Fragmentation experiments Fragmentation experiments LNS LNS Status Report C.Agodi TPS collaboration meeting Torino 5-6 novembre 2009
Mar 27, 2015
Fragmentation experimentsFragmentation experiments
LNSLNS
Status Report
C.Agodi TPS collaboration meeting
Torino 5-6 novembre 2009
What is the contribution to Ion Therapy Treatment Planning ?
The optimal TPS should be interactive and evaluated in real time.
Innovative contribution in this field is particularly needed in case of clinical ions beams.
Energy losses can be assessed via Monte Carlo simulation mainly to account for fragmentation nuclear processes.
Cross section fragmentation data
RBE table remodels the physical dose deposition including the hadron
specificity
Cross section fragmentation data
LNSLNS
The Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) is a complex computer system that helps both to design radiation treatments and to compute the dose to the patient.
Planning Treatment Volume
Computed Tomography
Projectile fragmentation
Reaction products :
• have velocity near to the primary beam;
• are emitted mostly in the forward direction
• The detection system has to be efficient in the interest angular region
LNSLNS
Projectile
Reaction atIntermediate energy
Target
Nuclei Fragmentation
12C beam from CS
Target
Hodo Big Hodo small
LNSLNS
Our Measurements at LNS: The ExperimentOur Measurements at LNS: The Experiment
We already measured the 12C fragmentation on 197Au and 12C targets with 32 and 62 AMeV CS beams at
LNS-INFN, Catania
In 2010 we plan to use different beams up to 80 AMeV.
INFN Laboratory Nazionali del Sud , Catania - Sicily - Italy
Superconducting cyclotron
LNS – INFN, Catania
An hodoscope (hodo big and hodo small) composed of two-fold and three-fold telescopes has been used for identify fragments produced in the reaction and measure the energy (θlab
between 0° and ±20°)
LNSLNS
HODO-BIG: 89 three-folds telescopes array 4.5°-22.5°Si(50μm)-Si(300μm)-CsI(6cm)
HODO-SMALL: 81 two-folds telescopes array 4.5°-4.5°
Si(300μm)-CsI(10cm)
projectile fragment
Experimental set – up
LNSLNS
FRAG (April 2009) 12C+12C,197Au,CH @62MeV
C + C N° ≈ 5·1012
I ~ 40 – 80 pA
C + CH2 N° ≈ 1·1012
I ~ 40 – 60 pA
C + Au N° ≈ 11·1012
I ~ 180 – 230 pA
LNSLNS
E-E plot
LNSLNS
Measured vs calculated angular differential cross Measured vs calculated angular differential cross sectionssections
CHARGED PARTICLE PRODUCTION CROSS SECTION
PRELIMINARY COMPARISONS – LNS DATA AT 62 AMeV Carbon incident
General better agreement of JQMD with our modifications but still worse agreement in the intermediate part of the spectra
LNSLNS
“Extensive study of nuclear reactions of interest for medical and space applications.”
G.Cuttone, F.Marchetto, G.Raciti, E.Iarocci, V.Patera, C.Agodi, C.Sfienti, E.Rapisarda, M. De Napoli, F. Giacoppo, M.C. Morone, A. Sciubba,
G.Battistoni, P.Sala, Sacchi, E.Spiriti, G.A.P.Cirrone, F.RomanoINFN: LNS, LNF, Roma2, Roma3, Milan, Turin, Roma Tor Vergata
S.Leray, M.D. Salsac, A.Boudard, J.E. Ducret, M. Labalme, F. Haas, C. RayDSM/IRFU/SPhN CEA Saclay, IN2P3 Caen, Strasbourg, Lyon
M. Durante, D. Schardt, R. Pleskac, T. Aumann, C. Scheidenberger, A. Kelic, M.V.Ricciardi, K.Boretzky, M. Heil, H. Simon, M. Winkler
GSI
P. Nieminen, G. SantinESA
Proposal of Experiment at SIS
LNSLNS
GSI-GPAC: «Extensive study of nuclear reactions of interest for Medical and Space Applications»: S371
LNSLNS
Assuming that the dependence of the acceptance on Pt can be determined with a
20% error then all the slopes should be determined with an accuracy better than 2.5 %,
in the worst case (Z = 2)
We can get the goal of 3% error in Double Differential Cross Section
Estimation of the systematic errors on momentum and angle as reconstructed
with ALADIN
Fragmentation measurements at GSIFragmentation measurements at GSI
The G-PAC approved with high priority the key measurements:
LNSLNS
•C+C @ 0.2, 0.4 and 1.0 AGeV
•C+Au @ 0.2, 0.4 AGeV
•O+C @ 0.2, 0.4 AGeV
Hadrotherapy
Analysis Exp.Apr.09
LNS@80AMeV (deadline proposal 12/09)
S371@GSI
Fragmentation 2010
LNSLNS
12C Fragmentation measurements In order to perform a systematic study of projectile fragmentation intermediate
energies, we measured the 12C fragmentation cross section on different targets at 32 and 62 AMeV at LNS.
LNSLNS
New mixed inner radiation field !
New mixed inner radiation field !
projectile
target
projectile fragment
target fragment
Outer radiation fields
Interaction of the radiation withthe spacecraft hulls, the body... Target Fragments Projectile fragments Target Fragments Projectile fragments
… … lower chargelower charge … lower charge … lower charge than target than primariesthan target than primaries… … high LET … mixed LET high LET … mixed LET … … short ranges … long rangesshort ranges … long ranges
Sezione d’urto di produzione di particelle cariche ( particelle α)
CONFRONTO PRELIMINARE – DATI LNS (12C at 62 AMeV)
In generale miglior accordo con il JQMD con le nostre modifiche .
Resta comunque una discrepanza notevole nella parte intermedia dello spettro
LNSLNS
Why fragmentation measurement in hadrontherapy?
Disadvantages
Disadvantages
LNSLNS
Light ions Advantages•Better Spatial selectivity in dose deposition: Bragg Peak
• Reduced lateral and longitudinal diffusion
• High Conformal dose deposition
• High Biological effectiveness
Treatment of highly radiation resistent tumours, sparing surrounding OAR
•Fall of dose in the tumour target region
• Unwanted dose in normal tissue behind the target volume
An extensive database on nuclear fragmentation cross sections and fluences are needed at therapeutic energy region
Disadvantages of carbon ions
Nuclear Fragmentation of 12C beam in the interaction processes with: • energy degraders, • biological tissues
Further problem different biological effectiveness of the fragments
Mitigation and attenuation of the primary beam
Dose over the Bragg Peak :
p ~ 1-2 %
C ~ 15 % Ne ~ 30 %
Production of fragments with higher range vs primary ions
LNSLNS
Carbon ions advantages
Lower lateral and longitudinal diffusion vs. proton More precise energy deposition
• Optimal RBE profile - penetration depth position.
• Online PET for depth deposition monitoring
•Good Compromise between RBE and OER.
LNSLNS
LNSLNS
Our Measurements at LNS: The ExperimentOur Measurements at LNS: The Experiment
The Hodo-small, set up at a distance of 80 cm from the target consisted of 81 two-
fold telescopes: 300 µm Silicon detectors 1x1 cm2 of
active area followed by a 1x1 cm2 and 10 cm long CsI(Tl)
and covered the angular range θlab=±4.5°.
The Hodo-big, set up at a distance of 0.6 m from the target, consisted of 89 three-
fold telescopes 50 µm + 300 µm Silicon detectors both having 3x3 cm2 surface
followed by a 6 cm long CsI(Tl)of the same surface. It covered the angular
range θlab between ±4.5° and ±20°
Hodo SmallHodo Small
TargetTarget
Hodo BigHodo Big
E CsI(Tl)