-
PhYBicB. - "Furthe1' expe1'iments with liquid helium. R. On the
electric resistance of pure metals etc. XI. Measw'ements
con-cerninp t!te elect"ic 1"esi~tance of 01'dina1'y lead and of
umniurn lead below 14° K." (Comm. N° . 160b from the Physical
Labo-ratOl'y at Leiden). By Prof. H, KAMRRJ.1NGH ONNES and W.
TUYN,
(Communicated at the meeting of October 28, 1922.)
~ 1. Object of t!te 1·esem·ch. Met/wd of p"epflring the
1'esistances. In Comm. N°. 133d ~ 13tÏ we repol'ted Ihat "Kahlbaum"
lead
became supel'conducting at the boiling poinl of liquid helium,
and remained so al 4,°3 K., the highest lemperat.ure altainable
with Ihe usual cl'yoslal for liquid helium j ill + 15 of the same
Cornm. frorn Ihe thl'eshold value of the cUITenl at 4,°25 K. t.he
vanishing point tempel"atul'e was eslimated at about 6° K. The
object of the invest-igation descl'Ïbed below was to establish the
vanishing point tempe-I'atlll'e of lead mOI'e accurately, as weil
as 10 trace the difference ill the vallishing point temperatul'e of
lead and ul'anium lead (Ra U) and to follow the course of the
change in the resistance of lead with the temperatnre above the
vanishing point, if possible up 10 14°,0 K, the lowest liqnid
hydrogen tempel'atllre. Regarding a possible diffel'ellee of
vanishing point lemperatlll'e for isotopes it seemed not impossible
th at the OCClIlTence of the supel'conductivity might be
illfluenced hy the mass of the nucleus. I).
FOI' the preparation of the reAistances we used "Kahlbaum" lead
alld ul"allium lead (Ra G), of which Pl'of. HÖNIGSCHMID of Vienna
ver)" kindly put 16,5 gl'. at our disposal j Ihe atomic weight of
ordinal'Y lead from non-radio-active sources is 207,20, that of Ra
G fl'om BRÖGGERIT \Ised is 206,06 '). Wil'es were drawn from ~oth
kinds of lead Ilnd resistances prepared from them in the manner
described in ~ 1 of Comm. Nt. 160fl j the chemical pl'operties of
the metal
I) Concerning the properties of isotopes see the article by K. F
AUNS in the Elster-Geilei-Festschrift (Vieweg) and the Presidential
j\.ddress 10 the American Association at I3altimore, Dec. 1918 by
T. W. RICHARDS.
,) According 10 alelIer from the firm of May 17th, 1916,
"Kahlbaum" lead contains a trace of Cu and Fe, the tol al impurity
is less than 0,01%; in a letter of Dec. 8th, 1916 they give a more
precise calculation of impurity: 0,002% Cu and Fe. Fol' an account
of the atomie weight of lead isotopes cf. ~'. W. ASTON "Isotopes",
London 1922.
-
452
made it possible 10 extend less car'e on them than on the
prepar'a-tion of the Tl-resistances, so that it is not necessal"y
that the resistances should be shnt off from the air' in a glass
lube witll helium gas. We used the l"esistan ces Pb-1919-B,
diameter 0,5 m.m. not ell~losed in a helium atmosphel'e, Pb-1919·1,
diameter' 0,12 m.m.
o o
G---l+\j.öw;;1lIIIr.;::;:;;w"" I
F
A
E
Th
B
enclosed in a helium atmosphere and lsotope Pb-1919-I, in
dimensions as much as possible the same as Pb-1919-1 and tl"eated
in the same wa.\'.
~ 2. An'an,qement of the C1·yostat. The cryostat wit.h which Ihe
experiments wel"e made, is executed by and uIIder the supel"vision
of tlle chief of the Techn. Dep. of tlre CI·yog. Lab., Mr' . G. J.
FJ.IM. Ronghly speaking, it is the same as that desel'ibed in Comm
. N°.124b. A charact-eristic of Ihe present cr'yostat is that
objects to be measured are sUlTounded by helium vapour or gas (the
lattel' at very low tempemtul"e) ; by using it, Ihe te mperature
field bel ween the boiling point of helium (4°,2 K.) and Ihe lowest
temp. obtainable with liquid hydl'ogen (J 4°,0 K.) is bridged ovel'
for the Ihst ti me . For the arrangement see fig. 1 . In the
enlirely silvered vacuunr glass A, an also entirely silvered vacuum
glass B hangs in an in\'el"ted position, ending in a single
silvel'ed glass tube; the bell-shaped space inside this glass is
the ex-perimental chambel'. In Ihis space are found the resistances
(in fig . 1 there is only one, marked W) and the
heliumgas-thermometer Tit . The uppel' end of B opens out outside
Ihe cl'yostat and is connected with the gasholder ; B is there
pl'ovided with a regulating tap K for blowing off (not visible in
the drawing). The liqnid helium comes in thl'Ough the enlrance D;
the floatel' C shows the height of the helium level. If the tap K,
leading to the gasholder, stands open, the helium will fill both A
and B; at the beginning of the ex-pel'iment measurements can thlIs
be made at the boilillg point of liquid helium . If tlle
-
453
tap K is closed, the heliullI vapoll!' fomled will quickly drive
the liquid helium out of Ihe bell.shaped cl'Jostat space; byopening
the tap K and pnlting 011 the elecll'ic heatillg in the spiral F, a
constant vapour str'eam may be sent Ihrough Ihe eryoslat; the
stream may be brought 10 Ihe lempenüure desÏl'ed by eleclric
heating of the spil'al . G; lhus Ihe liquid level ·of the
evapOl'ating helium remains betweell F and G, The coppel' mantie E
inside the bell contributes 10 the acquiring of an even
temperatul'e ovel' the whole space; further' experimenls must show
in how far uniformity of temperature has been achieved wilh Ihe
alTangemeIJt as descdbed , The tit'st cooling uses a great deal of
liquid helium.
~ 3, Resistance and temperature dete1'minations,
The resislances are measnred by compal'ison of the defleetions
of Ihe galvanometer, when eonnected with Ihe extremities ofan
unkllowTl and a knowIl ,'esistance (0,001 or 0,01 !]. O. W OI,FF) ;
the resistances are proportional to Ule menIIs of Ihe deflections
for both directions of the ClllTent, as follows from tht'!
comparison of the detleetions for 0,001 and 0,01!2.
The lempeJ'attu'es are deteJ'mined with a helinmgasthermometel'
of cOllstant volume and wilh open mallometer, the height of the
barometer is read fJ'om an aneroid. In the measnJ'ements of May
181h 1920 the zero pl'essUl'e of Ihe thel'mometer was calculated to
be abont 1140 e.m.; as it was II0t easy lo detel'mine Ihis pressure
accurately, the pl'essul'e at the temperature of Iiqnid helium was
taken as calibratioll point (this temperature followed from the
vapour pressUl'e of the bath).
For Ihe measul'ements of May 28th 1920 the zero-pressure of the
thel'llIometel' wa!! decl'eased to 290 cm., in ordeJ' 10 have less
difliculty with the cOI'l'ections on the provisional international
Kelvin scale, these correetions. in and below the field of liquid
hydrogen being insuflicienlly known, As two calibl'ation points the
tensions of the thermometer sel'ved, plaeed in liquid heliullI (May
28th 1920) and in liqlJid hydl'ogen (May 29th 1920); the
temperatlJl'es of these points again follow trom the vapouJ'
pressUI'e of the bath, using the data from Comm. N°, 147b and N°.
156b.
For the cOl'l'ection of the inoications of the thermometer on
the p,'ovisional internatiollal Kelvin scale, we had at OUl'
disposal the data of Comm. Sllppl. N°, 34a, p. 17, nole 4 (obtained
from the data of Comlll, N°. 102c), ill whieh B - 254o C. has been
taken zero,
-
El SI> ..::: :: (> '" ..... 8 Er 11 .... ~ ""3 5- ;:.
41'1 (1) I ö 6"3 0- ~ () ~ ..-. e.a ,:3 g 0 3 E' g tJj ö' :;- Ö
8 ? -., 0 I 0" (1) ~ ~ (1) .a ::> ti., tJj (1) (1) 0 CJQ 00 ____
_ 00
1ll ~ I (; _.'-' ~ ti ""3 (1).... b5 < 0- '-l g (1) ~ I ~:;.
6"3 ;::: ~ I t:tI 0-" 0
(1) ____
= = ... (>
;-:::s S' ., 0
~ GO; .,
(1) 3 0-~'" ;:;. (1) - 0-:::s < !!!. 0 ~ 4ë" ;n ' a
(1) -(1)
Er < (1) g. ~ 3 ",- (1)
TABLE I.
B. (:,. t I)
Temp. (Pressure heliumtbermometer at 0°. C. = 1000 m.m.) .
Old observations. I New observations. Old observations. I New
observations. 20°.5 K. - 0.00010 + 0.04s
19.1 0.00000 + 0.03g 4.29 - 0.00305 + 0.051 4.22 - 9 .00347 +
0.052 3 71 - 0.00420 +O.~
3.44 - 0.00538 + O.O~ -
~
~
Furlher we have made use of the newly ealeulated 6 fs, and from
this we deduee table 11.
TABLE 11.
Fitting I. pooe = 1140 e.m. May 18, 1921). I Filling 11. Pooc =
290 e.m. May 28 and 29, 1920. Tvapour T He. Wlcor.
Pin loeal P Tvapour T He. Wlcor.
pin loeal p 6. t m.m. Hg. THe'
6t m.m. Hg. THe · teDlioD rected tenlioD rected
0 0 4.20 K. 0.60 3.60 151.8 42 . 18 20 .37 K. 0.13 20 .24 209.7
10.3,
4.22 K- 0 . 15 4.07 42.7 10.4& I - -
-
455
and also from Comm. N". 119 § 5b B 4P,29K. = - 0,000047 1);
Table V of Comm. N". 156a gives a resumé of the corrections,
calculated with the above data. In accOl'dance with note 1 and 3,
p. 27, Comm. N°. 156a here BI = 0,000499, B lOO = 0,000476, tliHe =
= 0,0036614 are takelI, and the inflllence of the C's is neglec.led
').
New determinations, 10 be puolished sho/'tly, of helilllIl
isothe/'ms at T= 20°,5, 4°,2, 3 ~ ,7 and 3°,4 K. gave p.·ovisional
new vallles fOl' B, which thel'efo/'e infer the int/'odllction of
different corrections in the provisional intel'll. Kelvin-scale;
they are lal'gel' than those in Table V, Comm. W. 156a and they do
not come into line so weil with thos~ for higher tempel'atures.
FOl' the sake of eompleteneRs we give a cornparison of these in
Table 1. (cf. p. 387).
§ 4. Tempemtw'e of the vanishin,q point. 0" May 18th and 28 t1l
1920 all tlll'ee I'esistallces pl'o\'ed snpel'condlleting iJl
liqllid helium and behaved, thel'efol'e, in !.he IIsual way. Aftel'
this the cl'yostat was gl'adnally hrought to a higher tempe/'atnre
by electric heating of the vapOI'ised helinm. At a certain moment
the galvanometer moved qllickly over 35 c.m. on the scale alld the
vanishing point was apparently reached; the suddenness of the
deflection speaks weil fOl' the usefnlness of the c!'yostat if not
too high demands are put IIpon it. A repetition of the heating
(very gl'adnally) confirmed the first resnlt. While the
temperatllre was kept constant the thermo-meter was read at the
vanishing point. The results al'e given in Table lIL
TABLE 111.
Data. Filling. P ps therm om. in T He, uncorrecled L t. T. local
m.m. Ht.
° May 18, 1920. I 263.6 6.25 0,58 6 .8 K. May 28, 1920. 11 13.9
a. 1.08 0.15 a.1.23
b. 1.13 0.15 b. 7.28
I) The B = -- 0,000047 is that derived according to pv = RT + B;
the B's V
further mentioned in lhis number are those according to pv = RT
( 1 + !). in agreement with the change of notation mentioned in
note 360 of Comm. SuppJ. N°. 23.
') These values for Bo, B lOo and /X I He must be retained 10
get the corrections on th~ pl'ovisional internat. Kelvin-scale.
Measurements have shown that it would have been more correct to use
Bo = 0,000513, B100 = 0,000492 and /Xi He = 0,0036613 (Comm. N0.
102b, Table land Com. NU. 156a, p. 22, no te 1); this would lead to
a second provisional intern. Kelvin-scaJe (helium-Avogadl'o-scale)
for which reason we retain the first B's. .
-
456
In filling Il a is calculaled by inlel'polation bet.ween
calibl'ation points :,w°,24 and 4°,07 K" b by using only tbe
calibralion point 20°,24 K , in Ihe same wa)" as in filling r only
calibl'alion point 3°,60K, needed to be Ilsed ,
The agl'eemenl between the meaSlll'ements wilh filling land 11
is ,bad. If in filling 1I we calculate, with the presslil'e
increase of 10,3B Olm . pel' degl'ee, the temperature of the helium
on Ma)" 28tb • 1920, the calcuJation yields 4°,27 K, while the
vapoUl· pJ'eSSlll'e gave 4°,22 K (tabie 11); this is in favonr of
Ihe measurements on May 28th • IC we fUl'thel' take the lal'ge
l::.t's in filling I into consideration, a detel'mination with
filling I desel'ves less confidehce than one with filling 11. We
take T vanishing point lead = 7°,2 K, although it is still
desirabie to make a more accurate detel'mination,
~ 5. Cornparison oj' the vanishin,q point tempemtw'es of lead
and uranium lead (Ra G) .
On May 18th , 1920 the cross-tlll'ead of the kathetometel' was
adjusted 10 Ihe mercury menisclIs in the open tube of Ihe
thermo-meter at the pressure belonging to the vanishing point
temperature of Pb-1919-1 (the menisrus in the closed tube must of
course always be kept on the same mark).
Aftel' a decI'ease of temperature lsotope Pb-1919-/ was
insel'ted in the resistance circuit and Ihe tempel'atllre again
I'aised. IC the gal vanometel' moved, because the resistance passed
thl'ough Ihe vanishing point, the meniscus in the tuhe of Ihe
Ihel'mometer passed the CI'OSS thread; this phenomenon was cel·lain
up to 1 mOl. Hg: "Raltlbaum" lead, atomie weight 207,20 and uranium
lead (Ra G), atomie weight 206,06 have the same vilni.~hi1(q point
tempemt1t1'e witltin the aeeuraey ofl/.o degree. The same I'esllit
was yielded by Pb~1'919-B; an influence of the smaller CUlTent
densily in conseqllence of the largel' diameter could not be
detected (Ihe stl'ength of the measul'ing CUlTent was always 7,8
m.A.).
~ 6. Resistances above the tempemtlt1'e of the vanishin,q point.
The results of these measurements are given in fig. 2; the
point
most to the I'ight, placed within a square, is the l'esult of a,
mea-surement in liquid hydrogen. As vanishing point 7°,2 K was
taken, To make Ihe curve join on properly 10 the one in the field
of liquid hydrogen it must be trared as in Ihe diagram; th at is
why COITes-ponden ce with the points marked is defective. The
broken cl'osses have the following meaning: if the difference
between the vanishing
-
457
point temperatnres found on May 18th and May 28th may he
attributed entirely to b.t ha\'illg been taken too large on May
18th , all the other temperatUl'es must be I'ecalclilated, Ihis
recalclIlation yields the crosses. Allhough this aPP"oximation is
theoretically 1I0t qllite cOlTect, as T -- b.t and not T ought to
rise at every temperatul'e in lhe same ratio, yet the results are
in favour of the suggested assumptioll.
%0 ~-r----------~----------~--------~~-------'
QOl0'r-~--------r-------~--------~--~~~
0.OO51---+------+------b~"------___I>-----___l
~OOO~·-L~--------~----------L---------~~-------L fi5 7.0
• o 1+1 :.
9.0 110
Fig. 2.
Pb-1919-1, ! lsótope Pb-1919-I, 18 May 1920. Pb-1919-B,
Pb- 1919-B, 28 May 1920.
>< Redueed observations: § 6.
1.3.0 T