Top Banner
1 ANIMAL WELFARE ASPECTS OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE PIG PRODUCTION
154
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: GAP Pigs

1

ANIMAL WELFARE ASPECTS OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE

PIG PRODUCTION

Page 2: GAP Pigs

2

ANIMAL WELFARE ASPECTS OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE (GAP)pig production

This presentation has been adapted for use on shareview

Full version available free from ciwf.org/gap on DVD-ROM

Full version includes embedded video clips and interactive animation

DVD-ROM also includes film, book and lecturers’ notes

GAP Pigs DVD-ROM

Page 3: GAP Pigs

3

GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES:

• produce safe, healthy, high-quality food for consumers

• provide jobs with fair incomes for rural communities

• are socially and environmentally sustainable

• provide high standards of animal welfare

This presentation will concentrate on animal welfare aspects

Page 4: GAP Pigs

4

ANIMAL WELFARE ASPECTS OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE

PIG PRODUCTION

Contents:

• Chapter 1 Natural behaviour and production systems - 4

• Chapter 2 Space and foraging needs for dry sows - 19

• Chapter 3 Avoiding aggression in dry sows - 35

• Chapter 4 Space and nesting needs of farrowing sows - 50

• Chapter 5 Avoiding teeth clipping in piglets - 70

• Chapter 6 Avoiding castration in male piglets - 82

• Chapter 7 Avoiding early weaning - 94

• Chapter 8 Avoiding tail docking and tail biting - 106

• Chapter 9 Good stockmanship - 122

• Chapter 10 Summary - 144

To return to the contents list at any time,type 3 and press ENTER

To jump to any slide in this presentation, type the number of the slide and press ENTER

Page 5: GAP Pigs

5

Worldwide, 1.1 billion pigs are raised for meat each year

CHAPTER 1natural behaviour & production systems

Page 6: GAP Pigs

6

Pigs are descended from the wild boar

ANCESTRY Dale Arey/CIWF

Page 7: GAP Pigs

7

ANCESTRY

Some breeds have been developed for hot climates like these small black Iberian pigs

Some breeds have been developed for cold climates like these hairy Mangalicas

Page 8: GAP Pigs

8

ANCESTRY

Some traditional breeds still closely resemble their wild boar ancestors like these Tamworth crosses

Most pigs used in production are based on these Large White x Landrace crosses

Pigs of all breeds have inherited most of the behaviours of the wild boar

Page 9: GAP Pigs

9

SOCIAL BEHAVIOURPigs naturally live in social groups of 2-4 sows, often sisters or otherwise related, along with their offspring

Page 10: GAP Pigs

10

MATERNAL CYCLE

Nest away from group

Return withpiglets

to group

Suckle young

Graduallywean

Dale Arey/CIWF

Marek Spinka

Fiona Chambers of Fernleigh Free-Range

Page 11: GAP Pigs

11

ADAPTATION TO ENVIRONMENT

Pigs have evolved to live in a complex environment

Page 12: GAP Pigs

12

browsinggrazing

rooting Marek Spinka

Marek Spinka

FEEDING BEHAVIOUR

Pigs have evolved a range of foraging strategies to live in that environment

Page 13: GAP Pigs

13

DIURNAL BEHAVIOURThe day is divided between periods of

foraging (for up to nine hours a day)

and resting

Page 14: GAP Pigs

14

MAEP/CIWF

THERMOREGULATORY BEHAVIOUR

Huddling for warmth

Wallowing for skin care and cooling

Pigs mainly control their temperature through behaviour

Shade

Film of wallowing behaviour follows

Page 15: GAP Pigs

15

PLAY BEHAVIOUR

Young pigs also use their environment for recreation

Page 16: GAP Pigs

16

INTENSIVE PRODUCTIONsome intensive systems fail to satisfy behavioural needs of pigs

Dry sows

Farrowing sows

Weaners

Growing pigs

Could these systems be modified to meet behavioural needs?

Page 17: GAP Pigs

17

MODERN PRODUCTION SYSTEMSmethods of providing behavioural needs of pigs

Foraging

Secluded nesting

Comfortable rest

Separation of dunging and lying areas

Page 18: GAP Pigs

18

EXTENSIVE PRODUCTION SYSTEMSmethods of providing behavioural needs of pigs

Shelter

Protectionfrom predators

Temperaturecontrol

Posts for rubbing

Film of post-rubbing behaviour follows

Page 19: GAP Pigs

19

NATURAL BEHAVIOUR AND PRODUCTIONsummary

1. Pigs are descended from wild boar and have inherited most of their behavioural patterns

2. Pigs live in social groups consisting of mothers and their young

3. Pigs are adapted to complex environments that contain woodland and water

4. Pig behaviour has developed to utilise the environment for food, water, shelter, resting, temperature control, skincare, dunging and recreation

5. Intensive environments do not provide for these complex behaviours and give rise to many welfare problems

6. Modern systems can be designed to meet the behavioural needs of pigs

Page 20: GAP Pigs

20

CHAPTER 2space and foraging needs for dry sows

Diane Halverson / Animal Welfare Institute

Page 21: GAP Pigs

21

PREGNANT (DRY) SOWSsow stall (gestation crate) – a confinement system

Why are most sows kept in stalls?

• To reduce space and thereby costs

• To prevent aggression

• To simplify management and observation

Page 22: GAP Pigs

22

PREGNANT (DRY) SOWStether stall – another confinement system

Film of bar-biting behaviour by tethered sow follows

Page 23: GAP Pigs

23

SOWS IN STALLShealth issues

Health problem

Weak bones

Leg problems

Urinary disorders

Possible explanation

Lack of exercise

Lack of exercise

Unable to excrete away from lying area

Possible explanations for health problems suffered by sows in stalls

Page 24: GAP Pigs

24

Sows cannot:

• exercise

• forage

• socialise properly

• dung away from their lying area

• regulate their body temperature through behaviour

SOWS IN STALLSWelfare issues

What important behaviours are sows in stalls unable to carry out?

Page 25: GAP Pigs

25

SOWS IN STALLSwelfare issues

What abnormal behaviours are observed as a result of this close confinement and hunger?

In addition, dry sows are fed once a day on a maintenance ration which leaves them feeling hungry

See next slide

Page 26: GAP Pigs

26

STEREOTYPIESbar-biting

This sow may be hungry, but is unable to forage.

This may be a displaced feeding behaviour.

Unlike normal feeding, this is very repetitive and cannot fill her stomach.

Film of bar-biting behaviour follows

Page 27: GAP Pigs

27

What are the key features of stereotypic behaviour?

What kind of stereotypy is this?

What other kinds are there?

What causes stereotypies?

Bar-biting

Sham chewing, excess drinking etc

Frustration of natural behaviours

Repetitive and apparently devoid of function

STEREOTYPIES

Page 28: GAP Pigs

28

STEREOTYPIESsham-chewing

Sham-chewing is also thought to be caused by frustration, boredom and hunger

Film of sham-chewing behaviour follows

Page 29: GAP Pigs

29

STEREOTYPIESexcessive drinking

How could you find out whether this drinking was excessive?

Compare water intake of this sow with one that was completely satiated and not frustrated

This is another form of stereotypy

Film of excessive drinking behaviour follows

Page 30: GAP Pigs

30

STEREOTYPIES IN BARREN PENS

bar-biting

sham-chewing tongue rolling

Stereotypies can also occur in pens where there is no bedding to occupy the sows and provide gut fill

Film of these three behaviours follows

Page 31: GAP Pigs

31

APATHYAnother response to confinement and frustration

This sow might be resting. How would one distinguish apathetic behaviour from natural resting behaviour?

Test how responsive she is to different stimuli like cold water or novel food

Film of possibly apathetic behaviour follows

Page 32: GAP Pigs

32

GOOD PRACTICEproviding resources for natural behaviour

• Providing sufficient space

• Keeping sows in natural social groups

• Providing an enriched environment with foraging material

Outdoor systemsIndoor systems

How can stereotypic and apathetic behaviours be reduced?

Page 33: GAP Pigs

33

The same is true for boars which in many countries are not provided with bedding

GOOD PRACTICEproviding resources for natural behaviour

Page 34: GAP Pigs

34

“(7) To satisfy their hunger and given the need to chew, all dry pregnant sows must be given a sufficient quantity of bulky or high-fibre food as well as high-energy food.”

Council Directive 2001/88/EC 23rd October 2001

EU REGULATIONSrequirement for high fibre food

Page 35: GAP Pigs

35

The tether stall is banned in:• European Union

The sow stall is banned in:• Sweden• Switzerland• United Kingdom• Florida

Sow stall use is restricted in:• Philippines

Sow stall is due to be banned in:• European Union (2013, except for first four weeks of pregnancy)• New Zealand (2015, except for first four weeks of pregnancy)• Australia (2017, except for first six weeks of pregnancy)

LEGISLATION TO RESTRICT THE SOW STALLcurrent and future bans

Page 36: GAP Pigs

36

SPACE AND FORAGING NEEDS FOR DRY SOWSsummary

1. Most sows spend their entire pregnancies in confinement systems such as the sow stall

2. These severely restrict natural behaviour and cause a range of health and welfare problems

3. Restrictions on natural behaviour can lead to apathy and stereotypies such as bar-biting, sham-chewing, tongue rolling and excessive drinking

4. A key problem is hunger due to restricted diets – EU regulations require dry sows to be provided with high-fibre food to satisfy this hunger and the need to chew

5. Stereotypies can be avoided by satisfying the need of sows for space, company and foraging material

Page 37: GAP Pigs

37

CHAPTER 3avoiding aggression in dry sows

Dale Arey / CIWF

Page 38: GAP Pigs

38

• Competition for food and other resources

• Mixing sows that are unfamiliar with each other

Marek Spinka

AGGRESSION BETWEEN DRY SOWS

What are the main causes of aggression in dry sows?

Page 39: GAP Pigs

39

AGGRESSION DURING FEEDINGsow pens

Why is aggression at feeding a particular problem with dry sows?

• food restricted to a maintenance diet so sows remain hungry

• only fed once a day

• diet is low in fibre

• food not widely spread out

Film of aggression over food follows

Page 40: GAP Pigs

40

AGGRESSION DURING FEEDINGfree-range sows feeding with less aggression

Film of mild dominance behaviour follows

Why is aggression over food milder

in the following film?

Page 41: GAP Pigs

41

AGGRESSION DURING FEEDINGfree-range sows feeding with less aggression

Why was aggression milder here?

• lower motivation for less concentrated feed

• sows in stable groups have clear dominance order

• access to high fibre food reduces hunger

• spacious environment reduces stress

Page 42: GAP Pigs

42

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - INDIVIDUAL FEEDING SYSTEMSelectronic sow feeders

photos and video ASAB

Each sow wears a transponder. In the feeding stall, a computer provides each sow with an individual ration

Film of use of electronic sow feeder follows

Page 43: GAP Pigs

43

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - INDIVIDUAL FEEDING SYSTEMSelectronic sow feeders

photos and video ASAB

Advantages

Sows free from harassment in stall

Individual sows can be given extra food if needed

Can be run automatically

Disadvantages

Sows cannot feed simultaneously as they would normally

Aggression can occur outside the stall

Sows not occupied searching for main food supply

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Page 44: GAP Pigs

44

Feeding Release

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - INDIVIDUAL FEEDING SYSTEMSfeeding stalls

In this system, the sows have access to a straw area and are locked in the stalls just at feeding time

Film of use of feeding stalls and subsequent release follows

Page 45: GAP Pigs

45

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - INDIVIDUAL FEEDING SYSTEMSfeeding stalls

Advantages

Sows free from harassment in stalls

Individual sows can be given extra food if needed

Sows can be fed simultaneously

Disadvantages

Expensive to set up

Sows don’t have to search for their food

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Page 46: GAP Pigs

46

Top view Front view

Food is delivered slowly over longer periods. Sows that bully others out of their place lose out because food builds up in their own feed space

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - DISPERSED FEEDINGtrickle feed systems

Page 47: GAP Pigs

47

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - DISPERSED FEEDINGtrickle feed systems

Disadvantages

Aggression might still be a problem

Individual sows cannot be given extra food

Sows don’t have to search for their food

Advantages

Sows feed simultaneously

Aggression minimal since sows occupied in own stations

Feeding process can occupy sows for longer

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Page 48: GAP Pigs

48

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - DISPERSED FEEDINGscatter-feeding systems

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Dale Arey/CIWF

Advantages

Sows feed simultaneously

Aggression minimal since food dispersed

Feeding process naturally occupies sows for a long time

Extra fibre consumed at same time

Disadvantages

Aggression might still be a problem

Individual sows cannot be given extra food

Film of scatter feeding follows

Page 49: GAP Pigs

49

Colin Seddon / CIWF

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Food is automatically dumped from the feeders at the top of the picture

AVOIDING AGGRESSION - DISPERSED FEEDINGdump-feeding systems

Similar to previous system, though food less well dispersed

Page 50: GAP Pigs

50

AGGRESSION AT MIXING

Another major cause of aggression is mixing sows that are unfamiliar with each other

Page 51: GAP Pigs

51

CASE STUDY - STRESS AT MIXINGCollege farm experiences infertililty problems

Colin Seddon / CIWF

System worked well for Meishan cross sows mixed in large enriched pen%. However the meat was too high in fat content for the UK market so they switched to Large White x Landrace crosses.

Unfortunately sow fertility suffered as a result of stress, perhaps caused by aggression. They switched to housing sows in small groups and try to keep sows together in original groups to minimise stress

Page 52: GAP Pigs

52

AVOIDING AGGRESSION IN SOWSsummary

1. Sows should be fed separately and simultaneously where possible

2. Alternatively, feed should be spread out over as wide an area as possible or released slowly

3. Sows should be kept in small stable groups

4. The sow system should not be overcrowded and should allow sows to escape from each other

Page 53: GAP Pigs

53

CHAPTER 4 space and nesting needs of farrowing sows

Diane Halverson Animal Welfare Institute

Page 54: GAP Pigs

54

MATERNAL BEHAVIOURnesting in wild boar

BBC Motion Gallery

Film of nesting behaviour in wild boar sow follows

Page 55: GAP Pigs

55

MATERNAL BEHAVIOURnesting in domestic sows

Diane Halverson / Animal Welfare Institute

Domestic sows have inherited the same nest building instincts as seen in wild boar

What is the function of the nest?

• The nest provides protection from weather and predators

• It helps protect the piglets from being accidentally crushed by the sow

Film of nesting behaviour in domestic sow follows

Page 56: GAP Pigs

56

Marek Spinka

FARROWING SOWS AND THE RISK OF CRUSHING

Why is the risk of crushing high with modern breeds?

Sows are larger; litters larger, so piglets smaller

Page 57: GAP Pigs

57

FARROWING SOWS AND THE RISK OF CRUSHING

1. Sows respond naturally to a piglet’s squeal

How does the sow’s behaviour reduce the risk of crushing?

Film of Hungarian sow’s response to a piglet’s squeal follows

Page 58: GAP Pigs

58

FARROWING SOWS AND THE RISK OF CRUSHING

2. Sows check through the bedding and remove piglets before lying down. The sow needs plenty of space to be able to lie down carefully.

How does the sow’s behaviour reduce the risk of crushing?

Film of Hungarian sows checking through the bedding before lying down follows

Page 59: GAP Pigs

59

FARROWING CRATES

Most sows are housed in farrowing crates prior to giving birth

Farrowing crates are designed to reduce piglet crushing by slowing down the movements of the sow

Film of sow in farrowing crate trying to lie down follows

Page 60: GAP Pigs

60

Sows in farrowing crates cannot:

• walk or turn round

• lie down comfortably

• perform important behaviours such as nest building

• interact naturally with her piglets

How is the behaviour of the sow affected in the farrowing crate?

FARROWING CRATES AND SOW BEHAVIOUR

Her ability to move is very restricted

Film of sow in farrowing crate trying to get up follows

Page 61: GAP Pigs

61

FRUSTRATED MATERNAL BEHAVIOURnesting BBC Motion Gallery

What effects can be caused by this frustration?

• high blood levels of cortisol, a stress hormone

• delayed birth, leading to increased piglet mortality

The farrowing crate causes particular stress to a sow trying to build a nest before farrowing

Film of frustrated nesting behaviour in sow follows

Page 62: GAP Pigs

62

What are the risks of frustrating normal interactions between the sow and her piglets?

Sows in farrowing crates are more likely to savage their young. The risk of this may be increased if the sow cannot make normal contact

FRUSTRATED MATERNAL BEHAVIOURinteraction with young

Shortly after giving birth, sows naturally sniff their newborn piglets. This helps to create a bond between them

Film of sow trying to make contact with newborn piglet follows

Page 63: GAP Pigs

63

STRESS HORMONE LEVELSin sows in farrowing crates

Possible reasons include:

• The sow cannot escape from her piglets

• In the barren environment piglets may begin to bite and chew at the sow

• The sow is likely to have lost condition in the process of feeding a large litter

These rise at two times:

• Just before birth

(Due to frustration of the nesting instinct)

• 3-4 weeks after farrowing

Why do they rise again 3-4 weeks after farrowing?

Page 64: GAP Pigs

64

Family group system, Brazil. Sows are released into groups after 3 days in farrowing crate.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?

RELEASING SOWS EARLY

Disadvantages:• Sow still confined for at least a

week• Nesting instinct still frustrated• Early interactions between sow

and piglets still impeded

Advantages:• Sow only confined during period

of highest crushing risk• Piglets can mix before weaning

Page 65: GAP Pigs

65

photos Marek Spinka

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATESwedish group farrowing system

The sows have a communal straw area with individual boxes to farrow in

Page 66: GAP Pigs

66

photo Marek Spinka

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATE

Differences

Sows cannot find an entirely isolated spot to nest

Risk of two sows nesting in same box

Similarities

Nesting material readily available

Sows can nest separately

Piglets can mix once large enough to escape nest-box

How far does this system tie in with natural behaviour?

Page 67: GAP Pigs

67

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATEindividual farrowing pens

Advantages:

• Isolated nesting spot

• Nesting material available

• Protection for piglets with safety bars and heated safety area

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system?

Disadvantages:

• Piglets cannot mix with other litters

Page 68: GAP Pigs

68

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATEoutdoor free-range farrowing huts

Each sow has a separate hut to farrow in

The barriers contain very young piglets in the huts.

In the UK, 35% of piglets are produced outdoors

Page 69: GAP Pigs

69

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATEoutdoor free-range farrowing huts

Individual paddocks

Some outdoor units have individual paddocks for each sow and litter

What are the advantages and disadvantage of this?

• An advantage is that the sows are not disturbed by other sows

• A disadvantage is that it obviously costs more in time and effort

Once the piglets are four weeks old, the electric fences separating the paddocks are removed to allow the families to mix

Page 70: GAP Pigs

70

• Breeds which make good mothers

• Sufficient space for sow to be able to manoeuvre to avoid crushing piglets

• Excellent stockmanship

• Plenty of bedding material for nesting and warmth

• Safety areas for piglets

• Good shelter from all types of weather

ALTERNATIVES TO THE FARROWING CRATE

What features are required to make non-confinement systems work effectively?

Page 71: GAP Pigs

71

SOW AND PIGLET MORTALITIESUK figures comparing outdoor & indoor herds

Year ending September Outdoor herds Indoor herds

Sow mortality annually (%)2.84 5.92

Piglets:Pigs born dead per litter

0.79 0.96

Mortality of pigs born alive (%) 9.46 11.60

Pigs reared per litter 9.74 9.64

Pigs reared per sow per year 21.14 21.49UK averages for 2000-2004 (calculated from Meat and Livestock Commission Pig Yearbooks 2001-5)

Can these results be explained?

Page 72: GAP Pigs

72

UK SOW AND PIGLET MORTALITIESpossible explanations for figures

FeatureLower free-range sow mortality

Fewer free-range pigs born dead

Lower mortality for free-range piglets

More outdoor pigs reared per litter

More indoor pigs reared per sow per year

Possible explanation/sUse of farrowing crate can lead to higher sow death-rate

Stress of farrowing crate can delay birth, increasing mortality

Savaging rates may be higher with farrowing crates. Free-range sows bred for good mothering abilities

Lower mortality for free-range pigs

Indoor sows had slightly higher frequency of litters

Page 73: GAP Pigs

73

SPACE AND NESTING NEEDS OF FARROWING SOWSsummary

1. The large litters and small piglets of most modern breeds means that they are prone to being crushed

2. Farrowing crates were designed to reduce this risk

3. Confinement at farrowing causes stress particularly at the time when the sow wants to build a nest

4. Systems which give the sow more freedom are better for welfare and can give good production figures

5. Free farrowing systems require good management and breeds with good maternal abilities

Page 74: GAP Pigs

74

CHAPTER 5avoiding teeth clipping in piglets

Page 75: GAP Pigs

75

TEETH CLIPPINGwhy it is carried out

As soon as they are born, piglets compete to select a teat on the sow’s udder to which they remain attached until weaning

Piglets suckle own teat

Why do piglets compete for teats?

The older and stronger piglets try to select the anterior (front) teats that tend to produce more milk

Why do the front teats produce more milk?

It is probably an evolutionary strategy to ensure some piglets survive when food is short. When food is plentiful, the sow can produce enough milk for all her piglets.

Page 76: GAP Pigs

76

TEETH CLIPPINGwhy it is carried out

Piglets are born with sharp incisor teeth which they use to fight for the best teat and then to defend their teat

This defence can cause injuries to other piglets and also to the sows udder

How do the piglets compete for teats?

Vigorous teat defence

© Dale Arey

Page 77: GAP Pigs

77

TEETH CLIPPINGthe problems that it causes

• Teeth-clipping is likely to cause severe pain during the procedure

• Damage to the teeth leaves them prone to infection

• Infection can lead to abscesses and long-term pain

Farmer clipping teeth

What are the likely health and welfare consequences of this procedure?

Soon after they are born, the piglets’ incisors are cut with sharp clippers or side-cutters

The pig industry’s solution to problems with injuries is to teeth clip

Page 78: GAP Pigs

78

TEETH CLIPPINGhow it can be reduced or prevented

• Larger litters increase the amount of competition

• Fostering piglets from large litters onto smaller litters also increases competition

• Reduction in milk supply through poor condition, sow illness e.g. mastitis or sow discomfort due to confinement or lack of bedding Piglet with facial injuries

What factors might increase the risk of this occurring?

Piglets are more likely to fight for a better teat if they are not getting enough milk

Page 79: GAP Pigs

79

TEETH CLIPPINGhow it can be reduced or prevented

• Use breeds that have slightly smaller litters

• Minimise cross-fostering

• Ensure good hygiene and sow health to reduce the risk of infections

• Keep sows in free-farrowing systems with plenty of bedding

Piglets more settled with reduced competition

How can good management practice reduce the risk of injuries?

Page 80: GAP Pigs

80

TEETH CLIPPINGhow it can be reduced or prevented

If injuries do become a problem a less invasive technique is to use teeth grinders

Grinders have a small abrasive wheel designed to blunt the sharp tip of the incisors

This procedure is likely to cause less pain and is less likely to leave the teeth open to infection

Tooth clipping is banned in several countries including Denmark and Germany which only allow tooth grinding

Tooth grinding is still a painful mutilation. Routine tooth clipping and grinding are both banned throughout the EU

Farmer clipping teeth

Page 81: GAP Pigs

81

CASE STUDY enriched indoor production, Schleithal, France

If injuries occur, the farmer uses a teeth grinder

This farm does not clip teeth

Page 82: GAP Pigs

82

CASE STUDY organic production, Eastbrook farm, UK

This farm uses traditional breeds like Saddlebacks that have slightly smaller litters and the sows maintain condition. The farm does not tooth clip

Page 83: GAP Pigs

83

“Neither tail docking nor reduction of corner teeth must be carried out routinely but only where there is evidence that injuries to sows' teats or to other pigs' ears or tails have occurred. Before carrying out these procedures, other measures shall be taken to prevent tail biting and other vices taking into account environment and stocking densities (our emphasis). For this reason inadequate environmental conditions or management systems must be changed.”

Annex to Council Directive 91/630/EEC

EU REGULATIONS REQUIRE:

Page 84: GAP Pigs

84

TEETH CLIPPING summary

1. Injuries caused by teat defence are reduced by teeth-clipping

2. Teeth-clipping causes pain and can lead to infection

3. Tooth-grinding is a less invasive method that can be used to blunt teeth

4. Injuries are mainly a problem if sows do not produce enough milk for all their piglets

5. Breeding sows with smaller litters and which can produce plenty of milk is part of the solution

6. Avoiding udder infections and keeping the sow in a comfortable high welfare environment can also help improve milk supply

7. Avoiding cross fostering can also reduce the risk of injuries

8. Routine tooth clipping and grinding are not permitted in the EU and should be avoided by good breeding, environment and management

Page 85: GAP Pigs

85

CHAPTER 6avoiding castration in male piglets

Page 86: GAP Pigs

86

CASTRATIONWhy it is carried out

Shortly after birth, male piglets testes are removed

This is because when they become sexually mature, they can leave an odour in the meat known as ‘boar taint’ which some people find unpleasant

Some meat buyers insist that farmers castrate male pigs

Page 87: GAP Pigs

87

CASTRATIONHow it is carried out

The testes are removed through slits in the scrotum made with a scalpel

Piglet about to be castrated

Anaesthetics are rarely used even though the procedure causes severe pain

Some people argue that it is the handling of pigs which is stressful, not the castration itself. How do we know the procedure causes pain?

see next slides

Page 88: GAP Pigs

88

After Weary et al 1998

IS CASTRATION MORE STRESSFUL THAN HANDLING? Vocal responses of castrated piglets were compared with those of piglets which were similarly handled but without castration.

What do the results show?

Page 89: GAP Pigs

89

(after Wemelsfelder & van Putten 1985)

IS CASTRATION MORE STRESSFUL THAN HANDLING? The frequency (Hz) of vocal responses of piglets was measured at various stages of castration. What do these results show?

Page 90: GAP Pigs

90

CASTRATIONis there further distress after castration?

Following castration, a study showed that piglets:

• were less active

• showed more trembling, leg shaking, sliding and tail jerking

• took longer to lie down

• lied down in a way protective of the hindquarters

(after Wemelsfelder & van Putten 1985)

Page 91: GAP Pigs

91

CASE STUDYenriched indoor production, Schleithal, France

The farmer therefore uses a local anaesthetic before castration

The buyers of these pigs insist on castration because of the risk of boar taint in the meat

Anaesthetics provide short-term pain relief

Analgesics are also needed to provide long-term pain relief

Page 92: GAP Pigs

92

CASE STUDY Sparsholt College, UK

In the UK, pigs are very rarely castrated because they are slaughtered at an earlier age.

How does this avoid the need for castration?

The pigs are just over 6 months at slaughter and are sexually immature so boar taint is less of a problem

Avoiding castration means that male pigs grow faster and produce a leaner meat.

Page 93: GAP Pigs

93

WHICH IS THE BEST SOLUTION?

It could be a combination of more than one of these

1. Surgical castration without pain relief

2. Surgical castration with short and long term pain relief

3. Immunocastration

4. No castration, but one or more of the following:

a) Risk boar taint

b) Kill male pigs younger

c) Selectively breed pigs for less boar taint

d) Use herbal additives in the diet to reduce boar taint

e) Use sexed semen to increase the percentage of females born

f) Test carcases for boar taint in the slaughterhouse

Page 94: GAP Pigs

94

WHICH IS THE BEST SOLUTION?

Compassion in World Farming believes that:

• surgical castration without pain relief is unacceptable

• In the medium term, surgical castration should be avoided altogether

• In the long run, farmers should move towards keeping all pigs entire

Page 95: GAP Pigs

95

summary

CASTRATION IN MALE PIGLETS

1. Male piglets are castrated to avoid ‘boar taint’

2. The testes are removed through two slits in the scrotum made with a scalpel

3. The procedure causes acute pain and can affect piglet behaviour for days

4. Pain can be reduced using a local anaesthetic and a longer acting analgesic

5. In the UK pigs are slaughtered before they become sexually mature and so boar taint is less of a problem

6. A number of other alternatives to castration are being considered

Page 96: GAP Pigs

96

CHAPTER 7avoiding early weaning

Page 97: GAP Pigs

97

NATURAL WEANING

What is the natural weaning age for pigs?

Piglets:• begin to eat solid food at about three weeks• gradually eat more as they get older• are completely weaned between 13-17 weeks

MAEP/CIWF

Weaning is the process by which the sow gradually reduces the amount milk given to her piglets making them more reliant on solid food

Page 98: GAP Pigs

98

EARLY WEANINGin intensive production

Early weaned piglets

What is the usual weaning age for commercial piglets?

Weaning ages:

• EU – 4 weeks (3 weeks for “all in/all out” systems)

• US – as low as 2 weeks

Intensively reared piglets are weaned by forcibly removing them from their mother

Page 99: GAP Pigs

99

EARLY WEANINGin intensive production

Late weaning can lead to loss of condition in sows because:

• modern sows produce larger litters

• they have been bred for low fat content, so have fewer reserves to draw on for milk production

Irish sow with her litter

Why does the sow lose condition?

What are the reasons for early weaning?

Early weaning:

• induces oestrus so sow can become pregnant again

• reduces loss of condition in the sow

Page 100: GAP Pigs

100

Because of:

• Removal from their mother

• Sudden change of diet from milk to solid food

• Sudden change of environment

• Being mixed with piglets from other litters

• Aggression for dominance as a result of mixing

EARLY WEANINGand effects on welfare

Why is early weaning particularly stressful for piglets?

These stresses are compounded by the fact that they all happen at the same time

Page 101: GAP Pigs

101

EARLY WEANING and effects on welfare

This behaviour of early-weaned piglets is called belly nosing

ASAB

Film of belly-nosing in early-weaned piglets follows

Page 102: GAP Pigs

102

EARLY WEANING and effects on welfare

Belly nosing. ASAB

Belly-nosing resembles the way in which piglets massage the sow’s udder prior to suckling

Film of piglet massaging sow’s udder follows

Page 103: GAP Pigs

103

Belly-nosing also continues in older pigs.

Naturally they wouldn’t be weaned until 13-17 weeks old.

It is thought to be a sign of frustrationBelly-nosing is less common in enriched environments with plenty of straw. Why might this be?

Belly-nosing is a displaced foraging behaviour. Providing plenty of foraging material may help the weaning process.

Film of belly-nosing in older pigs follows

EARLY WEANING and effects on welfare

Page 104: GAP Pigs

104

Marek Spinka

EARLY WEANING and effects on welfare

What are the likely causes of these problems?

Problems with early weaning

Belly nosing

Digestive problems

Weight loss or growth check

Increased risk of disease

Increased use of antibiotics

- desire to suckle

- sudden change in diet

- diet change and digestive problems

- lowered immunity caused by stress

- lowered immunity

Page 105: GAP Pigs

105

EARLY WEANINGand effects on welfare

Stress can be reduced by:

• Getting piglets used to solid food before weaning

• Using liquid feeds after weaning

• Putting piglets into groups before weaning

• Leaving piglets in a familiar environment after weaning

• Providing a comfortable and enriched environment throughout

• Weaning later wherever possible

How can stress caused by early weaning be reduced?

Page 106: GAP Pigs

106

CASE STUDYloose-housed farrowing system, Sweden

Piglets can escape from the hut when bigger

They mix with the other piglets

The sow is removed at weaning

Sows farrow in groups

photos Marek Spinka

Page 107: GAP Pigs

107

CASE STUDY – LATER WEANINGorganic production Eastbrook farm, UK

Wean at 8 weeks or later (organic rules state minimum 40 days)

Use breeds like saddlebacks (left) that have better fat reserves and produce slightly smaller litters so they can wean later

Page 108: GAP Pigs

108

EARLY WEANINGsummary

1. Piglets naturally wean at 13-17 weeks old

2. Commercial piglets are weaned early at 2-4 weeks old to increase number of pigs produced per sow

3. Early weaning causes stress leading to a range of piglet health and welfare problems

4. Stress can be reduced by good management practice

5. Organic systems wean at 6-8 weeks to reduce health and welfare problems and the need for antibiotics

6. Later weaning requires breeds of sows capable of sustaining a full lactation with good fat reserves and slightly smaller litters

Page 109: GAP Pigs

109

CHAPTER 8avoiding tail-docking and tail biting

Page 110: GAP Pigs

110

TAIL-BITING

This pig’s tail has been bitten by one or more of her companions

Page 111: GAP Pigs

111

TAIL-BITINGwhat causes it

What factors have been linked to the likelihood of tail-biting in intensive production?

• Barren environments: there are no suitable substrates for the pigs to forage and chew

• Overcrowding: there is little opportunity for pigs to avoid each other

• Poor environments: discomfort can increase restlessness and frustration

• Poor nutrition: lack of feeder space and/or nutrients in the diet

Page 112: GAP Pigs

112

TAIL-BITINGthe problems it causes

Seemingly innocent nibbling can rapidly spread through the whole group and take on the resemblance of cannibalism

The wounds can cause considerable pain to the tail-bitten pig

Infections can get into the central vertebrae causing serious health problems and carcass damage

It is a sign of poor environments and/or management

It is one of the greatest economic losses to pig production

Page 113: GAP Pigs

113

On this farm, this was the only case of tail-biting observed in over 100 pigs. Why wasn’t it more common?

The farm manager attributed a low level of tail-biting to an enriched high-welfare environment with straw.

TAIL-BITINGthe problems it causes

Page 114: GAP Pigs

114

TAIL-BITINGthe industry’s solution to the problem

Shortly after birth, each piglet’s tail is docked with a blade or a hot wire

What is the industry’s solution to the problem?

Page 115: GAP Pigs

115

TAIL-BITINGthe industry’s solution to the problem

How is tail-docking likely to reduce tail-biting?

Removing most or just part of the tail may work by:

• making the tail less obvious to a foraging pig

• making the tail more sensitive to investigation, so pigs are less likely to tolerate tail-nibbling

Page 116: GAP Pigs

116

TAIL-DOCKINGarguments for and against

Lesions from tail-biting

Arguments for:

• Tail-docking is a simple way of reducing tail-biting

Arguments against:

• Tail-docking causes pain, distress and risk of infections

• It can lead to the formation of neuromas (swollen nerves)

• Tail-docking does not address the causes of the problem

What are the arguments for and against tail-docking?

Page 117: GAP Pigs

117

TAIL-BITINGhow it can be reduced or prevented

Some farms provide chains and toys to try and reduce problems with tail-biting

Which of these two methods of enrichment are likely to be most effective in reducing tail-biting?

Wood shavings, see next slide

Page 118: GAP Pigs

118

TAIL-BITING methods of enrichment that work best

Effect of environmental enrichment on tail-biting in piglets (after Zonderland et al, 2004)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Chain Rubber toy Strawhopper

Straw onfloor

Form of enrichment

% M

ild

or

seri

ou

s le

sio

ns

Mild lesions (%)

Serious lesions (%)

Zonderland et al investigated the effects of different kinds of enrichment on the number of mild and serious injuries caused by tail-biting.

What do the results show?

Page 119: GAP Pigs

119

TAIL-BITING methods of enrichment that work best

There are three stages to foraging behaviour:

• Searching

• Manipulating

• Eating

Which of these stages are provided by:

• Chains?

• Ropes?

• Beds of saw dust or straw?

• Rough ground, pasture or woodland?

An increasing amount of foraging is enabled as you go down the list

Film of rooting behaviour follows

Page 120: GAP Pigs

120

“Neither tail docking nor reduction of corner teeth must be carried out routinely but only where there is evidence that injuries to sows' teats or to other pigs' ears or tails have occurred. Before carrying out these procedures, other measures shall be taken to prevent tail biting and other vices taking into account environment and stocking densities (our emphasis). For this reason inadequate environmental conditions or management systems must be changed.

“Pigs must have permanent access to a sufficient quantity of material to enable proper investigation and manipulation activities, such as straw, hay, wood, sawdust, mushroom compost, peat or a mixture of such …”

Annex to Council Directive 91/630/EEC

EU REGULATIONS REQUIRE:

Page 121: GAP Pigs

121

Deep-bed of rice hulls

CASE STUDY - DEEP BED SYSTEM developed by EMBRAPA, Brazil

Suitable for small-scale farming:• capital costs 40-60% lower• existing buildings can be adapted

Better for the environment:• reduce ammonia emissions 50%• produce less waste and a better

fertiliser

Good for production and welfare:• reduce tail-biting and lameness• provide foraging opportunities• provide comfort

Page 122: GAP Pigs

122

CASE STUDY – SLATTED vs DEEP BED SYSTEMexperiment on Brazilian farm

Experimental group on deep-bed

Group on part slatted system

Weaners on the deep bed system:

• kept warmer and huddled less

• suffered less from diarrhoea

• were more active and less fearful See next slide

Page 123: GAP Pigs

123

Environmental enrichment can:• reduce fearfulness of novel

situations and human interaction• later reduce stress during transit• benefit health, welfare and food

quality

CASE STUDY – SLATTED vs DEEP BED SYSTEMWhy do these two groups of pigs respond so differently to photographers?

The pigs on the right are used to:

• a more stimulating environment

• interaction with people

Page 124: GAP Pigs

124

TAIL-BITING IN GROWING PIGSsummary

1. Tail-biting is a major problem for welfare and production

2. Tail-biting is a displaced foraging behaviour and a sign of poor welfare

3. Tail-docking is a common method of reducing tail-biting

4. Tail-docking causes pain and risks infection. It deals with the symptoms of the problem, not the causes

5. Environmental enrichment with straw or other fibrous material reduces tail-biting by encouraging normal foraging behaviour

6. Chains and toys are less effective enrichments since they don’t allow the full range of foraging behaviour

7. European Union regulations require environmental enrichment to be tried before resorting to tail-docking

Page 125: GAP Pigs

125

CHAPTER 9good stockmanship

Page 126: GAP Pigs

126

STOCKMANSHIPgood welfare depends on good stockmanship

What makes a good stockperson?

Some views of stockpeople:

• “Good stockmanship is about understanding your pigs”

• “A good stockperson is always checking that everything is alright”

• “A good stockperson knows instinctively when something is wrong”

• “It is a job you have to need to do”

• “It takes a lifetime to learn”

Page 127: GAP Pigs

127

STOCKMANSHIPgood welfare depends on good stockmanship

A good stockperson needs:

• Empathy

• Knowledge and experience

• Good observation skills

• Conscientiousness

How do these make a difference?

Page 128: GAP Pigs

128

STOCKMANSHIPempathy

Empathy is all about how you would feel if in the pigs situation

This stockperson is aware that this sow is stressed because she is about to give birth in a farrowing crate. She therefore tries to soothe the sow and cool her down.

Do some people naturally make more empathetic stockpersons?

This farm deliberately chooses female staff for supervising farrowing sows

Film of cooling farrowing sow follows

Page 129: GAP Pigs

129

STOCKMANSHIPknowledge and experience

These pig producers attend regular meetings where they share the latest scientific information

Page 130: GAP Pigs

130

STOCKMANSHIPgood observation skills

Recognising signs that pigs are thriving and content or not

These stockpersons know that ‘bedding down’ is a good time to observe the sows for any sign of illness or poor welfare

Film of bedding down of sows follows

Page 131: GAP Pigs

131

STOCKMANSHIPgood observation skills

Any sick or injured pigs should be moved immediately to a sick pen

Sick pen deepbedded with straw

Health problems should be monitored and vets should be consulted regularly

Page 132: GAP Pigs

132

STOCKMANSHIPconscientiousness

Paying careful attention to the pigs and the equipment they rely on

These farmers check whether there is sufficient bedding in the arcs

Page 133: GAP Pigs

133

STOCKMANSHIPwelfare codes

The “5 freedoms” form the basis of welfare codes that are recommended for pigs

Many different countries produce welfare codes that provide a useful reference for stockpersons

Although they are not always legally binding, they can be cited in prosecutions

In the UK, the law states that every person caring for animals must have instruction in the codes

English Welfare codes Defra

Page 134: GAP Pigs

134

STOCKMANSHIPwelfare codes are based on the five freedoms

All stockpersons must be aware of the “5 freedoms”:

•freedom from hunger and thirst•freedom from discomfort•freedom from illness•freedom to perform natural behaviour•freedom from fear and distress

Most stockpersons readily recognise the first three freedoms but freedom from fear and distress and freedom to perform natural behaviour can too easily be overlooked

Page 135: GAP Pigs

135

STOCKMANSHIPfreedom to perform natural behaviour

Stockpersons need to be aware of the natural behaviour and ethology of the pig

It is common for stockpersons to see bar biting as normal behaviour having never seen pigs in a more natural environment

Page 136: GAP Pigs

136

STOCKMANSHIPfreedom to perform natural behaviour

Pigs are naturally clean animals and will select a particular part of the pen away from the main lying area for dunging

If pigs are overcrowded and become too hot, they will start to use the dunging area as a wallow to try to cool down

Page 137: GAP Pigs

137

STOCKMANSHIPfreedom to perform natural behaviour

For outdoor sows it is even more important to have the correct provisions so that they can regulate body temperature through their own natural behaviour

Wallows Well bedded shelters

Page 138: GAP Pigs

138

STOCKMANSHIPfreedom from fear and distress

Pigs are naturally fearful of humans

The attitude and behaviour of the stockperson is important for reducing this fear

Reducing fear not only improves welfare it also improves performance

Film of fearfulness in early-weaned piglets follows

Page 139: GAP Pigs

139

STOCKMANSHIPfreedom from fear and distress

Type of interaction Good None Poor

Time to react with person (s) 10 92 160

Corticosteroid (ng/ml) 1.6 1.7 2.5

Pregnancy rate of gilts (%) 88 57 33

Growth rate 8-18 weeks (g/d) 897 881 837

Several studies have compared the effects of stockperson interaction on performance in pigs

(Gonyou et al., 1986; Hemsworth et al., 1986; 1987)

What do these results suggest?

Page 140: GAP Pigs

140

STOCKMANSHIPwelfare and production

Good interactions with pigs reduce both fear and stress

Reducing stress improves performance

This is because stress can have a negative effect on:

• growth• reproductive functioning• immunity

Regular inspection reduces stress

Better interactions with pigs can be developed through training

What would this training need to include?

Page 141: GAP Pigs

141

STOCKMANSHIPeffects of training on both welfare and production

Effect of training

Abnormal behaviours -36%

Fear of humans -29%

No. of piglets weaned +4.8%

Pigs/sow/year +6%

A four year study looking at 40 farms showed that the training of stockpeople can have a beneficial effect on both welfare and production

The training developed an understanding of the behaviour of pigs and a knowledge of how they should be handled correctly.

The training encouraged the stockpeople to develop more empathetic attitudes to pigs

(Hemsworth et al., 1987)

Page 142: GAP Pigs

142

STOCKMANSHIPhandling pigs

The most common interaction between stockpersons and pigs occurs when they are being moved

Good handling can have a beneficial effect on meat quality

How?

Because stress before slaughter increases the risk of PSE (Pale Soft Exudative) meat, reducing meat quality

Film of pig-handling follows

Page 143: GAP Pigs

143

STOCKMANSHIPhandling pigs

• Make sure the passageway is secure and uncluttered

• A thin layer of bedding can be used to cover any distractions in the floor surface

• Always use a pig board to prevent escape back to where they came from

• Use encouraging tones and gentle slapping to let the pigs know where you are and to achieve a steady flow

• Electric goads and sticks should be prohibited

What are the important things to remember when moving pigs?

Page 144: GAP Pigs

144

STOCKMANSHIPwelfare potential

Pigs can suffer in any system if stockmanship is poor

However, systems vary in their potential to provide good welfare

In most intensive systems, the stockperson is limited to ensuring that the pigs do not face any additional stressors

Most extensive systems have a higher welfare potential but this can be highly dependent on good stockmanship

Which of these systems has the higher potential for good welfare?

Page 145: GAP Pigs

145

STOCKMANSHIPsummary

1. A good stockperson has empathy, knowledge, good observation and conscientiousness

2. Stockpersons must be aware of the “5 Freedoms” and Welfare Codes and any related laws issued by their particular country

3. Good stockmanship is a main factor for the benefit of both pig welfare and performance

4. Good handling using correct procedures can be beneficial for meat quality

5. Stockmanship can be significantly improved by training

Page 146: GAP Pigs

146

STOCKMANSHIP

“ In many situations, the importance of the stockperson as a ‘welfare worker’ is undervalued “

Page 147: GAP Pigs

147

CHAPTER 10summary

Page 148: GAP Pigs

148

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYgood welfare depends on good environments

The environment must provide:

• Shelter and comfort

• Appropriate space

• Appropriate company

• Appropriate facilities for the expression of natural behaviours

• Material for foraging

All can be provided in good indoor and outdoor systems

What must a good environment provide?

Page 149: GAP Pigs

149

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYgood welfare depends on good genetics

Good breeding should ensure that:

• Pigs are healthy and are adapted to the local climate and conditions

• Sows have good mothering skills

• Sows can sustain a full lactation without unsustainable loss of condition

• Sows do not produce larger litters than they can rear

• Pigs display a good temperament to each other and to people when properly treated

How can good breeding improve welfare?

Page 150: GAP Pigs

150

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYgood welfare depends on good stockmanship

• Ensure the needs of pigs are provided for

• Recognise welfare problems whenever they arise

• Achieve the welfare and production potential of the farming system

• Ensure that pigs come to feel appropriately relaxed in the company of humans

What are the crucial roles of the stockperson?

Page 151: GAP Pigs

151

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYAnimal welfare aspects of Good Agricultural Practice

• Environments

• Genetics

• Stockmanship

• Health care

• Nutrition

All are essentialIf any of these are missing, welfare is likely to be poor

Which of these is the most important?

Pig welfare therefore depends on good:

Page 152: GAP Pigs

152

• Biological systems are more complex than technological ones

• The most intensive systems are not necessarily the most advanced

• Farm animals are sentient beings. They have feelings which matter to them

• For animals to grow well, their needs have to be understood, which are emotional as well as physical

• Developing good stockmanship is one the best investments that can be made for welfare and production

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYAnimal welfare aspects of Good Agricultural Practice

Finally, it is important to remember:

Page 153: GAP Pigs

153

ANIMAL WELFARE ASPECTS OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE (GAP)pig production

This presentation has been adapted for use on shareview

Full version available free from ciwf.org/gap on DVD-ROM

Full version includes embedded video clips and interactive animation

DVD-ROM also includes film, book and lecturers’ notes

GAP Pigs DVD-ROM

Page 154: GAP Pigs

154

PIG PRODUCTION – SUMMARYAnimal Welfare Aspects of Good Agricultural Practice

THE END