of Kanvinde’s works,
a sense of marvel can’t be avoided at the complex
associations and narratives behind their simplistic
definitions. Kanvinde has been often referred as a
"modern Indian" architect.
KANVINDE- THE “MODERN INDIAN" ARCHITECT.
In their book written to
"attempt an impartial appraisal
extending to the historical
context from which, the
architectural expression of
India is evolving", Bhatt and
Scriver assert that
"(his) early buildings were competent
straightforward renditions of the Bauhaus aesthetic by a
young convert to Gropius’s notions of architectural space
defined by function",
Meanwhile introducing one of Kanvinde’s works in an Indian
journal, Kalamdani claims that
"(he) is one of the few architects who has
consciously attempted an application of the values of
early modernism…Remaining relatively unperturbed by
passing fancies, swings of the pendulum, or the so-called
vagaries of time".
32
By the end of 1960s Kanvinde’s expressive
architectural palate of spatial and structural system as
observed in his IIT, Kanpur and later in NDDB, Anand
commissions were variously interpreted as
"an architectural expression that reflected the
culture and aspirations"
"clearly reflected the rise of the Brutalist
polemic of architecture".
Expressed Concrete structure in combination with
brick became the dynamic determinant of form and order.
Here the paradox is that what (Brutalism) in the West was
popular for the dynamism and the aesthetic of vigour, in
neo-Gandhian India of 1970s is regarded a realistic and
expressive product of India. In retrospect, that style shows
a remarkable similarity with the brute morphology of
vernacular architecture of various parts of India.
IIT Kanpur
Kanvinde – neo Gandhian Brutalism
33
KANVINDE VIEWS HIS OWN WORK AS A CHANGING
PROCESS
"The crux of the matter is that we observe and
assimilate and in the process discover ourselves. What
we try to achieve or pursue in terms of aesthetics is a
changing process. The aesthetics is essentially a conduct;
aesthetics and ethics are the products of the same thing“
In this process there are two aspects of his formative
years that are manifested in his work
• On the one hand, he was raised in a rural environment
where the tradition and moral conduct was nurtured.
• He was catapulted into the world of technology, avant-
gardism at Harvard. In rural India, the personal and the
concrete were highly valued; (Fig.22) while in Gropius’s
school the collective and the abstract were emphasised
The interactions of
these two aspects of
his experience and
training constitute the
essence of his
evolution.
34
Speaking at the first
Architect Achyut Kanvinde
Memorial Lecture, Balkrishna
Doshi hailed him as the
pioneer of modern
architecture in India
BALKRISHNA DOSHI ON KANVINDE
“Although he came from an art deco architecture
background, there was an aspiration in him, an aspiration to
do something different in a country where things were
changing at a fast pace, everyday,”
“I believe as an architect, you cannot create what
you are not, and going by this diktat, Kanvinde came across
as a humane, sensitive individual. His buildings spoke
volumes about his humanity and also indicated that he was
searching for his own self, through his works,”
“It was a time when everyday something new was
being created and India was just coming to terms with its
newly-acquired independent status. Kanvinde gave full rein
to his innate creativity in such a charged environment,”
35
“In each of his buildings, whether residential,
commercial or government complexes, one can see an attempt to
break away from traditional architectural design and yet,
design them keeping in mind all the aspects conducive to a
great building (such as climate, use of space, orientation and
aesthetics),”
“His ultimate concern was for his profession and for
society and that came through quite effortlessly in all his
works. Kanvinde traveled extensively across the country and
always made it a point to carry books and magazines along.
He used to say the long travels gave him time to read, reflect
and introspect. Kanvinde’s stellar contribution can be summed
up succinctly as that depicting plasticity, humility and
humanity,”
36
There are infinite number of concerns,
influences and traditions that have shaped Kanvinde’s
works and his assimilation and self-discovery is
drawing him closer to his self, an elusive ‘identity’
hidden and revealed by the palimpsest of human
existence. A much deep-probing understanding of his
life and his work responsive to his larger interests and
concerns seems important to clarify the important
phase of the political and social process in the creation
in the new country which he shaped and guided.
Humility and reticence
are acclaimed hallmarks of his
persona, which is one of the
reasons his works have not been
as widely known as they could be.
Early this year, addressing the
Indian architectural educators, he
suggested, " The role which the
schools have to play is to expose
students to various situations and
train them to cultivate and
appreciate values so that they can
experience and sharpen their
senses through observation and
practice". In the autumn of his
distinguished life, his humanity
and concerns need to be better
understood.
KANVINDE- THE HUMANITARIAN
37
It was Kanvinde and not as
is widely believed Le Corbusier in
his work in Chandigarh, who first
introduced Modernism and the
aesthetics of Function into the
dormant Indian Architectural
scene. What Kanvinde introduced
was the Modern legacy of rational
and ‘pure’ structure.
The state sponsored
vision of ‘New India’, as
Kanvinde had himself
translated into architecture
failed to offer this ‘identity’. Le
Corbusier’s Chandigarh had by
this time been completed and
these persons were sceptic of
its wide-ranging acclaim and its
relevance..
These concerns made Kanvinde organise the
Lalit Kala Academy seminar in 1959 where Nehru
himself addressed and responded to the
professionals’ debate
Kanvinde- An architect
less acclaimed for
38
Opening the discussion, Kanvinde observed that
"Our architectural expression is in a most
confused state as there is neither clear thinking nor
definite ideology…the architects who are confronted with
problems peculiar to modern functional design have to, at
the same time, create an architectural expression that
would reflect the present-day culture of India"
Nehru retorted with "…you may agree or
disagree with what has been attempted at
Chandigarh…but it has changed your lives"
39
Kanvinde and Rai,
was one of the most
influential and productive
architectural practices of
India. His works have been
much discussed in India and
often emulated and he has
himself received much
personal recognition and
professional accolade.
However neither in the international architectural
discourse nor in the standard 20th century architectural
historiographic literature have they been even
mentioned. It is even more intriguing to find that they
have rarely been discussed in the publications of last
few decades when there was a spurt in the interest in
non-Western, regional architecture and built work from
the Indian subcontinent were noticed for the first time
outside India. Moreover in the actual cases that they
were discussed they have been interpreted as per the
predilection(s) of the author(s) and categorised to
conform to one or the other of the prevalent architectural
movements. They have not received the critical attention
that they deserve.
Kanvinde- critical acclaims
The forgotten architect
40
•President of the Indian Institute of Architects (1974-6). •Chairman of the Scientific and Finance Section of the Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, (1970-75). • served on juries for national and international competitions and projects •lectured at the schools of architecture in New Delhi, Ahmadabad and Bombay.
PORTFOLIOES
•1975 received the Padma Shree, a national award for excellence •1985 the Gold Medal of the Indian Institute of Architects.
AWARDS
41
F:\A.P Kanvinde\IMAGES\webmap,
httpwww.iitk.ac.in.gif
Wikipedia
F:\A.P Kanvinde\Achyut_Kanvinde.htm
F:\A.P Kanvinde\alofsin.html
F:\A.P
Kanvinde\article_sick_buildg_syndrome.html
F:\A.P Kanvinde\gkvk information.html
F:\A.P Kanvinde\New CSE Building,
F:\theory of design\indian-institute-of-
technology-kanpur_files\a.htm
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOK REFERENCE
Campus design in India Kanvinde
and Miller
Submitted by-
Meme chauhan
Anindita banik
Puja roy
42