The Proceedings of International e-Learning Conference 2015
July 20-21, 2015BITEC Bangna, Bangkok, Thailand
Thailand Cyber University Project, Office of the Higher Education Commission
http://iec2015.thaicyberu.go.th
The Sixth TCU International e-Learning Conference 2015 Global Trends in Digital Learning
July 20-21, 2015 BITEC Bangna, Bangkok, Thailand http://iec2015.thaicyberu.go.th
#IEC2015Thailand
15.10 – 15.30 Refreshment Break Session D2 15.30 – 15.50 Systems Analysis of Risk Assessment for Moodle Learning
in a LAMP Environment from Log Files Preecha Pangsuban Prachyanun Nilsook Panita Wannapiroon King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand
D2_1
Page 211
15.50 – 16.10
The Analysis of the Quality of Learning Achievement of the Students Enrolled in Introduction to Programming with Visual Basic 2010 Thitima Chuangchai Charan Sanrach King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand
D2_2
Page 217
16.10 – 16.30
The Effect of Using Learning Model through Internet Network on Constructivist of Media Innovation and Information Technology for Educational Communication Subject of Undergraduate Students at Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University Surin Cortong Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, Thailand Saroch Sopheerak Kasetsart University, Thailand
D2_3
Page 226
16.30 – 16.50
Instructional Design of a Flipped Classroom through a Scientific Inquiry Learning Process using a Social Cloud Model Piyawadee Pongsawat Panita Wannapiroon Prachyanun Nilsook King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand
D2_4
Page 235
Day 1: July 20, 2015
Instructional Design of a Flipped Classroom
through a Scientific Inquiry Learning Process using a Social Cloud Model
Piyawadee Pongsawat
1, Panita Wannapiroon
2 and Prachyanun Nilsook
3
123Ph.D. Program in Information and Communication Technology of Education,
Faculty of Technical Education
King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
([email protected], [email protected] , [email protected])
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was (1) to
design a flipped classroom through a
scientific inquiry learning process using a
social cloud model, and (2) to assess the
relevance and value of such a model. The
sample consisted of five experts selected
by purposive sampling. Each possessed at
least five years’ experience in instruction
design, flipped classroom and scientific
inquiry learning processes. Tools were
used to assess the suitability of the model,
including were arithmetic mean and
standard deviation. There were two stages
of learning: Stage 1 preparation before
class, and Stage 2 the learning process
both outside and inside the flipped
classroom. Learning outside the
classroom through social cloud media was
divided into four stages: 1 Elicitation, 2
Engagement, 3 Study and research, and 4
Summary of the learning. Learning in the
classroom was also divided into four
stages: 1 Presentation of knowledge, 2
Elaboration, 3 Extension phase, and 4
Evaluation. The students were evaluated
by five experts to assess the instructional
model. Comments on the model were used
to develop the most appropriate overviews
( x = 4.67, S.D.= 0.51).
Keywords: Flipped Classroom Model,
Scientific Inquiry Learning, Social Cloud
Model
1) INTRODUCTION
The Thai education system is based on the
National Education Act 2542. Amendment
(No. 2) of the Act 2545, section 22 states
that education shall be based on the principle
that all learners are capable of learning and
self-development, and are regarded as being
most important. The teaching-learning
process shall aim at enabling the learners to
develop themselves at their own pace and to
their best potential. Section 24 is aimed at
promoting instructors to create the
ambiance, environment, instructional media,
and facilities for learning, and to benefit
from research as part of the learning process.
Both learners and teachers may therefore
learn together from different types of
teaching-learning media and other
knowledge sources.
The flipped classroom is a model for
instruction. Classroom lectures and
homework switch places, allowing students
to plan and control their own learning from
outside the classroom. The results are
presented and discussed, and learning
activities and tasks are completed together in
class with the teacher providing input/advice
(Bergmann & Sams, 2012).
Students engage in learning through a
variety of methods appropriate to their
potential, through a process of scientific
inquiry including; know the question, predict
235
the possible outcome, education planning,
experiment, information search using
technology, analysis, interpretation,
conclusion, and discovery of self-knowledge
(The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching
Science and Technology, 2551).
Scientific inquiry for knowledge is a
learning process whereby teachers must
encourage students to be creative and
develop their own ideas. The learner must
determine the survey linked to the original
idea, and lead to the pursuit of new
knowledge (Nuangchalerm, 2005).
Modern instruction requires modification of
methods and tools consistent with learning.
Social cloud-based learning combines social
networking principles and cloud computing.
The characteristics of social networks are
applied to the operations or activities. The
individuals or organizations work together as
a network; they share resources and services
through cloud computing (Chard,
Bubendorfer, Caton & Rana, 2012).
This was the concept for this study. The
researchers were interested in the
instructional design of a flipped classroom
using scientific inquiry learning on a social
cloud model, to comply with the context and
support for education and research as a tool
for use in the next phase.
2) Purpose of the Study
2.1 To design a flipped classroom
through a scientific inquiry learning process
using a social cloud model
2.2 To assess the value of the flipped
classroom
3) Hypothesis
The flipped classroom model designed
through a scientific inquiry learning process
using a social cloud model is highly suitable.
4) Scope of the Research
4.1 The variables used in the research
4.1.1 The independent variable was a
flipped classroom model
4.1.2 The dependent variable was the
value of the flipped classroom model
4.2 Population and sample
4.2.1 The population was the experts
in instruction design, flipped classroom, and
scientific inquiry learning.
4.2.2 The sample consisted of five
experts selected by purposive sampling.
Each possessed at least five years’
experience in instruction design, flipped
classroom and scientific inquiry learning.
5) Methodology
5.1 The First Phase
The first phase was to design a flipped
classroom through a scientific inquiry
learning process using a social cloud model
with the following steps:
5.1.1 To study, analyze, and
synthesize documents related to research
relevant to the elements of the instruction
model, flipped classroom, scientific inquiry
learning process, social cloud model, and
other related theories, to synthesize a
research framework.
5.1.2 To study information about
learning design by interviewing instructors
to synthesize the data associated with
learning activity, and interview students
about their ability to use information
technology and communication for learning,
including their social cloud learning styles.
5.1.3 To design a flipped classroom
through scientific inquiry learning on a
social cloud model.
The elements of a flipped classroom
consisted of eight stages of learning; both
236
outside the classroom through social cloud
media and learning in class (Figure 2).
i. Elicitation
ii. Engagement
iii. Study and research
iv. The Summary of the learning
v. The presentation of knowledge
vi. Elaboration
vii. Extension Phase
viii. Evaluation
5.1.4 Instruction through social cloud
media
Instruction through social cloud media must
be conducted under the social cloud
environment, through the technology of
social networks composed as follows:
i. Identify a network
ii. Create a network that can present
information in various formats such
as videos, images, or sounds
iii. Share ideas with other networks
interested in the same subject
iv. Collaborate with other networks
to exchange information
v. Peer to Peer : P2P discussion
These features are available on cloud
computing and students can access them via
the Internet.
The learning processes in the flipped
classroom were as follows:
1. The teachers were responsible for the
preparation of tools and activities used for
instruction, and the learning management
system. They created the content and
instruction installed in the system, tested
prior knowledge, and segmented the students
to prepare for classes both face to face and
with learning outside the classroom through
social cloud media.
2. The instruction of teaching and
learning in the flipped classroom enabled
students to learn outside the classroom
through online social cloud instruction.
Knowledge was gained and applied to
practice activities or homework in the class.
3. The model was evaluated on the
achievement of three assessment periods.
Assessment before class (or diagnostic
assessment) to determine the original
knowledge level as part of the lifelong
learning skills of the students. Assessment
during the class (or formative assessment)
for the instructor to ascertain the progress
and any problems of the students.
Assessment after class (or summative
assessment) to determine the outcome of the
class and the opinions of the students toward
the instruction model.
5.1.5 To present the flipped
classroom to the advisors for consideration
and revision
5.1.6 To create tools for evaluation
of the model suitability
5.2 The Second Phase
This was the evaluation of the suitability of
the flipped classroom.
5.2.1 To present the model of the
flipped classroom to five experts from the
fields of instructional design, flipped
classrooms, scientific inquiry learning
processes, and social cloud media for
evaluation
5.2.2 To improve the model of the
flipped classroom based on the suggestions
of the experts
5.2.3 To analyze the results of the
model evaluation through the use of mean
( x ) and standard deviation (S.D.), consisting
of five evaluation criteria according to the
Likert scale
6) Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework consisted of six
components: 1) the design of learning of the
ADDIE model, 2) the flipped classroom, 3)
the science process, 4) social networks, 5)
the inquiry-based learning process, and 6)
cloud computing (Figure 1).
237
Figure 1: The Conceptual Framework
7) Results
The results were separated into two sections:
7.1 The flipped classroom which was
divided into two steps:
Step 1. Preparation before class,
also divided into two steps:
1. Orientation The instructor
informed the students of the purpose of
learning, details, model, process, learning
activities, and basic knowledge of the
activities. The students sat a pre-test to
measure their existing knowledge.
2. Grouping The students were
split into groups of four with class talent of
brilliant - medium - soft in the proportion of
1: 2: 1. Instructor divided is four sub-topics,
to prepare learning content and resources in
each sub-topic.
Step 2. The learning process
consisted of two steps:
1. Learning outside the classroom
was divided into four stages:
1.1 Elicitation Students
registered login instructions and sat a pre-
test to measure their basic knowledge related
to the lesson bullet points.
1.2 Engagement Students
accessed learning through group discussion
about topics that the teachers provided. The
discussions were summarized to determine
common problems in learning, hypothesize
and predict answers in advance, and plan
learning.
1.3 Study and research Study
media content was individually provided by
the online instructor through the system.
Students researched their own information
from other sources, with the freedom to
learn and share knowledge within or outside
of the group.
1.4 The Summary of the learning
The panelists shared their learning back into
the group. The knowledge was delivered as a
learning log into the system.
2. Learning in class was also
divided into four stages:
2.1 Presentation of knowledge
The instructor selected the group with
perfect knowledge to present in class.
Discussion and comments checked the
hypothesis that the learning was right or
wrong.
2.2 Elaboration Post-test bullets
linked the old and new knowledge.
2.3 Extention Phase The students
returned to group activities with a given task
and applied the knowledge learned.
2.4 Evaluation Student self-
assessment, assess group friends and
instructor evaluation, group activities,
according to the tasks assigned to each
group.
238
Figure 2 : The flipped classroom through a scientific inquiry learning process using a social
cloud model
7.2 Evaluation of the Suitability of the
Model
This was performed by the five experts and
the results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Suitability of the Developed
Learning Model
Evaluation
List x S.D. Suitability
1. Instruction
methods used
4.71 0.50 Very Good
2. Activities in
class
4.72 0.48 Very Good
3. Application
suitability
4.60 0.55 Very Good
Total 4.67 0.51 Very Good
The experts agreed that the flipped
classroom was suitable at a very good
level ( x = 4.67, S.D. = 0.51) (Table 1). The
activities in the class were evaluated at the
highest score ( x = 4.72, S.D. = 0.48),
followed by the instruction methods used
( x = 4.71, S.D. = 0.50), and application
suitability ( x = 4.60, S.D. = 0.55).
8) Discussion
The experts determined that the model was
very suitable. The results agreed with Toto
& Nguyen (Abstract : 2009) who found
that a flipped classroom enhanced student
learning in an engineering program.
Sanrudee Deepu (2554) stated that the
learning achievement of science in
everyday life for first year undergraduate
majors in English in the Faculty of
Education, Phetchabun Rajabhat
University, was significantly higher than
the previous level of 0.05. Inquiry-based
learning therefore enhanced student
learning achievements. Jindal and Singhal
(2012) found that E-learning social
networking sites maintained by Cloud
239
providers served as a business model for
E-learning. The construction of e-learning
systems entrusted to cloud computing
suppliers and social networks improved
both teaching quality and content.
References
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip
Your Classroom: Reach Every
Student in Every Class Every
Day. International Society for
Technology in Education.
Chard, K., Bubendorfer, K., Caton, S., &
Rana, O. (2012). Social Cloud
Computing: A Vision for Socially
Motivated Resource Sharing. IEEE Trans. Services Computing,
5(4), p. 551-563.
Jindal, R. , & Singhal, A. (2012). Social
Networking based E-Learning
System on Clouds. International
Journal of Computer Applications,
41(8), p. 45-48.
Ministry of Education. (2545). The
National Education Act (B.E. 2542)
as amended (No. 2) (B.E. 2542).
Bangkok: Express Transportation
Organization of Thailand.
Prasart Nuangchalerm. (2005). Learning
science inquiry 7. Retrieved April
20,2557, from
http://www.myfirstbrain.com/teach
er_view.aspx?ID=66342
Sanrudee Deepu. (2554). Development
activities instructional inquiry-
base learning (5Es) 4000101 of
science in everyday life. Faculty of
Education. Phetchabun Rajabhat
University.
The Institute for the Promotion of
Teaching Science and Technology.
(2551). Science process skills, and
the skills That lead to the
scientific process. Bangkok:
Printing teachers Lat of Thailand.
Toto, R., & Nguyen, H. (Abstract : 2009).
Flipping the Work Design in an
Industrial Engineering Course. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education
Conference. doi: 978-1-4244-4714-
5/09
240
คาสงสานกงานคณะกรรมการการอดมศกษา
ท 178 /2558 เรอง แตงตงคณะกรรมการพจารณาคณภาพ
ประเมนและคดเลอกบทความ (Peer Reviewers) เพอนาเสนอผลงานวจย ในการจดการประชมวชาการนานาชาตดานอเลรนนงป 2558 The Sixth TCU International E-learning Conference 2015
“Global Trends in Digital Learning” ------------------------------------------
สานกงานคณะกรรมการการอดมศกษา โดยสานกงานบรหารโครงการมหาวทยาลยไซเบอรไทย จดการประชมวชาการนานาชาตดานอเลรนนงป 2558 The Sixth TCU International E-learning Conference 2015 “Global Trends in Digital Learning” ในระหวางวนท 20-21 กรกฎาคม 2558 ณ ศนยนทรรศการ และการประชม ไบเทค ซงเปนการจดประชมนานาชาตประจาปทดาเนนการมาอยางตอเนองทกป โดยมวตถประสงคเพอเปนเวทแลกเปลยนความร ระหวางนกวชาการ นกวจย คณาจารย และนสตนกศกษา เปนการประมวลความรดานอเลรนนง ในทกดานทสาคญจากนกวชาการดานการศกษาทงในประเทศ และตางประเทศ โดยกาหนดใหมการบรรยายพเศษ จากวทยากรรบเชญทงใน และตางประเทศ และการนาเสนอผลงานวจยดานอเลรนนง
เพอใหการดาเนนการดงกลาว บรรลถงวตถประสงค จงกาหนดใหมกรรมการ โดยมองคประกอบ ดานการพจารณาคณภาพ และคดเลอกบทความ (Peer Reviewers) ประเมนเพอนาเสนอผลงานวจยดานอเลรนนง ดงน
1. ผศ.เชาวเลศ เลศชโลฬาร ทปรกษา 2. ผศ.สพรรณ สมบญธรรม ทปรกษากรรมการ 3. ผศ.ฐาปนย ธรรมเมธา ประธานกรรมการ
ผอานวยการสานกงานบรหารโครงการมหาวทยาลยไซเบอรไทย 4. รศ.วสาข จตวตร กรรมการ มหาวทยาลยศลปากร 5. รศ.ถนอมพร เลาหจรสแสง กรรมการ
ผอานวยการสานกบรการเทคโนโลยสารสนเทศ มหาวทยาลยเชยงใหม 6. รศ.มธรส จงชยกจ กรรมการ
คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยเกษตรศาสตร 7. รศ.จนตวร คลายสงข กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตร จฬาลงกรณมหาวทยาลย 8. ผศ.อนชย ธระเรองไชยศร กรรมการ
รองผอานวยการสานกงานบรหารโครงการมหาวทยาลยไซเบอรไทย
/9.นอ.ผศ.ธงชย…
-2-
9. น.อ.ผศ.ธงชย อยญาตวงศ กรรมการ รองอธการบด มหาวทยาลยแมฟาหลวง 10. ผศ. เดนพงษ สดภกด กรรมการ
รองอธการบดฝายวชาการ และเทคโนโลยสารสนเทศ มหาวทยาลยขอนแกน 11. ผศ.กอบกล สรรพกจจานง กรรมการ
คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยเกษตรศาสตร 12. ผศ.ศรรตน เพชรแสงศร กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตรอตสาหกรรม สถาบนเทคโนโลยพระจอมเกลาเจาคณทหารลาดกระบง 13. ผศ.ประชต อนทะกนก กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตร มหาวทยาลยราชภฏสรนทร 14. ผศ.ปราวณยา สวรรณณฐโชต กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตร จฬาลงกรณมหาวทยาลย 15. ผศ.เอกนฤน บางทาไม กรรมการ
คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยศลปากร 16. ผศ.นามนต เรองฤทธ กรรมการ
คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยศลปากร 17. อาจารยอนรทธ สตมน กรรมการ
คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยศลปากร 18. อาจารยจารวรรณ กฤตยประชา กรรมการ
มหาวทยาลยสงขลานครนทร วทยาเขตสงขลา 19. อาจารยธรวด ถงคบตร กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตร จฬาลงกรณมหาวทยาลย 20. อาจารยพรสข ตนตระรงโรจน กรรมการ
คณะครศาสตร จฬาลงกรณมหาวทยาลย 21. อาจารยวรสรวง ดวงจนดา กรรมการ
ผอานวยการสานกการจดการศกษาออนไลน มหาวทยาลยศรปทม 22. อาจารยวตสาตร ดถยนต กรรมการ คณะศกษาศาสตร มหาวทยาลยเกษตรศาสตร 23. Prof. Yoshida Masami กรรมการ
Professor of Chiba University, JAPAN 24. Prof. Insook Lee กรรมการ
Professor of Sejong University, Korea (South) 25. Prof.Howard Combs กรรมการ
San Jose State University, United States 26. Prof. Mei-Yan Lu กรรมการ
San Jose State University, United States
/26.Assoc.Dr.Daniel…
-3-
27. Assoc.Daniel Tiong Hok Tan กรรมการ
Taylor's Education Group, Malaysia 28. Prof. Daniel Churchill กรรมการ University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's
Republic of China 29. Prof. Yoshimi Fukuhara กรรมการ Meiji University, Japan
อานาจหนาท และความรบผดชอบ
1. พจารณาคณภาพ ประเมน และคดเลอกบทความ (Peer Reviewers) เพอนาเสนอผลงานวจยดานอเลรนนง
2. ประสานงานกบหนวยงานทเกยวของใหสามารถดาเนนงานไดตามวตถประสงค
ทงน ตงแตบดนเปนตนไป
สง ณ วนท พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2558