Top Banner
Mariana Petris, NIPNE Buc harest CBM Meeting, March 9 - 12, 2005 HIGH COUNTING RATE TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR Bucharest Prototype In Beam Tests
17

HIGH COUNTING RATE TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Jan 31, 2016

Download

Documents

Meg

HIGH COUNTING RATE TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR. Bucharest Prototype In Beam Tests. Transition Radiation Detectors. ALICE - TRD ATLAS - TRT - type (radiator+drift chamber + MWPC) (radiator + straw tubes) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Mariana Petris, NIPNE Bucharest CBM Meeting, March 9 -12, 2005

HIGH COUNTING RATE TRANSITION RADIATION

DETECTORBucharest Prototype

In Beam Tests

Page 2: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Transition Radiation Detectors

ALICE - TRD ATLAS - TRT

- type (radiator+drift chamber + MWPC) (radiator + straw tubes)

- rej (at 90% e efficiency) 100 100

- Maximum drift time 2 s 40 ns

- Counting rates ~ 100 Hz/cm2 ~ 1MHz/ cm2

- Granularity (channel size) high (~6 cm2) low (~20cm2) CBM - TRD

Counting rates ~ 100 KHz/cm2

High granularity

- rej (at 90% e efficiency) > 100

Page 3: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

HCRTRD - prototype

- type: radiator + MWPC; 2.5 mm anode pitch

- maximum drift time: ~ 100 ns

- channel size: 6 cm2

Page 4: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

55Fe Source Tests

IFIN - HH 55Fe tests

30% CO2 + 70% Ar

HV 1920 V;

Readout: PASA (2 mV/fC, 1800 e

rms) + ADC Converter

Energy Resolution :

~10% ();

~25% FWHM

GSI 55Fe tests

15% CO2 + 85% Ar

HV 1700 V;

Readout:PASA (2mV/fC, 1800 e

rms) + FADC Converter

Energy Resolution:

~ 8.6 % ();

~20 % FWHM

Page 5: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Beam Test

Goal of the experiment: detector performance in high counting rate environment

Experimental Setup:

- 2 Scintillators (ToF, trigger);

- 2 Si - Strip Detectors (position information);

- 2 MWPC - GSI (10 x 10 cm2 )

- 1 MWPC - Bucharest (24 x 24 cm2 )

-1 MWPC - Dubna (10 x 10 cm2 )

- 1 GEM - Dubna

- Pb - glass calorimeter (last run)

- FADC readout ; DAQ (MBS)

Page 6: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Beam Composition

e/ vs. rate not possible, too low e intensities at SIS

/p @ 1 GeV/c too low rates;

p/d @ 2 GeV/c rate dependence studies.

p

p p d

p d

Page 7: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Beam Profile

x1 > 10 mm; x2 > 10 mm;

Si1 length 20;

Si2 length 20.

2 s 2 s

0.2 s 0.2 s

Page 8: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

2 s

1850 V

0.2 s

1850 V

Gain - 2s spill length,for protons

Page 9: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Average Pulse Height15% CO2 + 85% Ar, continuous anode, 1750 V 15%CO2 + 85% Ar, split anode, 1725 V

1 s

0.5 s

<P

H>

(mV

/0.7

4) 2 s

1 s

0.5 s

0.2 s

2 s

1 s

0.5 s

0.2 s

0 %

0.7 %

3.5 %

13.3%

0 %

0 %

0 %

2%

Page 10: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

ToF Spectra

Page 11: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Pulse Height and Charge Spectra

Page 12: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

e/ Discrimination

Page 13: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Pulse Height and Charge Spectra

MPV value (from landau fit of PH and Q proton spectra) as a function of rate

Page 14: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

High Counting Rate Effect

(4.2 1.2) %

(3.2 2.1) %

(11.7 1.8) %

(0.4 1) %

Page 15: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

High Counting Rate Effect

(8.9 1.4) %

(5 3.4) %

(8.4 3.9) %

(2.2 1.4) %

Page 16: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

High Counting Rate Effect

(6.8 1.5) %

(3.2 1.1) %

(5.8 1.9) %

(3.4 1.5) %

Page 17: HIGH COUNTING RATE  TRANSITION RADIATION DETECTOR

Conclusions

•Diagnostic system

not specific for hcr

environment

limited performance

The results of the first in-beam tests of such a geometry seem to

recommend it as a solution for a major percentage of the CBM

TRD subdetector.

Participants: Bucharest, Dubna, GSI, Heidelberg and Münster

•Modest statistics

limiting factor for

detailed analysis in terms

of:

- Beam profile

- Spill profile

•Much to low

systematics for

negatives (e/)

Although