‘If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.’ Romans 10:9 What would Paul’s readers have understood him to mean by speaking of Jesus as ‘Lord’? What are the implications for Christian life and ministry today? This essay explores the meaning of Paul’s statement in Romans 10:9, in particular regarding what it means to say ‘Jesus is Lord’, and its implications. I seek to answer the question by looking at how Paul presents Jesus as Lord with regard to his identity, position and power. To draw consistency with other Pauline writings I have briefly touched on texts from Galatians and Corinthians. The understanding of Lord also seeks to frame it’s meaning in light of the world in which Paul lived, namely the Greco-Roman world. The conclusion drawn is that the statement ‘Jesus is Lord’ requires an understanding of Jesus as a supreme benevolent ruler and saviour to whom we must wholly submit. The implications of this being that the evidence of our willingness to submit is seen through how we live our lives and whether we live in obedience to Christ, or in pursuit of our own self centred goals.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
‘If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him
from the dead, you will be saved.’ Romans 10:9
What would Paul’s readers have understood him to mean by speaking of Jesus as ‘Lord’? What
are the implications for Christian life and ministry today?
This essay explores the meaning of Paul’s statement in Romans 10:9, in particular regarding
what it means to say ‘Jesus is Lord’, and its implications. I seek to answer the question by
looking at how Paul presents Jesus as Lord with regard to his identity, position and power. To
draw consistency with other Pauline writings I have briefly touched on texts from Galatians and
Corinthians. The understanding of Lord also seeks to frame it’s meaning in light of the world in
which Paul lived, namely the Greco-Roman world. The conclusion drawn is that the statement
‘Jesus is Lord’ requires an understanding of Jesus as a supreme benevolent ruler and saviour to
whom we must wholly submit. The implications of this being that the evidence of our
willingness to submit is seen through how we live our lives and whether we live in obedience to
Christ, or in pursuit of our own self centred goals.
In Romans 10:9 it states that if a person declares with their mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believes
in their heart that God raised him from the dead, they will be saved. It seems a fairly simple task to
understand what it means to believe that God raised Jesus from the dead. It requests that a person
believes contrary to the normal human experience, whereupon a person who dies remains in the
grave, and that in the case of Jesus he did not remain in the grave but resurrected to life in bodily
form, never to die again. However, a more difficult task in our current society is to understand what
it means to declare Jesus as Lord. In our modern times our understanding of what ‘Lord’ means
would be very, very different to the understanding held by the church in Rome, who were the
original recipients of Paul’s letter. By unpacking what the original recipients understood by the
phrase, ‘Jesus is Lord’, and consequently its implications, I will seek to construct an explanation of
how Christians in our time, should understand the same phrase. From this then I will explore the
question of what the implications are for our Christian life and ministry today. I will seek to answer
the question of what it means to be Lord, be assessing how Jesus is presented throughout the letter
to the Romans, in particular with regard to his identity, his position and his power.
Firstly, it is important to consider the world that Paul was living in when he wrote this letter.
Living in the Greco-Roman world is very different to life in the year 2014 in Australia. We do not live
under the rule of a dictating emperor whose words are esteemed by the general population as akin
to God’s. We do not have leaders who claim to be demi-gods or the son of god and demand
absolute loyalty. We also do not have a civil obligation to sacrifice to the many gods who were
thought to protect and prosper the empire. If we refuse to acknowledge Tony Abbott or obey his
personal request of us, it is unlikely that we will be imprisoned or given the death sentence.
However, the Roman Empire was ruled by military might. Soldiers enforced the wishes of Caesar
with a ruthless obedience that would leave any dissidents trembling in fear. This was a civilisation
which would expose criminals and those who were considered a threat to the empire, to public
humiliation and torture. It was during these times that these people would be thrown to their death
in arenas, at the hand of well-trained gladiators or wild animals. This was the same civilization that
crucified our Lord Jesus.
Caesar was the self-proclaimed lord of lords and anyone else who sought to take that title was
executed. Caesar held the power of death in that he could take a life away by a single word. Caesar
would appoint rulers and leaders in different regions. Caesar was honoured by tributes received
from every town, city and province. He had the power to sweep aside all opposition and create an
extraordinary new world order, in which it was claimed, justice was brought to the world. It was
Caesar who was the lord who brought about the Roman peace throughout the empire, and it was
Caesar who demanded that all his subjects worship him. The expression, ‘Gospel’, (euaggelion) was
used to propagate this good news of the empire in which Caesar was proclaimed to be lord of the
world. 1 All people living during this time would understand that declaring someone ‘lord’
consequently implied their loyal commitment to honour, obey, and fear the one who rules over
them.
Purely by living in the capital of the Roman Empire, the members of the church in Rome would
have had the above understanding of ‘lord’ ingrained in their very being, and therefore would have
understood that to declare Jesus as Lord, would mean their ongoing loyalty and commitment to
honour, obey and fear Him. However, as we read through Romans, we see a more complete picture
of what they would have understood Paul to mean by speaking of Jesus as Lord.
The letter opens with a declaration of Paul as a servant of Jesus (1:1), which immediately implies
Jesus’ position as a master.2 This is followed closely by His title of ‘Christ’. 3 This term refers to the
1 N.T. Wright, "Paul and Caesar: A New Reading of Romans," A Royal Priesthood: The Use of the Bible Ethically
and Politically (2002).173-193,
2 Tokunboh Adeyemo, Africa Bible commentary (Nairobi, Kenya
anointed one of God, meaning one whom God had chosen. The term was used in the old testament
of priests, kings, and occasionally prophets, but in most instances for kings.4 The usage here shows
that Jesus’ position is more than just a master, but rather of God’s chosen king. In verse 4 Paul now
refers to Jesus as ‘our Lord’, and then in verse 6 he makes it clear that the people who form the
church in Rome belonged to Jesus. Already we see a picture emerging of a Lord who is a divinely
appointed king to whom we belong. One may say, that already very early on in the letter, it is clear
that Paul is saying to his audience, ‘This Lord, Jesus, owns you.’ This may seem like a flimsy
argument, because I am aware that the idea of belonging to Jesus may convey the notion of
belonging as one would consider themselves as belonging to, or being a part of their local soccer
team. This notion of belonging is far removed from being owned by the soccer team. However, as I
continue to build my case I will show later how my statement above is supported and stands true.
Nonetheless, at this very early stage in his letter, Paul’s readers would understand that Jesus is
someone with a very special position.
Paul speaks of the identity of Jesus from very early in this letter. In 1:3 he speaks of Jesus as being
a descendant of David. This shows his humanity and the fact that Jesus is a man. Which is also seen
in 5:15, 17. Paul makes it clear that the Lord Jesus is human. This statement draws attention to the
fact that Jesus descends from a much lauded royal lineage, and when this is coupled with 1:4, which
shows Jesus’ identity as the son of God5, his identity emerges as the king whom God spoke of when
Grand Rapids, Mich.: WordAlive Publishers ;
Zondervan, 2006).1377, Robert Horton Gundry, Commentary on the New Testament : verse-by-verse
explanations with a literal translation (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 2010).571
3 Colin G. Kruse, Paul's letter to the Romans, The Pillar New Testament commentary (2012).38
4 Lois Tverberg, "What does the word “Christ” actually mean?," http://ourrabbijesus.com/articles/what-does-
the-word-christ-actually-mean/.
5 D. A. Carson, New Bible commentary : 21st century edition, 4th ed. (Leicester, England ; Downers Grove, Ill.,
USA: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994).1119
he made his covenant with David in 2 Samuel 7:12-16 - the king whose kingdom and throne will last
forever.6 The idea of an everlasting kingdom is simply impressive, and leaves the greatness of the
Roman Empire to pale in comparison. Surely the king of an everlasting kingdom, the Lord Jesus, is
greater and worthy of more honour than the emperor of Rome.
Another way Jesus is identified is found in 3:24 where it is written, “…and all are justified freely by
his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.” Here Jesus is identified as our
redeemer. The remarkable thing we see here is that Jesus is the one who delivers us from the
penalty of our sin, namely the wrath of God!7 Identifying Jesus as redeemer gives yet another
dimension of his lordship. Now we see a human who is able to negotiate with God on our behalf
and in our favour. Indeed in Psalm 130:7-8 it is Yahweh who redeems Israel from their sins, and
therefore leaves us with the impression that the redemption of sins is a task which only God can do,
however when we read Job 19:25, we learn of a redeemer who seems to intercede between Job and
God who is inflicting him (see 19:6-22). The declaration that Jesus’ Lordship extends even to the
point of interceding on our behalf with God, gives us a sense if we can possibly grasp its immensity,
of how great our Lord is.
Throughout the letter to the Romans, Paul declares just what it means that Jesus is Lord, by
speaking of his power. In 1:4 he shows Jesus to have power over death, as is obvious in his
resurrection. In 1:5 Jesus has the power to dispense grace, and commission his servants to various
works of ministry. Verse 7 speaks of the peace Jesus gives, which 5:1 expands upon by saying he
gives peace with God. Not only does Jesus have the power to give us peace with God, but as 5:11-12
6 Adeyemo, Africa Bible commentary.1377, Gundry, Commentary on the New Testament : verse-by-verse
explanations with a literal translation.571
7 ———, Commentary on the New Testament : verse-by-verse explanations with a literal translation.582,
Kruse, Paul's letter to the Romans.183-85
shows, he has the power to reconcile us to God.8 He has the power to save us from the wrath of
God, (as outlined in 1:18-3:20), by the power of the gospel concerning him (1:3, 16). Jesus has the
power to declare us righteous before God and as already mentioned previously, to redeem us (3:24).
He has the power to fulfil his promises (4:21), to give us life (5:17-18), and not just ordinary life, but
to give us eternal life (5:21). Jesus has the power over sin and to free us from sin (6:6-7), and to set
us free from the law of sin and death (8:2). He has the power to give us the Spirit (8:9-11) which
brings about our adoption into God’s family as children (8:15). Many of these attributes are things
which can only be done by God!
Now, we already know that Jesus is introduced as the son of God in 1:4, and therefore it is possible
that the original recipients of this letter would have attributed the remarkable power of the Lord
Jesus to him having god-like abilities. However, Paul does not stop at identifying Jesus as the son of
God. In 9:5 he goes further and writes, “…and from them is traced the human ancestry of the
Messiah, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen.” Here Paul clearly states that Jesus is God!9 It
may seem that Paul is confused and believes like some of the so called ‘Christian gnostics’, that there
is more than one god. After all, he speaks countless times throughout Romans of God and of Jesus
as seemingly different entities. However, I believe that no clearer evidence is given than in 10:9-13
that Jesus is, in fact, God. He begins in verse 9 by saying that Jesus, the man, is Lord. I add the term
‘the man’, because it was the man who was crucified and then later raised from the dead, as
mentioned in the last part of verse 9. Then Paul goes on to say in verse 12 that the same Lord is Lord
of all – over Jews and Gentiles alike, and that he richly blesses all who call upon him. This ties in
nicely with 9:5 who calls Jesus God over all, insofar as it puts no limit to his rule. In 10:13 Paul now
quotes Joel 2:32 by saying everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. When reading
Joel 2:32 you will notice that it actually says the following, “And everyone who calls on the name of
8 Gundry, Commentary on the New Testament : verse-by-verse explanations with a literal translation.585-86
9 Adeyemo, Africa Bible commentary.1391
Yahweh will be saved…” Paul quotes a verse that is without doubt speaking of Yahweh, and uses
this verse to show just what kind of Lord he is speaking of in the previous verse in reference to
Jesus.10 Paul does the same in 1 Corinthians 1:31 and 2 Corinthians 10:17 when quoting Jeremiah
9:23-24, and also in 1 Corinthians 10:26 where he quotes Psalm 24:1 and, in all three instances,
clearly uses Lord in reference to Jesus, in exchange for the Old Testament Yahweh.11 Paul here is
saying that Jesus is Yahweh, and that Yahweh is Jesus. This is why he is able to call Jesus our
redeemer when in Psalms 130 it clearly shows that our redeemer in none other than Yahweh
himself.12
By a correct understanding of Jesus Lordship, the church in Rome would have acknowledged that,
as I mentioned previously, Jesus owns them. Paul’s discourse in 6:5-14 makes it clear that whilst
previously they were slaves to sin which was their master (vss 6, 14), now they must count
themselves alive to Jesus. The idea of being alive to Jesus required them to first die to sin (vs 11),
and their old self (vs 6), and give themselves over to God as instruments of righteousness. The
implication of this passage is that they are now slaves, or owned by, the Lord who freed them from
sin.13 This becomes very clear in 6:22 which says, “But now that you have been set free from sin and
have become slaves to God…” Paul does not leave the status of the relationship between Jesus and
the church in Rome ambiguous; he is very clear – Jesus is their master and they are his slaves.14 The
10 Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans, Baker exegetical commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.:
Baker Books, 1998).561
11 Daniel G. Reid, Ralph P. Martin, and Gerald F. Hawthorne, Dictionary of Paul and his letters (Downers Grove,
Ill. ; Leicester: InterVarsity Press, 1993).563
12 Kruse, Paul's letter to the Romans.410
13 Adeyemo, Africa Bible commentary.1387, David H. Stern, Jewish New Testament commentary : a companion
volume to the Jewish New Testament, 1st ed. (Clarksville, Md.: Jewish New Testament Publications, 1992).401-
02, Craig S. Keener and InterVarsity Press., The IVP Bible background commentary : New Testament (Downers
Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1993).425
14 Reid, Martin, and Hawthorne, Dictionary of Paul and his letters.569
difference is that He is a benevolent master15 and they were voluntary slaves (6:19). They
recognized the virtue of being part of the eternal kingdom of Jesus and they willingly submitted to
His lordship, being convinced of His goodwill to them because of the love He demonstrated on the
cross. Paul’s understanding of Jesus’ lordship is supported in Galatians 2:20 which says that it is ‘no
longer Paul who lives, but Christ who lives in him’, which demonstrates the laying down of one’s
own individual pursuits in submission to Jesus. The implications of their understanding of His totally
sovereign and divine Lordship extended much further than their understanding of the lordship of
Caesar. They may have obeyed and feared Caesar, but they did not live for him. Whereas, as
mentioned in 14:7-8, Paul was able to convey to the church in Rome that they did not live for
themselves, but for their Lord. Likewise, they do not die for themselves, but for their Lord Jesus. As
Paul writes, “So whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord.” Their understanding of Jesus as Lord
through reading Paul’s letter would have taken into account his identity, power and position as
sovereign God, and should therefore result in a total submission to his will in all facets of their lives.
As mentioned in 12:1 it should result in them offering themselves as living sacrifices to God. It
should result in their display of love (12:9-21; 13:8-10; 14:1-23), their submission to governing
authorities (13:1-7), and their consecration to Christ (13:11-14).16 The same kind of emphasis is
given in 1 Corinthians 6:13 - 7:40 where Paul is giving directions exhorting them to submit to the
Lord Jesus. This is especially seen in 7:22-23 which refers to the Corinthians as Christ’s slave and
reminds them they were bought at a price.17
The implications of this understanding for us today is much the same as what it implied to the
Christians in Rome. We, however, have the benefit of not being persecuted for our faith, and nor do
15 Schreiner, Romans.562, Kruse, Paul's letter to the Romans.282-86
16 Reid, Martin, and Hawthorne, Dictionary of Paul and his letters.566-
17 Ibid.567
we risk execution by declaring Jesus is Lord of lords.18 The message of Paul is clear in this regard, in
order to be saved, we must truly believe that Jesus is Lord, and it must be a belief that is outworked
by our attitudes and actions. As James says, faith without works is dead. We struggle to understand
the true concept of Lordship because the idea is foreign to us. We don’t experience this sort of
authority and dominion exercised over us by anyone, as the Romans did under Caesar. As a result
we are often very reluctant and slow to lay down our rights in order to follow and serve Jesus. Our
goal as Christians ought to be one of servitude to Jesus in all aspects of our lives, even if it means
laying down our lives for His sake, and in Christian ministry, we should be teaching others to do the
same. The other aspect is that we ought to rely totally and solely on Jesus as our source of peace,
protection, providence and eternal salvation. Even in ministry, our reliance should be upon Him for
its success, and it should not be depend on our abilities, but rather on our obedience to the one who
commissioned us.
Therefore the statement ‘Jesus is Lord’, encompasses His identity as the Son of David and the Son
of God, as Redeemer, and as God. It also recognises His position as God’s anointed king and our
Saviour, as our Master, our Owner, and God over all, and it acknowledges His sovereign power and
His benevolence and provision for us. When truly understood and believed, this will result in a
dedication of our lives completely to Him. Our every desire ought to be to please Him, and to live
out His commands as we rely on Him for all our wants and needs. Although whilst in this mortal
body it is unlikely to perfectly live this out, if our attitude does not reflect this, and our ministry does
not promote this, then we must seriously question if we have truly placed Jesus in His rightful place
as Lord of lords.
18 Kruse, Paul's letter to the Romans.410
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adeyemo, Tokunboh. Africa Bible Commentary. Nairobi, Kenya
Grand Rapids, Mich.: WordAlive Publishers ;
Zondervan, 2006. Carson, D. A. New Bible Commentary : 21st Century Edition. 4th ed. Leicester, England ; Downers
Grove, Ill., USA: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994. Gundry, Robert Horton. Commentary on the New Testament : Verse-by-Verse Explanations with a
Literal Translation. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 2010. Keener, Craig S., and InterVarsity Press. The Ivp Bible Background Commentary : New Testament.
Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1993. Kruse, Colin G. Paul's Letter to the Romans. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. 2012. Reid, Daniel G., Ralph P. Martin, and Gerald F. Hawthorne. Dictionary of Paul and His Letters.
Downers Grove, Ill. ; Leicester: InterVarsity Press, 1993. Schreiner, Thomas R. Romans. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids,
Mich.: Baker Books, 1998. Stern, David H. Jewish New Testament Commentary : A Companion Volume to the Jewish New
Testament. 1st ed. Clarksville, Md.: Jewish New Testament Publications, 1992. Tverberg, Lois. "What Does the Word “Christ” Actually Mean?"
http://ourrabbijesus.com/articles/what-does-the-word-christ-actually-mean/. Wright, N.T. "Paul and Caesar: A New Reading of Romans." A Royal Priesthood: The Use of the Bible