Investigation of the Catalytic Activity of Plasma- Treated Fe, Ni, and Co Foil for Water Splitting Nick Lavrov, Olivia Watson
Dec 14, 2015
Investigation of the Catalytic Activity of Plasma-Treated
Fe, Ni, and Co Foil for Water Splitting
Nick Lavrov, Olivia Watson
Introduction• Increasing evidence for climate change,
increasing cost of fossil fuels, and diminishing natural resources motivate today’s alternative energy research.
• An ideal alternative energy would be cost-effective and renewable.
• Our project focuses on storing solar energy in chemical bonds, using the body of research in surface science and electrochemical catalysis as our platform.
2
Introduction• A common mechanism used to store
energy from sunlight is called the water splitting reactionH2O O2 + H2 (E0 =1.23 V)
• Reactive groups called oxides and (oxy)hydroxides can improve the efficiency of oxygen production
• Plasma (ionized gas) can be used to grow thin layers of these materials on metal electrode surfaces
3
Sample Processing Procedure● Measure, cut and clean foils by sonication in
acetone, ethanol, and water, then load and ground sample.
● Turn on water cooling, leak in Ar gas, and ignite plasma to sputter.
● Main treatment:○ Leak in Ar or O2, then H2O○ Heat sample with resistive heating.○ Turn up ion energy and treat for 5-15
minutes.● Break vacuum with N2 gas between runs.
4
Electrochemistry•Electrolyte solution was a solution
of 1M NaHCO3 (NaHCO3 solid
dissolved in DI water).•Sample mounted as the working electrode, platinum coil counter electrode,Ag/AgCl (4 M KCl) reference electrode•Active area of samples marked off using chemically-resistant tape from 3M
5
Results
• For each foil, we implemented some of the following characterization techniques:
Linear Sweep Voltammetry Raman Spectroscopy X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
6
Linear Sweep Voltammetry• Current at working electrode
is measured while potential between the working electrode and the reference electrode is swept linearly in time.
7
Tafel Plot• Voltammetry data is
converted to fit the Tafel equation.
• From the graph we can extract the Tafel slope and exchange current density parameters.
8
Raman Spectroscopy• “Fingerprinting” method to identify
the unique inelastic scattering of monochromatic light by chemical bonds
• Instrument contains optical microscope, useful for initial assessment of changes in surface appearance
9
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
• Analysis technique that focuses X-ray beam on a surface to eject electrons
• Energy of ejected electron gives information about how tightly it was bound to its atom
• Every atom has a specific corresponding pattern of electrons at various energy levels
10
Scanning Electron Microscopy• Special type of microscope that
focuses an electron beam on a surface to give a topographical image of a sample
• SEM has many advantages over light microscopes including: greater depth of field, allow more of a surface image to be in focus at once; very high resolution; very high magnification
11
Fe Foil Color Changes• At RT, unchanged• At 200°C and 250°C, gold• At 300°C and 450°C, blue• Tempering colors due to thin film interference of
iron oxide.
12
13
1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 20E+00
1E-05
2E-05
3E-05
4E-05
5E-05
6E-05
7E-05
8E-05
0kV, 450C
0.1kV, 150C
BLANK
2kV, 250C
2kV, 250C
1kV, 20C
Iron Linear Voltammetry
Volts vs RHE
Cu
rren
t D
ensi
ty (
A/m
m2)
14
15
SEM: Fe surfaces
50 000x ; 5x5 μm• Very strong morphological differences between untreated Fe and
hematite; hematite grain size ~160 nm.• No obvious morphological difference in magnetite. 16
Untreated Fe Hematite Magnetite
1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 20E+00
1E-05
2E-05
3E-05
4E-05
5E-05
6E-05
7E-05
8E-05
9E-05
1E-04
1kV
Nickel Linear Voltammetry
Volts vs RHE
Cu
rren
t D
ensi
ty (
A/m
m2)
17
SEM: Ni surfaces
• No obvious morphological differences
18
Untreated Ni25 000x 10x10 μm
Treated Ni20 000x 13 x 13 μm
Ni: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
oxide
XPS data confirms an increasing presence of oxidized Ni with samples treated
with O2/H2O plasma. An increased XPS oxide peak corresponds to a small
cathodic shift in water oxidation onset potential.19
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 20
0.00002
0.00004
0.00006
0.00008
0.0001
0.00012
0.00014
1.6 kV
1.4 kV
1.2 kV
1.0 kV
0.5 kV
Cobalt Linear Scan (300C)
Volts vs RHE
Cu
rre
nt
De
ns
ity
(A
/mm
2)
20
-6.5 -6 -5.5 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.6
1.4
1.2
Cobalt Tafel Plot (300C)
Log Current Density
Ov
erp
ote
nti
al (
V)
21
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
-10
-9.5
-9
-8.5
-8
-7.5
-7
-6.5
-6
Exchange current density (I0) vs Ion Energy
Ion Energy (kV)
Lo
g E
xc
ha
ng
e C
urr
en
t D
en
sit
y (
I0)
22
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Tafel slope (A) vs Ion energy
Ion Energy (kV)
Ta
fel S
lop
e (
V/d
ec
ad
e)
23
Co: Raman Spectroscopy
expected peaks at 191, 470, 510, 608, 675 cm-124
Co: Raman Spectroscopy
Co sample 5Co blank Co sample 4
Images taken at 10x magnification during Raman spectroscopy25
SEM: Co surfaces
There are many scattered grains across the surface of sample 4, compared to sample 5, which has none.
Co sample 425,000 x10 x 10 µm
Co sample 525,000 x10 x 10 µm
26
SEM: Co surfaces
There are not any obvious morphological differences between the two Co samples at a higher magnification.
Co sample 450,000 x5 x 5 µm
Co sample 550,000 x5 x 5 µm
27
Conclusions
• Plasma treatment seems to be localized to surface and thus too thin to be characterized with Raman spectroscopy
• Plasma treatment is complex, with many parameters to optimize
• Future experiments would involve exploring other regimes of plasma treatment including increasing sputtering time, hydrogen plasma, chamber pressure.
28
Appendix
Gen2 Tectra® Plasma Source
● Microwave plasma source with magnets at 0.0875T to enhance plasma by ECR.● Hybrid mode.● One positive grid to accelerate ions to grounded sample by controlling ion energy.● High vacuum chamber kept at 10^(-6) Torr.
FARADAY CUP● Aperture of 3mm^2● Biased to 54V● Connected in series to picoammeter to
measure current at sample location in relation to ion energy and pressure.
● Materials: stainless steel, sapphire ceramic, tantalum wire.
30
Ion Beam Characterization ● Variables:
○ Gas: argon, oxygen, water vapor○ Gas mixture○ Partial and total pressure ( 0 - 1.0 mTorr )○ Ion Energy
Ar (mTorr) O2 (mTorr) H2O (mTorr)
1:1 0.46 0.45 0.42
2:3 0.46 0.3 0.75
31
Pure Plasma ResultsSputtering Conditions:- 1 kV- 10 minutes- 0.46 mTorr- Room Temperature- Used water contactangle to confirm surface cleaning.
32
Mixed Plasma Ion Flux
33