Top Banner
1 Financial Stability Review 23/10/2013
21

Financial Stability Review 2/2013

Jan 15, 2015

Download

Economy & Finance

Eesti Pank

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

1

Financial Stability Review 23/10/2013

Page 2: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

2 2

Key points

Page 3: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

3

Increased economic activity has reduced uncertainty in the international financial environment

Economies are recovering more slowly in some euro area countries and the risks are compounded by high debt levels and weak banking sectors

Source: EcoWin

Page 4: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

4

Money market rates have remained low in the current monetary policy environment

Source: EcoWin

Page 5: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

5

The strong confidence shown by the markets thus far has given Nordic bank groups good access to financing and stable prices

The large share of funding coming from the markets creates a vulnerability in the financing of Swedish banks

Source: Bloomberg

Page 6: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

6

A high debt burden among households and rapid growth in real estate prices have emerged as the major risks to financial stability in Sweden and Norway

A fall in real estate prices could cause a recession and hinder banks in accessing funding from financial markets

Sources: Valueguard, Norwegian Association of Real Estate Agents, Eesti Pank calculations

Page 7: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

7

The slowdown in the economy has not affected the solvency of Estonian companies

Sources: Krediidiinfo, Eesti Pank

Page 8: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

8

The risks to the solvency of households have been reduced by the low level of EURIBOR and by favourable developments in the labour market

Sources: Statistics Estonia, Eesti Pank

Page 9: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

9

Real estate prices have risen faster than nominal GDP

Sources: Statistics Estonia, Estonian Land Board

Page 10: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

10

Growth in housing loans has remained modest

Bank lending standards have not changed

Page 11: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

11

The margins on housing loans have not changed

Page 12: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

12

Growth in deposits has made the financing of the loan portfolio more balanced

The loans-to-deposit ratio fell to 109%

Page 13: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

13

Capitalisation of banks has improved as profitability is good

The quality of capital is high and leverage low

Page 14: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

14

Main risks and consequences

Page 15: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

15

Most of the risks to financial stability in Estonia are small

Page 16: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

16

The recession in the euro area weakened the asset quality of euro area banks significantly

Page 17: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

17

The Nordic financial sector is considered secure but risks have increased in the real estate market

Page 18: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

18

The banks operating in Estonia need to continue to be careful in issuing real estate loans

Page 19: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

19

Main risks affecting Estonian financial stability

Small risk Large risk

Weak economies in Europe damaging the quality of bank assets

A sharp fall in Nordic real estate prices following on from the rapid growth that could pose a threat to economies and bank groups in the area

A spiral effect created by rapid rises in real estate prices and wages, in which banks, borrowers and savers start to act ever more riskily

Page 20: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

20

For the Estonian banking sector to maintain its resilience it is important to keep the minimum capital requirement at 10%

Page 21: Financial Stability Review 2/2013

21

Planned changes to the capital requirements from 2014

Until 31/12/2013 From 2014

Minimum capital adequacy requirement 10% 8%

Systemic risk buffer - 2%*

Counter-cyclical buffer - 0%*

Total capital requirements 10% 10%*

* Proposed requirement