“Graphene Nanoplatelet (xGnP TM ) Additives for Multifunctional Composite Additives for Multifunctional Composite Materials” Lawrence T. Drzal Lawrence T. Drzal Lawrence T. Drzal Lawrence T. Drzal Dept of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science Composite Materials and Structures Center Composite Materials and Structures Center Michigan State University East Lansing, MI-48824 [email protected]Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University [email protected]
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
“Graphene Nanoplatelet (xGnPTM) Additives for Multifunctional Composite Additives for Multifunctional Composite
Materials”
Lawrence T. DrzalLawrence T. DrzalLawrence T. DrzalLawrence T. Drzal
Dept of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceComposite Materials and Structures CenterComposite Materials and Structures Center
55‐‐100 x 10100 x 10‐‐33 Ω cmΩ cm ~ 50 x 10~ 50 x 10‐‐66 Ω cmΩ cm ~ 50 x 10~ 50 x 10‐‐66 Ω cm Ω cm 1 Ω (C 1 Ω (C i )i )ResistivityResistivity ~ 1 Ω cm (C~ 1 Ω cm (C‐‐axis)axis)
Thermal Thermal ConductivityConductivity
2020‐‐2000 W/m K2000 W/m K 3000 W/m K 3000 W/m K 3000 W/m K (Plane)3000 W/m K (Plane)6 W/m K (C6 W/m K (C‐‐axis)axis)
Coef. Thermal Coef. Thermal ‐‐1 x 101 x 10‐‐66 ‐‐1 x 101 x 10‐‐66 ‐‐1 x 101 x 10‐‐6 6 (plane)(plane)Coef. Thermal Coef. Thermal Exp.Exp.
1 x 101 x 10 1 x 101 x 10 1 x 101 x 10 (plane)(plane)29 x29 x 1010‐‐6 6 (C(C‐‐axis)axis)
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
ffSynthesis of GrapheneSynthesis of Graphene
•• Cleavage of Graphite Single crystalsCleavage of Graphite Single crystals•• Vapor Phase SynthesisVapor Phase Synthesis•• Vapor Phase SynthesisVapor Phase Synthesis•• Oxidation to graphite oxide; reduction Oxidation to graphite oxide; reduction to grapheneto grapheneto grapheneto graphene
•• Intercalation and Intercalation and exfoliation to exfoliation to hhggrapheneraphene
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
CleavageCleavageCleavageCleavage“Geim's group essentially rubbed tiny pieces of graphite against a hard silicon dioxide surface to detach flakes of the carbon materialsilicon dioxide surface to detach flakes of the carbon material.
Novoselov et al., Science Novoselov et al., Science 306306, 666 (2004), 666 (2004)
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
GeimGeim, A. K. and , A. K. and NovoselovNovoselov, K. S., Nat. Mater. , K. S., Nat. Mater. 66, 183 (2007) , 183 (2007)
Vapor Phase SynthesisVapor Phase SynthesisVapor Phase SynthesisVapor Phase SynthesisGraphene via heating the surface of a wafer of silicon carbide so that
the silicon atoms evaporated, leaving behind a few layers of p g ycarbon atoms that assembled into graphene.
STM topographs (0.8 V sample bias, 100 pA) of nominally 1 ML epitaxialgraphene on SiC(0001). Top: Image showing large flat regions of 6p3 × 6p3 re-g ap e e o S C(000 ) op age s o g a ge a eg o s o 6p3 6p3 econstruction and regions where the reconstruction has not fully formed. Next-layerislands are also seen. Bottom: A region of 6p3×6p3 reconstruction, imaged throughthe overlying graphene layer.
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Walt A. de Heer, et al., Solid State Communications 143 (1-2), 92-100 (2007)
Gas Phase SynthesisGas Phase SynthesisGas Phase SynthesisGas Phase Synthesis
Atmospheric pressure Atmospheric pressure microwave (2.45 GHz) plasma microwave (2.45 GHz) plasma reactor created an argon reactor created an argon plasma. plasma.
Ethanol Ethanol droplets were injected droplets were injected directly into the argondirectly into the argonplasma (residence time 10plasma (residence time 10--11 s.s.
Ethanol Ethanol dissociated in the dissociated in the plasma, rapid cooling and plasma, rapid cooling and collected downstream as collected downstream as graphene sheetsgraphene sheets
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
A. A. DatoDato et al, et al, NanoLettersNanoLetters ((nlnl 8011566)8011566)
Graphite Oxide Graphene Graphite Oxide Graphene p O pp O pStaudenmaierStaudenmaier methodmethod::•• Graphite (Graphite (5g5g)+ )+ concconc HNOHNO33 ((45ml45ml) + ) + HH22SOSO44 (89 (89 mLmL) with ) with KClOKClO33 (55 g) (55 g) HH22SOSO44 (89 (89 mLmL) with ) with KClOKClO33 (55 g). (55 g).
•• Ice Ice bath bath to avoid to avoid sudden increases in sudden increases in temperature.temperature.
•• Repetitive washings to neutral Repetitive washings to neutral pH.pH.•• SpraySpraydried dried at 300 at 300 °°C. C. •• Thermal exfoliation Thermal exfoliation under under Argon Argon at at 1050 1050 °°C C for for 30 s.30 s.R d i i h H d i h d i R d i i h H d i h d i •• Reduction with Hydrazine hydrate in Reduction with Hydrazine hydrate in water at 100C for 24 hours.water at 100C for 24 hours.
[Caution! Addition of the potassium chlorate results in the formation of[Caution! Addition of the potassium chlorate results in the formation of[Caution! Addition of the potassium chlorate results in the formation of [Caution! Addition of the potassium chlorate results in the formation of chlorine dioxide gas, which is chlorine dioxide gas, which is explosive at highexplosive at highconcentrationsconcentrations.Purging.Purging the head space of the reaction vessel with an the head space of the reaction vessel with an inert inert gas,keepinggas,keeping the reaction vessel cool, and adding the potassium the reaction vessel cool, and adding the potassium chlorate slowly can help minimize the risk of explosion]chlorate slowly can help minimize the risk of explosion]
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
• Some of the GICs can be exfoliated by rapid heating.
SchafhaeutlSchafhaeutl C. J C. J PraktChemPraktChem; ; 2121:129:129––57, 184057, 1840
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
;; ,,
‘Ex‘Ex‐‐Situ’ Exfoliation and Situ’ Exfoliation and Size Size ExEx Situ Exfoliation and Situ Exfoliation and Size Size Reduction into Reduction into NanoPlateletsNanoPlatelets
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
G PG P M h l gM h l gxGnPxGnP MorphologyMorphology
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
•• Layers Layers can be intercalated and exfoliated into can be intercalated and exfoliated into platelets platelets with high with high aspect aspect ratiosratiospp
•• Basal Plane is inert (Basal Plane is inert (spsp22+ + ππ) ) –– hydrophobic hydrophobic •• Existence of functional groups at the edges can lead Existence of functional groups at the edges can lead to hydrogen to hydrogen or or
covalent covalent bonding bonding with polymer matrixwith polymer matrixcovalent covalent bonding bonding with polymer matrixwith polymer matrix•• Nanocomposite propertiesNanocomposite properties mechanical, electrical, thermal and mechanical, electrical, thermal and
barrier barrier propertiesproperties
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
ref. H. Aso et al. Energy & Fuels 2004, 18, 1309-1314
AromaticityAromaticity of Gof Graphene Nanoplateletsraphene Nanoplateletsh
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
G h G h NN P i l P i l M lM lGraphene: Graphene: NanoNano‐‐Particle to Particle to MacroscaleMacroscale•• Translate particle properties (nano) to Translate particle properties (nano) to polymers polymers
and compositesand composites–– Functionalize graphene on basal plane Functionalize graphene on basal plane
surface or edgessurface or edgessurface or edgessurface or edges–– Vary graphene platelet dimensionsVary graphene platelet dimensions–– Dispersion Dispersion of of graphenegraphenespe s ospe s o oo g ap e eg ap e e–– Organize into 2D Organize into 2D or 3D or 3D structuresstructures
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Conventional Composite
Intercalated Composite
Long Range Ordering
(LRO) Composite
Disordered Composite
Flexural Properties: Size and Surface Flexural Properties: Size and Surface Flexural Properties: Size and Surface Flexural Properties: Size and Surface Chemistry of NanoGraphite PlateletsChemistry of NanoGraphite Platelets
Effect of Size on Flexural StrengthEffect of Size on Flexural Modulus Effect of Size on Flexural Strength
Reinforcement pc (Vol%) pc (Wt%) ρ0 (ohm*cm) tCF 5 90 9 76 0 4 3 26
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
CF 5.90 9.76 0.4 3.26VGCF 1.09 1.87 0.03 3.03
Carbon Black 1.29 2.00 0.01 3.03Exfoliated Gr. 1.13 1.93 0.001 3.12
Thermal Conductivity and CTEThermal Conductivity and CTEo yo y
Thermal Conductivity Thermal Conductivity1
0 40.5
0.60.70.8
0.91
W/m
*K
0.40.50.60.70.80.9
(W/m
*K)
00.1
0.20.30.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exfoliated Graphite Content (Wt%)
W
00.10.20.3
ControlEpoxy
3 vol% MWEx.Gr
3 vol% CF 3 vol%VGCF
3 vol% CB
CTE below Tg
80859095
C]
Exfoliated Graphite Content (Wt%)
505560657075
[um
/m*C
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Con
trol
Epox
y CF
VGC
F
Car
bon
Bla
ck
Acr
ylam
ide
Gra
fted
Nan
ogra
phite
Th N C i F b i iTh N C i F b i iThermoset NanoComposite FabricationThermoset NanoComposite Fabrication
Epon 828 Epon 828 Epon 828 Epon 828
Jeffamine T403Jeffamine T403
ReinforcementReinforcement
OutgasOutgasin in
vacuumvacuum
CureCure
8585°°C for 2hrsC for 2hrs150150°°C f 2hC f 2h
PourPourintointomoldmold
Outgas Outgas in in
vacuumvacuumvacuumvacuum 150150°°C for 2hrsC for 2hrsmoldmold vacuumvacuumUltrasonicate & MixUltrasonicate & Mix
Th l ti N C it F b i tiTh l ti N C it F b i tiThermoplastic NanoComposite FabricationThermoplastic NanoComposite Fabrication
ExtrudeExtrudeInjection Injection MoldMold
xGnPxGnP
TPTP
xGnPxGnPCoat Coat PowderPowder
TPTPdd
Compression Compression MoldMold
P MiP MiE /I jM ldE /I jM ld
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
PowderPowder PreMixPreMixExtr/InjMoldExtr/InjMold
Fl l d I t P ti f G P/PP Fl l d I t P ti f G P/PP Flexural and Impact Properties of xGnP/PP Flexural and Impact Properties of xGnP/PP Modulus of Elasticity of xGnP-PP Nanocomposites
2xGnP-1G P 15
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
GPa
xGnP-15
10 0.01 0.05 0.1 1 2 3vol%
Flexural Strength of xGnP-PP Composites
4
50
55
Pa
xGnP-1xGnP-15
35
40
45
0 0.01 0.05 0.1 1 2 3vol %
MP
Impact Strength of xGnP-PP Nanocomposites
28
33
38xGnP-1xGnP-15
8
13
18
23
28
J/m
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
0% 0.01% 0.05% 0.10% 1% 2% 3%
Effect of xGnP on Crystallinity of PPEffect of xGnP on Crystallinity of PPPP
xGnP promotes the formationxGnP promotes the formationf f ββ h t l ( t l %)h t l ( t l %)0.01vol% xGnP 1/PP of of ββ phase crystals (at low %)phase crystals (at low %)
ββ--phase crystals of PP havephase crystals of PP havehigher impact strength andhigher impact strength and
toughness toughness
0.01% xGnP
toughness toughness
No change in the degree of No change in the degree of crystallinity crystallinity
130oC 10 i50μm
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Tc increases by 10Tc increases by 10--20 20 ooC C (1 to 10vol% of xGnP)(1 to 10vol% of xGnP)
130oC 10min
Reduce Percolation Point Reduce Percolation Point Premixing by Coating of PP Powder with xGnP Premixing by Coating of PP Powder with xGnP
xGnP is dispersed in IPA; add PP; remove IPA; xGnP is dispersed in IPA; add PP; remove IPA; compression mold compression mold ------ percolation to ~percolation to ~0.1%0.1%
Premixing by Coating of PP Powder with xGnP Premixing by Coating of PP Powder with xGnP
15μm
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 NanocompositeNylon 6 and Nylon 66 NanocompositeNylon 6 and Nylon 66 Nanocomposite Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 Nanocomposite Flexural Modulus and StrengthFlexural Modulus and Strength
Flexural Modulus of N66 Composites
8000
10000
12000
14000
Pa]
xGnP-1xGnP-15CFVGCFCBNanomer I34.TCNCloisite 93A
Flexural Modulus of Nylon 6 Composites
8000
10000
12000
14000
MPa
]
xGnP-1xGnP-15CFGFVGCFNanomer I34.TCNCloisite 93A
0
2000
4000
6000
0 5 10 15 20 25[V l%]
[MP
0
2000
4000
6000
0 5 10 15 20 25[Vol%]
[M
[Vol%]Flexural Strength of N66 Composites
100
150
200
250
[MPa
]
xGnP-1xGnP-15CFVGCFCBNanomer I34.TCNCloisite 93A
[Vol%]Flexural Strength of Nylon 6 Composites
100
150
200
250
[MPa
]
xGnP-1xGnP-15CFGFVGCFNanomer I34.TCNCloisite 93A
0
50
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 [Vol%]
0
50
100
0 5 10 15 20 25[Vol%]
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
El t i l d Th l C d ti itEl t i l d Th l C d ti itElectrical and Thermal ConductivityElectrical and Thermal Conductivityof Nylon 66 Nanocomposites of Nylon 66 Nanocomposites
Electrical Conductivity of Nylon 66 Composites
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
S/m
In-situ Gr.xGnP-1xGnP-15CFVGCFCB
Thermal Conductivity of Nylon 66 Composites
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
mK
]
1.E-110 5 10 15 20 25
[Vol%]
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
N66 20v% 20v% 20v% 20v% 15v% 10v%[W
/mN66 20v%
xGnP-120v%
xGnP-15 20v% In-situ
20v% CF
15v%VGCF
10v% CB
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Oxygen Permeability of Oxygen Permeability of xGnP/Nylon NanocompositesxGnP/Nylon NanocompositesxGnP/Nylon NanocompositesxGnP/Nylon Nanocomposites
1.071
3.19661 2.3965921.56378 3.062669 1.0611
Permeability of Nylon 6 Films51.56378 3.062669 1.0611
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Effective Utilization of graphene Effective Utilization of graphene Effective Utilization of graphene Effective Utilization of graphene nanoplatelets (xGnP) requires nanoplatelets (xGnP) requires
fabrication of individual particles fabrication of individual particles into 1D 2D into 1D 2D and 3D and 3D Morphologies Morphologies into 1D, 2D into 1D, 2D and 3D and 3D Morphologies Morphologies
without loss of desirable propertieswithout loss of desirable properties
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
11‐‐D Morphology ED Morphology E‐‐Field Field AlignmentAlignmentp gyp gy gg
High voltage sourceVoltage detectorVV
Copper platesPlastic dish
Voltage dividerD
E field Intensity: ~10-25KV/cmE field Intensity: 10 25KV/cm
(a) (b) (c)
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
2D 2D ‐‐ Transparent Transparent Conductive Conductive Monolayer Monolayer Film Film ‐‐ ITO ReplacementITO ReplacementFilm Film ITO ReplacementITO Replacement
2D Multilayer Graphene Graphene ‘Paper‘Paper’’2D Multilayer Graphene Graphene PaperPaperElectrical and Thermal ConductivityElectrical and Thermal Conductivity
••Highly Aligned xGnPHighly Aligned xGnP••Controllable sizeControllable size••Controllable thicknessControllable thicknessS l bl t l h tS l bl t l h t El i l d i i 2128 S/El i l d i i 2128 S/
Properties of xGnP Paper••Scalable to large sheetsScalable to large sheets
••Simple process Simple process •• Electrical conductivity: 2128 S/cmElectrical conductivity: 2128 S/cm•• Thickness: 47 micronThickness: 47 micron•• Surface resistivity: 0.1 ohm/sqSurface resistivity: 0.1 ohm/sq•• Graphite: ~Graphite: ~2x102x1033 S/cm S/cm OFHC C 5 8*10OFHC C 5 8*1055 S/S/
•• xGnPxGnP paper is ~ paper is ~ 100x100x < Cu in < Cu in electrical conductivityelectrical conductivityG PG P d it d it 22 // 33•• xGnPxGnP paper density ~paper density ~2g2g//cmcm33
•• Cu density ~8.9 g/Cu density ~8.9 g/cmcm33
•• xGnPxGnP paper is ~ 175 W/paper is ~ 175 W/mmooKK ininplaneplane
G PG P i 3 W/ i 3 W/ ooKK
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
•• xGnPxGnP paper is ~ 3 W/paper is ~ 3 W/mmooKK ––thruthruplaneplane
•• Cu is ~ 401 W/Cu is ~ 401 W/mmooKK
3D 3D ‐‐ xGnP xGnP Nanoparticles Applied to Nanoparticles Applied to CF CF Surfaces Surfaces ( 2%) in ( 2%) in Epoxy CompositesEpoxy CompositesSurfaces Surfaces (~2%) in (~2%) in Epoxy CompositesEpoxy Composites
Short Beam Shear Strength
90
100
30
40
50
60
70
80
[MPa
]
0
10
20
Control xGnP Coated sample
Flexural Strength in Transverse Direction
60
70
80
90
100
Flexural Modulus in Transverse Direction
7
8
9
10
11
0
10
20
30
40
50[M
Pa]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
[GPa
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University
Control xGnP Coated sampleControl xGnP Coated sample
Apply xGnP toApply xGnP to
3D 3D ‐‐ xGnP Modified SMCxGnP Modified SMCApply xGnP to Apply xGnP to fibers and filler fibers and filler
with a sizingwith a sizingMix fibers and Mix fibers and filler with filler with UPEUPE
Add Initiator Add Initiator and Promoter and Promoter UltrasonicateUltrasonicate
Cast and CureCast and Cure
• Strength• Modulus
exur
al s
tren
gth
8
10
hms.
m)
8
10
12
Ohm
s/sq
)
Volume resistivitySurface resistivity
•Fl
e
0
2
4
6
log
(Res
istiv
ity) (
R in
Oh
0
2
4
6
8
log
(Res
istiv
ity) (
R in
753 728649692
417
665
400
600
800
1000
stre
ngth
(J/m
)
28%( l fib ) + 47% 28%( l fib ) + 47% 0 1 2 3 4xGnP-1 wt.%
–– Multiple Synthesis Routes and CostMultiple Synthesis Routes and CostEffectiveEffective–– Platelet Platelet Morphology: NanoMorphology: NanoThickness; MicroThickness; MicroDiameter Diameter
•• High ModulusHigh Modulus•• High Electrical High Electrical ConductivityConductivity•• Optically Transparent Optically Transparent •• High Thermal High Thermal ConductivityConductivityHigh Thermal High Thermal ConductivityConductivity•• ThermoThermoOxidative ResistanceOxidative Resistance•• Barrier Properties Barrier Properties
M ltif ti l Additi f P l d C itM ltif ti l Additi f P l d C it–– Multifunctional Additive for Polymers and CompositesMultifunctional Additive for Polymers and Composites•• Dispersible Dispersible in Polymers and Waterin Polymers and Water•• Variable size Variable size •• Low Low Percolation ThresholdPercolation Threshold•• Fabrication for Controlled Fabrication for Controlled Anisotropy Anisotropy ((1D1D, , 2D2D or or 3D3D))•• Platform Platform for Nanofor NanoEngineeringEngineering
Copyright 2010, Professor Lawrence T. Drzal, Michigan State University