June 25, 2012 Asia Asia Derivatives Views Options Research HSCEI vs. SPX relative trades: Outperformance options and call vs. call pairs While our strategists expect offshore Chinese equities to benefit from the policy easing tailwinds, our equity trading strategies team has recommended a tactical short position in SPX amidst worse-than-expected macro data and weaker US growth outlook. We look at HSCEI vs. SPX trades which benefit if HSCEI outperforms SPX. While long/short pair trade has provided attractive returns, losses have been sharp during market corrections. We highlight HSCEI vs. SPX outperformance options which have offered slightly lower average returns but significantly lower volatility and limited losses. Call vs. call pair trade has offered better vol-adjusted returns. Risk-metrics fell sharply across assets With the Greece election outcome avoiding the destabilizing EU tail event, risk-metrics fell sharply last week. Implied vols fell across markets and tenors with 1-mo implied vols down 4-6 vol points in Asia. Short-dated skew fell as well with 3-mo skew now at or below full year average on many indices. With short-dated vols selling-off more, term-structures steepened and reverted to upward sloping. With lower vol and skew, outright puts look relatively less expensive. We highlight vol, skew and term-structure changes on page 5. Outperformance options: low vol, limited losses Source: GS Global ECS Research. HSCEI over SPX outperformance trades Our strategists expect offshore Chinese equities to potentially benefit from the policy easing tailwinds given their higher sensitivity to China growth-risk compared to EU/US risk-factors while our Equity Trading Strategies team recommended a tactical short-position in SPX. We look at trades which benefit if HSCEI outperforms SPX. Buy outperformance options contingent on both higher at expiry. Dec-12 HSCEI over SPX 5% outperformance (both higher) costs 2.07%. At current levels, average payoff since 2006 would have been 5.4% with significantly lower volatility and least losses under worst-case scenarios. Buy Dec-12 HSCEI calls, sell Dec-12 SPX calls. HSCEI vs. SPX Dec-12 105% calls cost 2.6%. At current levels, the trade would have provided an average payoff of 7.2% since 2006, with better vol- adjusted returns than long/short pair. We prefer outperformance options given limited loss profile. Sunil Koul +852-2978-0924 [email protected]Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. Jason Lui, CFA +852-2978-6613 [email protected]Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed by non-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S. This report is intended for distribution to GS institutional clients only. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo payoff (since 2006) Long / short futures Outperf. options Outperf. options (both higher) Call vs. call pair Average returns 7.6% 5.8% 5.4% 7.2% Stdev (volatility) 22.1% 16.2% 14.7% 18.2% Avg / Stdev 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.39 Max returns 94.4% 85.2% 87.3% 88.1% Worst-case returns -28.0% -4.2% -2.1% -22.2% Option cost (% of spot - 4.24% 2.07% 2.60%
21
Embed
HSCEI vs. SPX relative trades: Outperformance options and ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
June 25, 2012
Asia
Asia Derivatives Views Options Research
HSCEI vs. SPX relative trades: Outperformance options and call vs. call pairs
While our strategists expect offshore Chinese equities to benefit from the policy easing tailwinds, our equity trading strategies team
has recommended a tactical short position in SPX amidst worse-than-expected macro data and weaker US growth outlook. We look
at HSCEI vs. SPX trades which benefit if HSCEI outperforms SPX. While long/short pair trade has provided attractive returns, losses
have been sharp during market corrections. We highlight HSCEI vs. SPX outperformance options which have offered slightly lower
average returns but significantly lower volatility and limited losses. Call vs. call pair trade has offered better vol-adjusted returns.
Risk-metrics fell sharply across assets
With the Greece election outcome avoiding the
destabilizing EU tail event, risk-metrics fell sharply
last week. Implied vols fell across markets and
tenors with 1-mo implied vols down 4-6 vol points
in Asia. Short-dated skew fell as well with 3-mo
skew now at or below full year average on many
indices. With short-dated vols selling-off more,
term-structures steepened and reverted to upward
sloping. With lower vol and skew, outright puts
look relatively less expensive. We highlight vol,
skew and term-structure changes on page 5.
Outperformance options: low vol, limited losses
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
HSCEI over SPX outperformance trades
Our strategists expect offshore Chinese equities to
potentially benefit from the policy easing tailwinds
given their higher sensitivity to China growth-risk
compared to EU/US risk-factors while our Equity
Trading Strategies team recommended a tactical
short-position in SPX. We look at trades which
benefit if HSCEI outperforms SPX.
Buy outperformance options contingent on
both higher at expiry. Dec-12 HSCEI over SPX 5%
outperformance (both higher) costs 2.07%. At
current levels, average payoff since 2006 would
have been 5.4% with significantly lower volatility
and least losses under worst-case scenarios.
Buy Dec-12 HSCEI calls, sell Dec-12 SPX calls.
HSCEI vs. SPX Dec-12 105% calls cost 2.6%. At
current levels, the trade would have provided an
average payoff of 7.2% since 2006, with better vol-
adjusted returns than long/short pair. We prefer
outperformance options given limited loss profile.
Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed by non-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S. This report is intended for distribution to GS institutional clients only.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research
HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo
payoff (since 2006)
Long /
short
futures
Outperf.
options
Outperf.
options
(both higher)
Call vs.
call pair
Average returns 7.6% 5.8% 5.4% 7.2%
Stdev (volatility) 22.1% 16.2% 14.7% 18.2%
Avg / Stdev 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.39
Max returns 94.4% 85.2% 87.3% 88.1%
Worst-case returns -28.0% -4.2% -2.1% -22.2%
Option cost (% of spot - 4.24% 2.07% 2.60%
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 2
HSCEI vs. SPX relative trades: Outperformance options and call vs. call pairs
Our strategists expect offshore Chinese equities to benefit from the policy easing tailwinds. As highlighted in our latest
Growth Markets Perspective: Strategies for a China loosening cycle (June 21), offshore Chinese equities have a higher risk-
sensitivity to China growth risk compared to EU/US risk-factors and could potentially benefit from the ongoing and further policy
easing. While HSCEI sold off 11% amidst EU sovereign concerns in May, onshore China equities (CSI 300) ended the month
essentially flat suggesting offshore equities could close the gap relative to A-shares, should global macro risks normalize. Easier
financial conditions, coupled with inexpensive valuations and light positioning drives our positive strategic stance for Chinese
equities.
On the other hand, our Equity Trading Strategies team recommended a tactical short position in S&P 500. Our Equity Trading
Strategists in their recent report (Trade Update: Recommending short position in the S&P 500, June 21) recommend a tactical short
position in SPX with a near-term downside target of 1285, on the back of worse-than-expected macro data and weaker US-growth
outlook while our US strategist expects SPX to trade at 1250 by year-end (6.5% downside from current levels).
We look at relative option trades to express our preference for HSCEI over SPX. An easier China policy with deteriorating US
growth outlook could cause HSCEI to outperform SPX during 2H12, in our view. We look at HSCEI vs. SPX trades which could benefit if
HSCEI outperforms SPX. We compare HSCEI vs. SPX outperformance options and call vs. call pair trades to a long-short futures
pair trade as shown below:
(1) Long Dec-12 HSCEI over SPX 105% outperformance options, contingent on both indices higher, for 2.07%.
Outperformance options contingent on both indices higher has a bullish bias to equities and provides positive returns only if SPX
and HSCEI are both higher at expiration by year-end. The advantage of contingent options is a lower upfront premium. Currently
Dec-12 (28-Dec-12 expiry) HSCEI over SPX 5% strike outperformance, contingent on both indices higher, costs 2.07%, at more than
50% discount to vanilla 5% strike outperformance options (4.24%). HSCEI has historically made larger directional moves compared
to SPX, both on the up-side and down-side (Exhibit 1 in p.3). So the risk-reward on outperformance options contingent on both
indices higher looks better compared to vanilla outperformance options. The disadvantage however is that the trade provides no
return if HSCEI rallies while SPX falls. As shown in exhibit 2 and 3, we look at the historical profitability of a 6-mo HSCEI over SPX
5% outperformance options when entered at current levels. Since 2006, the average payoff for the outperformance option
contingent on both indices higher, has been 5.4%, less than long/short or call vs. call pair trade but with significantly lower
volatility and limited losses. Risk is loss of upfront premium.
(2) Long HSCEI Dec-12 105% calls vs. short SPX Dec-12 105% calls. Pay 2.6% in upfront premium.
Compared to a long/short futures trade, call vs. call pair trade isolates returns to the case where either of the markets is higher at
expiration. While HSCEI/SPX long-short pair has had sharp negative returns during market corrections, the call vs. call pair trade will
have a maximum loss of 2.6% upfront premium if SPX is lower at expiry. As shown in Exhibit 4 on p.4, we look at historical payoff of
buying 6-mo HSCEI 105% calls vs. selling 6-mo SPX 105% calls. At current levels, the trade would have provided an average return
of 7.2% since 2006 (vs. 7.6% for long/short pair) but with lower volatility and thus better vol-adjusted returns. Risks: Buyers of HSCEI
vs. SPX call vs. call pair trade risk unlimited loss if SPX rallies significantly more than HSCEI by expiry.
We prefer outperformance options to long/short futures or call vs. call pair trade given limited loss profile of the trade.
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 3
Exhibit 1: HSCEI has historically made larger moves compared to SPX both on the upside and downside
6-mo rolling returns of HSCEI and S&P 500
Source: GS Global ECS Research
Exhibit 2: HSCEI vs. SPX outperformance options would have offered limited
losses HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo 5% outperformance option backtest, at current levels
Exhibit 3: Upfront premium would have dragged average payoffs on
outperformance options HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo 5% outperformance option backtest, at current levels
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
‐80%
‐60%
‐40%
‐20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Jan‐06
May‐06
Sep‐06
Jan‐07
May‐07
Sep‐07
Jan‐08
May‐08
Sep‐08
Jan‐09
May‐09
Sep‐09
Jan‐10
May‐10
Sep‐10
Jan‐11
May‐11
Sep‐11
Jan‐12
May‐12
HSCEI
SPX
Rolling 6-month returns
Average 6‐month moves (since 2006)
When HSCEI 6‐mo % of Average move
return is... obs HSCEI SPX Difference
Down more than 20% 15 ‐33% ‐22% ‐12%
‐20% to ‐15% 6 ‐17% ‐6% ‐11%
‐15% to ‐10% 3 ‐13% ‐6% ‐7%
‐10% to ‐5% 5 ‐7% ‐1% ‐6%
‐5% to 0% 10 ‐2% 3% ‐6%
0% to 5% 9 3% 7% ‐5%
5% to 10% 7 7% 8% 0%
10% to 15% 6 12% 9% 3%
15% to 20% 5 17% 7% 11%
Up more than 20% 34 41% 9% 32%
HSCEI has historically made larger average
moves both on the
upside anddownside
‐40%
‐20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan‐06
May‐06
Sep‐06
Jan‐07
May‐07
Sep‐07
Jan‐08
May‐08
Sep‐08
Jan‐09
May‐09
Sep‐09
Jan‐10
May‐10
Sep‐10
Jan‐11
May‐11
Sep‐11
Jan‐12
May‐12
Long / Short
5% Outperformance
5% Outperformance(both higher)
HSCEI vs. SPX strategies
Year Ending
Long HSCEI vs. Short SPX
HSCEI vs. SPX 5% outperf.
HSCEI vs. SPX 5% outperf.
(both higher)
Long HSCEI vs. Short SPX
HSCEI vs. SPX 5% outperf.
HSCEI vs. SPX 5% outperf.
(both higher)
2006 17.1% 8.5% 8.5% ‐3.0% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
2007 37.7% 28.5% 22.5% 5.6% ‐3.6% ‐2.1%
2008 ‐6.7% ‐2.4% ‐2.1% ‐28.0% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
2009 20.1% 12.9% 10.6% ‐13.5% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
2010 ‐4.1% ‐3.4% ‐1.5% ‐22.7% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
2011 ‐11.1% ‐4.2% ‐2.1% ‐26.8% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
2012 ‐7.1% ‐4.2% ‐2.0% ‐16.6% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
Overall 7.6% 5.8% 5.4% ‐28.0% ‐4.2% ‐2.1%
Rolling 6m average returns Worst case returns
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 4
Exhibit 4: HSCEI vs. SPX call vs. call pair trade has been profitable at current
levels HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo 105% calls, at current levels
Exhibit 5: Call vs. call pair trade has lower average returns with lower vol
than long-short futures HSCEI vs. SPX 6-mo 105% calls; Long HSCEI vs. short SPX
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
Exhibit 6: Outperformance options: Best worse-case scenarios; Call vs. call pair trade: Highest vol-adjusted returns
HSCEI vs. SPX strategies, cost and historical payoffs
Source: GS Global ECS Research
‐30%
‐20%
‐10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Jan‐06
May‐06
Sep‐06
Jan‐07
May‐07
Sep‐07
Jan‐08
May‐08
Sep‐08
Jan‐09
May‐09
Sep‐09
Jan‐10
May‐10
Sep‐10
Jan‐11
May‐11
Sep‐11
Jan‐12
May‐12
Long / Short
HSCEI 6‐mo 105% call vs. SPX 6‐mo 105% call
HSCEI vs. SPX strategiesBuy 6‐mo 105% calls on HSCEI, Sell 6‐mo 105% calls on SPX (2.6% upfront cost)
Year Ending
Long HSCEI vs. Short
SPX
HSCEI calls vs. SPX calls
Long HSCEI vs. Short SPX
HSCEI calls vs. SPX calls
Long HSCEI vs. Short SPX
HSCEI calls vs. SPX calls
2006 17.1% 12.5% 11.7% 12.2% ‐3.0% ‐4.5%
2007 37.7% 33.3% 20.7% 19.8% 5.6% 2.3%
2008 ‐6.7% ‐1.7% 12.7% 3.4% ‐28.0% ‐2.6%
2009 20.1% 15.3% 18.7% 17.6% ‐13.5% ‐13.3%
2010 ‐4.1% ‐3.7% 9.2% 5.5% ‐22.7% ‐16.4%
2011 ‐11.1% ‐6.4% 6.0% 5.2% ‐26.8% ‐22.2%
2012 ‐7.1% ‐5.4% 5.2% 3.5% ‐16.6% ‐14.8%
Overall 7.6% 7.2% 22.1% 18.2% ‐28.0% ‐22.2%
Rolling 6m avg. returns Std Dev Worst case returns
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 7
Index hedging monitor
Exhibit 11: Index hedging monitor
Indicative pricing as of June 22, 2012
Source: GS Global ECS Research.
3-month 95% puts 3-month 95/85% put spreads 3-month 95/110% collars
Indicative cost (% of spot) Return on premium Indicative cost (% of spot) % of time capped downside Indicative cost (% of spot) % of time capped upside
* Assuming indices fall to their respective 3/6/12-mo low at expiry * capped downside = short put positions limiting return * capped upside = short call positions limiting return
1-mo return vs. 3-mo 95% puts Put spread cost saving vs. puts Collars cost saving vs. puts
HSI
HSCEI
KOSPI 200
TOPIX
Nikkei 225NIFTY
TWSE
MSCI Sing
ASX 200S&P 500
FTSE 100
EuroStoxx50
Bovespa
RDXUSD
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
‐2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8%
Cost of 3
‐mo 95% puts (%
of spo
t)
1‐mo return
46%
38%
38%
36%
34%
34%
32%
32%
32%
31%
31%
30%
30%
28%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
RDXU
SD
HSCEI
Bovespa
EuroStoxx50
FTSE 100 HSI
ASX 200
KOSPI 200
Nikkei 225
MSCI W
orld
S&P 500
TWSE
TOPIX
MSCI Sing
55%
50%
43%
39%
33%
32%
28%
27%
26%
11%
11%
11%
9% 9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
RDXU
SD
Bovespa
NIFTY
HSCEI
KOSPI 200
EuroStoxx50
Nikkei 225 HSI
TOPIX
FTSE 100
MSCI W
orld
MSCI Sing
S&P 500
ASX 200
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 8
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 15
Asia ex-Japan (India/Korea/Singapore) single stock volatility landscape
Exhibit 22: AEJ single stock volatility landscape
Goldman Sachs Research ratings, 3-month implied/realized volatility, consensus estimates, and indicative option pricing as of June 22, 2012 close
* indicates the shares are on our Regional Conviction List. B=Buy, N=Neutral, CS=Coverage Suspended For HIGH volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for selling 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts For LOW volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for buying 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts
Sources: FactSet, HSIL, I/B/E/S, GS Global ECS Research, Goldman Sachs Research estimates.
Ticker Company
3m ATM
Impl vol (%)
1-year %ile
1-week chg
minus rlzd
current impl vol
vs. history
current impl/rlzd
vs. history
current stock/idx vol ratio
vs. history
Current impl vol vs. 1m moves
Current impl vol vs. 3m moves
GS rating
Return to GS target
Return to Consensus
target1-week return
1-month return
CY2012 P/E
CY2013 P/E
ICBK.NS ICICI Bank 38.3 87% 3.5 6.7 LOW Inline HIGH HIGH Inline B 16.2% 29.1% 0.7 6.4 12.8x 11.6x
INFY.NS Infosys Tech 34.0 4% 3.0 -0.3 LOW Inline Inline HIGH HIGH N 5.1% 10.7% -1.9 6.2 15.6x 14.1x
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 16
Japan single stock volatility landscape – Autos, Financials, Tech, Materials
Exhibit 23: Japan single stock volatility landscape
Goldman Sachs Research ratings, 3-month implied/realized volatility, consensus estimates, and indicative option pricing as of June 22, 2012 close
* indicates the shares are on our Regional Conviction List. NC: Not Covered. B=Buy, N=Neutral, S=Sell, NR=Not Rated For HIGH volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for selling 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts For LOW volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for buying 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts
Sources: FactSet, I/B/E/S, Nikkei, TSE, GS Global ECS Research, Goldman Sachs Research estimates.
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 17
Japan single stock volatility landscape – Trading companies, Domestics
Exhibit 24: Japan single stock volatility landscape
Goldman Sachs Research ratings, 3-month implied/realized volatility, consensus estimates, and indicative option pricing as of June 22, 2012 close
* indicates the shares are on our Regional Conviction List. NC: Not Covered. NR: Not Rated. B=Buy, N=Neutral, S=Sell, CS=Coverage Suspended For HIGH volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for selling 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts For LOW volatility candidates, we show the indicative pricing for buying 3m 105% calls and 3m 95% puts
Sources: FactSet, I/B/E/S, Nikkei, TSE, GS Global ECS Research, Goldman Sachs Research estimates.
Ticker Company
3m ATM
Impl vol (%)
1-year %ile
1-week chg
minus rlzd
current impl vol
vs. history
current impl/rlzd
vs. history
current stock/idx vol ratio
vs. history
Current impl vol vs. 1m moves
Current impl vol vs. 3m moves
GS rating
Return to GS target
Return to Consensus
target1-week return
1-month return
CY2012 P/E
CY2013 P/E
2503.T Kirin (JP) 21.3 1% -2.2 -0.3 LOW Inline Inline HIGH HIGH NC -- 18.3% 2.2 2.9 19.2x 15.3x
2914.T Japan Tobacco 28.4 11% -1.4 0.7 LOW Inline Inline HIGH Inline B 28.1% 19.1% -0.3 7.8 12.7x 11.5x
3382.T Seven & I 19.2 24% -2.1 4.6 Inline Inline Inline HIGH Inline N 5.0% 22.5% 0.4 -3.1 13.2x 11.7x
4063.T Shin-Etsu Chem 26.6 45% -1.8 0.9 HIGH Inline LOW Inline Inline N 4.7% 5.6% 3.2 5.5 16.0x 14.4x
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 18
MSCI disclosure
All MSCI data used in this report is the exclusive property of MSCI, Inc. (MSCI). Without prior written permission of MSCI, this
information and any other MSCI intellectual property may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used to
create any financial instruments or products or any indices. This information is provided on an “as is” basis, and the user of this
information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Neither MSCI, any of its affiliates nor any third party
involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect
to this information (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and MSCI, its affiliates and any such third party hereby
expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with
respect to any of this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third
party involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive,
consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. MSCI and the MSCI
indexes are service marks of MSCI and its affiliates. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) were developed by and is the
exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. GICS is a service mark of MSCI and S&P and has been licensed for use by The
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 19
Disclosure Appendix
Reg AC
We, Sunil Koul and Jason Lui, CFA, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect our personal views about the subject company or companies and its or their securities.
We also certify that no part of our compensation was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.
Disclosures
Option Specific Disclosures
Price target methodology: Please refer to the analyst’s previously published research for methodology and risks associated with equity price targets.
Pricing Disclosure: Option prices and volatility levels in this note are indicative only, and are based on our estimates of recent mid-market levels(unless otherwise noted). All prices and levels
General Options Risks – The risks below and any other options risks mentioned in this research report pertain both to specific derivative trade recommendations mentioned and to discussion of
general opportunities and advantages of derivative strategies. Unless otherwise noted, options strategies mentioned in this report may be a combination of the strategies below and therefore carry
with them the risks of those strategies.
Buying Options - Investors who buy call (put) options risk loss of the entire premium paid if the underlying security finishes below (above) the strike price at expiration. Investors who buy call or put
spreads also risk a maximum loss of the premium paid. The maximum gain on a long call or put spread is the difference between the strike prices, less the premium paid.
Selling Options - Investors who sell calls on securities they do not own risk unlimited loss of the security price less the strike price. Investors who sell covered calls (sell calls while owning the
underlying security) risk having to deliver the underlying security or pay the difference between the security price and the strike price, depending on whether the option is settled by physical delivery or
cash-settled. Investors who sell puts risk loss of the strike price less the premium received for selling the put. Investors who sell put or call spreads risk a maximum loss of the difference between the
strikes less the premium received, while their maximum gain is the premium received.
For options settled by physical delivery, the above risks assume the options buyer or seller, buys or sells the resulting securities at the settlement price on expiry.
Distribution of ratings/investment banking relationships
Goldman Sachs Investment Research global coverage universe
Rating Distribution Investment Banking Relationships
Buy Hold Sell Buy Hold Sell
Global 31% 54% 15% 48% 41% 36%
As of April 1, 2012, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research had investment ratings on 3,507 equity securities. Goldman Sachs assigns stocks as Buys and Sells on various regional Investment
Lists; stocks not so assigned are deemed Neutral. Such assignments equate to Buy, Hold and Sell for the purposes of the above disclosure required by NASD/NYSE rules. See 'Ratings, Coverage
groups and views and related definitions' below.
Disclosures required by United States laws and regulations
See company-specific regulatory disclosures above for any of the following disclosures required as to companies referred to in this report: manager or co-manager in a pending transaction; 1% or
other ownership; compensation for certain services; types of client relationships; managed/co-managed public offerings in prior periods; directorships; for equity securities, market making and/or
specialist role. Goldman Sachs usually makes a market in fixed income securities of issuers discussed in this report and usually deals as a principal in these securities.
The following are additional required disclosures: Ownership and material conflicts of interest: Goldman Sachs policy prohibits its analysts, professionals reporting to analysts and members of their
households from owning securities of any company in the analyst's area of coverage. Analyst compensation: Analysts are paid in part based on the profitability of Goldman Sachs, which includes
investment banking revenues. Analyst as officer or director: Goldman Sachs policy prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts or members of their households from serving as an officer,
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 20
director, advisory board member or employee of any company in the analyst's area of coverage. Non-U.S. Analysts: Non-U.S. analysts may not be associated persons of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
therefore may not be subject to NASD Rule 2711/NYSE Rules 472 restrictions on communications with subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by the analysts.
Additional disclosures required under the laws and regulations of jurisdictions other than the United States
The following disclosures are those required by the jurisdiction indicated, except to the extent already made above pursuant to United States laws and regulations. Australia: Goldman Sachs Australia
Pty Ltd and its affiliates are not authorised deposit-taking institutions (as that term is defined in the Banking Act 1959 (Cth)) in Australia and do not provide banking services, nor carry on a banking
business, in Australia. This research, and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act, unless otherwise agreed by Goldman
Sachs. Brazil: Disclosure information in relation to CVM Instruction 483 is available at http://www.gs.com/worldwide/brazil/area/gir/index.html. Where applicable, the Brazil-registered analyst primarily
responsible for the content of this research report, as defined in Article 16 of CVM Instruction 483, is the first author named at the beginning of this report, unless indicated otherwise at the end of the
text. Canada: Goldman, Sachs & Co. has approved of, and agreed to take responsibility for, this research in Canada if and to the extent it relates to equity securities of Canadian issuers. Analysts may
conduct site visits but are prohibited from accepting payment or reimbursement by the company of travel expenses for such visits. Hong Kong: Further information on the securities of covered
companies referred to in this research may be obtained on request from Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. India: Further information on the subject company or companies referred to in this research may
be obtained from Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Limited; Japan: See below. Korea: Further information on the subject company or companies referred to in this research may be obtained
from Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch. New Zealand: Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited and its affiliates are neither "registered banks" nor "deposit takers" (as defined in the Reserve
Bank of New Zealand Act 1989) in New Zealand. This research, and any access to it, is intended for "wholesale clients" (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008) unless otherwise agreed by
Goldman Sachs. Russia: Research reports distributed in the Russian Federation are not advertising as defined in the Russian legislation, but are information and analysis not having product
promotion as their main purpose and do not provide appraisal within the meaning of the Russian legislation on appraisal activity. Singapore: Further information on the covered companies referred
to in this research may be obtained from Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W). Taiwan: This material is for reference only and must not be reprinted without permission.
Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. United Kingdom: Persons who would be categorized as retail clients
in the United Kingdom, as such term is defined in the rules of the Financial Services Authority, should read this research in conjunction with prior Goldman Sachs research on the covered companies
referred to herein and should refer to the risk warnings that have been sent to them by Goldman Sachs International. A copy of these risks warnings, and a glossary of certain financial terms used in
this report, are available from Goldman Sachs International on request.
European Union: Disclosure information in relation to Article 4 (1) (d) and Article 6 (2) of the European Commission Directive 2003/126/EC is available at
http://www.gs.com/disclosures/europeanpolicy.html which states the European Policy for Managing Conflicts of Interest in Connection with Investment Research.
Japan: Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. is a Financial Instrument Dealer under the Financial Instrument and Exchange Law, registered with the Kanto Financial Bureau (Registration No. 69), and is a
member of Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA) and Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ). Sales and purchase of equities are subject to commission pre-determined with clients plus
consumption tax. See company-specific disclosures as to any applicable disclosures required by Japanese stock exchanges, the Japanese Securities Dealers Association or the Japanese Securities
Finance Company.
Ratings, coverage groups and views and related definitions
Buy (B), Neutral (N), Sell (S) -Analysts recommend stocks as Buys or Sells for inclusion on various regional Investment Lists. Being assigned a Buy or Sell on an Investment List is determined by a
stock's return potential relative to its coverage group as described below. Any stock not assigned as a Buy or a Sell on an Investment List is deemed Neutral. Each regional Investment Review
Committee manages various regional Investment Lists to a global guideline of 25%-35% of stocks as Buy and 10%-15% of stocks as Sell; however, the distribution of Buys and Sells in any particular
coverage group may vary as determined by the regional Investment Review Committee. Regional Conviction Buy and Sell lists represent investment recommendations focused on either the size of the
potential return or the likelihood of the realization of the return.
Return potential represents the price differential between the current share price and the price target expected during the time horizon associated with the price target. Price targets are required for all
covered stocks. The return potential, price target and associated time horizon are stated in each report adding or reiterating an Investment List membership.
Coverage groups and views: A list of all stocks in each coverage group is available by primary analyst, stock and coverage group at http://www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. The analyst assigns one
of the following coverage views which represents the analyst's investment outlook on the coverage group relative to the group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Attractive (A). The
investment outlook over the following 12 months is favorable relative to the coverage group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Neutral (N). The investment outlook over the following 12
months is neutral relative to the coverage group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation. Cautious (C). The investment outlook over the following 12 months is unfavorable relative to the coverage
group's historical fundamentals and/or valuation.
Not Rated (NR). The investment rating and target price have been removed pursuant to Goldman Sachs policy when Goldman Sachs is acting in an advisory capacity in a merger or strategic
transaction involving this company and in certain other circumstances. Rating Suspended (RS). Goldman Sachs Research has suspended the investment rating and price target for this stock, because
there is not a sufficient fundamental basis for determining, or there are legal, regulatory or policy constraints around publishing, an investment rating or target. The previous investment rating and
price target, if any, are no longer in effect for this stock and should not be relied upon. Coverage Suspended (CS). Goldman Sachs has suspended coverage of this company. Not Covered (NC). Goldman Sachs does not cover this company. Not Available or Not Applicable (NA). The information is not available for display or is not applicable. Not Meaningful (NM). The
information is not meaningful and is therefore excluded.
Global product; distributing entities
The Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs produces and distributes research products for clients of Goldman Sachs on a global basis. Analysts based in Goldman Sachs offices
around the world produce equity research on industries and companies, and research on macroeconomics, currencies, commodities and portfolio strategy. This research is disseminated in Australia
by Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 21 006 797 897); in Brazil by Goldman Sachs do Brasil Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.; in Canada by Goldman, Sachs & Co. regarding
Canadian equities and by Goldman, Sachs & Co. (all other research); in Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.; in India by Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Ltd.; in Japan by Goldman
June 25, 2012 Asia
Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research 21
Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.; in the Republic of Korea by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch; in New Zealand by Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited; in Russia by OOO Goldman Sachs; in
Singapore by Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W); and in the United States of America by Goldman, Sachs & Co. Goldman Sachs International has approved this
research in connection with its distribution in the United Kingdom and European Union.
European Union: Goldman Sachs International, authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, has approved this research in connection with its distribution in the European Union and
United Kingdom; Goldman Sachs AG, regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, may also distribute research in Germany.
General disclosures
This research is for our clients only. Other than disclosures relating to Goldman Sachs, this research is based on current public information that we consider reliable, but we do not represent it is
accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Other than certain industry reports
published on a periodic basis, the large majority of reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment.
Goldman Sachs conducts a global full-service, integrated investment banking, investment management, and brokerage business. We have investment banking and other business relationships with a
substantial percentage of the companies covered by our Global Investment Research Division. Goldman, Sachs & Co., the United States broker dealer, is a member of SIPC (http://www.sipc.org).
Our salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to our clients and our proprietary trading desks that reflect opinions that are
contrary to the opinions expressed in this research. Our asset management area, our proprietary trading desks and investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the
recommendations or views expressed in this research.
The analysts named in this report may have from time to time discussed with our clients, including Goldman Sachs salespersons and traders, or may discuss in this report, trading strategies that
reference catalysts or events that may have a near-term impact on the market price of the equity securities discussed in this report, which impact may be directionally counter to the analysts' published
price target expectations for such stocks. Any such trading strategies are distinct from and do not affect the analysts' fundamental equity rating for such stocks, which rating reflects a stock's return
potential relative to its coverage group as described herein.
We and our affiliates, officers, directors, and employees, excluding equity and credit analysts, will from time to time have long or short positions in, act as principal in, and buy or sell, the securities or
derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal
recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this
research is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. The price and value of investments referred to in this research and the income
from them may fluctuate. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Fluctuations in exchange rates could have
adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments.
Certain transactions, including those involving futures, options, and other derivatives, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors. Investors should review current options
disclosure documents which are available from Goldman Sachs sales representatives or at http://www.theocc.com/about/publications/character-risks.jsp. Transaction costs may be significant in option
strategies calling for multiple purchase and sales of options such as spreads. Supporting documentation will be supplied upon request.
In producing research reports, members of the Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs Australia may attend site visits and other meetings hosted by the issuers the subject of its
research reports. In some instances the costs of such site visits or meetings may be met in part or in whole by the issuers concerned if Goldman Sachs Australia considers it is appropriate and
reasonable in the specific circumstances relating to the site visit or meeting.
All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client websites. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or
available to third-party aggregators, nor is Goldman Sachs responsible for the redistribution of our research by third party aggregators. For all research available on a particular stock, please contact
your sales representative or go to http://360.gs.com.
Disclosure information is also available at http://www.gs.com/research/hedge.html or from Research Compliance, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.