Top Banner
Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”
10

Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Meghan Fisher
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Interactivity Principle

“People learn better when they can control the pace of

presentation than when they receive a continuous

presentation.”

Page 2: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

It’s Good to Listen to Old Proverbs

“Tell me, and I'll forget. Show me, and I may not remember. Involve me, and I'll

understand.”

-Proverb

Page 3: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Dale Says It’s Good to Interact

Page 4: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Cool! Pacing Control

Studies have shown that allowing learners to control the pace of WBL programs can improve learning.

Sweet! Now this presentation is officially “Interactivity principle” compliant!

Page 5: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Pacing is for LosersGive Me Some Examples

Let’s learn how to say “good night” in Japanese

“Oyasuminasai”

Page 6: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Piece of Cake Right?

So can you say “good night” in Japanese now? I bet you’d be better at it if you could go back and

repeatedly listen to it. So looks like letting the learner interact by

controlling pace really can help learning after all you unbeliever!

Page 7: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

But isn’t There More to WBL and Interactivity than Pacing?

Interpersonal Interactivity Support for distributed cognition

Content Interactivity Dimensions (Sims, Roderick. Interactivity: A Forgotten Art?. [Online] Available

http://intro.base.org/docs/interact/, January 27, 1997.)

Engagement (instruction versus navigation) Control (user versus program) Concept (reactive, proactive, immersive)

Page 8: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Some Examples

Navigation Linear Branching Open

Feedback Assessment and

remediation Update and individualize

content

Page 9: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Some Cool Examples

Simulation Immersion

Click on the image to play the video clip

Page 10: Interactivity Principle “People learn better when they can control the pace of presentation than when they receive a continuous presentation.”

Now for the Excellent and Highly Interactive Assessment

Please answer the following questions:

1. What is the meaning of the “interactivity principle”?

2. Is it useful relative to WBL? Justify your answer.

Unfortunately the super AI program used to synchronously analyze assessment question responses and dynamically adjust the presentation to be perfectly inline with the learner’s current needs is experiencing technical difficulties due mainly in part to it’s non-existence.