Shinichi Sakurai, Bureau of Economic Geology T.S. Ramakrishnan, Austin Boyd and Nadja Muller Schlumberger Doll Research Tom Daley, Mike Hoversten and John Peterson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Shinichi Sakurai, Bureau of Economic Geology T.S. Ramakrishnan, Austin Boyd and Nadja Muller Schlumberger Doll Research Tom Daley, Mike Hoversten and John Peterson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Photo by Spud Miller Geologic – Frio Brine Field Project (1) Integrated evaluation for measuring, monitoring, and verifying CO 2 distribution
21
Embed
Integrated evaluation for measuring, monitoring, and verifying ... Pubs/GCCC...Tom Daley, Mike Hoversten and John Peterson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Photo by Spud Miller
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Shinichi Sakurai, Bureau of Economic Geology
T.S. Ramakrishnan, Austin Boyd and Nadja MullerSchlumberger Doll Research
Tom Daley, Mike Hoversten and John PetersonLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Shinichi Sakurai, Bureau of Economic Geology
T.S. Ramakrishnan, Austin Boyd and Nadja MullerSchlumberger Doll Research
Tom Daley, Mike Hoversten and John PetersonLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Photo by Spud Miller
Geologic – Frio Brine Field Project (1)
Integrated evaluation for measuring, monitoring, and verifying CO2 distribution
Photo by Spud Miller
Acknowledgements• DOE/NETL
• Sandia Technology
• Core Laboratories, Inc
• Susan Hovorka
• DOE/NETL
• Sandia Technology
• Core Laboratories, Inc
• Susan Hovorka
BureauofEconomic
Geology
Photo by Spud Miller
Outline
• New Injection Well – Core & Wireline Log
• Monitor CO2 Distribution– Monitor by PNC– Tie with Geophysics Data
• Conclusions
Outline
• New Injection Well – Core & Wireline Log
• Monitor CO2 Distribution– Monitor by PNC– Tie with Geophysics Data
• Conclusions
Photo by Spud Miller
* 3 Conventional CoresAnahuac Shale
C Sand
5400 ft Sand
* 3 Conventional CoresAnahuac Shale
C Sand
5400 ft Sand
Cores Cut and Objectives
Seal Rock PropertyTests by Oak Ridge, LLNL, LBNL & CSIRO
Reservoir QualityK & Φ for Model InputCO2 injection test
Available for Frio II Work
Seal Rock PropertyTests by Oak Ridge, LLNL, LBNL & CSIRO
Reservoir QualityK & Φ for Model InputCO2 injection test
Available for Frio II Work
Observation Well
Not Continuous Shale
Change Perforation In the Upper C sandstone
Core Description & Perforation Interval
Injection Well
Mid C Sand Shale ?Mid C Sand Shale
Perf. In Lower C sand
Sandy silt
K ~ 100 md
Core Analysis & Reservoir Description
Update input of simulation model
• Higher Φ & K
• New perforation
•Understand Reservoir Quality
•Old Estimates from publication
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
0 10 20 30 40Porosity (%)
Perm
eabi
lity
(md)
Hydrologic test
~ 2,400 md
Sakurai et al., SPWLA, 2005
•Conventional Analysis made @ 1800 psi
Special Core Analysis for Reservoir QualityCapillary Pressure