Top Banner
Reserved Judgment IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 43 of 2014 Narayan Dutt Bhatt ....Petitioner Versus Union of India & others .…Respondents Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Assistant Solicitor General for the Union of India. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Dy.A.G. for the State/respondent nos.2 and 3. Judgment Reserved- 13.06.2018 Date of Judgment - 04.07.2018 Coram: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Hon’ble Lok Pal Singh, J. Per: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. The present petition has been filed pro bono publico for the protection and welfare of animals. The petitioner has sought directions to the respondents to restrict the movement of horse carts/tongas from Nepal to India and from India to Nepal through Banbasa, District Champawat, India. Petitioner has prayed that there should be provisions for vaccination, medical checkup of the horses for suspected infections before entering into the Indian territory from Nepal and for regulating the traffic on the border areas. The route starts from Banbasa, District Champawat, Uttarakhand, India to Mahendra Nagar, Nepal. It runs over 14 Kms. (7 Kms. in India and 7 Kms. in Nepal). The route of 7 Kms. in India along with the width of the road is as under:- Route Approximate Width of the Road Banbasa Bus Stand to NH PC 7 meter wide NHPC to Canal 3½ meter wide Canal to Banbasa Dam 3½ meter wide Banbasa Dam (Bridge) 1000 meters- 10 feet wide 600 mts. – 8 feet wide Banbasa Dam to CPO Check Post 3½ meter wide CPO Check Post to Custom 3½ meter wide Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)
57

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 43 of 2014

Jul 10, 2023

Download

Documents

Engel Fonseca
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.