Top Banner
MMDG III-17 BSE ENGLISH
15
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

MMDG III-17 BSE ENGLISH

Page 2: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

LAST TIME:

We discussed about TEXTUAL ENHANCEMENT as a tool to focus

on grammar in communicative

context…

Page 3: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

This approach was concerned with raising learners’ attention to

grammatical forms by making target forms perceptually more salient through typographical

manipulation of certain aspects of the input.

Page 4: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

TODAY:

We will discuss

Page 5: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

This approach is based on an interactionist perspective to SLA

and the assumption that negotiated interaction (i.e., interactional

modifications made in the course of conversation) is essential for

language acquisition.

Page 6: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG
Page 7: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG
Page 8: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

How? Through:

clarification requests,

confirmation checks,

repetition,

recasts, etc.,

(e.g., Gass, 2003; Gass&Varonis, 1994; Long, 1991, 1996; Pica, 1994, 1998).

Page 9: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG
Page 10: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

Corrective feedback refers to utterances that indicate to the learner that his or her output is erroneous in some way (Lightbown&Spada, 1999). Also called negative

evidence

Page 11: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

In order to learn language, children rely mainly on some innate principles, or what is called

(e.g., Chomsky, 1965).

Page 12: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

L1-based studies have provided strong evidence that negative feedback exists in child–parent interactions and that it contributes to L1 development (see Mitchell & Myles,

2004, for a review).

L2 acquisition, researchers have argued that similar innate principles to those suggested to be available to L1 learners are also available fully or partially to L2 learners and that L2 learners do not need negative evidence,

or if they do, it is only in rare cases where positive evidence is not enough to trigger the UG principles (e.g., Flynn, 1996; Schwartz,

1993).

Page 13: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

However, although such a perspective exists in the field of L2 acquisition, the majority of SLA researchers believe that L2 learning is different from child L1 learning, and that adult L2 learners cannot develop native-like accuracy simply on the basis of exposure to positive evidence or models of grammatical input

(e.g., Carroll & Swain, 1993; DeKeyser, 1998; Doughty & Long, 2003; R. Ellis, 2001a; R. Ellis, Loewen, &Erlam, 2006; Mackey, Oliver, &Leeman, 2003; Pica, 2002).

Page 14: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG

Therefore, L2 learners need both negative and positive feedback in order to acquire an L2 successfully.

Page 15: Interactional Feedback intro and TH BG