Top Banner
In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt General Atomics
17

In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets

Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego

Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. PetzoldtGeneral Atomics

Page 2: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Purpose for in-hohlraum layering:• Layering with capsule already assembled in the hohlraum is

advantageous– Eliminates the need for separate layering device

– Eliminates the need for rapid, precision cryogenic assembly

• Requires highly uniform DT surface temperature (~100K) for up to several hours

– Need a well controlled temperature profile on hohlraum

Objective of our research: • Determine required temperature profile and suggest method(s)

for implementation – Chillers on staging tubes

– Tailoring of target material properties

Objectives

Page 3: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

DT temperature profile with constant T at hohlraum surface: BeBr shell

DT profile with constant T at hohlraum surface: polystyrene shell

Relaxed temperature requirements for high-yield targets

Effect of segmenting the Au layer

Hohlraum surface temperature profile needed for uniform DT

Passive control system for obtaining proper surface temperature

Sensitivity to small variations

Overview

Page 4: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Target Design

• Close-coupled, distributed radiator heavy ion target

• Materials:

From Nuclear Fusion 39(11)D. A. Callahan-Miller and M. Tabak

A: AuGd <1% denseB: AuGd 100% denseC: Fe 0.2% denseD: (CD2)AuE: AuGd <1% denseF: Al <3% denseG: AuGd <2% denseH: CD2

I: Al 2% denseJ: AuGd 4% denseK, L: DTM: BeBr or PolystyreneN: (CD2)Au

Page 5: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Axisymmetric ANSYS Model of Target

FliBe

DT

AuGd He (used to model all low-density materials)

BeBr or Polystyrene

Page 6: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

1. Benchmark with BeBr shell agrees with earlier work.

• The BeBr shell around the capsule creates a spherical isotherm

• Temperature of the DT outer surface is small and agrees with prior work (3 K variation at DT surface)

Constant surface temperature = 19.2 K on right boundary

DT ice outer surface temperature

Page 7: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

2. Polystyrene shell exhibits much larger DT temp. variations

• Change to polystyrene shell results in 10 mK temperature variation at the DT outer surface

• Is it too much?

DT ice outer surface temperature

Constant surface temperature = 19.2 K on right boundary

Page 8: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

3. High-yield capsules can tolerate significantly rougher surface finishes than ignition capsules

Ref: Mark Hermann, Indirect Drive Target Workshop, GA (1 May 2001).

Standards used for NIF targets Results for plastic ablator capsule

Page 9: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

The required degree of temperature symmetry is derived from the surface “roughness” requirement

DT thickness variation is ~200 m with hohlraum temperature fixed at 19.2 K

• Too much!

In the limit L /a<<1,L ~ sqrt(2k T/q’’’)

For small perturbations,~ (k/Lq’’’)=temperature perturbation=thickness perturbation

k = 0.33 W/m-kL = 0.33 mmq’’’ = 48,700 W/m3

Page 10: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

4. The AuGd layer must be altered to allow external control

• To affect the variation of temperature at the DT surface, we must eliminate conduction along the “B” layer

• Thermal conductivity of the “B” layer in the y-direction is modeled with helium properties

Page 11: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

5. An “inverse problem” is solved to determine the correct temperature profile to apply on the hohlraum surface

• An artificial block of material is added to remove the RHS boundary condition.

• The temperature at the DT surface is fixed at 18 K

• Heat flux applied at the right boundary is calculated based on 48,700 W/m3 volumetric heat generation in DT layer

• Solution gives approximate temperature distribution to apply to the target model

Flibe surface temperatures

Page 12: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Results of applying temperature profile to the hohlraum surface

• Variation at DT surface is reduced from 10 mK to ~200 K

• Subsequent iterations further improve the result (<100 K achieved)

Applied nodal temperatures

DT outer surface temperatures

Page 13: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

DT thickness corresponding to the modified surface temperature

Variation of DT thickness is ~5 m

Page 14: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

6. Use of a passive thermal control system to establish boundary temperature profile

• Varying thickness insulator used to map constant temperature cooled surface to desired hohlraum temperature profile

• Estimate of thickness profile made using T(y) and q(y) from original solution

CopperInsulator

Staging tube

Contact felt

Hohlraum

Cooling tubes

Page 15: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Temperature variation at DT for 0.5-cm thick scallop and 17 K boundary temperature (k=0.0125 W/m-K)

DT outer surface temperatures

Page 16: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

7. Sensitivity studies

• Sensitivity of DT temperature profile to 1-10% changes in properties and applied temperature was explored

• Case shown is 1-10% change in k for region D

• 1% changes roughly double the nonuniformity; 10% changes cause an order of magnitude increase

Page 17: In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

Conclusions

Benchmark using BeBr shell agrees well with earlier work.

Target using polystyrene in place of BeBr does not provide adequately smooth DT surface temperature distribution.

Temperature requirements are relaxed with high-yield targets, but not enough to avoid external temperature control.

AuGd layer must be modified to minimize conduction along the length of the target and allow hohlraum outer surface to “communicate” with the capsule.

The required applied temperature variation was determined and shown to reduce the temperature variation from 10mK to ~200K.

The passive control scheme requires optimization, but appears feasible.

Variations in properties and applied temperatures must be kept below a few percent.