Unit - 9 West Pavilion Michael Bredefeld RN BSN, Cecilia Wanjiru RN BSN, Victoria Sifrovich RN ASN Yale-New Haven Hospital’s York Street campus and associated ambulatory sites are Magnet-designated by the ANCC.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1. Unit - 9 West Pavilion Michael Bredefeld RN BSN, Cecilia
Wanjiru RN BSN, Victoria Sifrovich RN ASN Yale-New Haven Hospitals
York Street campus and associated ambulatory sites are
Magnet-designated by the ANCC.
2. Does increased communication between dietary staff, RNs,
PCAs and patients improve blood glucose management? P - Inpatient
diabetic patients excluding those NPO or on enteral/parenteral
feedings. I Improve communication between dietary, RN, PCA and
patient by education and implementing signage. C No intervention O
Improve blood glucose control by reducing the time between meal
tray arrival and insulin administration. Yale-New Haven Hospitals
York Street campus and associated ambulatory sites are
Magnet-designated by the ANCC.
3. Understand the articles pertaining to effective blood
glucose management in diabetic inpatient populations Acknowledge
the relevance of Blood Glucose Level (BGL) control, meal delivery
and insulin administration coordination Understand that an increase
in communication between dietary staff, RNs, PCAs and patients
pertaining to blood glucose management is necessary.
4. More than 24 million people in the U.S. have diabetes.
Potential of increased hospital stay for diabetic patients. Nurses
have a significant role in managing patients with diabetes. It is
necessary that a patients meal intake, insulin administration, and
glucose monitoring be tightly coordinated.
5. Suggestions by Institute for Clinical System Improvement for
the management of type 2 DM: 1) Regular insulin administration - at
least 30 minutes before a meal 2) Rapid acting insulin
administration - within 30 minutes of capillary blood glucose
testing and 10 to 15 minutes of meal consumption. Institute for
Clinical System Improvement (2012).
6. Relationship of Glucose Values To Sliding Scale Insulin
(Correctional Insulin) Dose Delivery and Meal Time In Acute Care
Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Barbara Trotter, Mark R. Conaway
and Susan Burns (2013) Medsurg Nursing Purpose: To determine the
effect of timing intervals on BG values and insulin dosing Level of
Evidence 3 Sample (N=60 adult pts) Findings: BGL measurements were
statistically significantly lower with increased time between PCA
and RN measurements P= am 0.002, pm 0.007 BGL was significantly
lower with increased time by 20.6 points.
7. Timing is everything. Lampe et al. (2014).Clinical Nurse
Specialist Journal Level of Evidence 3 Purpose: Evaluate the timing
and practice of blood glucose testing and rapid acting insulin
administration around meal times Method: Direct observation of the
timing of RAI administration, timing of BG testing and food intake
Findings: Overall only 14% of BGLs were tested within 1 hour prior
to insulin administration
8. Timing of Insulin Administration and Glucose Monitoring in
the Hospital. Barbara Freeland, Barbara Penprase and Maureen
Anthony(2011). The Diabetes Educator Level of evidence: 3 Purpose:
Examine if Nursing care met rec. standard Sample: A nonrandom
convenience sample (N=50) Methods: Observations were made on BGL
monitoring, meal intake and insulin administration times. Findings:
Only 8 patient (16%) fell within the standard (within 10 minutes of
meal). The mean insulin administration time was 21.4 minutes.
9. Obtained permission from corporate compliance to access
patient medical records Developed a form for nurses to record meal
arrival. EMR was reviewed for BGL time and insulin administration
time Designed and Implemented communication sign to be placed on pt
door and in pt room
11. Please press call button when your meal tray arrives. Thank
you.
12. Educate RNs, PCAs, BAs and dietary staff regarding use of
signage. Utilize signage, Educated patient to use call light when
meal tray arrives Educate dietary to press call button when tray
delivered Educated BA to notify RN when meal arrived Educated RNs
to record meal time delivery
13. Data collected on: Time of blood glucose monitoring Meal
delivery time Correctional insulin administration time Signage and
education to RNs, PCAs, dietary staff and patients then
followed.
14. Baseline meal arrival sample size=60. Known meal time=
44/60 (73.3 %) Standard met =33/60 (55 %) In other words 73% of the
nurses knew when the tray arrived but only 55% administered the s/s
insulin within the recommended standard amount of time.
15. Sample size=54 Known mealtimes= 47/54 (87%) There was a
13.7% increase in known meal tray arrival time. Standard met =39/54
(72.3 %) Difference in % between pre and post demonstrates 17.3%
improvement in the standard of care being met.
16. Use signage on units for meal delivery Inservice education
for RNs, BAs, PCAs and Dietary staff concerning the need for
tighter timing of insulin administration and meal tray arrival.
Reinforce with patients the importance of calling when meal tray
arrives Continue monitoring BGL, meal tray timing and insulin
administration for opportunities to improve outcomes.
17. Trotter B., Conaway M. and Burns S. (2013). Relationship of
Glucose Values To Sliding Scale Insulin (Correctional Insulin) Dose
Delivery and Meal Time In Acute Care Patients With Diabetes
Mellitus. Medsurg Nursing, 22, 99-104. Freeland B., Penprase B.,
Anthony M. (2011). Nursing Practice Patterns: Timing of Insulin
Administration and Glucosse Monitoring in the Hospital. The
Diabetes Educator, 37, 357-362.
18. Lampe J., Penoyer D.A., Hadesty S., Bean A., Chamberlain L.
(May/June 2014). Timing is Everything. Clinical Nurse Specialist
Journal, 161- 166. Institute for Clinical System Improvement.
(2012) Health care guideline: Diagnosis and management of type 2
diabetes mellitus in adults.
www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines
_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_endocrine_
guidelines/diabetes.
19. Joan McNeil APRN Corporate Compliance Dietary staff Tywana
Mitchell 9 west BA Jen Morrey APSM BSN RN Sharon Klein PSM RN MSN
Yale New Haven RNs
20. More than 24 million people in the United States suffer
from diabetes. Management of diabetes in the hospitalized patient
require tight coordination between meal tray delivery, checking
capillary blood glucose levels (BGL) and administration of rapid
acting insulin. Studies have shown a link between hyperglycemia,
diabetic complications and mortality rates. Patient complications
and mortality rates increase with poor BG control. Patient
satisfaction has been shown to be higher with greater BG control.
The problem stems from the fact that mealtime is not fixed and each
patient orders meal randomly based on eating habits. This lack of
coordination causes patients to experience postprandial
hyperglycemia resulting in an extended hospital length of stay. For
optimal patient outcomes, it is imperative that tight glycemic
control is achieved in the inpatient population. The purpose of
this project is to develop a meal delivery protocol and
communication tool for the inpatient diabetic patient. This tool
and education, will improve communication between nursing,
patients, and secretaries to better coordinate timely
administration of rapid acting insulin to prevent postprandial
hyperglycemia in the inpatient on the transplant unit. This project
was conducted with the use of signage to increase communication
between the dietary staff, RNs and patients. Signs were posted
inside the patient room and on the doorway instructing the patient
or dietary staff to press the call button when the meal tray
arrives. If the RN was aware of the meal tray arrival and insulin
was administered within 15 minutes, then the standard of care was
met. If the nurse was not notified, or insulin was not administered
within 15 minutes, then the standard was not met. Pre- and post-
interventions were recorded and results were tabulated. Known tray
arrival increased by 13.7%. The % difference between the standard
being met pre and post was 17.3%. A Chi square analysis was
performed on the proportions. The increase in communication
resulted in a greater awareness of meal tray arrival to a
statistically significant level (0.05).