Top Banner
IX - 497 IV. NEIGHBORHOODS ELEMENT Comment # Policy/Program Comment Response Recommendation PC 3/23/04 NH-69 (Dominican University Hillside Area) Delete first clause, last sentence “If sold for private single-family residential...” Edit: Revise as shown. If sold for private single - family residential development, t T he permitted density should reflect the significant site constraints. NH-69a (Development Review Process) Suggested edit: eliminate the Master Use Permit reference. Edit: Revise as shown. Through the development review process, amend the Master Use Permit as need ed. A a pply the Hillside Design Guidelines to design of housing at the site. Involve the neighborhood in the planning and review process of proposed development. 66-2 NH-71 (Freeway Sound Wall Landscaping) Include “sound deadening materials” in policy. Edit: Revise as shown. NH-71. Freeway Sound Wall Landscaping . Encourage Caltrans to landscape along the freeway sound wall and to incorporate sound-deadening technology . Change reference to Program N-6f (due to numbering change). PC 3/23/04 PH-59 NH-71a (Freeway Landscaping) Revise program to delete reference to GAP closure project. Suggested edit “In reviewing plans for the Gap Closure project or other subsequent separately funded project , encourage adequate landscaping.” Edit: Revise as shown. NH-71a. Freeway Improvements Landscaping . In reviewing plans for the Gap Closure freeway projects , encourage adequate landscaping and use of sound- deadening materials on the sound wall and/or the roadway surface . PC 7/8/04 NH-73 (New Residential Areas) Add the missing word “densities” Edit: Develop well-designed new residential areas at medium to high densities in the neighborhood…. PC 2/29/04 NH-74 (Conflicting Uses) State ‘district’ instead of ‘area.’ Edit: Prevent the encroachment of new residential development into the Light I i ndustrial/O o ffice District areas to minimize conflicts. PC 3/23/04 NH-80 (Possible Hotel Development) Identify location referred to. Response: The policy is outdated, and overlaps with LU-21 (Hotels, Motels and Inns) which encourages hotel development. The intent statement of this policy has been added to LU-21 (see Land Use Element comments.) Delete policy NH-80 (Possible Hotel Development). 38-4 NH-82 (Canalways) Statement about the efforts by some parties to purchase the Canalways property, and about recent drainage pond improvements. Response: Comment noted.
198

IV. NEIGHBORHOODS ELEMENT · 2019-06-19 · NH-73 (New Residential Areas) Add the missing word ... a designated portion of Canalways for beneficial reuse of dredge spoils for the

Jul 17, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • IX -

    497

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    NH

    -69

    (Dom

    inic

    an

    Uni

    vers

    ity H

    illsi

    de

    Are

    a)

    Del

    ete

    first

    cla

    use,

    last

    sent

    ence

    “I

    f sol

    d fo

    r priv

    ate

    sing

    le-f

    amily

    re

    side

    ntia

    l...”

    E

    dit:

    Rev

    ise

    as sh

    own.

    If

    sold

    for p

    rivat

    e si

    ngle

    -fam

    ily re

    side

    ntia

    l dev

    elop

    men

    t, tT

    he p

    erm

    itted

    den

    sity

    shou

    ld re

    flect

    the

    sign

    ifica

    nt si

    te

    cons

    train

    ts.

    N

    H-6

    9a

    (Dev

    elop

    men

    t R

    evie

    w P

    roce

    ss)

    Sugg

    este

    d ed

    it: e

    limin

    ate

    the

    Mas

    ter U

    se P

    erm

    it re

    fere

    nce.

    Edi

    t: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    Thro

    ugh

    the

    deve

    lopm

    ent r

    evie

    w p

    roce

    ss, a

    men

    d th

    e M

    aste

    r Use

    Per

    mit

    as n

    eede

    d. A

    appl

    y th

    e H

    illsi

    de D

    esig

    n G

    uide

    lines

    to d

    esig

    n of

    hou

    sing

    at t

    he si

    te. I

    nvol

    ve th

    e ne

    ighb

    orho

    od in

    the

    plan

    ning

    and

    revi

    ew p

    roce

    ss o

    f pr

    opos

    ed d

    evel

    opm

    ent.

    66-2

    N

    H-7

    1 (F

    reew

    ay

    Soun

    d W

    all

    Land

    scap

    ing)

    Incl

    ude

    “sou

    nd d

    eade

    ning

    m

    ater

    ials

    ” in

    pol

    icy.

    Edi

    t: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    NH

    -71.

    Fre

    eway

    Sou

    nd W

    all L

    ands

    capi

    ng.

    Enco

    urag

    e C

    altra

    ns to

    land

    scap

    e al

    ong

    the

    free

    way

    soun

    d w

    all a

    nd

    to in

    corp

    orat

    e so

    und-

    dead

    enin

    g te

    chno

    logy

    . C

    hang

    e re

    fere

    nce

    to P

    rogr

    am N

    -6f (

    due

    to n

    umbe

    ring

    chan

    ge).

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    PH-5

    9

    NH

    -71a

    (Fre

    eway

    La

    ndsc

    apin

    g)

    Rev

    ise

    prog

    ram

    to d

    elet

    e re

    fere

    nce

    to G

    AP

    clos

    ure

    proj

    ect.

    Su

    gges

    ted

    edit

    “In

    revi

    ewin

    g pl

    ans f

    or th

    e G

    ap C

    losu

    re p

    roje

    ct

    or o

    ther

    subs

    eque

    nt se

    para

    tely

    fu

    nded

    pro

    ject

    , enc

    oura

    ge

    adeq

    uate

    land

    scap

    ing.

    Ed

    it: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    NH

    -71a

    . Fr

    eew

    ay Im

    prov

    emen

    tsLa

    ndsc

    apin

    g. I

    n re

    view

    ing

    plan

    s for

    the

    Gap

    Clo

    sure

    free

    way

    pro

    ject

    s, en

    cour

    age

    adeq

    uate

    land

    scap

    ing

    and

    use

    of so

    und-

    dead

    enin

    g m

    ater

    ials

    on

    the

    soun

    d w

    all a

    nd/o

    r the

    ro

    adw

    ay su

    rfac

    e.

    PC 7

    /8/0

    4 N

    H-7

    3 (N

    ew

    Res

    iden

    tial A

    reas

    ) A

    dd th

    e m

    issi

    ng w

    ord

    “den

    sitie

    s”

    E

    dit:

    D

    evel

    op w

    ell-d

    esig

    ned

    new

    resi

    dent

    ial a

    reas

    at m

    ediu

    m

    to h

    igh

    dens

    ities

    in th

    e ne

    ighb

    orho

    od…

    .

    PC

    2/29

    /04

    NH

    -74

    (Con

    flict

    ing

    Use

    s)

    Stat

    e ‘d

    istri

    ct’ i

    nste

    ad o

    f ‘ar

    ea.’

    E

    dit:

    Prev

    ent t

    he e

    ncro

    achm

    ent o

    f new

    resi

    dent

    ial

    deve

    lopm

    ent i

    nto

    the

    Ligh

    t Iin

    dust

    rial/O

    offic

    e D

    istri

    ct

    area

    s to

    min

    imiz

    e co

    nflic

    ts.

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    NH

    -80

    (Pos

    sibl

    e H

    otel

    Dev

    elop

    men

    t) Id

    entif

    y lo

    catio

    n re

    ferr

    ed to

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : Th

    e po

    licy

    is o

    utda

    ted,

    and

    ove

    rlaps

    with

    LU

    -21

    (Hot

    els,

    Mot

    els a

    nd In

    ns) w

    hich

    enc

    oura

    ges h

    otel

    dev

    elop

    men

    t. T

    he in

    tent

    st

    atem

    ent o

    f thi

    s pol

    icy

    has b

    een

    adde

    d to

    LU

    -21

    (see

    Lan

    d U

    se

    Elem

    ent c

    omm

    ents

    .)

    Del

    ete

    polic

    y N

    H-8

    0 (P

    ossib

    le H

    otel

    Dev

    elop

    men

    t).

    38-4

    N

    H-8

    2 (C

    anal

    way

    s)

    Stat

    emen

    t abo

    ut th

    e ef

    forts

    by

    som

    e pa

    rties

    to p

    urch

    ase

    the

    Can

    alw

    ays p

    rope

    rty, a

    nd a

    bout

    re

    cent

    dra

    inag

    e po

    nd

    impr

    ovem

    ents

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : Com

    men

    t not

    ed.

  • IX -

    498

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    46-3

    N

    H-8

    2 (C

    anal

    way

    s)

    To th

    e ex

    tent

    that

    Can

    alw

    ays i

    s pr

    esen

    tly w

    et, i

    t is o

    nly

    beca

    use

    of th

    e C

    ity’s

    unl

    awfu

    l flo

    odin

    g of

    our

    pro

    perty

    resu

    lting

    from

    th

    e C

    ity’s

    failu

    re to

    repa

    ir its

    br

    oken

    dra

    inag

    e pu

    mps

    and

    di

    scha

    rge

    lines

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : Se

    e at

    tach

    ed M

    ay 2

    5, 2

    004

    lette

    r fro

    m A

    ssis

    tant

    City

    A

    ttorn

    ey C

    lark

    Gui

    nan.

    96-1

    N

    H-8

    2 (C

    anal

    way

    s)

    Re.

    usi

    ng th

    e si

    te fo

    r dre

    dge

    spoi

    ls:

    “…

    a de

    sign

    ated

    por

    tion

    of

    Can

    alw

    ays f

    or b

    enef

    icia

    l reu

    se

    of d

    redg

    e sp

    oils

    for t

    he S

    R c

    reek

    an

    d ac

    ross

    the

    flats

    . Thi

    s was

    the

    orig

    inal

    pla

    n an

    d it

    shou

    ld

    rem

    ain

    a vi

    able

    solu

    tion.

    Resp

    onse

    : Th

    ere

    is n

    o ap

    prov

    ed p

    lan

    to u

    se a

    por

    tion

    of C

    anal

    way

    s fo

    r dre

    dge

    spoi

    ls.

    100-

    1 N

    H-8

    2 (C

    anal

    way

    s)

    1.

    Who

    was

    invo

    lved

    in

    draw

    ing

    the

    map

    ping

    and

    zo

    ning

    des

    igna

    tions

    that

    w

    ere

    appl

    ied

    to th

    is

    Orth

    opho

    to?

    2.

    Whe

    n w

    ere

    the

    draw

    ings

    and

    de

    sign

    atio

    ns u

    nder

    take

    n an

    d co

    mpl

    eted

    ? 3.

    W

    ere

    the

    Can

    alw

    ays

    prop

    erty

    ow

    ners

    con

    sulte

    d on

    how

    the

    land

    s wer

    e to

    be

    diss

    ecte

    d w

    ith li

    nes,

    acre

    age

    size

    s and

    zon

    ing

    desi

    gnat

    ions

    ? 4.

    W

    hat s

    cien

    ce w

    as u

    sed

    in

    com

    ing

    to th

    ese

    draw

    ing

    and

    map

    ping

    con

    clus

    ions

    ? 5.

    W

    hat o

    ther

    inpu

    t was

    use

    d to

    dr

    aw th

    ese

    area

    bre

    akou

    ts?

    6.

    Why

    was

    the

    land

    usa

    ble

    to

    addr

    ess c

    omm

    unity

    nee

    ds

    redu

    ced

    from

    25

    acre

    s in

    Gen

    eral

    Pla

    n 20

    00 to

    11.

    5 ac

    res i

    n D

    raft

    Gen

    eral

    Pla

    n 20

    20?

    7.

    Was

    an

    econ

    omic

    impa

    ct

    repo

    rt do

    ne to

    det

    erm

    ine

    wha

    t det

    rimen

    tal e

    ffec

    ts

    redu

    cing

    dev

    elop

    men

    tal

    pote

    ntia

    l wou

    ld d

    o to

    the

    Resp

    onse

    : 1.

    Th

    e St

    eerin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    reco

    mm

    ende

    d th

    e la

    nd u

    se

    desi

    gnat

    ions

    ; the

    City

    Cou

    ncil

    adop

    ted

    the

    zoni

    ng d

    esig

    natio

    n.

    The

    ‘orth

    opho

    to’ m

    ap w

    as p

    repa

    red

    by C

    ity st

    aff.

    2.

    The

    land

    use

    reco

    mm

    enda

    tion

    was

    mad

    e A

    ugus

    t 4, 2

    003,

    and

    zo

    ning

    was

    ado

    pted

    Sep

    tem

    ber 1

    992.

    The

    ‘orth

    opho

    to’ m

    ap

    was

    pre

    pare

    d ea

    rly M

    arch

    200

    4.

    3.

    In 1

    992,

    all

    prop

    erty

    ow

    ners

    wer

    e se

    nt a

    not

    ice

    of th

    e Pu

    blic

    H

    earin

    gs fo

    r the

    new

    Zon

    ing

    Ord

    inan

    ce.

    A re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    of

    the

    prop

    erty

    ow

    ners

    rece

    ived

    not

    ices

    of a

    ll m

    eetin

    gs o

    f the

    St

    eerin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    , whi

    ch w

    ere

    open

    to th

    e pu

    blic

    .

    4.

    Staf

    f use

    d th

    e C

    ity’s

    GIS

    /aut

    ocad

    map

    ping

    pro

    gram

    to p

    repa

    re

    the

    Mar

    ch 2

    004

    map

    . The

    lot l

    ine

    and

    prop

    erty

    ow

    ner

    info

    rmat

    ion

    is fr

    om th

    e M

    arin

    Cou

    nty’

    s Ass

    esso

    r’s O

    ffic

    e; th

    e ac

    reag

    e si

    zes i

    s cal

    cula

    ted

    usin

    g th

    e co

    mpu

    ter m

    appi

    ng

    prog

    ram

    . 5.

    O

    ther

    info

    rmat

    ion

    incl

    ude

    the

    City

    ’s d

    igiti

    zed

    aeria

    l pho

    tos.

    6.

    See

    resp

    onse

    to N

    H-8

    2, fo

    r com

    men

    ts 2

    4-1,

    53-

    9, e

    tc.

    7.

    No.

    8.

    Y

    es.

    See

    resp

    onse

    to N

    H-8

    2, c

    omm

    ents

    PH

    091

    and

    185-

    1.

  • IX -

    499

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    Can

    al C

    omm

    unity

    , San

    R

    afae

    l or t

    he p

    rope

    rty

    owne

    rs?

    8.

    Was

    any

    con

    side

    ratio

    n gi

    ven

    durin

    g th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    map

    ping

    pro

    cess

    to

    desi

    gnat

    ing

    porti

    ons o

    f the

    si

    te fo

    r the

    com

    mun

    ity c

    ost

    effe

    ctiv

    e be

    nefic

    ial r

    euse

    of

    dred

    ge m

    ater

    ials

    , as c

    alle

    d fo

    r in

    the

    Fede

    ral

    Gov

    ernm

    ent’s

    long

    term

    m

    anag

    emen

    t stu

    dy fo

    r the

    pl

    acem

    ent o

    f dre

    dge

    mat

    eria

    l in

    the

    San

    Fran

    cisc

    o B

    ay?

    PH-1

    29

    NH

    82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    H

    ow c

    an th

    e de

    velo

    pmen

    t po

    tent

    ial b

    e re

    duce

    d fr

    om 2

    5 ac

    res t

    o 11

    acr

    es w

    hen

    the

    staf

    f re

    port

    indi

    cate

    d th

    at it

    is n

    ot

    poss

    ible

    to m

    ake

    the

    final

    de

    term

    inat

    ion

    betw

    een

    upla

    nd

    and

    wet

    land

    hab

    itat w

    ithou

    t ha

    ving

    a w

    etla

    nd d

    elin

    eatio

    n co

    nduc

    ted?

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    Ste

    erin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    reco

    mm

    ende

    d la

    nd u

    ses f

    or th

    e si

    te u

    sing

    info

    rmat

    ion

    from

    the

    Back

    grou

    nd R

    epor

    t (20

    01),

    and

    topo

    grap

    hic

    info

    rmat

    ion.

    In th

    e C

    onse

    rvat

    ion

    Dis

    trict

    stat

    es th

    at th

    e C

    ity w

    ill c

    onsi

    der s

    ome

    leve

    l of i

    nten

    sity

    and

    den

    sity

    of d

    evel

    opm

    ent

    upon

    evi

    denc

    e (i.

    e., a

    wet

    land

    s del

    inea

    tion

    subm

    itted

    by

    the

    prop

    erty

    ow

    ner)

    that

    such

    use

    is a

    ppro

    pria

    te.

    PH-1

    19

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    1.

    R

    aise

    the

    leve

    e of

    C

    anal

    way

    s at l

    east

    thre

    e fe

    et.

    2.

    Ker

    ner B

    lvd.

    Gap

    Clo

    sure

    ha

    s bee

    n ov

    erlo

    oked

    . 3.

    C

    reat

    e th

    e I-

    580/

    101

    expr

    essw

    ay

    4.

    Cro

    ss I-

    580

    at A

    nder

    sen

    to

    prov

    ide

    a do

    uble

    loop

    and

    tra

    ffic

    relie

    f 5.

    Pr

    eser

    ve so

    me

    wet

    land

    s and

    al

    so b

    uild

    aff

    orda

    ble

    hous

    ing

    in C

    anal

    way

    s. 6.

    B

    uild

    a p

    edes

    trian

    /bic

    ycle

    br

    idge

    ove

    r the

    can

    al a

    t San

    R

    afae

    l Hig

    h Sc

    hool

    Resp

    onse

    : 1.

    Th

    e de

    gree

    of l

    evee

    impr

    ovem

    ents

    at C

    anal

    way

    s wou

    ld b

    e de

    term

    ined

    in c

    onsu

    ltatio

    n w

    ith P

    ublic

    Wor

    ks a

    nd g

    eote

    chni

    cal

    eval

    uatio

    n.

    2.

    Con

    nect

    ing

    Ker

    ner B

    lvd.

    was

    a n

    eces

    sary

    impr

    ovem

    ent f

    or th

    e G

    ener

    al P

    lan

    2000

    traf

    fic m

    itiga

    tion

    of Ir

    ene

    over

    cros

    sing

    . W

    ith

    the

    alte

    rnat

    ive

    impr

    ovem

    ent o

    f the

    580

    con

    nect

    ion

    at

    Shor

    elin

    e/A

    nder

    sen,

    the

    Ker

    ner B

    lvd.

    gap

    clo

    sure

    is n

    o lo

    nger

    ne

    eded

    . 3.

    C

    omm

    ent n

    oted

    . 4.

    A

    con

    nect

    ion

    acro

    ss I-

    580

    at A

    nder

    sen

    is p

    ropo

    sed

    at S

    hore

    line

    Driv

    e.

    5.

    Com

    men

    t not

    ed.

    6.

    A p

    edes

    trian

    /bic

    ycle

    brid

    ge o

    ver t

    he C

    anal

    is re

    com

    men

    ded

    as a

    ci

    rcul

    atio

    n im

    prov

    emen

    t in

    the

    draf

    t Pla

    n.

  • IX -

    500

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    136-

    3 N

    H-8

    2 (C

    anal

    way

    s)

    Can

    alw

    ays

    desi

    gnat

    ions

    1.

    How

    did

    staf

    f com

    e to

    the

    conc

    lusi

    on th

    at o

    nly

    the

    sele

    cted

    11.

    5 ac

    res i

    s de

    velo

    pabl

    e?

    2.

    Did

    the

    Live

    Oak

    con

    sulta

    nt

    dete

    rmin

    e th

    e 11

    .5 a

    cre

    choi

    ce?

    3.

    Did

    a c

    omm

    ittee

    redu

    ce th

    e ac

    reag

    e 11

    .5 a

    nd c

    hoos

    e th

    e pa

    rcel

    s of l

    and?

    4.

    W

    ho p

    artic

    ipat

    ed in

    or m

    ade

    this

    dec

    isio

    n?

    5.

    On

    wha

    t sci

    ence

    is th

    is 1

    1.5

    acre

    LI/O

    dec

    isio

    n ba

    sed?

    Resp

    onse

    : 1.

    Th

    e la

    nd u

    se re

    com

    men

    datio

    n ha

    s bee

    n m

    ade

    by th

    e St

    eerin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    , not

    by

    staf

    f. 2.

    N

    o.

    3.

    The

    Map

    ping

    Sub

    com

    mitt

    ee m

    ade

    a la

    nd u

    se re

    com

    men

    datio

    n fo

    r Can

    alw

    ays t

    o th

    e G

    ener

    al P

    lan

    2020

    Ste

    erin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    , w

    hich

    dis

    cuss

    ed a

    nd c

    onfir

    med

    the

    Subc

    omm

    ittee

    ’s

    reco

    mm

    enda

    tion.

    4.

    Th

    e M

    appi

    ng S

    ubco

    mm

    ittee

    , the

    Ste

    erin

    g C

    omm

    ittee

    , and

    the

    publ

    ic.

    5.

    See

    resp

    onse

    to N

    H-8

    2, fo

    r com

    men

    ts 2

    4-1,

    53-

    9, e

    tc.v

    PH-1

    40

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    Th

    e C

    anal

    way

    s site

    is a

    wet

    land

    ha

    bita

    t tha

    t inc

    lude

    s mor

    e th

    an

    wet

    land

    s. B

    irds a

    nd a

    nim

    als u

    se

    the

    wes

    tern

    side

    for r

    estin

    g,

    hunt

    ing

    and

    feed

    ing.

    Site

    shou

    ld

    be p

    rese

    rved

    . The

    Cor

    ps o

    f En

    gine

    ers p

    revi

    ousl

    y de

    nied

    de

    velo

    pmen

    t pro

    ject

    . It w

    ould

    be

    very

    diff

    icul

    t to

    build

    due

    to th

    e im

    porta

    nce

    of th

    e ha

    bita

    t.

    Com

    men

    t not

    ed.

    PH-1

    31

    NH

    82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    M

    any

    peop

    le b

    elie

    ve th

    at

    Can

    alw

    ays i

    s a w

    etla

    nd si

    te, b

    ut

    the

    lang

    uage

    shou

    ld n

    ot b

    e in

    clud

    ed in

    pol

    icy

    until

    stud

    ies

    are

    cond

    ucte

    d.

    Resp

    onse

    : Th

    e Ba

    ckgr

    ound

    Rep

    ort (

    2001

    ) ide

    ntifi

    ed a

    sign

    ifica

    nt

    porti

    on o

    f the

    site

    as w

    etla

    nds.

    The

    site

    -spe

    cific

    impl

    emen

    ting

    prog

    ram

    reco

    gniz

    es th

    at a

    wet

    land

    s del

    inea

    tion

    will

    ass

    ist i

    n id

    entif

    ying

    app

    ropr

    iate

    are

    a(s)

    for d

    evel

    opm

    ent.

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    108-

    1 10

    9-1

    11

    3-1

    11

    5-1

    11

    6-1

    11

    7-1

    153-

    1 18

    4-1

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    Le

    ave

    as is

    . Cha

    nge

    the

    wor

    ding

    to

    “pr

    ovid

    e ha

    bita

    t for

    rare

    , en

    dang

    ered

    and

    oth

    er sp

    ecie

    s.

    Ed

    it: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    Rec

    ogni

    ze th

    e hi

    gh re

    sour

    ce v

    alue

    of t

    he si

    te’s

    wet

    land

    s th

    at p

    rovi

    de h

    abita

    t to

    man

    y sp

    ecie

    s, w

    hich

    may

    incl

    ude

    rare

    and

    end

    ange

    red

    spec

    ies.

  • IX -

    501

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    22-2

    23

    -1

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    In

    clud

    e la

    ngua

    ge st

    atin

    g th

    at if

    de

    velo

    pmen

    t is a

    llow

    ed, s

    peci

    al

    tax

    asse

    ssm

    ents

    and

    dev

    elop

    men

    t ar

    rang

    emen

    ts a

    re to

    be

    mad

    e fo

    r C

    anal

    way

    s res

    tora

    tion

    and

    park

    co

    mpl

    etio

    n/m

    aint

    enan

    ce.

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    site

    is z

    oned

    PD

    -WO

    (Pla

    nned

    Dis

    trict

    – W

    etla

    nds

    Ove

    rlay)

    . Th

    e W

    etla

    nds O

    verla

    y zo

    ning

    requ

    ires d

    elin

    eatio

    n of

    w

    etla

    nds b

    y th

    e A

    rmy

    Cor

    ps o

    f Eng

    inee

    rs, a

    nd a

    Wet

    land

    s M

    anag

    emen

    t Pla

    n fo

    r the

    pro

    tect

    ion,

    rest

    orat

    ion

    and/

    or c

    reat

    ion

    of si

    te

    wet

    land

    s as d

    eter

    min

    ed n

    eces

    sary

    . B

    ond

    fund

    ing

    may

    be

    requ

    ired

    if ne

    cess

    ary

    to im

    plem

    ent t

    he W

    etla

    nds M

    anag

    emen

    t Pla

    n.

    St

    aff r

    ecom

    men

    ds n

    o ch

    ange

    to th

    e po

    licy.

    22-3

    11

    4-1

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    A

    dd la

    ngua

    ge to

    pre

    vent

    cur

    rent

    ab

    use

    and

    degr

    adat

    ion

    of th

    e C

    anal

    way

    s pro

    perty

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : Abu

    se a

    nd d

    egra

    datio

    n of

    the

    site

    can

    be

    repo

    rted

    to th

    e Po

    lice

    Dep

    artm

    ent o

    r the

    Cod

    e En

    forc

    emen

    t Div

    isio

    n. T

    he C

    ity h

    as

    in th

    e pa

    st ta

    ken

    actio

    n to

    evi

    ct h

    omel

    ess e

    ncam

    pmen

    ts a

    nd re

    port

    mow

    ing

    of P

    ickl

    ewee

    d ve

    geta

    tion.

    Staf

    f rec

    omm

    ends

    no

    chan

    ge to

    the

    polic

    y.

    24-1

    53

    -9

    65-1

    13

    7-1

    138-

    2

    PH-5

    7 PH

    -63

    PH

    -64

    PH-9

    0 PH

    -120

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    1.

    St

    ate

    the

    fact

    s abo

    ut th

    is

    prop

    erty

    in th

    e G

    ener

    al P

    lan.

    U

    se h

    elpf

    ul v

    erbi

    age

    inst

    ead

    of u

    nfai

    rly b

    urde

    nsom

    e la

    ngua

    ge.

    2.

    Can

    alw

    ays i

    s one

    of t

    he la

    st

    maj

    or in

    fill s

    ites i

    n Sa

    n R

    afae

    l. Ev

    iden

    ce h

    as n

    ever

    be

    en su

    ppor

    ted

    that

    C

    anal

    way

    s is a

    thriv

    ing

    wet

    land

    s sup

    porti

    ng

    enda

    nger

    ed sp

    ecie

    s. Su

    gges

    ted

    wai

    ting

    until

    a

    deve

    lopm

    ent p

    lan

    is

    subm

    itted

    and

    let t

    he E

    IR

    dete

    rmin

    e th

    e ou

    tcom

    e.

    3.

    Con

    cern

    ed a

    bout

    the

    redu

    ctio

    n in

    per

    mitt

    ed

    deve

    lopm

    ent f

    rom

    25

    to 1

    1.5

    acre

    s. 4.

    In

    supp

    ort o

    f job

    s and

    ho

    usin

    g on

    Can

    alw

    ays s

    ite.

    5.

    Con

    cern

    ed a

    bout

    the

    elim

    inat

    ion

    of re

    side

    ntia

    l ho

    usin

    g as

    an

    antic

    ipat

    ed

    perm

    itted

    use

    . 6.

    In

    appr

    opria

    te to

    des

    igna

    te

    entir

    e si

    te a

    s Con

    serv

    atio

    n.

    Resp

    onse

    : 1.

    G

    ener

    al P

    lan

    Exhi

    bits

    26

    (Geo

    logy

    and

    Sta

    bilit

    y), 2

    8 (F

    lood

    H

    azar

    d A

    reas

    ), 34

    (Bio

    tic H

    abita

    t), 3

    5 (B

    ayla

    nds)

    , 36

    (Wat

    ersh

    ed

    Bou

    ndar

    ies a

    nd S

    igni

    fican

    t Hyd

    rolo

    gic

    Feat

    ures

    ) and

    37

    (Thr

    eate

    ned

    and

    Enda

    nger

    ed S

    peci

    es) p

    rovi

    de th

    e ba

    ckgr

    ound

    en

    viro

    nmen

    tal i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    in su

    ppor

    t of t

    he d

    raft

    polic

    y.

    2.

    As n

    oted

    in th

    e co

    mm

    ent,

    an E

    IR p

    repa

    red

    for p

    ropo

    sed

    deve

    lopm

    ent o

    f the

    site

    wou

    ld id

    entif

    y th

    e ex

    tent

    of w

    etla

    nds a

    nd

    the

    exis

    tenc

    e of

    end

    ange

    red

    spec

    ies o

    n th

    e si

    te.

    3.

    The

    sout

    hwes

    t cor

    ner o

    f the

    site

    is d

    esig

    nate

    d Li

    ght

    Indu

    stria

    l/Off

    ice,

    con

    sist

    ent w

    ith th

    e su

    rrou

    ndin

    g ar

    ea a

    long

    K

    erne

    r Blv

    d, a

    nd a

    llow

    ing

    for s

    ome

    deve

    lopm

    ent t

    hat w

    ould

    pr

    ovid

    e jo

    bs.

    4.

    R

    esid

    entia

    l use

    is n

    ot re

    com

    men

    ded

    for t

    he si

    te g

    iven

    the

    envi

    ronm

    enta

    l and

    traf

    fic c

    onst

    rain

    ts.

    Bec

    ause

    resi

    dent

    ial u

    se is

    a

    24-h

    our u

    se, w

    ith p

    ets t

    hat c

    ould

    hav

    e a

    nega

    tive

    impa

    ct o

    n sp

    ecie

    s in

    the

    habi

    tat a

    reas

    , it i

    s not

    a re

    com

    men

    ded

    for t

    his s

    ite.

    5.

    The

    rem

    aind

    er o

    f the

    site

    is d

    esig

    nate

    d C

    onse

    rvat

    ion,

    indi

    catin

    g th

    at th

    e si

    te h

    as “

    visu

    al o

    r oth

    er n

    atur

    al re

    sour

    ce si

    gnifi

    canc

    e th

    at

    shou

    ld b

    e pr

    otec

    ted

    thro

    ugh

    the

    deve

    lopm

    ent r

    evie

    w p

    roce

    ss.”

    Th

    e C

    onse

    rvat

    ion

    land

    use

    cat

    egor

    y is

    pro

    pose

    d to

    be

    amen

    ded

    (see

    com

    men

    ts u

    nder

    Exh

    ibit

    10 a

    bove

    ) to

    indi

    cate

    that

    de

    velo

    pmen

    t pot

    entia

    l in

    the

    Con

    serv

    atio

    n di

    stric

    t wou

    ld b

    e id

    entif

    ied

    once

    env

    ironm

    enta

    l and

    oth

    er re

    sour

    ces h

    ave

    been

    id

    entif

    ied.

    6.

    It’

    s not

    pos

    sibl

    e at

    this

    poi

    nt to

    iden

    tify

    the

    size

    of t

    he a

    rea

    avai

    labl

    e fo

    r dev

    elop

    men

    t. O

    nly

    with

    a th

    orou

    gh si

    te-s

    peci

    fic

    envi

    ronm

    enta

    l ass

    essm

    ent,

    as w

    ould

    be

    cond

    ucte

    d if

    a de

    velo

    pmen

    t pro

    posa

    l wer

    e su

    bmitt

    ed, c

    ould

    the

    City

    iden

    tify

    the

    appr

    opria

    te e

    xten

    t of d

    evel

    opm

    ent o

    n th

    e si

    te.

  • IX -

    502

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    PH-1

    16

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    Ea

    st/w

    est o

    verc

    ross

    ing

    coul

    d co

    nnec

    t Ker

    ner B

    lvd.

    to

    And

    erse

    n th

    roug

    h C

    anal

    way

    s. Th

    is c

    ould

    be

    an a

    ltern

    ativ

    e co

    nnec

    tion.

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    Tra

    ffic

    Eng

    inee

    r has

    reco

    mm

    ende

    d an

    eas

    t/wes

    t cr

    ossi

    ng u

    nder

    Hig

    hway

    580

    as a

    n al

    tern

    ativ

    e co

    nnec

    tion

    to th

    e Ir

    ene

    Stre

    et o

    verc

    ross

    ing

    liste

    d in

    Gen

    eral

    Pla

    n 20

    00.

    The

    unde

    rcro

    ssin

    g is

    less

    exp

    ensi

    ve th

    an a

    n ov

    ercr

    ossi

    ng, a

    nd it

    wou

    ld h

    ave

    the

    leas

    t im

    pact

    on

    surr

    ound

    ing

    land

    use

    s.

    96-1

    18

    5-1

    PH-9

    1

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    Su

    gges

    ted

    esta

    blis

    hing

    dre

    dged

    sp

    oils

    to C

    anal

    way

    s pro

    perty

    su

    ch a

    s tho

    se e

    stab

    lishe

    d at

    Bay

    Po

    inte

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : A U

    se P

    erm

    it w

    ould

    be

    requ

    ired

    for w

    etla

    nds r

    esto

    ratio

    n,

    incl

    udin

    g fo

    r a p

    roje

    ct u

    sing

    dre

    dged

    spoi

    ls.

    Envi

    ronm

    enta

    l and

    pr

    ojec

    t rev

    iew

    wou

    ld d

    eter

    min

    e th

    e ap

    prop

    riate

    ness

    of t

    his u

    se a

    t the

    si

    te.

    110-

    1 11

    4-1

    173-

    1 17

    9-1

    151-

    1 15

    4-1

    155-

    1 15

    6-1

    158-

    1 15

    9-1

    160-

    1 16

    1-1

    162-

    1 16

    3-1

    164-

    1 16

    5-1

    166-

    1 16

    7-1

    168-

    1 16

    9-1

    170-

    1 17

    1-1

    172-

    1 17

    4-1

    181-

    1 PH

    -65

    PH-1

    25

    NH

    -82

    (Can

    alw

    ays)

    O

    ppos

    ed to

    any

    dev

    elop

    men

    t to

    Can

    alw

    ays s

    ite. T

    raff

    ic, a

    ir qu

    ality

    and

    wet

    land

    s iss

    ues.

    In su

    ppor

    t of t

    he c

    urre

    nt

    wor

    ding

    on

    NH

    -82.

    C

    anal

    way

    s site

    is u

    sefu

    l as a

    se

    ason

    al w

    etla

    nds s

    ite. S

    ite h

    as

    over

    100

    spec

    ies o

    f wild

    life.

    Le

    ave

    in c

    urre

    nt d

    raft

    wor

    ding

    . C

    anal

    way

    s is t

    he la

    st re

    mai

    ning

    un

    deve

    lope

    d Sa

    n R

    afae

    l sh

    orel

    ine

    habi

    tat a

    rea.

    It sh

    ould

    be

    pre

    serv

    ed in

    per

    petu

    ity fo

    r th

    e lo

    cal c

    itize

    ns to

    enj

    oy.

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    Pla

    nnin

    g C

    omm

    issi

    on h

    as re

    com

    men

    ded

    no c

    hang

    e to

    th

    e dr

    aft p

    olic

    y.

  • IX -

    503

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    Staf

    f N

    H-8

    3 (C

    oord

    inat

    ed

    City

    , Can

    alw

    ays,

    and

    Win

    dwar

    d W

    ay

    Res

    iden

    tial S

    ite

    Des

    ign)

    This

    pol

    icy

    is th

    e sa

    me

    as E

    SR-

    24 fr

    om G

    ener

    al P

    lan

    2000

    ; it

    addr

    esse

    s a d

    esig

    n is

    sue

    conc

    erni

    ng h

    ousi

    ng d

    evel

    opm

    ent

    on th

    e no

    rther

    n en

    d of

    C

    anal

    way

    s, an

    d th

    e ac

    cess

    issu

    es

    invo

    lvin

    g th

    e th

    ree

    site

    s.

    How

    ever

    , in

    Gen

    eral

    Pla

    n 20

    20

    deve

    lopm

    ent o

    n C

    anal

    way

    s will

    no

    long

    er b

    e co

    ntig

    uous

    with

    th

    ese

    two

    site

    s. T

    his p

    olic

    y is

    no

    long

    er n

    eede

    d.

    Map

    of t

    he a

    rea:

    Edit:

    D

    elet

    e po

    licy

    NH

    -83

    (Coo

    rdin

    ated

    City

    , Can

    alw

    ays a

    nd

    Win

    dwar

    d W

    ay R

    esid

    entia

    l Des

    ign)

    41-1

    N

    H-8

    4 (W

    indw

    ard

    Way

    ) Th

    e G

    ener

    al P

    lan

    and

    Zoni

    ng

    Ord

    inan

    ce sh

    ould

    be

    clea

    r abo

    ut

    allo

    win

    g ho

    usin

    g as

    a u

    se o

    n th

    is

    site

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : Sta

    ff d

    oes n

    ot re

    com

    men

    d th

    at th

    e pr

    opos

    ed P

    ark

    land

    use

    de

    sign

    atio

    n be

    cha

    nged

    to a

    hou

    sing

    des

    igna

    tion.

    Pol

    icy

    PR9a

    co

    ntai

    ns la

    ngua

    ge th

    at w

    ould

    allo

    w c

    onsi

    dera

    tion

    of d

    evel

    opin

    g a

    porti

    on o

    f the

    site

    to fa

    cilit

    ate

    crea

    tion

    of th

    e pa

    rk.

    This

    site

    has

    bee

    n de

    sign

    ated

    for d

    evel

    opm

    ent o

    f a p

    ark

    due

    to th

    e in

    suff

    icie

    nt a

    mou

    nt

    of p

    ark

    acre

    age

    com

    pare

    d to

    pop

    ulat

    ion

    with

    in th

    e su

    rrou

    ndin

    g ne

    ighb

    orho

    od.

    It sh

    ould

    be

    note

    d th

    at th

    e si

    te h

    as li

    mite

    d de

    velo

    pmen

    t pot

    entia

    l due

    to e

    xist

    ing

    wet

    land

    s, lim

    ited

    traff

    ic

    capa

    city

    and

    the

    cost

    of b

    uild

    ing

    on fo

    rmer

    land

    fill.

  • IX -

    504

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    25-1

    78

    -4

    89-1

    PC

    3/

    23/0

    4 PH

    -121

    5/

    25/0

    4

    NH

    -87

    (Cal

    -Pox

    Si

    te)

    Any

    dev

    elop

    men

    t sho

    uld

    incl

    ude

    spec

    ial t

    axes

    to c

    ompl

    ete

    adjo

    inin

    g w

    etla

    nds r

    esto

    ratio

    n,

    build

    ing

    heig

    ht li

    mits

    , pla

    ntin

    g of

    tree

    s to

    prov

    ide

    priv

    acy.

    Se

    nten

    ce in

    ital

    ics s

    houl

    d be

    de

    lete

    d. It

    is n

    ot a

    ppro

    pria

    te, o

    r sa

    fe, f

    or re

    side

    ntia

    l use

    . O

    n be

    half

    of th

    e ow

    ners

    of C

    al-

    Pox,

    supp

    ort r

    ecom

    men

    datio

    n th

    at h

    otel

    and

    /or r

    esid

    entia

    l use

    s be

    con

    side

    red

    for t

    he si

    te.

    Title

    27

    of th

    e C

    alifo

    rnia

    Cod

    e of

    regu

    latio

    ns re

    gula

    tes p

    ost-

    clos

    ure

    deve

    lopm

    ent o

    n la

    ndfil

    ls, a

    nd a

    llow

    s hou

    sing

    and

    ho

    tel d

    evel

    opm

    ent s

    ubje

    ct to

    sc

    rutin

    y. T

    here

    are

    exa

    mpl

    es

    whe

    re fo

    rmer

    land

    fill s

    ites h

    ave

    been

    use

    d fo

    r res

    iden

    tial a

    nd

    land

    use

    . H

    otel

    s and

    seni

    or h

    ousi

    ng a

    re

    beni

    gn u

    ses i

    n te

    rms o

    f pea

    k ho

    ur tr

    affic

    .

    Resp

    onse

    : On

    May

    25,

    the

    Plan

    ning

    Com

    mis

    sion

    con

    side

    red

    the

    bene

    fits a

    nd c

    onst

    rain

    ts to

    resi

    dent

    ial d

    evel

    opm

    ent o

    n th

    is si

    te.

    As a

    si

    te w

    ith k

    now

    n ha

    zard

    ous m

    ater

    ials

    , the

    env

    ironm

    enta

    l con

    stra

    ints

    m

    ay b

    e pr

    ohib

    itive

    of r

    esid

    entia

    l use

    . Add

    ition

    ally

    , the

    site

    is a

    n is

    olat

    ed lo

    catio

    n fo

    r res

    iden

    tial u

    se, b

    eing

    a c

    onsi

    dera

    ble

    dist

    ance

    for

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    serv

    ices

    or t

    rans

    it. O

    n th

    e ot

    her h

    and,

    ther

    e is

    a

    pres

    sing

    nee

    d fo

    r hou

    sing

    site

    s, an

    d se

    nior

    hou

    sing

    and

    hot

    els d

    o ha

    ve fe

    wer

    traf

    fic im

    pact

    s tha

    n ot

    her p

    ossi

    ble

    uses

    . Th

    e Pl

    anni

    ng

    Com

    mis

    sion

    reco

    mm

    ende

    d th

    at re

    side

    ntia

    l not

    be

    allo

    wed

    at t

    he si

    te.

    Edit:

    A

    llow

    ligh

    t ind

    ustri

    al/o

    ffic

    e an

    d sp

    ecia

    lty re

    tail

    uses

    . Tr

    affic

    con

    gest

    ion

    in th

    e ar

    ea, p

    rior t

    o ne

    eded

    road

    way

    im

    prov

    emen

    ts, m

    ay li

    mit

    deve

    lopm

    ent o

    n th

    e si

    te to

    low

    tra

    ffic

    -gen

    erat

    ing

    uses

    . R

    esid

    entia

    l and

    /or H

    hote

    l use

    m

    ay b

    e co

    nsid

    ered

    for t

    he si

    te p

    rovi

    ded

    that

    en

    viro

    nmen

    tal a

    naly

    sis d

    emon

    stra

    tes t

    hat p

    oten

    tially

    ha

    zard

    ous s

    oils

    con

    ditio

    ns a

    re in

    com

    plia

    nce

    with

    Sta

    te

    and

    Fede

    ral l

    aws a

    nd th

    at g

    eo-s

    eism

    ic c

    ondi

    tions

    and

    co

    mm

    erci

    al u

    se c

    onfli

    cts h

    ave

    been

    miti

    gate

    d

    78-2

    PC

    3/

    23/0

    4

    NH

    -90

    (Par

    ks a

    nd

    Rec

    reat

    ion)

    A

    dd B

    ella

    m/W

    indw

    ard

    Way

    Pa

    rk to

    this

    pol

    icy.

    Ed

    it: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    Com

    plet

    e pl

    anne

    d Pi

    ckle

    wee

    d Pa

    rk a

    nd S

    tark

    wea

    ther

    Sh

    orel

    ine

    Park

    impr

    ovem

    ents

    , and

    pla

    n an

    d im

    plem

    ent

    park

    impr

    ovem

    ents

    at t

    he B

    ella

    m/W

    indw

    ard

    Way

    site

    . C

    hang

    e/ad

    d re

    fere

    nces

    : PR

    -8a

    (Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d Pa

    rk Im

    prov

    emen

    ts) a

    nd P

    R-9

    a (B

    ella

    m/W

    indw

    ard

    Way

    site

    )

    Staf

    f N

    H-9

    6 (S

    hore

    line

    Emba

    nkm

    ents

    ) Th

    ere

    is th

    e po

    tent

    ial f

    or th

    e lo

    ss

    of so

    il re

    sour

    ces d

    ue to

    ero

    sion

    as

    wel

    l as t

    he p

    oten

    tial f

    or th

    e ex

    posu

    re o

    f im

    prov

    emen

    ts to

    er

    osio

    n-re

    late

    d da

    mag

    e.

    Add

    ition

    al w

    ordi

    ng sh

    ould

    be

    adde

    d.

    E

    dit t

    he p

    olic

    y by

    add

    ing

    the

    sent

    ence

    : R

    equi

    re ri

    prap

    on

    the

    outs

    ide

    face

    of l

    evee

    s fac

    ing

    the

    Bay

    . Afte

    r lar

    ge st

    orm

    s, in

    spec

    t exi

    stin

    g rip

    rap

    on le

    vee

    face

    s. R

    epai

    r and

    repl

    ace

    as n

    eces

    sary

    to p

    rovi

    de

    adeq

    uate

    wav

    e er

    osio

    n pr

    otec

    tion.

    PC

    1/13

    /04

    NH

    -97

    (Fill

    Hei

    ghts

    ) D

    uplic

    ativ

    e w

    ith S

    -15

    (see

    be

    low

    )

    Edi

    t: D

    elet

    e po

    licy

    and

    prog

    ram

    . A

    dd re

    fere

    nce

    to S

    -15

    .

  • IX -

    505

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    PC

    6/29

    /04

    NH

    -99

    (Env

    ironm

    enta

    l R

    esou

    rces

    )

    Say

    “enc

    oura

    ge th

    e pr

    eser

    vatio

    n an

    d co

    nser

    vatio

    n” in

    stea

    d of

    “p

    rote

    ct a

    nd c

    onse

    rve”

    Resp

    onse

    : O

    rigin

    al w

    ordi

    ng is

    in 1

    988

    plan

    . The

    pol

    icy

    shou

    ld b

    e de

    lete

    d as

    it is

    re

    dund

    ant w

    ith o

    ther

    pol

    icie

    s and

    pro

    gram

    s.

    Edit:

    Del

    ete

    polic

    y.

    NH

    -99.

    Env

    iron

    men

    tal R

    esou

    rces

    . Pr

    otec

    t and

    con

    serv

    e th

    e fo

    llow

    ing

    sign

    ifica

    nt

    envi

    ronm

    enta

    l res

    ourc

    es in

    the

    Can

    al:

    •Wet

    land

    s/B

    ayla

    nds i

    nclu

    ding

    the

    San

    Raf

    ael C

    anal

    . •T

    hrea

    tene

    d an

    d en

    dang

    ered

    spec

    ies a

    nd th

    eir h

    abita

    ts.

    Such

    hab

    itats

    incl

    ude

    but a

    re n

    ot li

    mite

    d to

    Eas

    t San

    R

    afae

    l pon

    ds, m

    arsh

    land

    s and

    bay

    land

    s, an

    d (p

    oten

    tially

    ) San

    Que

    ntin

    Rid

    ge.

    •The

    Bay

    shor

    elin

    e.

    •San

    Que

    ntin

    Rid

    ge/h

    illsi

    de.

    • A

    rcha

    eolo

    gica

    l res

    ourc

    es o

    n up

    land

    site

    s. PC

    7/8

    /04

    NH

    -105

    (New

    D

    evel

    opm

    ent)

    Del

    ete

    redu

    ndan

    t phr

    ase

    in

    seco

    nd b

    ulle

    t

    Edit:

    A

    ssur

    ing

    that

    new

    dev

    elop

    men

    t and

    sign

    ifica

    nt

    rem

    odel

    ing

    resp

    ect a

    nd e

    nhan

    ce th

    e ch

    arac

    ter o

    f su

    rrou

    ndin

    g ho

    usin

    g in

    term

    s of d

    ensi

    ty a

    nd d

    esig

    n,

    and…

    Staf

    f N

    H-1

    09 (E

    xist

    ing

    Ret

    ail C

    ente

    rs

    Upg

    rade

    )

    Add

    refe

    renc

    e to

    rede

    velo

    pmen

    t in

    cent

    ive

    in F

    AR

    pol

    icy.

    Edi

    t: A

    dd re

    fere

    nce

    See

    LU-L

    U-9

    (Int

    ensi

    ty o

    f Non

    resi

    dent

    ial D

    evel

    opm

    ent).

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    57-1

    2

    NH

    -110

    (Unu

    sed

    Porti

    ons o

    f the

    Fo

    rmer

    NW

    P R

    ight

    -of

    -Way

    )

    Rev

    ise

    to c

    larif

    y.

    Use

    s of t

    his r

    ight

    -of-

    way

    shou

    ld

    ensu

    re p

    rote

    ctio

    n of

    any

    adj

    acen

    t w

    etla

    nd h

    abita

    ts.

    Ed

    it: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n.

    Unu

    sed

    Port

    ions

    of t

    he F

    orm

    er N

    WP

    SMA

    RT

    Rig

    ht-

    of-W

    ay. E

    ncou

    rage

    use

    , whi

    le e

    nsur

    ing

    prot

    ectio

    n of

    any

    ad

    jace

    nt w

    etla

    nd h

    abita

    t, of

    the

    unus

    ed p

    ortio

    ns o

    f the

    fo

    rmer

    Nor

    thw

    est P

    acifi

    c R

    ailro

    ad ri

    ght -

    of-w

    ay th

    at is

    no

    t par

    t of t

    he n

    ew S

    MA

    RT

    right

    -of-

    way

    incl

    udin

    g th

    e se

    ctio

    n be

    twee

    n D

    ownt

    own

    and

    the

    Lark

    spur

    ferr

    y te

    rmin

    al, t

    o fa

    cilit

    ate

    desi

    red

    rede

    velo

    pmen

    t of a

    djac

    ent

    parc

    els a

    nd a

    n ea

    sem

    ent f

    or th

    e N

    orth

    -Sou

    th b

    ikew

    ay.

  • IX -

    506

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    69-1

    PH

    -45

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k V

    isio

    n A

    sugg

    este

    d re

    visi

    on o

    f the

    V

    isio

    n w

    as su

    bmitt

    ed.

    E

    dit:

    Rev

    ise

    Vis

    ion

    Stat

    emen

    t as s

    how

    n.

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k is

    a u

    niqu

    e, h

    isto

    ric a

    nd w

    alka

    ble

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    in c

    lose

    pro

    xim

    ity to

    Dow

    ntow

    n. I

    t is

    esse

    ntia

    lly b

    uilt-

    out a

    nd w

    ill re

    mai

    n a

    very

    div

    erse

    and

    ac

    tive

    resi

    dent

    ial n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    with

    rela

    tivel

    y lit

    tle

    chan

    ge.

    Futu

    re d

    evel

    opm

    ent w

    ill b

    e lim

    ited

    to sm

    all

    scal

    e in

    fill r

    esid

    entia

    l pro

    ject

    s. O

    ppor

    tuni

    ties s

    houl

    d be

    ta

    ken

    to v

    isua

    lly u

    pgra

    de o

    r rep

    lace

    apa

    rtmen

    t bui

    ldin

    gs

    to b

    e m

    ore

    com

    patib

    le w

    ith th

    e hi

    stor

    ic n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    desi

    gn c

    hara

    cter

    , pre

    serv

    e hi

    stor

    ic st

    ruct

    ures

    and

    ar

    chite

    ctur

    al c

    hara

    cter

    , red

    uce

    impa

    cts o

    f thr

    ough

    -traf

    fic

    on n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    stre

    ets a

    nd to

    rest

    ore

    adeq

    uate

    par

    king

    on

    nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d st

    reet

    s.Edi

    t: R

    evis

    e V

    isio

    n St

    atem

    ent

    as sh

    own.

    69-2

    PH

    -48

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k In

    trodu

    ctio

    n Su

    gges

    ted

    wor

    ding

    “G

    erst

    le

    Park

    has

    thre

    e di

    stin

    ctly

    uni

    que

    neig

    hbor

    s on

    thre

    e si

    des t

    hat

    vary

    in te

    rms o

    f fee

    l, zo

    ning

    , us

    e, a

    nd c

    onge

    stio

    n/tra

    ffic

    ge

    nera

    tion,

    plu

    s the

    ne

    ighb

    orho

    od’s

    Nor

    ther

    n B

    ound

    ary

    is a

    maj

    or

    Tran

    spor

    tatio

    n C

    orrid

    or.”

    La

    st se

    nten

    ce a

    dd su

    gges

    ted

    wor

    ding

    “no

    n-ne

    ighb

    orho

    od

    rela

    ted

    pass

    -thru

    and

    co

    mm

    erci

    al tr

    affic

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    tran

    sitio

    n be

    twee

    n G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    and

    the

    Dow

    ntow

    n is

    m

    entio

    ned

    in th

    e de

    scrip

    tive

    text

    due

    to it

    s im

    porta

    nce

    in th

    e po

    licy

    stat

    emen

    ts w

    hich

    follo

    w.

    It is

    not

    an

    atte

    mpt

    to d

    escr

    ibe

    all t

    he

    boun

    darie

    s of t

    he n

    eigh

    borh

    ood.

    Edi

    t: R

    evis

    e te

    xt (n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    desc

    riptio

    n, P

    age

    109)

    as

    follo

    ws:

    N

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    issu

    es th

    at n

    eed

    to b

    e ad

    dres

    sed

    are

    traff

    ic

    prob

    lem

    s suc

    h as

    lack

    of p

    arki

    ng a

    nd ,e

    xces

    sive

    spee

    d an

    d pr

    otec

    tion

    of n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    stre

    ets f

    rom

    the

    impa

    cts

    of th

    roug

    h-tra

    ffic

    , ade

    quat

    e dr

    aina

    ge, a

    nd m

    aint

    enan

    ce o

    f st

    reet

    s, si

    dew

    alks

    , his

    toric

    pre

    serv

    atio

    n, a

    nd p

    rivat

    e pr

    oper

    ty m

    aint

    enan

    ce.

    PH-1

    37

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k C

    onsi

    der t

    he im

    prov

    emen

    ts fo

    r G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d se

    ctio

    n. C

    hang

    e is

    goo

    d, b

    ut it

    m

    ust b

    e te

    mpe

    red

    and

    reba

    lanc

    ed. S

    ugge

    sted

    to

    proc

    eed

    caut

    ious

    ly.

    Com

    men

    t not

    ed.

    122-

    1 G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    Mor

    e de

    finiti

    ve la

    ngua

    ge

    prov

    idin

    g ac

    know

    ledg

    emen

    t and

    pr

    otec

    tion

    need

    s to

    be in

    clud

    ed

    in th

    e G

    ener

    al P

    lan.

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    lette

    r com

    men

    ts in

    gen

    eral

    term

    s abo

    ut c

    ondi

    tions

    in

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k bu

    t doe

    s not

    requ

    est s

    peci

    fic c

    hang

    es to

    dra

    ft po

    licie

    s an

    d pr

    ogra

    ms.

  • IX -

    507

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    69-3

    PH

    -121

    A

    NH

    -116

    . (N

    ew

    Dev

    elop

    men

    t)-la

    st

    bulle

    t

    Sugg

    este

    d w

    ordi

    ng. “

    Req

    uirin

    g th

    at a

    djac

    ent D

    ownt

    own

    land

    us

    e de

    sign

    atio

    ns a

    nd

    deve

    lopm

    ents

    are

    com

    patib

    le

    with

    and

    pro

    vide

    ade

    quat

    e tra

    nsiti

    on o

    r gat

    eway

    ther

    eby

    not

    infr

    ingi

    ng u

    pon

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k’s

    dist

    inct

    cha

    ract

    er o

    r qua

    lity

    of

    life

    do n

    ot n

    egat

    ivel

    y af

    fect

    the

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    .”

    E

    dit:

    Rev

    ise

    as sh

    own.

    R

    equi

    ring

    that

    adj

    acen

    t Dow

    ntow

    n la

    nd u

    se d

    esig

    natio

    ns

    and

    deve

    lopm

    ents

    are

    com

    patib

    le w

    ith a

    nd d

    o no

    t ne

    gativ

    ely

    affe

    ct th

    e ne

    ighb

    orho

    od a

    nd th

    at se

    nsiti

    ve

    trans

    ition

    s occ

    ur w

    here

    Dow

    ntow

    n de

    velo

    pmen

    t abu

    ts

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    resi

    denc

    es.

    Add

    refe

    renc

    e to

    CD

    -11b

    . (C

    ompa

    tibili

    ty o

    f Pat

    tern

    s),

    revi

    sed

    as fo

    llow

    s: A

    dopt

    des

    ign

    guid

    elin

    es to

    ens

    ure

    com

    patib

    ility

    of n

    onre

    side

    ntia

    l bui

    ldin

    g pa

    ttern

    s.

    Gui

    delin

    es m

    ay a

    ddre

    ss se

    tbac

    k pa

    ttern

    s, pa

    rkin

    g an

    d dr

    ivew

    ay p

    atte

    rns,

    build

    ing

    scal

    e, h

    eigh

    t and

    bui

    ldin

    g st

    epba

    cks,

    trans

    ition

    s bet

    wee

    n co

    mm

    erci

    al a

    nd

    resi

    dent

    ial d

    istri

    cts,

    sign

    age

    and

    land

    scap

    ing.

    Staf

    f N

    H-1

    16. (

    New

    D

    evel

    opm

    ent)-

    seco

    nd b

    ulle

    t

    Con

    firm

    that

    land

    use

    de

    sign

    atio

    ns in

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k do

    no

    t con

    flict

    with

    pol

    icie

    s lim

    iting

    resi

    dent

    ial d

    ensi

    ty a

    nd

    proh

    ibiti

    ng a

    dditi

    onal

    no

    nres

    iden

    tial d

    evel

    opm

    ent.

    Ed

    it: R

    evis

    e as

    show

    n:

    • Pr

    ohib

    iting

    add

    ition

    al n

    onre

    side

    ntia

    l dev

    elop

    men

    t in

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k co

    nsis

    t ent

    with

    exce

    pt a

    s allo

    wed

    in

    zoni

    ng re

    gula

    tions

    .

    69-4

    N

    H-1

    16a

    (Dev

    elop

    men

    t R

    evie

    w P

    roce

    ss)

    Sugg

    este

    d w

    ordi

    ng. “

    Use

    the

    deve

    lopm

    ent r

    evie

    w p

    roce

    ss to

    en

    cour

    age

    desi

    gn a

    nd u

    se

    cons

    iste

    nt w

    ith th

    is p

    olic

    y, a

    nd

    prov

    ide

    spec

    ial a

    ttent

    ion,

    no

    tific

    atio

    n an

    d/or

    requ

    ired

    DR

    B fo

    r gat

    eway

    or c

    orrid

    or

    proj

    ects

    adj

    acen

    t to

    Ger

    stle

    Pa

    rk.”

    Resp

    onse

    : Not

    e pr

    opos

    ed m

    odifi

    catio

    ns a

    bove

    whi

    ch sp

    ecifi

    cally

    re

    fer t

    o de

    sign

    tran

    sitio

    ns b

    etw

    een

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k an

    d D

    ownt

    own

    deve

    lopm

    ent a

    nd th

    e ch

    ange

    to P

    rogr

    am C

    D-1

    1b w

    hich

    cal

    ls fo

    r cr

    eatio

    n of

    des

    ign

    guid

    elin

    es to

    iden

    tify

    desi

    red

    desi

    gn so

    lutio

    ns fo

    r re

    side

    ntia

    l/com

    mer

    cial

    inte

    rfac

    e.

    57-1

    3 N

    H-1

    18 (A

    lber

    t Pa

    rk)

    Polic

    ies s

    houl

    d re

    quire

    the

    Cre

    ek

    in th

    is a

    rea

    to b

    e pr

    otec

    ted

    and

    enha

    nced

    .

    E

    dit:

    Add

    a n

    ew p

    olic

    y an

    d re

    fere

    nces

    as s

    how

    n.

    NH

    -X.

    Mah

    on C

    reek

    . Pr

    eser

    ve a

    nd e

    nhan

    ce M

    ahon

    C

    reek

    . Se

    e C

    ON

    -8a

    (Cre

    ek R

    esto

    ratio

    n), C

    ON

    -8c

    (Tre

    e R

    eten

    tion)

    and

    LU

    -2a

    (Dev

    elop

    men

    t Rev

    iew

    )

  • IX -

    508

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    69-5

    Su

    gges

    ted

    New

    Po

    licy.

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k.

    Sugg

    est w

    ordi

    ng fo

    r new

    pol

    icy

    “Ger

    stle

    Par

    k. C

    omm

    it to

    im

    prov

    emen

    ts th

    at e

    nhan

    ce th

    e co

    mm

    unity

    ’s u

    se o

    f thi

    s ne

    ighb

    orho

    od p

    ark.

    E.g

    . re

    surf

    ace

    the

    tenn

    is c

    ourts

    , re

    pair

    the

    bask

    etba

    ll co

    urts

    , get

    th

    e w

    ater

    foun

    tain

    s wor

    king

    , up

    grad

    e th

    e re

    dwoo

    d gr

    ove

    faci

    litie

    s, an

    d pe

    rhap

    s co

    nsol

    idat

    ed si

    gnag

    e to

    impr

    ove

    appe

    aran

    ce, a

    s wel

    l as e

    ncou

    rage

    so

    lutio

    ns/p

    olic

    ing

    of h

    omel

    ess

    enca

    mpm

    ents

    .”

    Resp

    onse

    : Pol

    icy

    PR-7

    a ca

    lls fo

    r pre

    para

    tion

    of a

    new

    mas

    ter p

    lan

    for G

    erst

    le P

    ark.

    The

    se sp

    ecifi

    c is

    sues

    shou

    ld b

    e br

    ough

    t up

    and

    addr

    esse

    d w

    hen

    such

    a m

    aste

    r pla

    n is

    pre

    pare

    d an

    d pu

    blic

    inpu

    t so

    ught

    .

    69-6

    PH

    -48

    Sugg

    este

    d N

    ew

    Polic

    y Su

    gges

    ted

    wor

    ding

    “Pr

    omot

    e an

    d pl

    an fo

    r Gat

    eway

    at

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    ent

    ranc

    es th

    at

    mig

    ht in

    clud

    e si

    gnag

    e or

    la

    ndsc

    ape,

    traf

    fic c

    alm

    ing

    or

    othe

    r mea

    ns to

    tran

    sitio

    n to

    G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    as a

    resi

    dent

    ial

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    at m

    ain

    stre

    ets o

    f B

    , C, E

    , and

    Woo

    dlan

    d.

    Resp

    onse

    : Sev

    eral

    ass

    ocia

    tions

    had

    ver

    y sp

    ecifi

    c su

    gges

    tions

    for

    entry

    poi

    nts i

    nto

    thei

    r nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    ds.

    Ther

    efor

    e, a

    com

    mon

    pol

    icy

    rega

    rdin

    g N

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    Iden

    tity

    and

    Land

    mar

    ks (N

    H-7

    ) was

    pr

    epar

    ed.

    Spec

    ifics

    wou

    ld b

    e de

    term

    ined

    dur

    ing

    prep

    arat

    ion

    of a

    ne

    ighb

    orho

    od p

    lan.

    Pol

    icy

    CD

    -8 d

    iscu

    sses

    City

    -iden

    tifie

    d ga

    tew

    ays

    show

    n on

    Exh

    ibits

    17

    and

    18.

    The

    gate

    way

    of W

    olfe

    Gra

    de is

    id

    entif

    ied

    in th

    e G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    for f

    urth

    er c

    onsi

    dera

    tion

    and

    enha

    ncem

    ent.

    69-7

    PH

    -48

    Sugg

    este

    d N

    ew

    Polic

    y. S

    hort

    Scho

    ol

    Site

    .

    Sugg

    este

    d w

    ordi

    ng. “

    Shor

    t Sc

    hool

    Site

    . Enc

    oura

    ge a

    nd

    surv

    ey p

    oten

    tial f

    or c

    omm

    unity

    us

    e fir

    st b

    efor

    e co

    nsid

    erat

    ion

    for

    hous

    ing

    and

    even

    then

    onl

    y in

    ke

    epin

    g w

    ith c

    urre

    nt sc

    ale,

    de

    nsity

    and

    arc

    hite

    ctur

    e of

    pr

    edom

    inan

    t nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d ch

    arac

    ter.”

    Resp

    onse

    : Thi

    s is a

    noth

    er is

    sue

    whi

    ch w

    as a

    ddre

    ssed

    in se

    vera

    l ne

    ighb

    orho

    od p

    lans

    and

    was

    con

    solid

    ated

    in P

    olic

    y N

    H-1

    1 Sc

    hool

    s, w

    hich

    says

    : “R

    etai

    n lo

    cal s

    choo

    ls w

    here

    pos

    sibl

    e, b

    ut w

    hen

    reus

    e is

    ne

    cess

    ary,

    hou

    sing

    dev

    elop

    men

    t at p

    reva

    iling

    den

    sitie

    s in

    the

    imm

    edia

    te a

    rea

    shou

    ld b

    e th

    e ap

    prop

    riate

    land

    use

    . W

    here

    it is

    in th

    e co

    mm

    unity

    ’s in

    tere

    st to

    reta

    in p

    ublic

    recr

    eatio

    n, o

    n-si

    te d

    ensi

    ty

    trans

    fers

    will

    be

    allo

    wed

    to th

    e re

    mai

    ning

    scho

    ol si

    te a

    crea

    ge,

    prov

    ided

    the

    resu

    lting

    hou

    sing

    des

    ign

    is c

    ompa

    tible

    with

    the

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    cha

    ract

    er.”

    (em

    phas

    is a

    dded

    )

    75-7

    75

    -13

    Vis

    ion

    of L

    inco

    ln/

    San

    Raf

    ael H

    ill

    Com

    men

    ts re

    gard

    ing

    traff

    ic

    cong

    estio

    n, tr

    affic

    spee

    d, sa

    fety

    an

    d pa

    rkin

    g.

    Resp

    onse

    : G

    ener

    al c

    omm

    ents

    and

    obs

    erva

    tions

    are

    not

    ed.

    Com

    men

    ts a

    re to

    o sp

    ecifi

    c to

    be

    incl

    uded

    in a

    gen

    eral

    pla

    n

  • IX -

    509

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    75-1

    3 V

    isio

    n of

    Li

    ncol

    n/Sa

    n R

    afae

    l H

    ill

    Prop

    osed

    revi

    sion

    s to

    the

    visi

    on

    stat

    emen

    t, in

    clud

    ing

    issu

    es

    rela

    ted

    to re

    tent

    ion

    of lo

    w-

    dens

    ity h

    illsi

    de li

    mita

    tions

    , se

    cond

    uni

    ts, p

    rivac

    y im

    pact

    s of

    new

    dev

    elop

    men

    t, en

    forc

    emen

    t of

    par

    king

    rest

    rictio

    ns, n

    ot

    cons

    ider

    ing

    Linc

    oln

    as a

    “c

    orrid

    or”,

    rete

    ntio

    n of

    the

    nurs

    ery

    and

    mot

    els,

    elim

    inat

    ion

    of p

    oten

    tial f

    or h

    eigh

    t and

    de

    nsity

    bon

    uses

    , miti

    gatio

    n of

    no

    ise

    impa

    cts,

    unde

    rgro

    undi

    ng

    of u

    tiliti

    es, p

    arki

    ng e

    nfor

    cem

    ent

    and

    new

    traf

    fic si

    gnal

    in

    stal

    latio

    n.

    Resp

    onse

    : Th

    e pr

    opos

    ed v

    isio

    n la

    ngua

    ge is

    muc

    h m

    ore

    deta

    iled

    than

    ot

    her n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    visi

    ons.

    No

    chan

    ges a

    re p

    ropo

    sed

    in th

    e lo

    w

    dens

    ity a

    llow

    ance

    s for

    the

    hills

    ide

    area

    s. Is

    sues

    rela

    ted

    to se

    cond

    un

    its h

    ave

    been

    pre

    empt

    ed b

    y st

    ate

    law

    . R

    eten

    tion

    of e

    xist

    ing

    mot

    els

    and

    nurs

    ery

    is a

    ddre

    ssed

    in C

    omm

    ent 7

    5-10

    abo

    ve.

    The

    heig

    ht b

    onus

    co

    ncer

    n is

    add

    ress

    ed in

    Com

    men

    t 98-

    2. D

    ensi

    ty b

    onus

    es a

    re re

    quire

    d to

    be

    offe

    red

    by st

    ate

    law

    .

    PC

    3/23

    /04

    NH

    -119

    (Ped

    estri

    an

    Link

    ages

    ) A

    dd b

    ikes

    to th

    is o

    r a re

    fere

    nce

    to th

    e B

    icyc

    le/P

    ed. M

    aste

    r Pla

    n

    E

    dit:

    Rev

    ise

    as sh

    own.

    Im

    prov

    e bi

    cycl

    e an

    d pe

    dest

    rian

    linka

    ges a

    nd la

    ndsc

    ape

    treat

    men

    t of m

    ajor

    ent

    ry ro

    ads f

    rom

    the

    Dow

    ntow

    n ar

    ea,

    such

    as B

    , C, a

    nd D

    Stre

    ets.

    Add

    refe

    renc

    e to

    Pro

    gram

    C-2

    6a (B

    icyc

    le a

    nd P

    edes

    trian

    Pl

    an Im

    plem

    enta

    tion)

    74-1

    74

    -5

    PH-4

    5 PH

    -48

    NH

    -119

    (Ped

    estri

    an

    Link

    ages

    ) Su

    gges

    ted

    edits

    to p

    olic

    y “I

    mpr

    ove

    pede

    stria

    n lin

    kage

    s an

    d la

    ndsc

    ape

    treat

    men

    t of a

    t m

    ajor

    ent

    ry ro

    ads f

    rom

    the

    Dow

    ntow

    n ar

    ea, s

    uch

    a s B

    , C,

    and

    D S

    treet

    s. Pr

    omot

    e an

    d pl

    an

    for g

    atew

    ays a

    t nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d en

    tranc

    es th

    at w

    ould

    incl

    ude

    sign

    age

    or la

    ndsc

    ape

    desi

    gn to

    tra

    nsiti

    on to

    Ger

    stle

    Par

    k as

    a

    resi

    dent

    ial n

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    at th

    e m

    ain

    stre

    ets o

    f B, C

    , E,,

    and

    Woo

    dlan

    d.”

    Resp

    onse

    : Sam

    e su

    gges

    tions

    as C

    omm

    ent 6

    9-6

    abov

    e.

    74-2

    N

    H-1

    19a

    (Ped

    estri

    an

    Impr

    ovem

    ents

    ) N

    o ed

    it su

    gges

    ted.

    N

    o re

    spon

    se n

    eede

    d.

    74-3

    74

    -7

    PH-4

    5 PH

    -46

    Sugg

    este

    d N

    ew

    Prog

    ram

    . NH

    -119

    b.

    Bic

    ycle

    Im

    prov

    emen

    ts.

    Sugg

    este

    d w

    ordi

    ng “

    Bic

    ycle

    Im

    prov

    emen

    ts. P

    rom

    ote

    plan

    ning

    to a

    ffor

    d G

    erst

    le P

    ark

    bein

    g a

    safe

    pla

    ce to

    bic

    ycle

    …”

    Resp

    onse

    : Thi

    s is a

    n is

    sue

    that

    was

    cov

    ered

    in se

    vera

    l nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d pl

    ans a

    nd w

    as th

    eref

    ore

    craf

    ted

    into

    Pol

    icy

    NH

    -6 B

    icyc

    le a

    nd

    Pede

    stria

    n-Fr

    iend

    ly S

    treet

    s.

  • IX -

    510

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    74-4

    74

    -8

    PH-4

    7

    Sugg

    este

    d N

    ew

    Prog

    ram

    . NH

    -119

    c.

    Traf

    fic

    Impr

    ovem

    ents

    .

    Sugg

    este

    d w

    ordi

    ng. “

    Impl

    emen

    t tra

    ffic

    cal

    min

    g an

    d re

    desi

    gn o

    f tra

    ffic

    to m

    inim

    ize

    conf

    lict

    betw

    een

    vehi

    cles

    , ped

    estri

    ans,

    and

    bicy

    cles

    …”

    Resp

    onse

    : Thi

    s is a

    n is

    sue

    that

    was

    cov

    ered

    in se

    vera

    l nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d pl

    ans a

    nd w

    as th

    eref

    ore

    craf

    ted

    into

    Pol

    icy

    NH

    -5 S

    afe

    Stre

    ets.

    69-8

    PH

    -44

    Sugg

    este

    d N

    ew

    Polic

    y. N

    H-1

    19X

    Su

    gges

    ted

    wor

    ding

    “N

    eigh

    borh

    ood

    Park

    ing.

    Im

    prov

    e pa

    rkin

    g in

    the

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    , con

    duct

    a p

    arki

    ng

    surv

    ey to

    furth

    er e

    valu

    ate

    spec

    ific

    park

    ing

    prob

    lem

    s and

    id

    entif

    y po

    ssib

    le so

    lutio

    ns th

    at

    allo

    w fo

    r stre

    et p

    arki

    ng th

    at d

    oes

    not d

    omin

    ate

    the

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    …”

    Resp

    onse

    : Thi

    s is a

    n is

    sue

    that

    was

    cov

    ered

    in se

    vera

    l nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d pl

    ans a

    nd w

    as th

    eref

    ore

    craf

    ted

    into

    Pol

    icy

    NH

    -8 P

    arki

    ng a

    nd

    Prog

    ram

    s NH

    -8a,

    NH

    -8b,

    NH

    -8c

    and

    NH

    -8d.

    98-2

    PC

    7/8

    /04

    NH

    -120

    (Lin

    coln

    A

    venu

    e)

    LSR

    HN

    A o

    ppos

    es a

    ny a

    ttem

    pt

    to a

    llow

    bui

    ldin

    gs th

    at e

    xcee

    d th

    ree

    stor

    ies t

    o be

    bui

    lt al

    ong

    Linc

    oln

    Ave

    nue.

    O

    ppos

    ed to

    bus

    ines

    s use

    s lar

    ger

    than

    five

    full-

    time

    empl

    oyee

    s w

    ithou

    t maj

    or ju

    stifi

    catio

    n an

    d fu

    ll pu

    blic

    hea

    rings

    . A

    dd re

    fere

    nce

    to L

    U-1

    4 (H

    eigh

    t B

    onus

    es).

    Resp

    onse

    : The

    hei

    ght b

    onus

    for a

    ffor

    dabl

    e ho

    usin

    g al

    ong

    Linc

    oln

    Ave

    nue

    is c

    urre

    nt p

    olic

    y, a

    nd p

    ropo

    sed

    to b

    e ca

    rrie

    d fo

    rwar

    d in

    to

    Gen

    eral

    Pla

    n 20

    20.

    The

    curr

    ent p

    olic

    y al

    so st

    ates

    that

    hei

    ght b

    onus

    es

    may

    be

    gran

    ted

    only

    if th

    e si

    te is

    mor

    e th

    an 1

    50 fe

    et in

    wid

    th a

    nd a

    t le

    ast 2

    0,00

    0 sq

    . ft.

    in si

    ze.

    The

    Stee

    ring

    Com

    mitt

    ee d

    id n

    ot

    reco

    mm

    end

    thes

    e de

    tails

    in k

    eepi

    ng w

    ith a

    mor

    e ge

    nera

    l app

    roac

    h to

    he

    ight

    bon

    uses

    in p

    olic

    y LU

    -14

    and

    Exhi

    bit 9

    (pag

    e 32

    of t

    he d

    raft

    Plan

    ). H

    owev

    er, t

    hese

    spec

    ifics

    are

    reco

    mm

    ende

    d to

    be

    incl

    uded

    in

    the

    zoni

    ng o

    rdin

    ance

    pro

    visi

    on re

    gard

    ing

    a he

    ight

    bon

    us o

    n Li

    ncol

    n A

    venu

    e.

    The

    polic

    y la

    ngua

    ge p

    rohi

    bits

    furth

    er c

    onve

    rsio

    n of

    resi

    dent

    ial u

    nits

    to

    off

    ice

    uses

    . It

    is u

    ncle

    ar w

    heth

    er th

    e co

    mm

    ent i

    s ref

    errin

    g to

    oc

    cupa

    ncy

    of e

    xist

    ing

    offic

    e sp

    ace

    by g

    reat

    er th

    an 5

    em

    ploy

    ees o

    r cr

    eatio

    n of

    add

    ition

    al o

    ffic

    e sp

    ace,

    whi

    ch is

    allo

    wed

    in th

    e O

    ffic

    e/R

    esid

    entia

    l lan

    d us

    e de

    sign

    atio

    n on

    por

    tions

    of t

    he e

    ast s

    ide

    of

    Linc

    oln.

    98-3

    N

    H-1

    20 (L

    inco

    ln

    Ave

    nue)

    A

    ny d

    evel

    opm

    ent i

    s opp

    osed

    th

    at d

    oes n

    ot c

    ompl

    ete

    desi

    gn

    and

    impl

    emen

    tatio

    n of

    par

    king

    sp

    aces

    that

    mee

    ts 1

    00%

    of t

    he

    need

    s of t

    hat d

    evel

    opm

    ent.

    Resp

    onse

    : Pro

    visi

    on o

    f req

    uire

    d on

    -site

    par

    king

    in n

    ew d

    evel

    opm

    ent

    is a

    giv

    en.

    Prog

    ram

    NH

    8d a

    lso

    requ

    ires t

    hat p

    arki

    ng re

    quire

    men

    ts in

    th

    e Zo

    ning

    Ord

    inan

    ce b

    e re

    view

    ed a

    nd u

    pdat

    ed fo

    r ade

    quac

    y.

    98-4

    N

    H-1

    20 (L

    inco

    ln

    Ave

    nue)

    Th

    e C

    ity sh

    ould

    be

    mor

    e rig

    orou

    s in

    notic

    ing

    delin

    quen

    t ca

    rs a

    nd d

    river

    s and

    enf

    orci

    ng

    curr

    ent,

    rele

    vant

    ord

    inan

    ces.

    Resp

    onse

    : Enf

    orce

    men

    t iss

    ues s

    houl

    d be

    rais

    ed w

    ith th

    e ne

    ighb

    orho

    od’s

    Com

    mun

    ity P

    olic

    e O

    ffic

    er.

  • IX -

    511

    IV.

    NE

    IGH

    BO

    RH

    OO

    DS

    EL

    EM

    EN

    T

    Com

    men

    t #

    Polic

    y/Pr

    ogra

    m

    Com

    men

    t R

    espo

    nse

    Rec

    omm

    enda

    tion

    35-1

    14

    4-8

    & 9

    18

    3-1

    Loch

    Lom

    ond

    Vis

    ion

    Cha

    nge

    “res

    iden

    tial u

    ses”

    to

    “res

    iden

    tial a

    rea”

    Th

    e Lo

    ch L

    omon

    d vi

    sion

    st

    atem

    ent i

    s not

    con

    sist

    ent w

    ith

    neig

    hbor

    hood

    des

    ires.

    Th

    e vi

    sion

    s of o

    ther

    ne

    ighb

    orho

    ods r

    efle

    ct th

    e de

    sire

    s of

    thos

    e ne

    ighb

    orho

    ods f

    or

    prot

    ectio

    n.

    Resp

    onse

    : Se

    e pr

    opos

    ed e

    dit b

    elow

    .

    The

    visi

    on e

    xpre

    ssed

    by

    the

    Stee

    ring

    Com

    mitt

    ee fo

    r eac

    h ne