FREQUENCY OF CITATIONS IN FEDERAL COURT … · Ken-Mac Metals, Inc., 458 F3d 1073 ... Ronald W. Davis, ... PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., 615 F.3d 412 ...

FREQUENCY OF CITATIONS IN FEDERAL COURT ANTITRUST OPINIONS:

SELECTED LAW REVIEWS

MEMORANDUM

To: Editorial Board, Antitrust Law Journal

From: Joshua D. Wright

Associate Editor, Antitrust Law Journal

Subject: Updated Study of the Influence of Antitrust Law Journal

Date: April 20, 2012

This memorandum updates the April 2006 study of the frequency with which law reviews are

cited by the federal courts in antitrust cases. The 2006 study was conducted under the direction

of Robby Robertson, then Editorial Chair. The original study (August 2000) was described in a

memorandum from Jonathan B. Baker, then Editorial Chair Designate.1

Study Results

Antitrust Law Journal continues to be the most frequently cited law journal when compared to

Antitrust Bulletin, Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Michigan Law Review, Journal of

Competition Law & Economics, and Journal of Competition Policy International. Previous

studies have not included the Journal of Competition Law & Economics and Competition Policy

International. Because the present study included these two journals, for consistency purposes,

data was recollected for the 2003–2006 period where applicable.

The following table contains the revised data from the 2003–2006 study in the right column.

The other column shows information obtained for the remainder of 2006,2 as well as 2007–2011.

Similarly, the accompanying graph illustrates the total number of citations each journal received

in federal court opinions in the years 2003–2011.

1My research assistant, Stephanie Greco, reviewed and corrected prior citation analyses and

conducted the updated study presented here. 2 Data were originally collected up to and including April 14, 2006.

Frequency of Citations in Federal Court Antitrust Opinions: Selected Law Reviews

JOURNAL 2006–2011 2003–2006

Antitrust Law Journal 53% 45%

Yale Law Journal 14% 22%

Harvard Law Review 25% 23%

Michigan Law Review 3% 7%

Antitrust Bulletin 3% 3%

Journal of Competition

Law & Economics 2% 0%

Competition Policy

International 0% 0%

Methodology

The citation frequency study counted the number of federal antitrust cases that cited to each

journal. The present study is based on a review of an additional 104 federal antitrust opinions

between April 16, 2006 and December 31, 2011. The citation frequency counts the number of

times an article relating to antitrust material was cited in a case relating to antirust subject matter.

For example, if two different articles from the same periodical were cited within a case, this

would count as two citations for that periodical. However, if the same article was cited multiple

times within a case, the periodical would still only be counted once. The search for citations was

0

5

10

15

20

25

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Antitrust L.J. Harv. L. Rev. Yale L.J.

Mich. L. Rev. Antitrust Bull. J. Competition Law & Econ.

Competition Pol'y Int'l.

Federal

Court

Citations

conducted on both LexisNexis and WestLaw search engines to ensure inclusive results.

Unlike the original data collected for the 2003–2006 time period, the present study does not

include citations to briefs or citations in State Supreme Court or State Court opinions.

Conclusions

The Section of Antitrust Law should continue to be proud of its achievement in fostering

important scholarship in the field of antitrust law. With its high-quality articles and wide

circulation, the Antitrust Law Journal remains the premier law review in the field of antitrust.

The Antitrust Law Journal has long been extremely useful to antitrust practitioners, the Journal’s

primary constituency. The influence of Antitrust Law Journal articles among judges, as reflected

in the results of the citation study, adds to the great value that the Journal already provides

practitioners.

As noted in the memorandum describing the results of the previous study, the increased quality

and recognition of Antitrust Law Journal articles has coincided with the increasing

professionalization of the editorial process. As a refereed law review, and with the editorial

supervision of its expanded professional editorial board, the quality of published articles in the

Antitrust Law Journal and their value to judges has consistently increased.

Number of Citations in Opinions by Court 2006–2011: Antitrust Law Journal

Year U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of

Appeals

U.S. District

Court

2006 0 3 0

2007 6 7 8

2008 0 4 12

2009 1 3 10

2010 0 5 4

2011 0 1 13

TOTAL 7 23 47

Opinions

Supreme Court

2007

Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007).

Frank H. Easterbrook, Vertical Arrangements and the Rule of Reason, 53 ANTITRUST L.J.

135 (1984).

F.M. Scherer, The Economics of Vertical Restraints, 52 ANTITRUST L.J. 687 (1983).

Robert L. Steiner, How Manufacturers Deal with the Price-Cutting Retailer: When Are

Vertical Restraints Efficient?, 65 ANTITRUST L.J. 407 (1997).

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc., 549 U.S. 312 (2007).

John B. Kirkwood, Buyer Power and Exclusionary Conduct, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 625

(2005).

Roger G. Noll, “Buyer Power” and Economic Policy, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 589 (2005).

Steven C. Salop, Anticompetitive Overbuying by Power Buyers, 72 ANTITRUST L. J. 669

(2005).

2009

Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., 555 U.S. 438 (2009).

Phillip Areeda, Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles, 58

ANTITRUST L.J. 841(1989).

Court of Appeals

2006

Schor v. Abbott Laboratories, 457 F3d 608 (7th Cir. 2006).

Michael H. Riordan & Steven C. Salop, Evaluating Vertical Mergers, 63 ANTITRUST L.J.

513 (1995).

Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc., 458 F3d 1073 (10th Cir. 2006).

Kenneth L. Glazer, Concerted Refusals To Deal Under Section 1 Of The Sherman Act, 70

ANTITRUST L.J. 1 (2002).

Gregory J. Werden, Economic Evidence on the Existence of Collusion: Reconciling

Antitrust Law with Oligopoly Theory, 71 ANTITRUST L.J. 719 (2004).

2007

Freightliner of Knoxville, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Vans, LLC, 484 F.3d 865 (6th Cir. 2007).

Barbara O. Bruckman, Discounts, Discrimination, and Exclusive Dealing: Issues Under

the Robinson-Patman Act, 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 253 (2000).

Tunica Web Advertising v. Tunica Casino Operators Ass'n, Inc., 496 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2007).

Kenneth L. Glazer, Concerted Refusals to Deal Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 70


NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Co., 507 F.3d 442 (6th Cir. 2007).

Ronald W. Davis, Standing on Shaky Ground: The Strangely Elusive Doctrine of

Antitrust Injury, 70 ANTITRUST L.J. 697 (2003).

Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 505 F.3d 302 (4th Cir. 2007).



Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth, 502 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2007).

George A. Hay, Predatory Pricing, 58 ANTITRUST L.J. 913 (1989).

Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2007).

Daniel G. Swanson & William J. Baumol, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND)

Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power, 73 ANTITRUST L.J. 1

(2005).

Smith Wholesale Co., Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 477 F3d 854 (6th Cir. 2007).

Barbara O. Bruckman, Discounts, Discrimination, and Exclusive Dealing: Issues Under

the Robinson-Patman Act, 68 ANTITRUST L.J. 253 (2000).

2008

American Needle Inc. v. National Football League, 538 F.3d 736 (7th Cir. 2008).

Gregory J. Werden, Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures: An Overview, 66 ANTITRUST

L.J. 701 (1998).

F.T.C. v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., 548 F.3d 1028 (D.C.Cir. 2008).

Daniel P. O'Brien & Abraham L. Wickelgren, A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss

Analysis, 71 ANTITRUST L.J. 161 (2003).

Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Salvino, Inc., 542 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2008).


L.J. 701 (1998).


George A. Hay, Predatory Pricing, 58 ANTITRUST L.J. 913 (1989).

2009

Four Corners Nephrology Associates, P.C. v. Mercy Medical Center of Durango, 582 F.3d 1216

(10th Cir. 2009).

Phillip Areeda, Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles, 58


Princo Corp. v. International Trade Com'n, 563 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Roger B. Andewelt, Analysis of Patent Pools Under the Antitrust Laws, 53 ANTITRUST

L.J. 611 (1985).

In re American Express Merchants' Litigation, 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009).

Dando B. Cellini, An Overview of Antitrust Class Actions, 49 ANTITRUST L.J. 1501

(1980).

2010

West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMC, 627 F.3d 85 (3d Cir. 2010).

Warren S. Grimes, The Sherman Act's Unintended Bias Against Lilliputians, 69


Maurice E. Stucke, Symposium, When a Monopolist Deceives, 76 ANTITRUST L.J. 823

(2010).

Princo Corp. v. International Trade Com'n, 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Joseph Kattan, Antitrust Analysis of Technology Joint Ventures: Allocative Efficiency and

the Rewards of Innovation, 61 ANTITRUST L.J. 937 (1993).

Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 602 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2010).

Frank H. Easterbrook, Treble What?, 55 ANTITRUST L.J. 95 (1986).

PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., 615 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2010).


135 (1984).

2011

In re American Express Merchants' Litigation, 634 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2011).

Dando B. Cellini, An Overview of Antitrust Class Actions, 49 ANTITRUST L.J. 1501.

(1980).

United States District Courts

2007

Lotus Business Group LLC v. Flying J Inc., 532 F.Supp.2d 1011 (E.D. Wis. 2007).


135 (1984).

Westerfield v. Quizno's Franchise Co., LLC, 527 F.Supp.2d 840 (E.D. Wis. 2007).

George A. Hay, Is the Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full?: Reflections on the Kodak Case,

62 ANTITRUST L.J. 177 (1993).

Alan Silberman, The Myths of Franchise “Market Power”, 65 ANTITRUST L.J. 181

(1996).

In re Tableware Antitrust Litigation, 484 F.Supp.2d 1059 (N.D. Cal. 2007).

Kenneth L Glazer, Concerted Refusals to Deal Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 70


Southwire Co. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 528 F.Supp.2d 908 (W.D. Wis. 2007).

Stephen Calkins, The October 1989 Supreme Court Term and Antitrust: Power, Access,

and Legitimacy, 59 ANTITRUST L.J. 339 (1991).

Government Employees Medical Plan v. Regence Blue Shelf of Idaho, 2007 WL 576463 (D.

Idaho 2007).

Andrew L. Gavil, After Daubert: Discerning the Increasingly Fine Line Between the

Admissibility and Sufficiency of Expert Testimony in Antitrust Litigation, 65 ANTITRUST

L.J. 663 (1997).

In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, 235 F.R.D. 127 (D. Me. 2007).

George J. Benston, Indirect Purchasers' Standing to Claim Damages in Price Fixing

Antitrust Actions: A Benefit/Cost Analysis of Proposals to Change the Illinois Brick Rule,

55 ANTITRUST L.J. 213 (1986).

William H. Page, The Limits of State Indirect Purchaser Suits: Class Certification in the

Shadow of Illinois Brick, 67 ANTITRUST L.J. 1 (1999).

2008

In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation, 253 F.R.D. 478 (N.D. Cal. 2008).



In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, 554 F.Supp.2d 1003 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

Charles F. Rule, The Administration's Views on Joint Ventures, 54 ANTITRUST L.J. 1121

(1985).

White Mule Co. v. ATC Leasing Co. LLC, 540 F.Supp.2d 869 (N.D. Ohio 2008).

Steven C. Salop, Anticompetitive Overbuying by Power Buyers, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 669

(2005).

Black Box Corp. v. Avaya, Inc., 2008 WL 4117844 (D.N.J. 2008).

David A.J. Goldfine & Kenneth M. Vorassi, The Fall of Kodak Aftermarket Doctrine:

Dying a Slow Death in the Lower Courts, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 209 (2004).

Avaya, Inc. v. Telecom Labs, Inc., 2008 WL 4117957 (D.N.J. 2008).

David A.J. Goldfine & Kenneth M. Vorassi, The Fall of Kodak Aftermarket Doctrine:

Dying a Slow Death in the Lower Courts, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 209 (2004).

Spahr v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., 2008 WL 3914461 (E.D. Tenn. 2008).


135 (1984).

U.S. v. Daily Gazette Co., 567 F.Supp.2d 859 (S.D.W.Va. 2008).

Maurice E. Stucke & Allen P. Grunes, Antitrust and the Marketplace of Ideas, 69


Siemer v. Quizno's Franchise Co. LLC, 2008 WL 904874 (N.D. Ill. 2008).


(1996).

BellSouth Telcoms., Inc. v. Ky. PSC, 2008 US Dist LEXIS 99581(D. Ky. 2008).

James B. Speta, Antitrust and Local Competition Under the Telecommunications Act, 71


City of New York v. Group Health, Inc., 2008 WL 4974578 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).

Roy J. Epstein & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Merger Simulation: A Simplified Approach with

New Applications, 69 ANTITRUST L.J. 883 (2002).

Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 2008 WL 73689 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

Jonathan B. Baker, Market Definition: An Analytical Overview, 74 ANTITRUST L.J. 129

(2007).

Michael L. Katz & Howard A. Shelanski, Mergers and Innovation, 74 ANTITRUST L.J. 1

(2007).

2009

In re Flonase Antitrust Litigation, 610 F.Supp.2d 409 (E.D. Pa. 2009).



Emigra Group, LLC v. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, 612 F.Supp.2d 330

(S.D.N.Y. 2009).


(2007).

In re Static Random Access memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation, 264 F.R.D. 603 (N.D.Cal.

2009).



Martrano v. Quizno's Franchise Co., L.L.C, 2009 US Dist. LEXIS 52025 (W.D. Pa. 2009).


(1996).

AVX Corp. v. Cabot Corp., 600 F.Supp.2d 286 (D. Mass. 2009).

Gregory J. Werden, Economic Evidence on the Existence of Collusion: Reconciling

Antitrust Law with Oligopoly Theory, 71 ANTITRUST L.J. 719 (2004).

Arnold v. Petland, Inc., 2009 US Dist LEXIS 31377 (S.D. Ohio 2009).


(1996).

McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Com'n, 655 F.Supp.2d 1003

(D. Ariz. 2009).

James B. Speta, Antitrust and Local Competition under the Telecommunications Act, 71


Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc., 645 F.Supp.2d 734 (D. Minn. 2009).



Somers v. Apple, Inc., 258 FRD 354 (N.D. Cal. 2009).



Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 594 F.Supp.2d 945 (N.D. Ill. 2009).

William Blumenthal, The Scope of Permissible Coordination Between Merging Entities

Prior to Consummation, 63 ANTITRUST L.J. 1 (1994).

2010

Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service Com'n, 693 F.Supp.2d 703

(E.D. Ky. 2010).

James B. Speta, Antitrust and Local Competition under the Telecommunications Act, 71


Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, 2010 WL

3855552 (E.D. Pa. 2010).



Coalition For A Level Playing Field, L.L.C. v. AutoZone, Inc., 737 F.Supp.2d 194 (S.D.N.Y.

2010).

Roger G. Noll, “ Buyer Power” and Economic Policy, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 589 (2005).

James F. Rill, Availability and Functional Discounts Justifying Discriminatory Pricing,

53 ANTITRUST L.J. 929 (1985).

2011

Sprint Nextel Corp. v. AT&T Inc., 2011 WL 5188081 (D.D.C. 2011).



Michael H. Riordan & Steven C. Salop, Evaluating Vertical Merger: A Post-Chicago

Approach, 63 ANTITRUST L.J. 513 (1995).

In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation, 743 F.Supp.2d 827 (N.D. Ill. 2011).

R. Bork, Ancillary Restraints and the Sherman Act, 15 ANTITRUST L.J. 211 (1959).


L.J. 701 (1998).

In re Cox Enterprises, Inc. Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litigation, 2011 WL

6826813 (W.D. Okla. 2011).

Patrick Greenlee, David Reitman & David S. Sibley, Comment on Muris and Smith,

Antitrust and Bundled Discounts: An Experimental Analysis, 77 ANTITRUST L.J. 669

(2011).

Timothy J. Muris & Vernon L. Smith, Antitrust and Bundled Discounts: An Experimental

Analysis, 75 ANTITRUST L.J. 399 (2008).

In re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Cheese Antitrust Litigation, 767 F.Supp.2d 880 (N.D. Ill.

2011).

John B. Kirkwood, Buyer Power and Exclusionary Conduct, 72 ANTITRUST L.J. 625

(2005).

In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, 2011 WL 3918165 (E.D.N.Y. 2011).

Yong Huan, Pursuing the Second Best: The History, Momentum, and Remaining Issues

of China's Anti-Monopoly Law, 75 ANTITRUST L.J. 117 (2008-2009).

F.T.C. v. ProMedica Health System, Inc., 2011 WL 1219281 (N.D. Ohio 2011).


(2007).

U.S. v. Keyspan Corp., 763 F.Supp.2d 633 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).

Einer Elhauge, Disgorgement as an Antitrust Remedy, 76 ANTITRUST L.J. 79 (2009).

Deborah Heart and Lung Center v. Penn Presbypyterian Medical Center, 2011 WL 6935276

(D.N.J. 2011).

Jonathan M. Jacobson, Exclusive Dealing, "Foreclosure," And Consumer Harm, 70


In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation, 2011 WL 2790179 (N.D. Cal. 2011).

Einer Elhauge, Disgorgement as an Antitrust Remedy, 76 ANTITRUST L.J. 79 (2009).

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Mayer Laboratories, Inc., 2011 WL 1225912 (N.D. Cal. 2011).

Steven C. Salop, Refusals to Deal and Price Squeezes by an Unregulated, Vertically

Integrated Monopolist, 76 ANTITRUST L.J. 709 (2010).

Number of Citations in Opinions for Harvard Law Review

Year US Supreme Court US Court of Appeals US District

Court

2006 0 2 1

2007 3 3 5

2008 0 2 5

2009 0 0 10

2010 2 1 1

2011 0 5 3

TOTAL 5 13 18

Opinions

Supreme Court

2007

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007).

Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007). (2)

2010

American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 130 S.Ct. 2201 (2010). (2)

Court of Appeals

2006

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Cigarettes Cheaper!, 462 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2006).

In re First Alliance Mortgage Co., 471 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2006).

2007

Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., 507 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2007).


Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 491 F.3d 380 (8th Cir. 2007).

2008

JDA Software, Inc. v. Bissett, 282 Fed.Appx. 532 (9th Cir. 2008).


2010

Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. Cuomo, 624 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 2010).

2011

Brady v. National Football League, 640 F.3d 785 (8th Cir. 2011).

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc., 637 F.3d 435 (4th Cir. 2011). (3)

Astra Media Group, LLC v. Clear Channel Taxi Media, LLC, 414 Fed.Appx. 334 (2d Cir. 2011).


2006

Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F.Supp.2d 992 (E.D.N.Y. 2006).

2007

Dearborn v. Everett J. Prescott, Inc., 486 F.Supp.2d 802 (S.D. Ind. 2007).

Beale v. Biomet, Inc., 492 F.Supp.2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Consumers Warehouse Center, Inc. v. Intercounty Appliance Corp., 2007 WL 922423 (E.D.N.Y.

2007).

McGough v. Nalco Co., 496 F.Supp.2d 729 (N.D.W.Va. 2007).

In re Late Fee and Over-Limit Fee Litigation, 528 F.Supp.2d 953 (N.D. Cal. 2007).

2008

Kelly Services, Inc. v. Greene, 535 F.Supp.2d 180 (D.Me. 2008).

Sheet Metal Workers Nat. Health Fund v. Amgen Inc., 2008 WL 3833577 (D.N.J. 2008).

Meijer, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 544 F.Supp.2d 995 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

2009

McDonough v. Toys R Us, Inc., 638 F.Supp.2d 461 (E.D. Pa. 2009).

Warren Pub. Co. v. Spurlock, 645 F.Supp.2d 402 (E.D. Pa. 2009).

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc., 683 F.Supp.2d 401 (E.D. Va. 2009).

Xerox Corp. v. Media Sciences, Inc., 660 F.Supp.2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). (2)

In re Title Ins. Antitrust Cases, 702 F.Supp.2d 840 (N.D. Ohio 2009).

Cottonwood Financial Ltd. v. Cash Store Financial Services, Inc., 778 F.Supp.2d 726 (N.D. Tex.

2009).

Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries, 782 F.Supp.2d 1059 (E.D. Cal. 2009).

Black v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 2011 WL 4102802 (W.D. Pa. 2009).

Number of Citations in Opinions for Yale Law Journal


Court

2006 0 1 0

2007 0 5 1

2008 0 4 1

2009 0 1 2

2010 0 2 0

2011 0 1 2

TOTAL 0 14 6

Opinions

Court of Appeals

2006

Schor v. Abbott Laboratories, 457 F.3d 608 (7th Cir. 2006).

2007

Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 505 F.3d 302 (4th Cir. 2007).

Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth, 502 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2007). (3)

Houston Community Hospital v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc., 481 F.3d 265 (5th Cir.

2007).

2008

Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth, 515 F3d 883(9th Cir. 2008). (3)

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng, 522 F.3d 874 (9th Cir. 2008).

2009

White v. National Football League, 585 F.3d 1129 (8th Cir. 2009).

2010

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Tabari, 610 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2010).

Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. Cuomo, 624 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 2010).

2011

Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., 2011 WL 6367740 (3d Cir. 2011).

United State District Courts

2007

Burgess v. Gilman, 475 F.Supp.2d 1051 (D. Nev. 2007).

2008

In re Ford Motor Co. E-350 Van Products Liability Litigation, 2008 US Dist LEXIS 73690

(D.N.J. 2008).

2009

Kaiser Foundation v. Abbott Laboratories, 2009 WL 3877513 (C.D. Cal. 2009).

Sananap v. Cyfred, Ltd., 2009 WL 4544805 (Guam 2009).

2011

Cottonwood Financial Ltd. v. Cash Store Financial Services, Inc., 778 F.Supp.2d 726 (N.D. Tex.

2011).

Sprint Nextel Corp. v. AT & T Inc., 2011 WL 5188081 (D.D.C. 2011).

Number of Citations in Opinions for Michigan Law Review


Court

2006 0 0 1

2007 0 0 1

2008 0 0 0

2009 0 0 0

2010 0 2 0

2011 0 0 1

TOTAL 0 2 3

Opinions

Court of Appeals

2010

West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMC, 627 F.3d 85 (3d Cir. 2010).

Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic Intern., Inc., 626 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2010).


2006

Windt v. Qwest Communs. Int'l, Inc., 2006 US Dist LEXIS 75335 (D.N.J. 2006).

2007

American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints, 496 F.Supp.2d 941 (E.D. Ill. 2007).

2011

Sprint Nextel Corp. v. AT&T Inc., 2011 WL 5188081 (D.D.C. 2011).

Number of Citations in Opinions for Antitrust Bulletin


Court

2006 0 0 1

2007 0 1 0

2008 0 1 1

2009 0 0 0

2010 0 0 0

2011 0 0 0

TOTAL 0 2 2

Opinions

Court of Appeals

2007


2008



2006

Mumford v. GNC Franchising LLC, 437 F.Supp.2d 344 (W.D. Pa. 2006).

2008

In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, 554 F.Supp.2d 1003 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

Number of Citations in Opinions for Journal of Competition Law & Econ.


Court

2006 0 0 1

2007 0 0 0

2008 0 0 1

2009 0 0 0

2010 0 1 0

2011 0 0 0

TOTAL 0 1 2

Opinions

Court of Appeals

2010

Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund v. Bayer AG, 604 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2010).


2006

In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, 235 F.R.D. 127 (D. Me. 2006)

2008

In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation, 253 F.R.D. 478 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

FREQUENCY OF CITATIONS IN FEDERAL COURT … · Ken-Mac Metals, Inc., 458 F3d 1073 ... Ronald W. Davis, ... PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., 615 F.3d 412 ...

Documents