Navigating Issues in Research Compliance: what is all the fuss about??? Allison Griffin Ratterman, Ph.D. Director, Research Integrity Research Integrity Program Office of the Executive Vice President for Research University of Louisville
Dec 15, 2015
Navigating Issues in Research Compliance:what is all the fuss about???
Allison Griffin Ratterman, Ph.D. Director, Research Integrity
Research Integrity ProgramOffice of the Executive Vice President for Research
University of Louisville
Why do we care about conducting ethical research?
First and foremost, it is the right thing to do!
As an institution of higher learning, we strive daily to nurture and strengthen our relationship with the community. A headline or news item on TV or radio can shatter that trust in a matter of seconds
As funded researchers, we must be accountable stewards of those funds and conduct ourselves in an integrity driven manner
Institution Driven◦ Position◦ Role◦ Employment Location
Facility Driven◦ Hospitals◦ Center for Predictive Medicine◦ Private Practice
Compliance and Training Milestones
Activity Driven◦ Animals◦ Humans◦ Chemicals / Hazardous Materials / Equipment
Data Driven◦ Protected Health Information◦ Confidential / Sensitive Data
Sponsor Driven◦ Training◦ Reporting◦ Purchasing / Spending
Compliance and Training Milestones
Responsible Conduct
of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and Environmenta
l Safety
Conflicts of Interest
Fiscal Responsibility
Professional Standards
Social Responsibility
in Science
Research Misconduct
Responsible Conduct
of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and Environmenta
l Safety
Conflicts of Interest
Fiscal Responsibility
Professional Standards
Social Responsibility
in Science
Research Misconduct
Conflict of Interest is not a “four letter
word”…
but even in the best of times it can be
confusing to navigate
Why do we care????◦ It helps to assure the public that the research
community is acting in conformity with the spirit and guidelines of the University of Louisville Policy and with the public good in mind
◦ Newspaper Headlines
◦ Governmental Agency Reports
◦ Scientific Journals
◦ Funding Agencies
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of Interest:University Research Enterprise
University of Louisville supports technology transfer to patent and license, to participate in the establishment of industry
partnerships, to accept company-sponsored research funding,
and to consult.
Federal government has mandated that universities seek to commercialize the results of federally supported research for the public good
Conflicts of Interest:Types of Conflicts in Research
Conflict of Financial Interest◦ A researcher has a responsibility to respect the well being of the
University
Conflict of Research Integrity◦ Researchers should maintain the highest level of scientific integrity
in the conduct of research. The complete, objective, and timely distribution of new findings through publications and presentations, is essential for research integrity.
Conflict of Educational Mission◦ Students and post-doctoral fellows must be assured of an
educationally appropriate training program
Conflict of Commitment◦ The workforce owes its primary commitment and allegiance to the
University
Conflicts of Interest:University Process
The University has established policies that define potential conflicts and provide guidelines and procedures for limiting and managing them.
Annual disclosure requirement remains in effect Thresholds for disclosure have been lowered Training is required External Interests must be reviewed across the aggregate
relationship Relationships with non-profits are no longer exempt from disclosure Directly sponsored or directly reimbursed travel must be disclosed
Responsible Conduct
of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and Environmenta
l Safety
Conflicts of Interest
Fiscal Responsibility
Professional Standards
Social Responsibility
in Science
Research Misconduct
Financial Stewardship
Institutional and Sponsor Requirements
Training required
Fiscal Responsibility
Responsible Conduct
of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and Environmenta
l Safety
Conflicts of Interest
Fiscal Responsibility
Professional Standards
Social Responsibility
in Science
Research Misconduct
Authorship and Publication
Collaboration
Data Management and Stewardship
Mentor / Mentee Relationships
Peer Review
Professional Standards
Original work in which the author has made a new and significant intellectual contribution to others
Be Careful! ◦ Taking Credit=Responsibility for Accuracy
Avoid Dilution◦ Only include those who significantly contributed ◦ Laboratory, financial or technical assistance (i.e.) may be
acknowledged with consent Author Order
◦ Responsibility of Principals and determined early!◦ Become familiar with order of authorship in your discipline
Nativio, D.G. (Sep2000 ) Authorship. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (V12, I 9, p351). Retrieved August 3, 2009 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=6&hid=9&sid=80c85c3f-550d-4411-af19-666faaec0dd1%40sessionmgr11
Authorship and Publication
All authors should review final before submission
Be prepared to produce original data
Be prepared to produce breakdown of contributions
Nativio, D.G. (Sep2000 ) Authorship. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (V12, I 9, p351). Retrieved August 3, 2009 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=6&hid=9&sid=80c85c3f-550d-4411-af19-666faaec0dd1%40sessionmgr11
Authorship and Publication
Basis of collaborative arrangement is “contractual”
Look ahead, plan ahead, anticipate
Be direct and honest about possible problems, misunderstandings
Collaborative activity
In shared research all must adhere to ethical standards.
Confidentiality when promised or appropriate should be maintained.
Design and conduct research with honesty and integrity.
Original data must be recorded, preserved, made accessible to University.
Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing and Ownership
What the Mentor can do!◦ Serve as a Positive Role Model◦ Be Available◦ Continually Evaluate Progress and Performance◦ Serve as Career Coach◦ Engage Beyond Current Projects◦ Encourage Relationships
◦ University of Louisville Graduate School Graduate Council. (1998-1999) Mentor and Graduate Student Strategies for Success. Retrieved August 3, 2009 from https://graduate.louisville.edu/pubs/mentor-and-graduate-student-strategies-for-success.html
Mentor / Mentee Relationships
What the Mentee can do!◦Keep in Touch
Problems◦Contribute Knowledge
Good mentors know mentees will surpass them◦Seek Advice from Others
From best prepared◦Change the relationship if necessary
Not all are successful
◦ University of Louisville Graduate School Graduate Council. (1998-1999) Mentor and Graduate Student Strategies for Success. Retrieved August 3, 2009 from https://graduate.louisville.edu/pubs/mentor-and-graduate-student-strategies-for-success.html
Mentor / Mentee Relationships
Reviewers shall provide reviews that are thorough
Reviewers shall provide reviews that are unbiased
Reviews should be done in a timely fashion
Expert reviews and the materials being evaluated shall remain confidential
Peer Review
Responsible Conduct of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and
Environmental Safety
Conflicts of
Interest
Fiscal Responsi
bility
Professional
Standards
Social Responsibility in Science
Research Miscondu
ct
Why do we care about conducting socially responsible (ethical)
research?
Ethical questions arise because of social responsibilities to others in the community and because behavior is capable of influencing the welfare of others
Research with Vulnerable Populations International Research Research on Controversial Issues Dual Use Technologies Genetic manipulation of plants,
organisms, people
Social Responsibility in Research
Keys to Socially Responsible Research Valid research design
Competent research personnel
Consequences / Impacts have been identified and addressed as needed
Design, Performance and reporting of the research is free from bias
Responsible Conduct of Research
Human Subjects
HIPAA
Animal Subjects
Biological and
Environmental Safety
Conflicts of
Interest
Fiscal Responsi
bility
Professional
Standards
Social Responsibility in Science
Research Miscondu
ct
Research Misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research results
Research Misconduct
Making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Fabrication
It would have taken me forever to actually perform all of those tests.
Altering raw data for reporting purposes
Falsification
22% 98% 12% 100%Sample size: 16 Sample size: 900
Reporting others’ data, ideas, processes, results, or words without giving credit by acknowledging the source
Plagiarism
Copier
Research Misconduct Proceedings Allegations of Research Misconduct
◦ Consult with Research Integrity Ombudsperson Barbara Speck (Nursing) Richard Stremel (Physiology) Eleanor Lederer (Renal Medicine) Douglas Darling (Dentistry)
◦ Consult with Research Integrity Allison Ratterman – 852-2453
While not meeting the federal definition of research misconduct, the following behaviors are examples of unethical research practices:
◦ Forging a practitioner's signature on medical orders; ◦ Breaching human subject confidentiality; ◦ Failing to obtain IRB and/or FDA approval for changes implemented in an
approved protocol.◦ Serious deviation from accepted practices in proposing or carrying out
research, improper manipulation of experiments to obtain biased results, deceptive statistical or analytical manipulations, or improper reporting of results.
◦ Improper use of information gained by privileged access, such as information obtained through service on peer review panels and editorial boards.
◦ Deliberately sabotaging or physically damaging the laboratory research set up, equipment, or records.
Unacceptable Research Practices
Research Misconduct Proceedings Allegations of Research Misconduct
Process◦ Allegation Referral Form
Dr. Ratterman will work with you to complete the form
◦ Research Integrity Ombudsperson performs Preliminary Assessment
◦ Depending on outcome of assessment, inquiry may be opened
Research Misconduct Proceedings Allegations of Research Misconduct
Process◦ Inquiry determines whether alleged actions meet
regulatory criteria of research misconduct or unacceptable research practices If yes, investigation opened If no, recommendation made for resolution of any identified
issues
◦ Investigation determines if misconduct occurred, by whom and to what extent
◦ Deciding Official determines institutional action required
Plan, then act When in doubt, ask Make use of available
resources both inside your unit, your institution and beyond…
Getting all the pieces…
Faculty and Administrators
Research Integrity Program
Professional Societies
Colleagues
Available Resources
Questions????
If you have questions about anything included in this presentation, please feel free to contact:
Allison Griffin Ratterman, Ph.D.Research Integrity ProgramOffice of the Executive Vice President for Research
[email protected]@louisville.edu502-852-2454research.louisville.edu/researchintegrity
Sources used for this presentation include:
http://louisville.edu/research/humansubjects/investigator-research-team-information
www.asiaplanet.net http://web.missouri.edu/~bondesonw/Laud.html
www.kwintessential.co.uk/resources/global-etiquette
“Culture and Global Business Research” road.uww.edu/.../Marketing%20Research%20Spring
“Responsible Conduct of Research” presentation by Allison Griffin Ratterman PhD
“The Research Integrity Program” presentation by Laura Engel
Screen Beans Art : © A Bit Better Corporation, used under licensed permission
Clip art provided by Microsoft “Clip art on Office Online” at : http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/clipart/download.aspx
“Ethical Concerns in Research: What is all the fuss about?” The Research Integrity Program, University of Louisville, Presentation by Allison Griffin Ratterman Ph. D.
http://louisville.edu/research/humansubjects/investigator-research-team-information