Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
General Observations :
1. The data projected in DPRs is differing from the real time data appraised
by the Commissioners during the meetings for all most all the
municipalities in terms of Population, area, existing equipment etc.
Commissioners shall provide ULB- specific information to the Consultant
and take ownership of DPR.
2. The estimates of the solid waste quantity generated and presented were
not matching to the ULB information. The consultants shall reconcile the
figures and arrive at the final quantities.
3. The analysis of the solid waste with respect to composition is not
realistic, which may be due to improper sampling collection or testing
procedure. The consultants shall engage a NABL accredited laboratory
other than one engaged earlier for re – sampling of MSW in all the ULBs
(vertically composite samples shall be collected at each monitoring
station). These samples shall be analyzed for component fraction and
Physico - chemical parameters. 3 additional sample collection per ULB
(Exiting old dump, fresh MSW at dump site, fresh MSW at dump site,
random sample in the city) shall be taken and analyzed wherever
composition does not reflect the actual composition.
4. The specific areas of disposal like existing land or new area of inert
disposal was not mentioned. In the calculations the consultant should
have made an estimate of the inert material left out after the conversion
or disposing to integrated Municipal Solid waste processing plant. The
inert material requires how much land for 20 years (up to 2030) required
and whether land has to be acquired or the existing land is sufficient to
dispose was not mentioned.
5. The location specific studies were not made as to which type of facility is
suitable. The consultant should take in to cognizance of the existing
system and prepare the draft accordingly.
6. Study does not reflect the ground water conditions, soil percolation back
ground air quality in the existing dump yards and the habitation or land
use land cover in the existing dup yards or new dump yards identified.
7. The DPR’s in nut shall should reflect the local conditions and should
suggest specific solid waste management facility that is specific to that
locality. The draft DPRs are more or less generalized rather than specific
to that location.
8. The equipment should be minimized after calculating the trips and
available machines. The optimization of transport is not discussed.
Prioritization and phasing out of the activities is not discussed by the
consultants.
Review of Draft DPR Pertaining to ULBs of East & West Godavari
Districts
The Following key aspects to be studied by all the teams simultaneously.
1. Breakup of Project Cost like salaries of Employee maintaining and monitoring
the project.
2. Waste minimization practices adopted.
3. Best practices adopted compared with other successful systems.
4. Waste to Wealth or waste to Energy aspects of the project.
5. Routing with GPS.
6. Segregation of solid waste and salvage.
7. Life cycle analysis of solid waste.
8. Who transports solid waste to the proponents.
9. What measures are taken to dispose of ash.
10. How inert and hazardous wastes are land filled.
11. Sampling by authorized lab + Data of ULBs to be cross verified. Some primary
data is must instead of more secondary data.
12. Push carts to be preferred to Auto and vans.
13. Ensure land availability and suitability in different parts of the District and
cluster rather than a single place.
14. System suggested must be site specific ie District specific.
15. When will be the first activity started and completed, may be a small activity in
just 1 or 2 care?
16. Provision for Automated way Bridge
17. Legal hurdles envisaged with action plan
18. Capital cost and O&M cost of treatment per ton waste
19. Explore the possibility of converting some sparsely populated areas to ply
grounds or parks or golf field after 3 years of Dumping with 4 to 5 m tall covers.
Regards.
Prof. KVSG Murali Krishna.
Lr.No SAC/COO/ISWM/F.No45/15.D.No41/15,date:14.10.2015 Sub: Sending data to DPR consultants Ref: MSW DPR Review Meeting held on Sep 28, 29, and 30, 2015. With reference to the cited, the data given in Appendix I may be ensured / provided by the ULBs to the DPR consultants to avoid discrepancies in the report, future waste projections and analysis in choosing the technology for processing and disposal of MSW. Encl: Appendix I.
Sd/- Swachha Andhra Corporation
To, All Municipal Commissioners of ULBs of Andhra Pradesh
Appendix I
S.No. Data required Status of submission (Yes / No)
Remarks if any
ULB Name:
1 Quantity of waste generated in the ULB including drain silt (along with weigh bridge proof)
2 Waste collection route map
3 Town map
4 Sanitation proforma (3C)
5 Drain cess / SWM cess
6 Income / Revenue last 5 years
7 Service level bench marks
8 Filled in MoUD check list for review of DPR
Name of the ULB:
Name of the Commissioner:
Signature of the Commissioner:
Date:
Check List for Review of MSW
DPR
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPRA General Components1 Project justification / need Need for MSW management in the ULB and project2 Scheme of the project / fund for project Funding agency for the project
Any similar projects
Funds already granted of any
Details on ongoing MSW project - funding agency, population, infrastructure, capacity of compost plant, landfill
3 Compatibility between existing MSW system and proposed MSW system
4 Administrative and political jurisdiction map ULB boundary map in the district5 Landuse of the ULB / Master Plan Master plan prepared, if any?
Present landuse in the ULB
Landuse map6 Consent / Clearances from SPCB,
SEIAA/SEAC/EAC, Airport/Airfield authorities, Flood Control / Groundwater Management Authorities, etc. if any
EC before setting up of the plant
Consent from SPCB for setting of the MSWM facility
Any other clearances if required?
7 Executive summary of DPR Executive summary to be provided.
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPRB Existing Status1 MSWM Facility Area and availability of land
Land acquisition status – acquired or in process of acquisition, no land (proof is any)
for setting up of MSWM Facility/transfer stations
Topographic map of the project area
Geo-technical investigation reports for the MSWM site
Electric feeder line to MSW plant / Transfer station and agreement / commitment from Electricity department
Is the land / site location as per the Master Plan
Any clearances or consent obtained from authorities.2 Waste
generation Quantification surveys - per capita waste generation and waste generated per day in
the ULB
Sources of waste generation
Characteristics of waste – collection of composite samples by accredited lab
Certified lab reports
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPRB Existing Status3 Collection and
transportation Route maps ( ULB has to provide)
Door to door collection
Collection from open areas, community bins
Hazardous, bio-medical waste collection
Transfer stations, if any.
Operating schedule of primary and secondary collection vehicles - no. of trips, timing
4 Processing, Treatment and Disposal
Open dumping,
Any consent or clearances obtained for processing, treatment and disposal
Detailed note on existing solid waste management systemC Proposed Interventions1 Waste generation and
segregation Population projections as per CPHEEO Manual
Consideration of floating population
Per capita waste generation
Estimated waste generation for future 30 years
Strategies for 100% source segregation
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPR
C Proposed Interventions2 Waste collection and
transportation Whether proposed primary and secondary collection is as per CPHEEO
Manual – no. and type, trips, additional vehicles/equipments
Need for transfer station and design features ( based on ULB to dump yarddistance, quantity of waste generated)
Traffic diversion / control during construction phase3 Waste processing,
treatment and disposal at MSWM facility
Major components of the project, its conceptual design and drawings as per CPHEEO manual
Selection of proven technologies considering the ULB profile
Whether the proposed land area for MSWM facility and its future expansion serves designed period of 30 years?
Opportunities for reclamation and bio-mining of old dump sites.4 Compost
plant/RDF/Biomethanisation/WtE etc
Capacity, area
Marketing of compost / RDF/PPA, arrangements , if any?
O&M5 Landfill Quantity of waste to be accommodated in landfill ( ULB wise or Regional)
Capacity of landfill, area
Covering material (earth) required for landfill
Detailed design ; O&M
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPRC Proposed Interventions6 Leachate Leachate collection system
Leachate treatment plant – generation rates, capacity of plant, area, treatment technology, treated leachate standards
7 Conceptual Drawings Process flow diagram for entire MSWM system
Detailed drawings to scale of all components of facility and ancillary works
D Project Cost1 Major components of the project
and its cost Cost for all major components of the project
Any modular approach proposed for setting up of the facility?
Whether BOQ and cost estimates as per latest SOR? Authenticated documents for various equipment / machinery, pro-forma invoices, etc.
2 O&M cost and revenue generation details (existing & proposed), annual SWM cess
Compost plant O&M
Landfill O&M
3 Internal return of rate / economic rate of return
S.No. Check List Points for addressal / inclusion in DPRE Other Activities1 Others Project implementation schedule
Provision for IEC activities
Institutional and financial status of project executing agency
Service level benchmarking
Environmental and social problems if applicable
Provision for capacity building of ULB @ 0.5% of project cost? Action plan for capacity building programme
PPP component and funding pattern
Association of waste pickers organization
R&R plan if applicable
Period of completion of project
Options for using the inert material like Construction & Demolition waste.
Proposed measures for involvement of stakeholders in MSWM.
Measures for leadership development and change management.
Cluster approach if required.
Check List for Review of MSW DPR
as per MoUD,
Check List as per MoUD, March 2012
S.No. Check List Inclusion in DPR
1 Project justification / need
2 Scheme of the project / fund for project
3 Compatibility between existing MSW system and proposed MSW system
4 Administrative and political jurisdiction map
5 Landuse of the ULB / Master Plan
6 Land acquisition status (certificate is acquired) for setting up of MSWM Facility/transfer stations
7 Action plan for acquisition of land, in case land not acquired.
8 Consent / Clearances from SPCB, SEIAA/SEAC/EAC, Airport/Airfield authorities, Flood Control / Groundwater Management Authorities, etc.
9 Electric feeder line to MSW plant / Transfer station and agreement / commitment from Electricity department
Check List as per MoUD, March 2012
S.No. Check List Inclusion in DPR
10 Topographic map of the ULB / project area
11 Geo-technical investigation reports and bore hole logs for the MSWM site
12 Executive summary of DPR
13 Population projections as per CPHEEO Manual
14 Consideration of floating population
15 Garbage survey – per capita waste generation and waste generated per day
16 Characteristics of waste - composite sample and certificate from accredited lab
17 Covering material required for landfill
18 Detailed note on existing solid waste management system
19 Transfer station and operating schedule of primary and secondary collection vehicles, no. of trips, timing
Check List as per MoUD, March 2012
S.No. Check List Inclusion in DPR
20 Details on ongoing MSW project - funding agency, population, infrastructure, capacity of compost plant,landfill
21 Proposal of major components of the project, its design and detailed drawings as per CPHEEO manual – door to door collection, primary collection, secondary collection, treatment & disposal facilities, leachatecollection system, LTP – capacity, technology , treated leachate standards
22 Major components of the project cost and its cost
23 Hazardous waste generation and its treatment
24 Biomedical waste generation and its treatment
25 Primary and secondary collection route maps
26 Process flow diagram for entire MSWM system
27 Drawings to scale of all components of the facility
28 Geometry of land certified
Check List as per MoUD, March 2012
S.No. Check List Inclusion in DPR
29 Selection of proven technologies considering the ULB profile
30 Is MSW facility site location as per Master Plan ?
31 Whether the proposed land area for MSWM facility and its future expansion serves designed period of 30 years?
32 Any modular approach proposed for setting up of the facility?
33 Whether BOQ and cost estimates as per latest SOR?Authenticated documents for various equipment / machinery, pro-forma invoices, etc.
34 Provision for IEC activities
35 Detailed drawings for components and ancillary works
36 Provision for DG set, capacity calculations
37 Implementation schedule
Check List as per MoUD, March 2012
S.No. Check List Inclusion in DPR
38 Internal return of rate / economic rate of return
39 Traffic diversion / control during construction phase
40 Institutional and financial status of project executing agency
41 Marketing of compost / RDF, tying up with an agency?
42 O&M cost and revenue generation details (existing and proposed) and annual SWM cess
43 Service level benchmarking
44 Environmental and social problems if applicable
45 Provision for capacity building of ULB @ 0.5% of project cost? Action plan for capacity building programme
46 PPP component and funding pattern
47 Association of waste pickers organization
48 R&R plan if applicable
49 Period of completion of project
Scope of Work provided in RFP for DPR review
S.No. Scope of Work as per RFP for MSW DPR Project To Review1 Realistic assessment of quality, Characterization and classification of
MSW, the current scenario in each ULB.2 Planning-Detailed planning for resource requirement and
implementation strategy.3 Proposed DPR shall be in line with MSW rules, 2000 of GoI and the
toolkit of the Government of India for MSW projects.4 The DPR to address the policy requirements for the following:
Keeping wet and dry waste streams separated at the household/source level itself.
Door step collection, Segregation of wet waste.
Composting of biodegradable waste.
Recycling of dry waste by category.5 Strategies for 100% source segregation and door to door collection of
household & commercial waste, street sweeping, silt removal, vegetable& fruit market waste, slaughter house waste etc. and suitable incentivestructure to promote source segregation & recycling.
6 Options for production of compost preferably in a decentralized manner,and generation of green energy through bio-mechanization whereappropriate, sustainable, environment and eco-friendly and protectspublic health, and identification of ideal site for their setting up in theproposed ULB/Cluster of ULBs as per feasibility.
S.No. Scope of Work as per RFP for MSW DPR Project7 Transportation of resource from the secondary collection point to the
proposed processing plant with detailed process.8 Analysis of the need for Transfer station and its basic design features.9 Tie-ups for inorganic waste and suggestions for sustainable technologies
for processing.10 Options and strategies for processing of organic waste.11 Opportunities for involvement of various groups of the society for
MSWM activities.12 Techno-economic and environmental analysis of various options for
MSWM processes and institutionalization.13 Road map towards achieving zero land fill facilities.14 Innovative incentive structure to the operating personnel for motivation
and for ensuring sustainability of MSWM.15 Exploring innovative processes and their enforcement for making the
habitations liter free, bin free and dump free so as to prevent and healthhazards.
16 Creating and sustaining a supply chain for recycled waste (products andemployment)
17 Availability of land for proposed landfill.18 Availability of power supply and exploration of renewable sources of
energy.19 Implementation strategy including resource requirement.
S.No. Scope of Work as per RFP for MSW DPR Project20 Information, Education and Communication (IEC) campaign models and
enforcement plans.21 Training and competency building plans.22 Streamlining and optimization of transportation system.23 Options for using the inert material like Construction & Demolition
waste.24 Opportunities for reclamation and bio-mining of old dump sites.25 Impact of the proposed MSWM system on community health and
environment.26 Proposed measures for involvement of stakeholders in MSWM.27 Measures for leadership development and change management.28 The study should also consider the existing projects being implemented
on cluster-basis in consultation with the concerned MunicipalCommissioners & CDMA. The consultant shall study the land availabilityfor land fill in each ULB within the proposed cluster and the distance tothe centre of the clusters, and quantity of rejects to be taken to the landfill. In each Region clustering is done wherever practicable.
29 The DPR submitted should be practical and thoroughly implementablewith zero landfill concept and with Operation & Maintenance strategiesof MSWM.
S.No. Scope of Work as per RFP for MSW DPR Project30 The DPR should propose a practical action plan for each ULB with cost
implications and financial requirements for each suggested methodologyand consolidating for each cluster and overall cost of implementation forthe entire state.
31 The DPR to suggest implementation strategies for the MSWM plans for(i) individual ULBs which are not part of the clusters (ii) for the cluster ofULBs (iii) for improvements in the clusters in which MSWM project isunder implementation.
32 The consultant should provide independent DPRs for each proposedcluster. Separate action plan shall be proposed for each ULB activity wiseduly coated indicating responsible personnel to undertake each activityand proposed financing pattern.
33 Based on the Feasibility Study, the numbers of clusters that can beformed in the Region are to be proposed. One DPR is to be prepared foreach ULB. The DPR for the ULB in which the Common Processing Unit isproposed for the cluster should contain complete details of theTechnology and Cost estimate of the processing unit.
Related Documents
