Top Banner
1 SM S M anagem ent& Technology Goldilocks and the Three Bears: a story about social computing in government Matthew Hodgson Web and Information Management Service Offering Lead, ACT SMS Management & Technology
23

Government And Social Computing

Nov 01, 2014

Download

Technology

Matthew Hodgson

Presentation to Web Standards Group on 26 July 2007. Details a case study on the use of certain social computing tools -- wikis and tagging -- to bring allow two groups to share their world-views of information.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Government And Social Computing

1

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y Goldilocks and the Three Bears:a story about social computing in government

Matthew Hodgson

Web and Information ManagementService Offering Lead, ACTSMS Management & Technology

Page 2: Government And Social Computing

2

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Goldilocks and Porridge

PorridgeLoves to eat

Eaten in

Built in

Visited

Contained

Contained

Goldilocks

Chairs

Just Right!Too hard

Too soft

Forest

Kitchen

Contained

Felt

FeltFelt

Felt

Felt

Felt

Page 3: Government And Social Computing

3

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Three Bears and Porridge

Breakfast Lunch Dinner

Porridge

Page 4: Government And Social Computing

4

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Information Disconnect

PorridgeLoves to eat

Eaten in

Built in

Visited

Contained

Contained

Goldilocks

Chairs

Just Right!Too hard

Too soft

Forest

Kitchen

Contained

Felt

FeltFelt

Felt

Felt

Felt

Breakfast Lunch Dinner

Porridge=?

Page 5: Government And Social Computing

5

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Govt. Department and Information Disconnect

WRITE WRITE

CONTAINS

Free-text

PolicyCompliance Fees

=?Stakeholders

REPORTS ON

Page 6: Government And Social Computing

6

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

The Problem

“How can you determine what’s in these reports so that one world view can inform the other?”

“How do you create business processes and tools that connects these two world views of information?”

- Mark Allenby, SMS Consultant

Page 7: Government And Social Computing

7

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Page 8: Government And Social Computing

8

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

A typical approach

Parent term

Child term Child term Child term

Taxonomy

+EDMS or TRIM

Might meet the businesses needsWould it meet users’ needs?

Page 9: Government And Social Computing

9

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Using a taxonomy?

IssuesNeed to have a finite set of ‘things’ to build a good taxonomyContent of reports are not finite and change over timeDoesn’t fit people’s personal view of informationNo one will use it (except for the experts)

ExtensibilityTaxonomy needs to be redesigned to adapt to new information

Parent term

Child term Child term Child term

Page 10: Government And Social Computing

10

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Issues Good as a ‘filing cabinet’ for documents Good for records managers Not designed to match the way users’ think about their own

information (corporate way only) Not designed for other things like ‘sharing information’ Tower Software uses a wiki to share knowledge and

information

Using TRIM?

Page 11: Government And Social Computing

11

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

A tagging approach

“… instead [of using a system], you may want to capture and communicate… the essence of what is talked about by using free text tagging (like they do with blogs and wikis)…”

- Matt’s response

Page 12: Government And Social Computing

12

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Selling tagging

Currently tracking over 8 million tags

5 years and millions of tags and users

8 years worth of tagged, public, online diaryand information websites

All user/self-classified information

Page 13: Government And Social Computing

13

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Tagging = users’ view of information

Benefits for users: Chosen by the user Not part of a formal taxonomy

(my way, not the corporate way of thinking) Adapts easily to new information Flexible and easy to use

Benefits for the business: People want to use it - high level of participation Information still gets classified Tag clouds show frequency of terms for reporting

Page 14: Government And Social Computing

14

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Applying Garrett’s User-Centred Design Methodology

See also: http://www.jjg.net/ia/

Page 15: Government And Social Computing

15

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Scope phaseBig gaps in information and little communications between stakeholders and the Department due to different world-views

Some documented process, but without documented workflow or governance

No tools or supporting systems

Page 16: Government And Social Computing

16

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

SolutionFacilitate information storage & communication Create a place to share information and knowledge Invite and encourage stakeholders to participate

Establish governance Document roles and responsibilities Document process

Provide tools and systems Support business process Support the way people think about their own information If tools are usable they will be used Focus on connecting people, information and knowledge

Page 17: Government And Social Computing

17

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Tagging and Topic Maps

Topic maps = connected information

Topic Map

WRITE WRITE

CONTAINS

Free-text

Stakeholders

Tagging CorporateTaxonomy

Laws ComplianceEquivalent to

BillsFees

Policy

Equivalent to

Has categoriesDecisions

Equivalent to

Page 18: Government And Social Computing

18

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Topic Map

WRITE WRITE

CONTAINS

Free-text

Stakeholders

Tagging CorporateTaxonomy

Laws ComplianceEquivalent to

BillsFees

Policy

Equivalent to

Has categoriesDecisions

Equivalent to

Wiki

Store and share knowledge

Contributeknowledge

Contributeknowledge

Wikis to store knowledge

Page 19: Government And Social Computing

19

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Page 20: Government And Social Computing

20

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Department’s term in theirCorporate taxonomy

Related tags users haveCreated and related to the term ‘policy’

Page 21: Government And Social Computing

21

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Social computing tools in this case study

Tagging Good for user classification of information Good for representing information based on the user’s own

world-view

Wikis Good for communication - sharing information and

knowledge Easy to create and maintain content Easy and cheap to setup

Topic Maps The glue that connects disconnected information

Page 22: Government And Social Computing

22

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

Key messages The more our computers are connected, the more

we realise how disconnected our information is Social computing tools can connect people,

information and knowledge Use social computing tools in “smart ways” to

serve growing user demand to interact directly with government

Remember to concentrate on the “social”-part, not the “computing” part

Page 23: Government And Social Computing

23

SM

S M

anag

emen

t & T

echn

olog

y

… happily ever after

Blog: magia3e.wordpress.comEmail: [email protected]

Web: www.smsmt.com