Top Banner
Beha viour al Aspect Of Beha viour al Aspect Of Budgeting Budgeting
43

Final MCS Anamika

Apr 10, 2018

Download

Documents

abhijitswar
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 1/43

Behavioural Aspect OfBehavioural Aspect Of

BudgetingBudgeting

Page 2: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 2/43

Compiled by:Compiled by:

Tanmay gangwar 091202064Pratham Hegde 091202073

Nayana 091202057

Shanawaz 091202115Anamika Kanoi 091202047

Page 3: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 3/43

ContentsContents

Definition and process of budget

Significance of budget

Impact of budget on stakeholders

Conflicting role of budgets

Effect of budget levels on performance

Reasons for bias in budgeting

Bottlenecks of allocating budgets

Conclusion

Page 4: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 4/43

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

To understand human behavior and their aspiration in relation to budget.

To study the impact of stringent budget on the stakeholders

To understand the concepts and process of budget.

To suggest measures to encourage the performance of people concerned

in relation to formulation of budget.

Page 5: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 5/43

 W hat is Budget?

quantified plan relating to a given period.

Although Budgets are often stated in terms of money, they need not be,

and can also relate to quantities made and sold, numbers of employees to

be recruited, or weights of material to be consumed.

Quantification is important because it adds precision and Clarity to a plan.

Page 6: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 6/43

PURPOSE OF PURPOSE OF BUDGETINGBUDGETING

Planning:

Necessitates setting of goals and establishing actions needed toattain goals.

Organising: involves the allocation of resources.

Leading: 

Two main aspects are communicating & motivating.

Controlling: 

Process of setting standards, measuring current performance andtaking remedial action if needed.

Page 7: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 7/43

The Budgeting ProcessThe Budgeting Process

Page 8: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 8/43

Step 1: Planning the Process

Identify who will coordinate the budgeting process and which staff, board

members and committees need to be involved;

Agree upon key definitions, assumptions and document formats;

Set timelines and key deadlines;

Determine and schedule any training or key meetings.

Page 9: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 9/43

Step 2: Communicating about the

Process

Clearly communicate responsibilities, expectations and deadlines to

everyone involved;

Explain and distribute forms and assumptions.

Page 10: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 10/43

Step 3: Programmatic Goal

Setting

Determine program goals and objectives;

Project staffing requirements and salary and benefit

assumptions based on program goals;

Get board agreement on goals and assumptions.

Page 11: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 11/43

Step 4: Information Gathering

Research and gather information about income and expenses based on

program goals and assumptions;

Construct budget details by program;

Communicate regularly to avoid duplication of effort and to share

information and assumptions.

Page 12: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 12/43

Step 5:Compilation and Revision

Have one person compile all information, review it for

consistency and redistribute to everyone involved;

Leave plenty of time for review and revisions.

Page 13: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 13/43

Step 6:Committee Review 

Have the finance committee and other appropriate staff and

board committees review a budget draft and key

assumptions;

Page 14: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 14/43

Step 7: Final Approval

Board meeting held and budget proposal and programmatic

and fundraising assumptions are presented for approval.

Page 15: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 15/43

Effects Of Budget On The Various

Parties Involved In An Organisation

Page 16: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 16/43

StakeholdersStakeholders

SUPPLIERS

In case of a stringent budget the production department (stores and

purchases) is under heavy pressure to control and reduce the cost. Due to

this it tries to curtail on the raw material consumption or else tries to

resort to compromising on quality.

The suppliers in this case may or may not agree to reduce cost which will

create issues regarding the budget.

Page 17: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 17/43

CUSTOMERS

The customers are also affected because of the company`sbudget .

If in case a stringent budget is prepared by the concerned

authorities, various aspects such as advertisement, awareness

, value added services, etc are not provided in the desirable

way to the customers which creates hassles for them.

Page 18: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 18/43

GOVERNMENT

Due to stringent budget policies the company may strive tocut down its tax liability which is unethical and would try to

reduce it to the extent possible.

This might affect the government which is considered as one

of the stakeholders of the company

Page 19: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 19/43

INVESTORS

Budget plays a very important role for the investors as theirexpectations are linked to the overall performance of the

organisation .

The increase in performance of the company leads to an

increase in its investor base thereby leading to an increase in

the value of the firm and its shares

Page 20: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 20/43

EMPLOYEES

The employees are affected heavily if the budgets assigned tothem are strict in nature.

This might lead to development of a negative attitude from

the employees which would further lead to the downfall of 

the company

Page 21: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 21/43

Conflicting Role Of

Budgets

Page 22: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 22/43

Tight budgets should be established to motivate maximum performance,

although this may mean that the budget will not be achieved.

However, tight budgets that are unlikely to be achieved are most

unsuitable for cash budgeting and for harmonizing the company plans in

the form of a master budget.

Because of this conflict separate budgets should be used for planning and

for motivational purposes.

The counter argument to this is that budgetees may react unfavourably to

a situation where they believe that one budget is used to evaluate their

performance and a second looser budget is used by top management.

It is unlikely that one set of budgets can, at the same time, meet both the

planning and the motivational requirements.

Page 23: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 23/43

Managerial Use budgets In PerformanceManagerial Use budgets In Performance

E valuationE valuation

Study conducted by Hopwood(1976)

Three distinct styles of using budget were

recognized:

budget-constrained style

Profit-conscious style

Non accounting style

Page 24: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 24/43

OBSERVATIONS $ FINDINGS

Accounting data showed the performance on

a quantitative scale ignoring the long term

costs

Both budget constrained style and profit

conscious style were better as compared tonon accounting style

Profit conscious style concentrated on

attaining the budgets without incurring anyemotional or undesirable behaviour

Page 25: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 25/43

contd.

Budget constrained style created worry and a

feeling of unjust among the employees

Budget constrained style may at times involvemanipulation and mal practices being adopted

by the managers and their unit memebers and

there is a high focus on short term benefits

Page 26: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 26/43

PARTICULARS BUDGET

CONSTRAINED 

STYLE

PROFIT CONSCIOUS

STYLE

NON ACCOUNTING 

INVOLVEMENT

WITH COSTS

HIGH HIGH LOW

JOB RELATED 

TENSIONS

HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM

MANIPULATION OF

ACCOUNTING

INFORMATION

EXTENSIVE LITTLE LITTLE

RELATION WITH

SUPERIORS

POOR GOOD GOOD

RELATIONS WITH

COLLEAGUES

POOR GOOD GOOD

Page 27: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 27/43

The Effect Of Budget Levels On aspiration

level and Performance.

Hofstedes Research(1968) provides an insight into the effect

of budget levels on the aspiration level and performance.

Page 28: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 28/43

In case 1, the budget is too

loose (above N). The

budgetee will not find itdifficult and will set a

higher aspiration level. The

result R will be equal to the

aspiration level.

Page 29: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 29/43

In case 2, the budget isequal to N, and the

aspiration level and result

coincide with the budget;

the budget will not

influence performance

Page 30: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 30/43

In case 3, the budget is

below N, and the

budgetee responds by

altering his aspiration

level to below N but not

to budgeted level of 

expenditure. The actual

result will be equal to

aspiration level.

Page 31: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 31/43

In case 4, here there is an

improvement in aspirationlevel. But since the budget

and aspiration level, there is

a strong possibility that the

actual result will not be as

good as aspiration level. A

higher level of performanceis achieved here.

Page 32: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 32/43

In case 5, the aspiration

level is easier than case

4.here the actual result

will be equal to the

aspiration level.

Page 33: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 33/43

In case 6, the budget is so

tight that the budgetee will

regard it as impossible. The

effect of this approach is

that the actual result will

be worse than that which

would have been achieved

had no budget been set.

In case 1 and 6 budgets

do more harm than

good, andimprovements occur

only in case 3 and 4.

Page 34: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 34/43

Hofstedes conclusions concerning budget difficulty were as follows;

Budgets have no motivational effect unless they are accepted bythe managers involved as their own personal targets

Up to the point where the budget target is no longer accepted, themore demanding the budget target the better results achieved.

Demanding budgets are also seen as more relevant than lessdifficult targets, but negative attitudes result if they are seen toodifficult.

Acceptance of budgets is facilitated when good upwardcommunication exists.

Managers reaction to budget targets was affected both by theirown personality and by more general cultural and organisationalnorms.

Page 35: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 35/43

Bottlenecks in Allocating Budgets

Page 36: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 36/43

Applying managerial motives of the firm theory, managers cannot obtain their self-

vested interest as well as those of the firm without a hefty budget to implement

acquisition and other diversification strategies. such mentioned strategies require

physical, financial and organizational resources.

Departmental networks also often argue about appropriation of annual budgets

for their specific causes.

When budgets fail to meet expectations of such units, it may result to reduced

motivation and even firm rebellion particularly against the finance division.

Page 37: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 37/43

Example

Page 38: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 38/43

Applying performance budgeting to these instances can mitigate the destructive

speculation of excessive/ meager budget allocations.

Managers will be periodically audited in the post-expansion implementation.

This budgeting system is result-oriented, it should be coupled with ethical

committee oversight to regulate unacceptable level of immorality to obtain

intended results.

Allocation of the budget and selecting the appropriate model should be inferred in

firm specific aspects in order to identify motivational points.

Page 39: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 39/43

REWARDING EMPLOYEES ON A BUDGET

Everyone likes to get a pat on the back for a job well doneespecially if that pat

includes some type of bonus or other financial compensation or recognition before

colleagues.

steps to design an effective employee rewards program:

Identif y what you want to reinf orce

Motivate your employees

Make sure it works f or the company

Page 40: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 40/43

Types of  Rewards

Opportunities

Exposure

Experience Praise

Allow flexibility in an employee's schedule

Page 41: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 41/43

BIAS IN THE BUDGET PROCESS

REASON:

THE REWARD SYSTEM OF THE COMPANY

THE INFLUENCE OF THE COMPANY PRACTICES THE INSECURITY OF CERTAIN MANAGERS

Page 42: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 42/43

Conclusion

Partial fulfillment of the set objectives.

There is a significant relationship between

budget level ,aspiration level and performance

Manipulations happen due to unimaginary

and unattainable targets.

An organisation cannot serve both

motivational and planning aspects

simultaneously.

Page 43: Final MCS Anamika

8/8/2019 Final MCS Anamika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/final-mcs-anamika 43/43

Thank you!!!!