I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS REPORT on the BUTT URANIUM RARE EARTH PROPERTY BUTT TOWNSHIP DISTRICT OF NIPISSING ONTARIO FOR 2. 45460 RECEIVED GRIFTCO CORPORATION prepared by: JUN 1 6 2010 GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd. L.D.S. Winter, P.Geo. 7 June 2010
31
Embed
Geophysical Surveys Report on the Butt Uranium Rare Earth ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS REPORT
on the
BUTT URANIUM RARE EARTH PROPERTY
BUTT TOWNSHIP
DISTRICT OF NIPISSING
ONTARIO
FOR 2. 45460
RECEIVED GRIFTCO CORPORATION
prepared by:
JUN 1 6 2010
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE
Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd.
L.D.S. Winter, P.Geo.
7 June 2010
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Property 2.1 Property Description 2.2 Location, Access and Infrastructure
BUTT URANIUM RARE EARTH PROPERTY ZONES OF ANOMALOUS CHARGEABILITY
CHARGEABILITY VALUES STATION BACKGROUND ANOMALY
mVN mVN
From end of line (30+00N) to <0 to 5 >5 to 26
33+50N
From end of line (30+00N) to <0 to 5 >5 to 34
33+50N
40+00N to north end of line
<0 to 5 >5 to 9
From end of line {20+00N) to <0 to 10 >10 to 20
24+00N
28+00N to <0 to 10 10 to 28
31+50N
41+00N
22+00N to 24+00N
<0 to 10 10 to 30
28+00N to <0 to 10 10 to 20
32+50N
COMMENTS
Broad zone at south end of line with 2 more anomalous sections at 30+00N and 32+50N. Coincident with high resistivity 2 x to >14 x background.
Broad zone at south end of line with one more anomalous section at 30+00N. Coincident with high resistivity 2 x to 20 x background.
Increasing chargeability with increasing resistivity at north end of line.
Broad zone of increased chargeability with highest values at 23+50N. Variable resistivity.
Broad zone of increased chargeability with 2 more anomalous sections at 28+75N and 31+00N. Section at 31+00N has highest chargeabilities. Section at 28+ 75N shows higher resistivities while that at 31+00N shows lower resistivities.
Increasing chargeability and resistivity at end of line.
Broad zone of increased chargeability. In general coincident, high resistivity.
Broad zone of increased chargeability separated into a northern and southern section. Southern section at 29+00N has higher associated resistivities.
11
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
22+00E
23+00E
24+00E
25+00E
19+00N to <0 to 10
22+00N
30+00N to 3 to 10
32+00N
17 +OON at south end of line to 0 to 10
19+00N
30+00N to 35+00N
<0 to 10
18+00N at south end of line to 4 to 10
22+50N
26+00N to 34+00N
3 to 10
17 +OON at south end of line to 0 to 10
18+00N
26+00N to 33+00N
3 to 8
33+00N to 1 to 10
34+00N
Broad zone of increased chargeability with 2 more
10 to 32 anomalous sections at 19+00N - 20+00N and 22+00N with coincident increased resistivity.
200 m wide zone of increased
10 to 24 chargeability, increasing with depth. In part low and in part higher resistivity.
200 m wide zone of increased 10 to 32 chargeability with coincident
high resistivity.
Broad irregular zone of increased chargeability with
10 to 23 generally low resistivity except for a small zone at 33+00N -34+00N of higher values.
Broad zone of increased 10 to 19 chargeability below n = 3 with
associated high resistivity.
Broad zone of increased chargeability with 3 narrow sections of more anomalous values at 26+00N, 27+50 to
10 to 34 29+00N and 31+50N to 34+00N. The first 2 sections show increased resistivity whereas the 3rd section has low resistivity.
Modest increase in 10 to 17 chargeability with low
resistivity.
Modest irregular increase in 8 to 12 chargeability with high
resistivity.
Approximately 1 00 m wide zone of high chargeability with
10 to 66 associated low resistivity. This zone contains the highest chargeability values obtained during the survey.
12
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
A total field magnetometer survey was carried out on 27 line-km of cut lines
spaced at 100 m in the eastern part of the Property. An earlier survey (Winter,
2009) indicated two magnetic domains on the Property, one with lower magnetic
susceptibilities to the north and one with higher magnetic susceptibilities to the south
with the boundary between the 2 domains trending northwest-southeast (330°). This
overall pattern also shows up in the current survey with the general boundary
between the 2 domains being at about 30+00N (UTM 5063000mN). In addition to
the 300° trend, two other trends, east-west and northeasterly are also present.
The IP survey chargeability results show 2 main zones of anomalous
chargeabilities/interest. The first area lies at and north of the baseline (29+00N to
34+00N) and from 17+00E to 25+00E. Within this area, anomalous zones show
northeasterly and east-west trends. The second area of anomalous values lies from
17+00N to 24+00N and between 19+00E and 25+00E, in the southeastern part of
the grid.
Previous work in the 1950's identified a number of radioactive showings, for the
most part hosted in pegmatite dykes. Some of these reported showings lie adjacent
to the anomalous chargeability zones, however, for other showings there appears to
be no correlation.
In summary, the magnetometer survey returned similar results to the earlier
survey (Winter, 2009) and within the area surveyed confirmed the presence of two
mqgnetic domains, an area of low magnetic susceptibility to the north and an area of
higher magnetic susceptibility to the south. Three general trends or patterns are
indicated by the magnetic survey, northwesterly (330°), northeasterly and east-west.
The IP survey identified two areas of anomalous chargeability values, one in the
north-central part of the grid and one in the southeastern part of the grid. The IP
anomalies also show the same 3 trends as shown by the magnetic survey.
13
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
At this point, there is no apparent direct correlation between the IP anomalies
and areas of known radioactivity.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
At this point, it is considered to be important to determine, if possible, what is the
cause of the increased IP chargeability and if there is any relationship between areas of
known radioactivity and the IP and/or magnetic survey results. To this effect, it is
recommended that;
1. the Property be geologically mapped and,
2. all showings be cleaned out, mapped and sampled.
Based on the prospecting and sampling work from the 1950's, it is considered
that the Property has considerable potential to host uranium and rare earth element
(REE) mineralization of economic interest. Once the recommended mapping and
sampling are completed, the results can be correlated with the geophysical survey
results and then a comprehensive evaluation program can be implemented.
8. PERSONNEL
The surveys were carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., Massey, Ontario
using the following personnel.
Mike Faulkner, Walford, Ontario
Gab Roy, Elliot Lake, Ontario
Mike Whalen, Walford, Ontario.
Bronson Ede, Sudbury, Ontario
Andy Desjardins, Espanola, Ontario
Tyler Gagan, Espanola, Ontario
Cliff Moffatt, Sudbury, Ontario
Matt Mandigo, Massey, Ontario
Brent Patrie, Val Therese, Ontario.
14
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
9.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
EXPENDITURES
TABLE 3 GRIFTCO CORPORATION
BUTT URANIUM RARE EARTH PROPERTY EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES APRIL 2010
Line cutting: 27 km@ $650/km
Magnetometer Survey: 27 km @ $150/km
IP Survey: a= 25m; n = 6: 17 km@ $1600/km
Two mobilization trips; one for line cutting and
one for geophysical surveys@ $1600 each
Data Processing/printing maps
Report (6 copies)
Total
$ 17,550
4,050
27,200
3,200
2,000
2,600
$ 56,600
The expenditures were made on three (3) claims in the following proportions:
4246900
4214917
4214918
33.3%
42.6%
24.1%
Total 100.0%
L.D.S. Winter, P.Geo.
7 June 2010
15
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
REFERENCES
Easton, R.M., 1992
The Grenville Province and the Proterozoic History of Southern and Central Ontario; p. 715-754, The Central Gneiss Belt, in Geology of Ontario, Part 2, MNDM.
Ferguson, S.A., 1971
Columbium (Niobium) Deposits of Ontario, ODM, Mineral Resources Circular 14, p. 49.
Hewitt, D.F., 1967
Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Southern Ontario, ODM, Mineral Resources Circular No. 4, p. 47.
Marmot, C. and Johnston, M., 1987
Mineral Deposits Studies in the Huntsville-Parry Sound-Powassan Area -A Progress Report, OFR 5647, OGS, Mines & Minerals Division.
Winter, L.D.S., 2009
Magnetometer Survey Report on the Butt Township Property, Butt Twp., Dist. of Nipissing, Ontario for Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., 11 pages, 4 Figures, 2 Maps.
16
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
L.D.S. Winter
1849 Oriole Drive, Sudbury, ON P3E 2W5 (705) 560-6967
I, Lionel Donald Stewart Winter, P. Geo. do hereby certify that:
1. I am currently an independent consulting geologist.
2. I graduated with a degree in Mining Engineering (B.A.Sc.) from the University of Toronto in 1957. In addition, I have obtained a Master of Science (Applied) (M.Sc. App.) from McGill University, Montreal, QC.
3. I am a Life Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, a Life Member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, a Registered Geoscientist in Ontario and in British Columbia (P.Geo.).
4. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 50 years since my graduation from university.
5. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 ("NI43-1 01 ") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in Nl 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of Nl43-101.
6. I am the author responsible for the preparation of the Geophysical Survey Report titled "Geophysical Surveys Report on the Butt Uranium Rare Earth Property, District of Nipissing, Ontario" and dated June 7, 2010 (the "Technical Report").
?oon I --~. ___ ) __ _ ---'--· _ ___ I ~- · - . .1-.--. t___ I . ---- ·-· ' _ __J _ _ ,-J__ . .L---L-- I -~- ___ .J... ___ , ... I - - ··- ·· .--L-. . --L- .. ~ I 200G ()
Cha rgeabil ity
29+00 N .50r00 N 3 1+00 N :~?+00 N 33+00 N j4rQQ N j~·rOO N ."~6+00 N 37+00 N :>:> .6 23.9 u.~. 11 .4 13 .8 1o.7 1€- . 3 149 a.111 7 . i 4 6.0<~ -1-.95 3 . 74 ?.:2 :> . 4 1. 43
38r00 N .59 r 00 N 40+00 N fitter i8 n - 1
iiite'" Chargeability n~1
n~2
n-.1
n-:-4
fl-~)
,.,- 6
~t=2 2~
~ 1/
n-:j 15 11
1'•' 4 7
" j n .. !; ?
1 ,,.E; -·1
29+00 N 3o~oo N . F;l\er 22900 HOOO 8680
alcu lated Res1stiv:it¥~ 1
3 1+00 N 32+00 N JJ •OO N 3~+00 ~ 35+00 N 36+00 N 37•00 N 38~00 N 39f 00 N ~0+00 N Fill~a l culated Resistivi
30+00 N :S1+00 N 32+00 N .D+OO N 34+00 N 35+00 N 36+00 N 37-fCO N 38+00 N 40+00 N 41+00 N Filt~alculated Resistivi 6640 10400 1.3!:>00 12500 1 0~00 9230 7220 3990 ~ 1 w :lo:lo 3St>O 3020 2()30 3520 3650 4050 4220 t:.580 4990 5850 6530
O 1. . • I~ 1 , _ L_ I _ _ •.. 1. L - _I_. _ l _L_ . - 1 - - 1 - ~ .
riua: 8;~~ .N h .4 1 ~;29~ .N lo.2 20~29~ · N; ' .3 2 ~ ;J~ .N A. s~ 2?;~~ .N 'l .9a 2?;_~~ .N 8.74
2~;~;. IN 5.74 21:.~~ IN 9 . 7 ~ 2?;~~ .N 6 9; 2 {;?~ I ~ io. 4
2?~?~ ,N Lu 291'~~~ IN 1o.3 39~2.~ ,N ; , . ~ .5) ;~~ .N 12.; .5{;7.~~ IN 1.d
3:;~~ .N 2?. .1 J~ ;,9~ '1-J 1o.s 3?;,9~ _N
36+00 N 37+00 N e s I t o o e I o 1 1
12 12 . 1 u .7 4.ro fi .H. r. = 1 &
n-=2
.. - .)
n - IJ
n= 6
18•00 N 19;00 N 20+00 N 2i +OU N 22+00 N 24+00 N ?.5+00 N 2/+0U N 28+00 N 29~-oo N 30+00 1\ J1 ~oo N .37..+00 N .),31·00 N 36!·00 1\i 37+00 N 169CO 7950 11100 14/00 13800 7?00 8j5Q 12:)00 14200 13600 !29UO 10900 I 1.~00 6tlt>O 4270 3900 4580 18/::lO ; 4200 16300 1.3600 I 1900 11900 1 I 700 '!0600 9140
4 .)1 11-2 10967~" ~ ~H)o~·a ~019 I
f:lter 206(}() 7MOO 24300 a leu Ia ted Resistivit¥_1
2Q(1()J ... . I 1.---1... - 1 .. ---L -L-- j -'----l.. • I •• I -· . .L_,_ - ·J.. -.J.__ -- ! .... l2Q0Q
r~: 125 ·20
1/-100 N 1~+00 N 19•00 N 20•00 N 21t00 N 22+00 N 2S·•OO "l /1.·100 N /.5+00 N 16.3 12 .!:1 7 9 10.2 9.96 !1 . ?.4 8 . 38 !>.73 4 . 77 4 . 43 5.5'1 6.'1 7.14 IU:il 5.17 6.35 I. II 7 . 04
2/100 N /R+OO N 29t-DO N 3/+00 N 8.f~ 6.31 7 .89 8 . 66 7.60 9 . 42 10 . :~ 10. i '•?. 6