HMA & HTA: eoretical and Practical Issu
Jan 13, 2016
HMA & HTA:Theoretical and Practical Issues
Topics
Development of the (env) HMA Strategies for subtype determination
Heteroduplex Tracking Assay
Importance of PCR template
quantitation
Heteroduplex Mobility Assay (HMA)
TAA
TTA
AATTTA
Denature,Reanneal
Denature,Reanneal
AcrylamideGel
Homoduplexes
Heteroduplexes
AcrylamideGel Heteroduplexes
Homoduplexes
T CA G
C T G A
G A
T C
A G
C T
G CA TG C
A T
Heat
Ureaor
More Heator Urea
Melt &Reanneal
Detection of heteroduplexes
25--
50035-+
50035+-
50035-+
5003535 3535-- ---- --
500100501035Cycles-Resolve-Heat/Cool
5DNA (ng)
Agarose gel
Acrylamide gel
M 1.3 1.4 1.8 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.7 4.9 M
Detection of mismatches (without Indels)
% mismatches
MW215X201215X202215X204215X207215X210215X216
16X21416X21516X21616X20116X20216X204
9X23 5X16 224X165X212 5X2145X215
MW0.18%
0.36%0.9% 1.08% 1.45%
2.0%
EACH BAR INDICATES THE POSITION OF NUCLEOTIDE SUBSTITUTIONS BETWEEN THE TWO SEQUENCES
THE POSITION OF THE SUBSTITUTION IS INDICATED ON THE RIGHT5% polyacrylamide, 200 volts, 3 hours.
676 bp
517 bp
1 101 201 301 401 501 601 701 801 901 1001 1101 1201 1301 1401
ED5-ED12ES7-ES8
ED31-ED33
V1-V2 V3loop V4 V5
Curves: Gaps
Gaps +Base changes
PCR Fragments Used For HIV-1 env Heteroduplex Tracking
Spectrum of Gel Shifts (env HMA)
Within an individual
Between individuals (same subtype)
Between individuals(different subtype)
% Divergence
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
10 5 10 15 20 25
US- AFRUS- USInt ras ubje c tNo Gaps
M M
Gel Shift versus Divergence (V3-V5 Region)
0.16 0.95 1.42 0.79 0.95 1.11- - - + + +
M
M3 Seq.
Impact of INDELS* on
heteroduplex mobility
*INDELS - Insertions or deletions # of bands =(# of Distinguishable Species)2 - (# of D.S.)
vif
rev
env
rev
pol
gag
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
nef
vpr
•
•tat
•
•vpu
•tat
•
HIV-1 Env Gene Amplimer SitesED5 ED12
ES7ED31 ED33
ES8
V3 Loop V4 V5
gp120
V1-V2
BetweenM & O groups
Withina person or
subtype
5 300
20
40
60
80
100
120
10 15 20 25 35 40 45 50
Within or betweensubtypes
1.2kb ED5-ED12
DNA divergence in env regions
% DNA Distance
0.5kb ED31-33
0.63kb ES7-ES8
~Range of HMA in neutral 5% Acryl. gels
M Ho A B C D E F
Importance of Multiple Comparisons
He
*Please avoid “sub-subtype” designationsbased on affinity to different references*
He
Ho A B C D E F Ho A B C D E F
93RW003 93RW004
Highly Divergent Subtypes
ssDNA
M Ho A B C D E F
4vs6
RU103 vs:
Identification of a new subtype
He
Ho
He
ss
M HoB D E
He
He
Ho
93TH063HoB D E
93TH064HoB D E
93TH062
Efficient Subtype Analysis
M HoB D E
He
He
Ho
94TH135HoB D E
94TH1364HoB D E
94TH137
Importance of the “Ho” Control
Vs.TH239
B
Vs.TH129
E
vs. TH239B
vs. TH129E
Rapid Subtyping in Thailand
1.2kb FRAGMENTS (ED5/ED12)
M
A1
A3+
A2
A3+
B1
B3+
B2
B1+
C1
C3+
C2+
C3
D1
D2+
D3
D1+
E1
E2+
E3
E1+
F1
F2+
G1
G2+
G3
G2+
A1
A2+
B2
B3+
C1
C2+
D2+
D3
E2
E3+
G1
G3+
C1+
C4
C2+
C4
C3
C4+
WITHIN SUBTYPE COMPARISONS
M A2 B1 C2 D1 E2 F2 G2 H2 B2
B2 + OTHER SUBTYPES
Inter- and Intra-Subtype Comparisons
M A2 B1 C2 D1 E2 F2 G2 H2 B2
0.7kb FRAGMENTS (ES7/ES8)
M
A1
A3+
A2
A3+
B1
B3+
B2
B1+
C1
C3+
C2+
C3
D1
D2+
D3
D1+
E1
E2+
E3
E1+
F1
F2+
G1
G2+
G3
G2+
A1
A2+
B2
B3+
C1
C2+
D2+
D3
E2
E3+
G1
G3+
C1+
C4
C2+
C4
C3
C4+
WITHIN SUBTYPE COMPARISONSB2 + OTHER SUBTYPES
Inter- and Intra-Subtype Comparisons
M A2 B1 C2 D1 E2 F2 G2 H2 B2
0.5kb FRAGMENTS (ED31/ED33)
M
A1
A3
+A2
A3
+B1
B3
+
B2
B1+
C1
C3
+C2+
C3
D1
D2
+
D3
D1+
E1
E2
+
E3
E1+
F1
F2
+G1
G2
+
G3
G2+
A1
A2
+B2
B3
+C1
C2
+D2+
D3
E2
E3
+G1
G3
+C1+
C4
C2+
C4
C3
C4+
WITHIN SUBTYPE COMPARISONSB2 + OTHER SUBTYPES
Inter- and Intra-Subtype Comparisons
M A1 A2 AG1 AG2 AE1 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 D1 D2 F1 F2 G1 G2 H2 J1 J2 Ho
p93BR029.4 - B/F
gag HMA
07/07/00
env HMA
M A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D3 E1 E2 E3 F1 F2 G1 G2 G3 H2 Ho
02/24/200 ES7/ES8
5% PAGENO UREA
5% PAGE20% UREA
21/2 Hrs250V constant
21/2 Hrs250V constant
Baseline specimen evaluation:Crude nucleic acid preparation (e.g., ~0.1ug cellular DNA, or
cDNA from ~0.01 ml plasma or sera)
1st Round PCR (e.g., ED3 / ED14, ~gp120)2nd Round PCR (e.g., ED5 / ED12, ~V1-V5)
Agarose gel (to quantitate product and template)
Heat, cool PCR fragments (to form heteroduplexes)5% Acrylamide gel (to assess heterogeneity)
Mix unknown with reference strains:Heat, cool PCR fragments (to form inter-sample heteroduplexes)
5% Acrylamide gel (to identify fast-migrating heteroduplexes)
Subtype determination:Patterns with references from a given subtype should be consistent
Phylogenetic clustering:Determine heteroduplex mobility relative to homoduplex
Subtype Determination with HMA
(optional)
Heteroduplex
TrackingAssay
(Detect only heteroduplexes
formed from probe alone or with target virus population)
Probe1X
32P
Driver100X
Mix, Heat, Cool
S ingleStrands
Different Time Points or Compartments
Different PersonSame Person
Probe only
HIV population diversifying through point mutations only
EthBr stained gel Probed with 1st time pt.
Populations sampled by DNA sequencing
HIV population diversifying through point mutations and
length variation
EthBr stained gel
Populations sampled by DNA sequencing
2 2 codon codon deletiodeletio
nn1 1 codon codon deletiodeletio
nnno deletionno deletion
Probed with 1st time pt.
AOGGE333JJ
BBB33JJBHB333FGBBBJHHH
F3GGGFJFFFFHHHHHHJ3BJJFGCCCEEFFC
GEEEEAAAA
ECCCCCCAAOEAAA
1%
B 4J 4.5H 53 3.5F 3G 2.5E 2C 1A 0.5O 09779859988987997100
10099
99999996781009889
OOOOOOO
homoduplexhetero-duplexes
Years Post Infection
100,000 cell equivalents
5.4 1.8 3.9 8 4.7 3.8
V11 V13 V14 V15 V16 V18
Input TemplateCopy Number
~ Normalized copy number
16 14 27 26 28 27
V11V13 V15V16V18V14
Importance of Template Quantitation
0
5
10
15
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Ave
rag
e
nu
mb
er
of
un
iqu
e t
em
pla
tes
Input copy number, N
10 clones
20 clones
15 clones
5 clones
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1P
rob
ab
ility
of
resa
mp
ling
10 clones
20 clones
15 clones
5 clones
“QUALITY” - Resampling probablilities