GRAS III GRAS III St.Petersburg St.Petersburg Case Case Russia Russia Project Results Project Results TEAM: TEAM: Ksenia Shelest Ulrika Ksenia Shelest Ulrika Åkerlund Åkerlund Lena Petrova Galina Lena Petrova Galina Schelkanova Maria Schelkanova Maria Tysiachniouk Tysiachniouk
GRAS III St.Petersburg Case Russia. Project Results TEAM: Ksenia Shelest Ulrika Åkerlund Lena Petrova Galina Schelkanova Maria Tysiachniouk. CONTENTS. 1. Methodology of Research – Enquiries and Interviews Phases (K.Sh.,L.P.&G.Sch.) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
GRAS IIIGRAS IIISt.Petersburg Case St.Petersburg Case
Lena Petrova Galina Schelkanova Lena Petrova Galina Schelkanova Maria Tysiachniouk Maria Tysiachniouk
CONTENTSCONTENTS• 1. Methodology of Research –
Enquiries and Interviews Phases (K.Sh.,L.P.&G.Sch.)
• 2. Analysis of Results on Enquiries and Interviews (K.Sh.)
• 3. Conclusions:
Differences & Similarities, Problems, Perspectives for S.D. (K.Sh.&M.T.)
1.1. METHODOLOGY OF GRAS III METHODOLOGY OF GRAS III RESEARCH in SPBRESEARCH in SPB
• TWO PHASES - Enquiries and Interviews COLLECTION
• RESULTS ANALYSIS AND REPORTING
• TEAM ORGANIZATION – Senior Researcher, PhD Student- Coordinator, Student Team leader, Students
Phase of Enquiries collection (Lena)Phase of Enquiries collection (Lena)
• Field Trips to Areas with All team• Contacts with local residents
• Informing about the international research programme
• Guidance of students about the process• Collecting of Enquiries by students• Weekly organizational meetings• Checking of filled enquiries
Phase of Interviews collection (Galina)Phase of Interviews collection (Galina)
• Field Trips to Areas with All team
• Contacts with local residents
• Interviews doing by the Senior & Students with recording & written comments
• Transcription of records in Russian
• Interviews Translation into English
2. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -12. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -1
• 100 filled enquiries (50 – SHA , 50 – MHA)
RESPONDENTS CATEGORIES:• Very young people (from 15 years) 11• Young people 20-30 without children 11• Lone mothers with child(ren) 6• Single persons 13• Adult couples with children 17• Middle age persons 16• Pensioners 27
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
2. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -22. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -2
• HOUSEHOLDS & OCCUPATION:Families (2 adults with children)Full-time working and Old age pensionersThree genaration families (15-20%)
• EDUCATION & INCOME LEVEL:College/Special (SHA)&High Education (MHA)Average (50%) and Low (45%) income
2. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -32. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -3
• Rather Stable Habitations (>6 years 80%)
(from which >20 years – 40%)
• SATISFACTION & INTENDANCY:
Average level - (yes, mostly)
80% - intend to stay here longer
Not nigh Mobility Potential
2. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -42. ENQUIRIES RESULTS -4
• PHYSICAL RESOURSES
SHA – use less resourses, but don’t think about environment mostly
MHA – more important for people (education), but easier access & more use
Env.issues (WASTE, ENERGY SAVING) are ”important for future”/ ”coming”
OPPORTUNITIES1. Organization of Green Space & Parking places
2. Creation of Meeting Places – Indoor & Outdoor
THREATS1. New Houses & People – >pressure on resourses
2. Destroying of Green Structure and Pavements
3. Overloading of Services
Perspectives for Olgino (SHA)Perspectives for Olgino (SHA)
• City/ Municipal Support for Creation of Central Communal Services
• Govermental Strategy for Historical & Cultural Heritage Protection
• Municipal Support for Social Infrastructure Development (Medical Centre, etc.)
• Improvement of Transport Connection
Perspectives for Moskovsky/ Perspectives for Moskovsky/ Zvezdnaya (MHA)Zvezdnaya (MHA)
• Control for New Houses Building
• Improvement of Quality & Quantity of Green Areas
• Improvement of Infrastructure (gabage, parking places, roads repair)
• Organization of Local Cultural Life within the Area (Events, Projects, etc.)
Theoretical Points from Community Theoretical Points from Community and Globalization Sociologyand Globalization Sociology
• “ patterned interactions among people in a local geographical setting” (Warren 1978, p.417-418
• “community always exist” , “community-natural outgrowth of community interaction” (Wilkinson 1991)
• “social imaginaries” impact community (Castoriadis 1987, Gaonkar 2002, Taylor 2004)—we draw on this statement
Peculiarities of the Peculiarities of the Period of TransitionPeriod of Transition
• No spatial separation of pour and rich• Low income households own houses• Intelligentsia-new poor, but continue to be a
driving forse• New rich-mixed enterty• Small appartments—strive for social space• Private houses- individual orientation• Peculiar understanding of public participation
Possible InterpretationsPossible Interpretations
• New rich—incorporate market economy values-away from collective-separate infrastructure, loan-monoculture, cut trees
• High fense as a symbol of social stratification• Mobilization capacity and civic initiatives highher
in Moscovski urban community driven by old intelligentsia, which turned to be succeptable to new western sustainability initiatives
• In Olgino the rich sponsor infrastructure and get governing positions