Integrated Project Presentation

8/23/2019 Integrated Project Presentation

1/41

INTEGRATED PROJECT:

GROUP 2Presentation 29/05/2013

Topic: Redevelopment of business park on outskirts of

Cwmbran

Jonathan Venus

Mitchell Waters

Mugtaba Mohammed -

Abdulrahman Alotaibi -

Shaun Hussey -


2/41

PROJECT OVERVIEW: BUILDING

SPECIFICATIONS BUILDING 1 12 STOREY, 190 BEDROOMS, GROUND FLOOR

FFL 12.00M

BUILDING 2 SINGLE STOREY, RESTAURANT, BASEMENT FFL

8.00M, GROUND FLOOR FFL 12.00M

BUILDING 3 3 STOREY, RECEPTION, LOUNGE BAR,MANAGERS ACCOMODATION, GROUND FLOOR FFL 12.00M

BUILDING 4 SINGLE STOREY, 4.5M MIN CEILING HEIGHTCONFERENCE ROOMS, MULTI USE SPACE, GROUND FLOORFFL 12.00M


3/41

TASK 1: SELECTING APPROPRIATE

SUPERSTRUCTURE (3 & 4)

MITCH WATERS CONTRIBUTION

Building 4 & Building 3 roofBuilding 4

Open Spaced, Hall

Portal FrameBuilding 3 Roof

Glulam

Extremely Strong, Very Durable,

Less maintenance than

timer,

Less material is wasted.

Suitable for long span, load-bearing

widths,

Exceptionally strong material,

Aesthetically pleasing.

Steel


4/41

JONATHAN VENUS CONTRIBUTION

Building 3 & Stream diversion



3 storey Reception, lounge bar,

managers accommodation

Requirements

25 Year life span

Environmentally efficient

Low maintenance

Considerations

Noise pollution to adjoining

conference

rooms/managers

accommodation

Fire resistance

Thermal stability ofstructure

Aesthetically pleasing


5/41

Building 3

Superstructure

Cross wall construction

Why?

Pre fabricated build/faster construction time

Virtually maintenance free

Superb sound insulation

Fully utilises the thermal mass properties of concrete

Concrete has impeccable fire resistance characteristics

Saves money


6/41

Building 3

Method of construction

Cross wall construction


7/41

Use of existing stream as a power

source


8/41

Why?

Highly efficient energy source

Reliable energy source

Cost effective energy solution Can be integrated with national grid

Generates clean electricity

Robust engineering systems give easilyachievable life spans of up to 50 years


9/41



SHAUN HUSSEY CONTRIBUTIONBuilding 3 & 4 Google Sketchup: core principles

of methods


10/41

Visual example of the

principles of the chosen

construction methods.

Steel portal frame Concrete cross wall

Interior look of the proposed

construction method of the

superstructure building 4

Bracing following slide

support


11/41

Wind bracing

Stability

Positioning

Direction

Connected to building 3

Visual example of the main

principle core basis of cross

wall construction.


12/41

Finally, plan view of building 3& 4.

Roof structure

Internal view of core basis

of cross wall construction


13/41



ABDULRAHMAN ALOTAIBI CONTRIBUTION

Building 3 durability & stability of concrete

MUGTABA MOHAMMED CONTRIBUTION

Pros & Cons of using brick & mortar


14/41


SUBSTRUCTURE


Site investigation, Reduced levels, Bolted

connections

Site investigationReduced levels and Sections

Bolted Connections

Borehole Logs

On site test

Laboratories

experiments

Section 6.5.9 of the

euro-codes.

F=P/A.

F = Shear yield

stress

P = Load acting

on the individual

Bolt

A = Area ( d2/4)


15/41


SUBSTRUCTURE


Building 3 foundations, Stream diversion

Reinforced concrete strip foundation


16/41

Alternative foundations

Piling foundations

Why?

Mitigation of any potential radon

gas inhalation within the area as

proposed in the site investigation

Negates the need to work belowground level/mitigating associated

risks

Will not compromise structural

stability of adjacent foundation

excavation/building 4


17/41

Reason for choosing alternative foundation methodCriteria Location Who is at

risk?

Conseque

nce

Risk

before

mitigati

on

Available Mitigation Measure Risk after

mitigation

S L R Preliminary

decision

Detailed

design

Construction S L R

Deep

excavation

trench

Building 3 Constructi

on staff

Risk of

collapsing

excavation

Risks

associate

with

working in

confined

spaces

4 2 8 Considerati

on given to

the use of

piling

techniques

to allow

foundation

works to be

completed

aboveground.

Discussio

ns held

with the

ECI

contracto

r

The use of soil

displacement piles

is preferred to

allow works to be

carried out above

ground level

2 1 2

Contaminated

ground

Radon gas

present

Whole site Constructi

on staff

Risk of

inhalation

Health

risks to

constructi

on staff

3 3 9 Analysis of

borehole

samples

taken from

site as part

of

geotechnic

al

investigatio

n

Discussio

ns held

with ECI

contracto

r

Piling technique

will avert the need

for construction

staff to enter

excavation

beneath ground

level

1 1 2

Severity (S)

1 Minor injury, sickness or damage

2 First aid injury or lost time illness

3 Reportable injury, sickness or substantial

damage

4 Major injury, amputation or long term

absence

5 Fatal injury, Catastrophic damage

Likelihood (L)

1 Very low

2 Low

3 Possible

4 Likely

5 Very likely

Risk Rating (R) = L x S

R 8 Low risk

8 R 15 Medium risk

R 15 High risk


18/41


SUBSTRUCTURE

SHAUN HUSSEY CONTRIBUTION

Building 4 foundations, Wind bracing

PAD FOUNDATIONS

GROUND CONDITIONS - Stable in the area,Portal frame has intermittent columns,

Traditional method.

HEALTH & SAFETY Plant used by trainedemployees, high visibility jackets, signage, PPE

SUSTAINABILITY Concrete is durable, less

concrete required than other methods


19/41


Pre-start investigation, Site management,Personnel, Site access & deliveries, Site

logistics, Security & site establishment

TASK 3: METHOD STATEMENT


20/41

Method Statement

Pre-Start Investigation

Site Logistics

Security and Site Establishment

Site Management

Personnel

Site Access and Deliveries

The Existing Site Levels, The previous history of the site

for any exciting services present,

The conditions of the

surroundings and site,

Site access,

Cranes,

Forklift trucks,

Scaffolding.

Senior Building Manager Site personnel

Building manager

Project surveyor

Head office

Heras fencing ,

Locked containers,

Temporary site office,

Suitable eating areas.

Companies Health and Safety

regulations

Specific site rules, Must be

followed.

Vehicle Rules and Health and

Safety regulations.

Directions from main office

No deliveries during rush hour


21/41

JONATHAN VENUS CONTRIBUTIONCo-ordination of task, Construction,

Substructure, Structure



22/41


Alterations to existing buildings, External

works, Post contract support, Reportingprocedures


Necessity of method efficiency, understanding, organisation Health & safety more organised = safer work environment


23/41


Opening introduction, General issues, planningprogramme

MUGTABA MOHAMMED CONTRIBUTIONSignage, Storage, Scaffolding, Safety



24/41

TASK 4: CAR PARKING, DRAINAGE &

RETAINING WALLMITCHELL WATERS CONTRIBUTION

Car park layout, Public transport,disabled spaces, Pedestrian

pathways

Public Transport

Disabled Spaces

Pedestrian Pathways

Car Park Layout

Separate from vehicle routes

2m width for prams, wheelchairs, etc.

Side rails used to aid the partially sighted

Buffed red tactiles used at uncontrolled

crossings

4.8x6.0m width and length,

6% of total spaces will be for

disabled spaces = 13 spaces.

Very good public transport,

Two buses run past the site,

Buses run every 15 minutes,

Possible to assume people will

arrive by public transport.


25/41


RETAINING WALL

JONATHAN VENUS CONTRIBUTIONFlexible pavement investigation, determination of

methodDesign considerations

20 Msa

Wearing course

Road base

Sub base

Total design thickness (260mm)

Consisting of :

Dense Tar Macadam (160mm thick)

High Density Macadam (50mm thick)

Hot Rolled Asphalt (50mm)

Measurement of

subgrade CBR

Foundation design

Traffic evaluation

Structural layer

design

Surfacing design


26/41


RETAINING WALLSHAUN HUSSEY CONTRIBUTION

Surface water run off, Related legislations

CHOSEN METHOD: SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGESYSTEM (SUDS)

DURABLE

CAPABLE OF RECEIVING LARGE CAPACITY OFDRAINAGE MATERIALS POOR WEATHER

CONDITIONS POSSIBLE?

SUSTAINABLE REMOVES POLLUTANTS

VARIOUS LEGISLATION ALL REQUIRED TO BE

COMPLIED WITHIN


27/41

CHOSEN METHOD: SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGESYSTEM (SUDS)

DURABLE

CAPABLE OF RECEIVING LARGE CAPACITY OFDRAINAGE MATERIALS POOR WEATHERCONDITIONS POSSIBLE?

SUSTAINABLE REMOVES POLLUTANTS VARIOUS LEGISLATION ALL REQUIRED TO BE

COMPLIED WITHIN


28/41


RETAINING WALL


Retaining wall


Materials related to flexible pavements


29/41

TASK 5: HEALTH & SAFETY CDM

REGULATIONS

MITCHELL WATERS CONTRIBUTIONDealing with subcontractors, Inexperienced

clients, Projects requiring CDM co-ordinator,

Projects not requiring CDM co-ordinator


30/41

Projects not requiring a CDM coordinator

Dealing With Sub-Contractors or Sub-Consultants

Inexperienced Clients

Projects requiring a CDM coordinator

Select a suitable subcontractor

Assess the risks of the work

Do a risk assessment Provide information, instruction and training

to your employees

Set up liaison arrangements for co-operation

and co-ordination

Decide what you need to do to manage and

supervise

It is important that the designer

makes an effort to explain the

benefits and consequences for

the clients requests and actions.

Meetings can be used to outline and

address the problems that might occurwhich:

could have an adverse effect on the

health or safety of others

may impinge on the statutory obligations

of designers

may adversely affect the project

Responsibilities fall to the designer tocheck that the clients are aware of

their duties.

In certain circumstances the designer

can use their competent adviser to

assist with helping the client with

disscussions.


31/41


REGULATIONS

JONATHAN VENUS CONTRIBUTIONFoundations for building 3Radon gas, Side

collapse, Adjacent structures, Designers risk

assessment


32/41

DESIGNERS RISK ASSESSMENTCriteria Location Who is at

risk?

Consequenc

e

Risk

before

mitigatio

n

Available Mitigation Measure Risk after

mitigation

S L R Preliminary

decision

Detailed

design

Construction S L R

Deep

excavation

trench

Building

3

Construction

staff

Risk of

collapsing

excavation

Risksassociate

with working

in confined

spaces

4 2 8 Consideration

given to the

use of piling

techniques toallow

foundation

works to be

completed

above

ground.

Discussions

held with

the ECI

contractor

The use of

soil

displacemen

t piles ispreferred to

allow works

to be carried

out above

ground level

2 1 2

Contaminat

ed groundRadon gas

present

Whole

site

Construction

staff

Risk of

inhalationHealth risks

to

construction

staff

3 3 9 Analysis of

boreholesamples

taken from

site as part of

geotechnical

investigation

Discussions

held withECI

contractor

Piling

techniquewill avert the

need for

construction

staff to enter

excavation

beneath

ground level

1 1 2


33/41


REGULATIONS


Construction phase health & safety plan

Site inductionContact details

Key dates

Essential details of site investigation

Management of work

Welfare facilities & First aid

Risk assessments

Site rules must be followed!

Fire & Emergency procedures

Health & Safety file


34/41


REGULATIONS


Background, Major risks

MUGTABA MOHAMMED CONTRIBUTIONTask co-ordination, Hazard elimination


35/41

TASK 6: PROGRAMMEMITCHELL WATERS CONTRIBUTION

Bomb procedures, Assisted Mugtaba & Jonathan

Bomb Procedure

1. Make sure nobody touches or goes

near.

2. Inform the Police, giving;

3. Location of the site; the connection to

the main offsite drain.4. Contract Managers name.

5. Description of the object.

6. Notify employer and the reception of

the situation and that the police have

been alerted.

Evacuated personnel move to a

safe place e.g. behind a solid wall

Prevent radio/telephone

transmissions within 50 metres of

the suspect package. If directed, utilise any available

manpower to set up a cordon

around the suspected area out of

line of sight of the item.

Make written notes and a sketch

plan of the suspicious itemslocation as soon as possible.

The person who made the

discovery and who initiated the

alert is to remain in the areato brief

Police upon their arrival with the

notes and plan.

DEVON PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 2013 HR29 Security and Safety Policy

[www]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:w

ww.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombT

hreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk (5/3/2013).

TASK 6 PROGRAMME
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ukhttp://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nBTty0vgt6QJ:www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/tx_mocarticles/HR29_Appx1_BombThreat_Sep11.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk


36/41

TASK 6: PROGRAMME


Gannt chart, Activity on arrow diagram


37/41

Activity on arrow

Diagram


38/41

TASK 6: PROGRAMME


The sub-contractor supplying and fixing the

structural frame for building 3 has become

bankrupt and is unable to complete the

contractresolution?


39/41

RESOLUTION

INITIAL PROBLEMS THIS CAUSES Structuralframe is now not going to be delivered orfitted, Site works are restricted

Required to contact next contractor availabledetermined through the procurement period are they still available?

IMPLICATIONS TO CONSTRUCTION

PROGRAMME - Plant, Labour, Materials

RESPONSIBILITIES Contractor left withresponsibility


40/41

TASK 6: PROGRAMME


A fire occurs in building 4 which severely

damages the interiorresolution?


During the excavation to the main offside drain,an unexploded bomb is exposedresolution?


41/41

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO THE

GROUPS PRESENTATION

FINALLY,

ANY QUESTIONS ARE WELCOMED

Integrated Project Presentation

Documents