How can Cognitive Science improve Online Learning? Joseph Jay Williams [email protected] www.JosephJayWilliams.com/education CognitiveScience.Co/learn www.LearningResearch.net 1
Dec 05, 2014
How can Cognitive Science improve Online Learning?
Joseph Jay [email protected]/education
CognitiveScience.Co/learnwww.LearningResearch.net
1
Research Landscape
• Qualitative analyses
• Randomized Controlled Trials
• Longitudinal studies
• Educational Data Mining
• Cognitive Science
2
Cognitive Science
3
• Learning: “Adding” vs. “Integrating” information.• Before: Problem-based learning• During: Request Explanations• After: Assessments as instructional tools – Testing & Mixing
• Learning that promotes learning • Motivation• Strategies• Online search
• Resources: • Review of Cognitive Science with practical value: www.josephjaywilliams.com/education• Wiki with resources on Online Education: sites.cognitivescience.co/learn• Contact between researchers & practitioners: www.learningresearch.net
4
Preview
5
Add object
to bucket
Integrate webpage
with internet
Content Exercise
Transfer is rareLearning: Add vs. Integrate
• Consider:– Scenario 1: General invading a fortress can’t use full force, part of force insufficient– Scenario 2: Doctors destroying an internal tumor can’t use strong rays, but weak
rays aren’t enough
• Transfer extremely low (Gick & Holyoak, 1984)
• Motivated MBA students appeared to learn extremely well, but failed to transfer to face-to-face in real life (Gentner, Loewenstein, & Thompson, 2003)
• Transfer is so rare that it’s not a plausible goal (Detterman, 1993)
6
Transfer is rare
• Problem Based Learning (Hmelo-Silver, 2006; Needham & Begg, 1998; Schwartz, 1998)
7
How do you…?Is it possible to…?
Before: Start with Questions & Problems
8
Why…? Free study, Think Aloud…
Learning Measures
(Williams & Lombrozo, 2010)
(Williams, Lombrozo, & Rehder, in press)
(Williams, Walker, Lombrozo, 2012)
During: Request explanations
9
Statistics problem
• Learn a university’s ranking system from examples(Schwartz & Martin, 2004, Belenky & Nokes, 2011)
Sarah was ranked higher.
Rule for ranking John Ranked? Tom
Higher personal score 85% > 69%
Points above average 6% > 4%
Points below maximum –5% > –18%
Number of deviations above average (Z-score)
0.75 < 1.3
85% in HistoryMin of 67%, Max 90% Class Average 79%Standard Deviation 8%
69% in PhysicsMin of 42%, Max 87% Class Average 65%Standard Deviation 3%
>
Accuracy change
10
Single Anomaly Multiple Anomalies0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Free Study
Explain
Accu
racy
impr
ovem
ent f
rom
Pr
e-te
st to
Pos
t-Te
st
Write Thoughts
Williams, Walker, & Lombrozo, 2012
Key Findings
• Explaining increased:• Discovery of principles (Williams & Lombrozo, 2010)
• Use of existing knowledge (Williams & Lombrozo, 2013)
• Explanation’s effect was selective:• Same or even worse memory • Impaired learning if patterns were unreliable (Williams, Lombrozo,
Rehder, in press)
• Similar effects in 5 year olds (Walker, Williams, Lombrozo, & Gopnik, under revision)
Online Mathematics Exercises
• Khan Academy:
• Explain why that solution is correct.
• Here is another student/teacher’s explanation.• Grade both.• Rate how similar they are.
Benefits of explanation
• Instructor guided & learner generated• Learning without feedback• Abstract principles
• The “Testing Effect” (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006)
14
Immediate test: Study+Study ~= Study+TestAfter hours, days, weeks: Study+Study < Study+Test
Learners claim: Study+Study > Study+Test
After: Use Assessments as Instructional Tools
• Mixing Effect (Rohrer, 2009)
• Ten Benefits of Testing (Roediger et al, 2011)
15
After: Efficient Assessments use Mixing Effect
• Support Randomized Experiments or A/B Testing• Precise delivery & control• Quantitative measures of learning
• Ecological validity• Evidence-based decisions• Fidelity• Scalability• Iterative improvement
16
Real-World Laboratories
• Motivation• Learning Strategies• Online search
17
Learning that improves Learning
• Beliefs about intelligence (Dweck, 2006)• Do you agree that…– Your intelligence is something very basic about you that
you can’t change very much. (Fixed Theory).– No matter how much intelligence you have, you can always
change it quite a bit. (Malleable Theory).
• Teach a malleable theory?
18
Increasing motivation
19
Randomized Controlled Trial: Middle, High School, Community College. (Paunesku, Romero et al, 2011; 2012)
Increasing motivation
• Before: Preparatory questions• During: Explanations• After: Applying concept
Currently applying these principles to learning a “Growth Mindset”
Next directions:• Create video versions for MOOCs, Khan Academy, students• Change feedback in Khan Academy exercises
20
Cognitive + Social Psychology
• Teach learning strategies through videos in MOOCs
• Transfer? (Clark & Mayer, 2011)
• Assessment?
• Explanation; Reciprocal Teaching (Palinscar & Brown, 1984)
• Change “theory” of learning• Habit & Behavior Change (Fogg, 2002)
• Technology (Rose et al, 2008)
21
Learning Strategies
• Sophisticated uses• “Theory”: Fishing vs.
Toolkit for Problem-solving
22
Content Exercise
Online search
• Rate the plausibility of each answer.• Predict Accuracy. • Rate similarity.• Grade explanations.
23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
“Best” vs. “Big” Data
Resources
• Selection of Cognitive Science research applicable to (Online) Education• www.josephjaywilliams.com/education• Wiki with resources on Online Education: sites.cognitivescience.co/learn• Contact between researchers & practitioners: www.learningresearch.net• Comprehensive Wiki & Newsletter on K-12 Ed-Tech www.edsurge.com• Policy Prescriptions for schools National Center for Education and the Economy www.ncee.org Surpassing Shanghai, by Mark Tucker• Institute of Education Sciences “evidence-based education” www.whatworks.ed.gov• E-learning in Industry & Workforce, Online Corporate Training & Development
www.elearningguild.com www.astd.org
Questions?