Top Banner
John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC
22

John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

Brittany Carson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

John Smithson, WCER

Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO

Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using

SEC

Page 2: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

How do we interpret SEC alignment?

Page 3: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Instruction

Assessment

Standards

Intersection of what is taught with what is tested.

Intersection of what is taught with what is in standards.

Intersection of whatis taught with what is in the standards

Taught,tested, and inthe standards

Alignment Relationships in Standards-based Reform

Page 4: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Target – Intended(e.g. Standards)Instruction (Enacted)

Alignment: The intersection of time spent in the enactedcompared to the relative emphasis placed in the intended.

Page 5: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Coarse GrainAlignmentCalculation

For K-12 MathEquals the sumof Cell Intersectionsacross 16 Content Areas by 5 Cognitive Demand Categories

Page 6: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.
Page 7: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

‘Overall’ AlignmentCalculation

For K-12 MathEquals the sumof Cell Intersectionsacross 183 Content Topics by 5 Cognitive Demand Categories

Page 8: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

‘Re-Centered’ AlignmentCalculation

For K-12 Math Equals the sum of Cell Intersectionsacross relevant Content Topics by 5 Cognitive Demand Categories, with results for each description “re-centered” to sum to 1.00

= 1

Page 9: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.
Page 10: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

What is meant by “Good Alignment”?

Or At Least:

What is good enough?

Page 11: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

We used to say this was good alignment

Page 12: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Now we say this is good alignment

Page 13: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

What is meant by “Good Alignment”?

• Norm-referenced?

• Predictability?

• Is More Necessarily Better?

• Alignment = 1.00 is not the Goal?

Page 14: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

What is meant by “Good Alignment”?

Page 15: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

The answer is more a judgment call that considers alignment, time on topic, student achievement and other factors in relation to one another.

The underlying question should be: ‘Are we adequately preparing students to perform well on high-stakes assessments.

What is meant by “Good Alignment”?

Page 16: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

What are the implications?

• Look over data

• Make sure you understand how to read the chart

• Discuss what you observe with a partner

Page 17: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.
Page 18: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

More Context

• The teacher data includes grades 9-12 ELA teachers

• There is a grade 10 graduation test

• Now look at alignment to upper HS grade levels

• What do you think?

Page 19: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.
Page 20: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

(Topics) (Cog. Dmnd.)

Massillon City (2007 Gr. 4) [11]TO: OH Indctrs Gr. 3 Alignment

Number Sense 0.29 0.12 0.45 0.49

Operations 0.28 -0.01 0.36 0.75

Measurement 0.30 -0.07 0.57 0.58

Consumer Applications #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Basic Algebra 0.41 -0.01 0.53 0.78

Advanced Algebra #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Geometric Concepts 0.19 0.06 0.31 0.77

Advanced Geometry #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Data Displays 0.27 -0.08 0.38 0.67

Statistics 0.35 0.01 0.61 0.46

Probability 0.35 0.01 0.68 0.37

Analysis #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Trigonometry #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Special Topics 0.00 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Functions #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Instructional Tech. #DIV/0! 0.02 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Overall 0.28 0.79 0.42 0.62

Multi-state Average*:

Alignment Analysis Summary Table

Balance of Representation

Categorical Concurrence

Cognitive Complexity

Page 21: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

(Topics) (Cog. Dmnd.)

District Grade 3 [14]TO: OH Indctrs Gr. 3 Alignment

Number Sense 0.28 0.09 0.48 0.46

Operations 0.30 -0.04 0.49 0.76

Measurement 0.30 -0.05 0.62 0.52

Consumer Applications #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Basic Algebra 0.39 -0.03 0.58 0.68

Advanced Algebra #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Geometric Concepts 0.17 0.09 0.36 0.64

Advanced Geometry #DIV/0! 0.01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Data Displays 0.32 -0.07 0.45 0.59

Statistics 0.35 0.01 0.63 0.52

Probability 0.45 0.00 0.68 0.46

Analysis #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Trigonometry #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Special Topics 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Functions #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Instructional Tech. #DIV/0! 0.02 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Overall 0.27 0.80 0.47 0.56

Multi-state Average*:

Alignment Analysis Summary Table

Balance of Representation

Categorical Concurrence

Cognitive Complexity

Page 22: John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.

Questions

• Is alignment of instruction to state standards improving under standards-based reform?

• If so, does this represent individual teacher change, or a change in the teacher population taking the survey?