Top Banner
INTERIM REPORT FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE: INTERIM REPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITH CORROSION INHIBITORS MICHAEL SPRINKEL, P.E. Research Manager CELIK OZYILDIRIM, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist V·I·R·G·I·N·I·A TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH COUNOL VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH COUNCIL
51

FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Aug 10, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

INTERIM REPORT

FIELD EVALUATIONOF CORROSION INHIBITORS

FOR CONCRETE:INTERIM REPORT 1: EVALUATION

OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIREDWITH CORROSION INHIBITORS

MICHAEL SPRINKEL, P.E.Research Manager

CELIK OZYILDIRIM, Ph.D.Principal Research Scientist

V·I·R·G·I·N·I·A

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH COUNOL

VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH COUNCIL

Page 2: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Report No. Report DateStandard Title Pa2e · Report on State ProjectNo. Pages Type Report: Interim Project No.:

00021555VTRC 99-IRI December 1998 47 Period Covered: Contract No.

Title and Subtitle:Field Evaluation of Corrosion Inhibitors for Concrete: Interim Report 1: Evaluation ofExposure Slabs Repaired with Corrosion InhibitorsAuthors: Michael Sprinkel and Celik Ozyildirim

Performing Organization Name and Address:

Virginia Transportation Research Council530 Edgemont RoadCharlottesville, VA 22903Sponsoring Agencies' Name and Address

Virginia Department of Transportation1401 E. Broad StreetRichmond, VA 23219Supplementary Notes

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-six exposure slabs have been constructed with and without a variety of combinations of corrosion inhibitingadmixtures and topically applied inhibitors. To accelerate corrosion one hundred and thirty-six of the slabs were constructed withconcrete that surrounded the top mat of reinforcement with chloride contents of 3,6, 10, and 15 Ib/yd3 (1.8,3.5,5.9, and 8.9kg/m3

). This paper presents the results from measurements made on the slabs in May 1998 after approximately 1 year of exposure.The measurements show that as the chloride ion content in the slabs increases, the macrocell current, macrocell potential, half-cellpotential, and rate of corrosion increase and the resistance decreases. Macrocell currents exceed 10 )..lA, indicating corrosionactivity, in slabs cast with chloride in the concrete except those with 3 Ib/yd3 (1.8 kg/m3

) of chloride that were overlayed andpatched or patched. Measurements taken to determine the rate of corrosion indicate high, moderate, low, and passive states ofcorrosion in 63,22, 12, and 3 percent, respectively, of the slabs. The measurements also show no significant difference betweenthe slabs repaired with and without corrosion inhibitor admixtures and topical treatments. Slabs repaired with 7% silica fumeshowed half-cell potentials that were less negative than those repaired without silica fume.

Page 3: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

INTERIM REPORT

FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE:INTERIM REPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED

WITH CORROSION INHIBITORS

Michael Sprinkel, P.E.Research Manager

Celik Ozyildirim, Ph.D.Principal Research Scientist

(The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in thisreport are those of the authors and not necessarily those of

the sponsoring agencies.)

Virginia Transportation Research Council(A Cooperative Organization Sponsored by theVirginia Department of Transportation and the

University of Virginia)

Charlottesville, Virginia

December 1998VTRC 99-IR1

Page 4: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Copyright 1998 by the Virginia Department of Transportation.

ii

Page 5: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

ABSTRACT

One hundred and fifty-six exposure slabs were constructed with and without avariety of combinations of corrosion-inhibiting admixtures and topically appliedinhibitors. To accelerate corrosion, 136 of the slabs were constructed with concrete thatsurrounded the top mat of reinforcement with chloride contents of3, 6,10, and 15 Ib/yd3

(1.8,3.5,5.9, and 8.9 kg/m3). This report presents the results from measurements made

on the slabs in May 1998 after approximately 1 year of exposure.

The measurements show that as the chloride ion content in the slabs increases, themacrocell current, macrocell potential, half-cell potential, and rate of corrosion increaseand the resistance decreases. Macrocell currents exceed 10 f.lA, indicating corrosionactivity, in slabs cast with chloride in the concrete except in those with 3 Ib/yd3 (1.8kg/m3

) of chloride that were overlaid and patched or patched. Measurements todetermine the rate of corrosion indicated high, moderate, low, and passive states ofcorrosion in 63, 22, 12, and 3 percent, respectively, of the slabs. The measurements alsoshowed no significant difference between slabs repaired with and without corrosioninhibitor admixtures and topical treatments. Slabs repaired with 70/0 silica fume showedhalf-cell potentials that were less negative than those repaired without silica fume.

111

Page 6: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

INTERIM REPORT

FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE:INTERIM REPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED

WITH CORROSION INHIBITORS

Michael Sprinkel, P.E.Research Manager

Celik Ozyildirim, Ph.D.Principal Research Scientist

INTRODUCTION

Various types of corrosion inhibitors have been developed and marketed tomitigate continued corrosion in newly rehabilitated structures. When physical damage isrepaired, these materials are usually incorporated into the repair procedure by applyingthem to the surface of the original concrete and allowing them to penetrate beforepatching, including them as an admixture in the patch material, or both. The applicationsadd relatively little work to the conventional repair activity. Construction costs are lowcompared to those of alternative corrosion protection treatments, and there are essentiallyno future maintenance costs directly associated with inhibitors. However, the question ofwhether inhibitor performance meets expectations with minimal side effects remains tobe answered.

A national pooled fund study was initiated in August 19961 to evaluate the long­term performance of structures and exposure slabs that were to be patched and overlaidwith concrete containing corrosion-inhibiting admixtures and that were treated withtopical applications of inhibitors. The study includes the evaluation of 156 exposureslabs, four bridge decks with overlays, and a patched bridge substructure. The estimatedcost for the 5-year study is $250,000. The DOTs contributing to this project are Florida,Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, NewYork, North Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

This interim report presents the results obtained from measurements done in May1998 on 136 slabs after approximately 1 year of exposure. Twenty full-depth slabs arebeing ponded and are not actively corroding at this time.

METHODOLOGY

One hundred and fifty-six slabs were fabricated in VTRC's laboratory. The fourslab designs are shown in Figure 1. Twenty slabs were designed to simulate new

Page 7: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

construction and are being ponded with 3% NaCl solution (2-week wet and 2-week drycycle) as shown in Figure 1. Forty-eight slabs were fabricated with either 3, 6, 10, or 15Ib/yd3 (1.8, 3.5, 5.9, and 8.9 kg/m3

) of chloride in the concrete cast into the top portion ofthe slab prior to receiving an overlay 1.25 in (32 mm) thick. Fifty-two slabs werefabricated with either 3,6, or 10 Ib/yd3 (1.8, 3.5, and 5.9 kg/m3

) of chloride in theconcrete cast into the top portion of the slab before being patched and overlaid. Thirty­six slabs were fabricated with either 3,6, or 10 Ib/yd3 (1.8, 3.5, and 5.9 kg/m3

) of chloridein the concrete cast into the top portion of the slab before being patched. The concretemixing schedule and mixture proportions are shown in Tables 1 through 4.

Full-depth slabs, overlays, and patches were cast with concrete containing eitheran inorganic inhibitor, DCI (4 gal/yd3 [20 11m3

]); an organic inhibitor, Ferrogard 901(2gal/yd3 [10 11m3

]); or Rheocrete 222 (1 gal/yd3 [511m3]). Before being patched or

overlaid, some slabs received three applications of a topical inorganic inhibitor, Postrite(P) ([125 ft2/gal (3.1 m2/1]), or two applications of an organic inhibitor, Ferrogard 903(300 ft2/gal [7.4 m2/1]). The surfaces treated with Ferrogard 903 were power washedbefore being patched and overlaid.

Some repairs were done with concrete containing Type 1/11 portland cement (PC)and some with concrete containing PC and 7% silica fume by weight of cement (7% SF).Slabs constructed with 3, 6, and 10 Ib/yd3 (1.8, 3.5, and 5.9 kg/m3

) chloride were overlaidand patched approximately 3 months after being cast. Slabs constructed with 15 Ib/yd3

(8.9 kg/m3) chloride were overlaid 9 months after being cast.

The following measurements are being made on the 156 slabs each quarter:

• macrocell current, between top and bottom rebar mats (rnA), measured with10 ohm resistor

• macrocell potential (mV), measured immediately after disconnecting the topand bottom rebar mats

• resistance between top and bottom rebar mats (ohms), measured using aNilsson Model 400 soil resistance meter using the two-pin method

• half-cell potentials for bars band d (mV [CSE]) (ASTM C 876)

• rate of corrosion for bar b (mils per year), measured using the PR monitor.

RESULTS

Results of tests for compressive strength, permeability to chloride ion, and freeze­thaw durability are shown in Tables 5 through 7. The 28-day compressive strength of allmixtures except the one with Catexol 1000 exceeded the requirement for bridge deck

2

Page 8: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

concrete of 30 MPa (4,350 psi). Permeability values ranged from negligible for a "rapidset" repair to high for repairs with DCI-5. All mixtures failed the freeze-thaw testoutlined in ASTM C6566, Procedure A.

The results of corrosion measurements in May 1998 after approximately 1 year ofexposure are shown in Tables 8 through 13 and summarized in Figures 2 through 8.Figures 9 through 14 compare measurements done in May 1998 on the slabs that wererepaired with inhibitors to measurements done on slabs repaired without inhibitors fromthe standpoint of percentage of readings that support less corrosion than the control slabs(no inhibitors).

The following conclusions were drawn from the measurements taken in May1998:

Macrocell Current:

• Current increases as chloride content increases.

• Macrocell currents exceed 10 }.lA, indicating corrosion (ASTM G 109) in theslabs cast with chloride in the concrete except those with only 3 Ib/yd3 (1.8kg/m3

) of chloride that were overlaid and patched or patched.

• No significant difference between slabs with and without inhibitors.

Macrocell Potential:

• Potential becomes more negative as chloride content increases.

• No significant difference between slabs with and without inhibitors.

Resistance:

• Resistance decreases as chloride content increases.

• Resistance decreases with addition of inhibitors.

Half-Cell Potentials (ASTM C 876):

• Potentials become more negative as chloride content increases.

• Measurements indicate no or uncertain corrosion activity for most of the slabs.

• No significant difference with or without inhibitors.

3

Page 9: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Rate ofCorrosion:

• Rate increases as chloride content increases.

• Measurements indicate high (> two mpy), moderate (1 to 2 mpy), low (0.2 to 1mpy), and passive « 0.2 mpy) states of corrosion in 63, 22, 12, and 3 percentof the slabs, respectively.

• No significant difference for slabs with and without inhibitors except for slabswith DCI and 3 and 6 Ib/yd3 chloride, which were associated with lower ratesthan the control slabs.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Corrosion activity increases with an increase in chloride content.

2. Slabs cast with chloride in the concrete surrounding the top mat of reinforcement areactively corroding after 1 year of exposure.

3. After 1 year of exposure, there is no difference in corrosion activity between slabsrepaired with and without corrosion-inhibiting admixtures and topical treatments.

REFERENCE

1. Michael Sprinkel, Gerardo Clemefia, and Celik Ozyildirim. Field Evaluation ofCorrosion Inhibitorsfor Concrete. VTRC 97-RP6, National Pooled Fund Study No.SPR-2 (184) (8-95-7). Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville,August 1996.

4

Page 10: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

APPENDIX

This appendix includes the figures and tables that are available from the VirginiaTransportation Research Council.

Figure 1. Slab designsFigure 2. Macrocc,:] current measurementsFigure 3. Macrocell potential measurementsFigure 4. Resistance measurementsFigure 5. Open circuit potential measurements by half cell meterFigure 6. Open circuit potential measurements by PR monitorFigure 7. Rate of corrosion measurements by PR monitorFigure 8. Measurements done on slabs OL/P with special mixturesFigure 9. Percent of macrocell current measurements less negative than for the

control slabFigure 10. Percentage of macrocell potential measurements less negative than for the

control slabFigure 11. Percentage of resistance measurements less than for the control slabFigure 12. Percentage of open circuit potential readings by half cell meter less negative

than for the control slabFigure 13. Percentage of open circuit potential readings by PR monitor less negative

than for the control slabFigure 14. Percent of corrosion rate measurements less than for the control slab

Table 1. Corrosion inhibitor admixture mixing schedule and mixture details, repairedslabs

Table 2. Corrosion. inhibitor admixture mixing schedule and mixture details, fulldepth slabs

Table 3. Mixture proportions for base concretes and full depth slabs, Ib/yd3

Table 4. Mixture proportions for overlays and patches, Ib/yd3

Table 5. Compressive strength of slab and repair concrete, psiTable 6. Permeability to chloride ion of slab repair concrete, coulombsTable 7. Freeze thaw durability of slab repair concretesTable 8. Stabilized macrocell current, rnATable 9. Macrocell potential, mV

Table 10. Resistance between top and bottom bars, ohmsTable 11. Open circuit potential bar b by Half-cell meterTable 12. Open circuit potential bar b by PR monitorTable 13. Corrosion rate bar b as calculated by PR monitor

5

Page 11: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

o.5

"of

3%N

aCI

So

lutio

nD

Ove

rlay

•C

on

cret

eW

ithN

aCI

•C

on

cret

eW

ith

ou

tN

aCI

-.I~

~-18

:-:3'~

t~---12~

L,

,""",

"'";1,

i1 .25 · .- 4.25

"-~

"" ab

Slab

with

1.25

inch

over

lay

~ C

~~

~~

~~

~d

1t",.n

.*-"'_

"!"!~!

':l."~

.!'...

'~",~~

,,,,!,

_..~~~t

\."'l.

".,!\.

t!"..!

"...'B

.~~~

~~

~"

""

i'S

~S

3"

.,"

."~

~~

~"

""

j'~

s~

s~

~~

a~

~S

S~

~~

~

~!'i

-"'_

~!'~

T!'.:

'"~"'n

;~"~"J

!'..."

'.....!

\.!'_~

t.;:c!

'..~l"

'n."'~

".r'J#

-"'...

"~f;l

~~

~d

~~

~~

d~

~~

~2211­

1211~6"-'~

t 1f-bw

~6"~6~.

8.0

'.l

~-

I~18"-~

-.

3"

'-1

".1

t--1

2'-

--.!

3".-

!..---_m

_._-

---I

I,:::::

:-::::::::::

~:::::::::':

::::::::::

ab

cd *---

22"-

----1

~8"~~2"~

NI

'---

1

8.0'

" i1f"u~'uc'::':y'uc'UC'u,~u"'u'uu'u,.'u,

Full

dept

hex

posu

resl

ab

dc

b

:2 ,~ <::1

""'~!'

..1:;;

''''~'

'

:3 I; :; j' :~ :3 ,; :~ f:l :~ :~ ,:l

"~~W-~

j~ :3 a

oO

verl

ay

..

Co

ncr

ete

Wit

hN

aCI

•C

on

cret

eW

ith

ou

tN

aCI

..

Pat

ch

,;I ~''''4

S'.•:trlg.n-c$'...~·

~ ,::l :z I? :;: ~ ,;\ ;j ,., :~ ,;I

""1-"'''

''d

cb

.:3 ;~ j~

1'~"'..~'11'~

~; ,:3 :~ i' :3 t~ .:1 :~ 1~ ,;:I .:1

....~..!"J

!"..:'_

.; ~, a

•C

on

cret

eW

ithN

aCI

l1li

Co

ncr

ete

Wit

ho

ut

NaC

I

•P

atch

.­ 4.25

"~

~15"--'1

1'--1

8"

.~

-.

3"1.-

~3"

~12"~

I

~22"

12"~

6"-'

~ft

..~6

"~6"

~:'~

8.0"~

IL

.,

~

+~12"~

1__

18"~~

-.

3"~12.---:l3"

r:._

;25

'4.

25" •

~15"--'1-

~2

2"-----1

12"~6"-'~6"~

6"~2"1.

t1 }:-1l

8.0" .Lf

-I[U[

utrnn

rw'P m

•~12H~

Slab

with

1.25

inch

Ove

rlay

and

Patc

hSl

abw

ithpa

tch

Fig

ure

1.Sl

abD

esig

ns

(1in

.=

25.4

mm

)

7

Page 12: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

7°k SF OLIP PC Patch

0 <"0.1

;( -0.05 .s 0.05S -0.1 o None, 0 ..,

0o None, 0.... Ct: -0.15 (J OO-S, 4

~[J OO-S, 4

e-0.2 II Ferrogard 901,2 ... -0.05 III Ferrogard 901,2... ::J~

u -0.25 • Rheocrete 222+,1 0 -0.1 • Rheocrete 222+, 1

a; -0.3 .OO-S,4w/P a;-0.15

.OO-S,4w/Pu CJe -0.35 • Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903 0 II Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903...u

-0.4 CJ -0.2ftS co::E -0.45 ::E -0.25

6 (3.5) 10(5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content, Iblyd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3

)

~

70/0 SF Overlay PC OverlayI

0 0<" -0.1 ;(.s -0.1... -0.2o None, 0 S o None, 0

CmOO-S, 4

.... -0.2 oOO-S, 4e t:... -0.3 • Ferrogard 901, 2 ~ -0.3 II Ferrogard 901, 2::J I ~0 -0.4 • Rheocrete 222+, 1 U -0.4 • Rheocrete 222+, 1

a;-0.5

.OO-S,4w/P a;-0.5

.OO-S,4w/PCJ u0 • Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903 0 • Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903... ...CJ -0.6 u -0.6co ftS

::E -0.7 ::E -0.7

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content, Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3

)

7°k SF Patch PC Patch

;( 0 <" 0.1

.s -0.1 .s 0.05 o None, 0... o None, 0 ...0c

-0.2C CDCI-S,4

~ CDCI-S, 4 e... 8Ferrogard 901,2 ... -0.05 ..Ferrogard 901, 2::J -0.3 ::J0 • Rheocrete 222+, 1 0 -0.1 • Rheocrete 222+, 1Ci) -0.4 • DCI-S, 4 wI P a; • DCI-S, 4 wI P-0.15(,)

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w/903CJ

0 -0.5 e • Ferrogard 901, 2 w/903... -0.2(,) CJco

-0.6co

::E ::E -0.256 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kglm3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kglm3

)

Figure 2. Macrocell current measurements.

8

Page 13: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

PC OL/P

o None, 0

cro-S,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

llro-Sw/P,4

II Ferrogard 901w I 903, 2

o-2 --I-------~

-4 -+--------

-6 -+-------- ~~---

a; -8 --1-------------­

(,)

~ -1 0 -+--------~-(,)ftS:E -12 -1...---------------'

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

o None, 0

[J ro-s, 4

II Ferrogard 901,2 I

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

• ro-Swl P, 4 I.. Ferrogard 901 w1903, 2

I

I

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kglm3)

PC Overlay

I

~O~None-.~O---llCOCI-S,4

iii Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

.OCI-5 wI P, 4

II Ferrogard 901 wI 903, 2

10 (5.9)6 (3.5)3 (1.8)

>' 0 TCEII_~-rr;;gCi -10 -+----------1

~S -20 -+---------------1oa.. -30 --1------------1

Q)e -40 -+-------------__1------4

(,)

~ -50 -'----------------'

a None, 0

[Joel-5 , 4

II Ferrogard 901 I 2

• Rheocrete 222+ I 1

.OCI-S wI P, 4

• Ferrogard 901wl 903, 2

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

7% SF Overlay

>' 0 -r-t'"""'~ ~-r=

g -5 -+-- ~----I

Ci -1 0 -+-------1

~ -15 --1---------- 1---------1

S -20~ -25 --1---------- 1---------1

a; -30 --1-----------------1e -35 ~---------------l I-------~

~ -40-+-------------~:E -45 ---L..- --'

7°k SF Patch PC Patch

00> -5 >g g

-10 o None, 0 -2ca ca o None, 0; -15 [:Iro-S,4 ; -4 CDCI-S,4t: t:CI) -20 II Ferrogard 901, 2 S II Ferrogard 901,2'0 -6-25 II Rheocrete 222+,1

0Q. Q. II Rheocrete 222+, 1

a; -30 .ro-Sw/P,4 a; -8 II DCI-S wI P, 4CJ

-35 II Ferrogard 901w1903, 2 CJII Ferrogard 901 wI 903, 2e e -10

CJ -40 CJco co

-12:E -45 :E

6 (3.5) 10(5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kglm3

)

Figure 3. Macrocell potential measurements.

9

Page 14: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

7% SF OLIP PC OLIPI

70 60 iI

fi) 60 fi) 50 I

o~e,O .·llE50

o None, 0 E-'= cOO-S,4 -'= 40Q. Q. cOO-S,4 I

40 II Ferrogard 901,2 IG) II Ferrogard 901,2 G) 30(,)II Rheocrete 222+,1

(,)• Rheocrete 222+, 1C 30 c

S .OO-S,4w/P CO 20 .OO-S,4w/P20

...In In

"Ci) II Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903 "Ci)10

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903G) 10 G)

0::: 0:::

0 06 (3.5) 10(5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3

)

r--- -l I II

7% SF Overlay PC Overlay

II

70 70 IIfi) 60 U) 60E o None, 0 E o None, 0-'= 50 50Q. DDCI-S,4

.cDDCI-S,4Q.

G) 40 II Ferrogard 901,2 CD 40 II Ferrogard 901, 2(,)

30 II Rheocrete 222+, 1U

30 II Rheocrete 222+, 1C cS II DCI-S, 4 wI P J!

20 II DCI-S, 4 wI PIn 20 In

"Ci) II Ferrogard 901,2 wI 903 "iii II Ferrogard 901,2 wI 903CD 10G) 10 a::

0:::00

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10(5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3

)

L -------.l

PC Patch

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3)

o None, 0

C OCI-S, 4

III Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

• OCI-S, 4 wI P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

o3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

40 --.--------------------,

fi)

~ 30Q.~ 20cS"m 10G)

0:::

o None, 0

DDCI-S,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

II DCI-S, 4 wI P

II Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903

10 (5.9)6 (3.5)

60 ----------------.,

~50+-----------.cQ. 40 -f--------------t

B 30c

-m 20

": 100::

o

Figure 4. Resistance measurements.

10

Page 15: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

- ·1

I

I

o None, 0

ooa-S, 4

11II Ferrogard 901, 2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.oa-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wi 903

PC OLIP

0.05 -.----------------,

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15 --t-------==-----

-0.2 -+----------L----'

-0.25 --I.....-----------~

"is~cG) ­.... -OWD.U)-0"i;~-"is:I:

o None, 0

fJ oa-S, 4

II Ferrogard 901,2 ,

• Rheocrete 222+, 1 I.oa-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

o

-0.05

-0.1

-0.15 +-----------11 -----1

-0.2 -+----------

-0.25 --1.....- ---'

"is~cG) ­.... -OWD.U)-0"i;~-"is:I:

I II

L' 6 _{3_.5_} 1_0_{5_.9_} 11 1

3

_{_1_.8_} 6_{3_.5_} _Chlorit:e Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3) . Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3

)

7% SF Overlay PC Overlay

o None, 0

cCO-S, 4

.. Ferrogard 901, 2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.CO-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2 +--- -f

-0.25 +--------i

-0.3 -+---------------===!I·>~.:l___ I___I

-0.35 -L...- -----I J3 {1.8} 6 {3.5} 10 {5.9}

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

~~~

~CCD -oWo.C/)_0a;;;0_~Ci::I:

o-0.05

o None, 0

-0.1 coa-S,4

-0.15 -+--------1 II Ferrogard 901, 2• Rheocrete 222+, 1

-0.2 -+-------- -----1 .oa-S,4w/P

-0.25 +------ ----==1__~ l-._F_er_rog_a_rd_90_1_,2_w_I_9_03-J I

L' __-_0._3~_-_3~{-1_.8~}---6-{3.-.5~}-~~1 0~{~5.~9}~ --.l

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3)

7% SF Patch PC Patch

"is~CG):::::.... WOU)

~O"i;0_..!."is:I:

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2 -+--------

-0.25 -+----------=---------j

-0.3 ---L- ------'

o Nona, 0

DOCI-S,4

III Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

• OCI-S, 4 wi P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wi 903

"is~CG):::::.... wOU)

~o"i;0_..!."is:I:

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2 +-----------------.

-0.25 --I.....-----------~

o None, 0

COCI-S,4

11II Ferrogard 901, 2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

• OCI-S, 4 wi P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wi 903

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kglm3

)

Figure 5. Open circuit potential measurements by half-cell meter

11

Page 16: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

70/0 SF OLIP PC OLIP

'ii­;iWCU)SOo-n.>..,-·S 0u..,....­.- co 0c::E(1)0:::gn.

o

-0.05

-0.1 -

-0.15 +-----I_-~'~

-0.2

-0.25 -L...- --J

o None, 0

[J OO-S,4

.. Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.OO-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

'ii­;iWCU)SO0-In.>..,-·S 0~:=.- co 0c::E(1)0:::gn.

o

-0.05

-0.15 -+----------1

-0.2

-0.25 --L-- --J

o None, 0

[J OO-S, 4

.. Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.OO-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3(kg/m3)

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3(kg/m3)

'ii­;iWCU)SOo-n.>..,-·S 0~:=.- co 0c::E(1)0:::gn.

7% SF Overlay

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15 -I-------~: :~~--1

-0.2 -1---------------1

-0.25 +------=--- -----1

-0.3 --L...- ---'

o None, 0

C OO-S,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

.. Rheocrete 222+, 1

.OO-S,4w/P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

II

I

"ii­;iWCU)SOo­n.>..,­.- ...::s 0u..,....­.- co 0c::E~o:::on.

PC Overlay

o-0.05

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2 -+----------/

-0.25 +----------~

-0.3 -+-------------1

-0.35 ---L..--- ---J

10 None, 0

cOO-S, 4

.. Ferrogard 901, 2

.. Rheocrete 222+, 1

.OO-S,4w/P

.. Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3(kg/m3)

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3(kg/m3)

7% SF Patch PC Patch

o

-0.05

-0.1

o None, 0

CI OO-S, 4

III Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.. OO-S, 4 wI P

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903

o

-0.1

-0.2 --L.-- --J

-0.05

-0.15 +------------"--1:

cu::::::~wCcnSoo-n.>..,-·S 0u..,....­.- co 0c:EQ)o:::gn.

o None, 0

[] OO-S, 4

II Ferrogard 901,2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.. OO-S, 4 wI P

-0.2 -1---- -----1 '-----._F_er_rog_a_rd_90_1_,2_w_I_90_3---, I

-0.25 --L..- ---I

-0.15 --l----==------------I

"ii­~WCU)SOO-n.>..,-·S 0~:=.- co 0c::E(1)0:::gn.

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) I 3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

'----- C_h_l_o_ri_de_C_o_n_te_n_t_lb_/y_d~3 __(_kg_l_m_3_)_______1'----- C_h_l_o_ri_de_C_o_n_te_n_t_lb_/y_d_3_(_k9_I_rn_

3_) _

Figure 6. Open circuit potential measurements by PR monitor.

12

Page 17: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

7%SF OL/P PC OL/P

o

4--r----------------,~ 3.5 -+----------~----g 3 -+----~-~~-~---~

~ 2.5a::: 2-+------------S 1.5 +----------------j"iii 1eo 0.5o 0

o None, 0

COO-5,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

II 00-5 wI P, 4

II Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

2--r----------------,~g 1.5 --J------

sC'G

a:::c:o

"iiie 0.5...oo

10 None, 0

I[] [x)-5, 4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+,1

II [x)-5 wI P, 4

II Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

----------------~

o

PC Overlay

o None, 0

000-5,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

II Rheocrete 222+,1

II 00-5 wI P, 4

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903

2---,-----------------,

o

~g 1.5 -+-------~__---- ~

SC'G0::co";e 0.5ou

I II I

II

o None, 0

000-5,4

II Ferrogard 901,2

II Rheocrete 222+, 1

• 00-5w/P, 4

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

7% SF Overlay

2-r-------------------.>;c.g 1.5 --+------ ----------1

s~Co

"U;e 0.5...oo

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

PC Patch

0.5

o

2.5 -r------------------.

2 +-------------==---------1 r---o-C:-Non"-----e----=,0,---------, I

EJ 00-5,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

• Rheocrete 222+, 1

.00-5w/P,4

• Ferrogard 901, 2 wI 903

~ 1.50::co";eou

o None, 0

g00-5,4

II Ferrogard 901, 2

• Rheocrete 222+,1

.00-5w/P,4

• Ferrogard 901, 2 w1903

o

2.5 -r------.-------------.>;C. 2+-----------g.; 1.5 +-----------0::co

"U;"E 0.5oo

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

3 (1.8) 6 (3.5)

Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

Figure 7. Rate of corrosion measurements by PR Monitor.

13

Page 18: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

60 0

ciw -0.05U) 50

~~ -0.1E o MCI 2005, 0 3 wI 2020 (1)- -0.15 o MCI 2005, 0 3 wI 2020.c 40 "'02- [J Catexol, 3 wI AXIM 0_

-0.2 DCatexol, 3 wI AXIMD. ~

(I)30

II None, 0 wI 15% LMC~S -0.25 -

II None, 0 wI 15% LMCCJC .. None, 0 wI RS/LMC = (I) .None, 0 wI RS/LMC

J! • None, 0 wI Rapid Set~:& -0.3 • None, 0 wI Rapid SetU) 20 0=·iii • None, 0 wI ASPHALT (I) -0.35 • None, 0 wI ASPHALT

(I) CO-0.40::: 10

(1)'1-Q.-o ca -0.45::E:

0 -0.5

6 (3.5) 10 (5.9) 6 (3.5) 10(5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3

)

o

-0.1

-0.2

-0.3 --f-------

-0.4 +-------

-0.5 --f-------------

-0.6 --L...- ~

o MCI 2005, 0 3 wI 2020

CCatexol, 3 wI AXIM

II None, 0 wI 15% LMC

• None, 0 wI RS/LMC

• None, 0 wI Rapid Set

• None, 0 wI ASPHALT

o--,---,.....-~-

C( -0.2

g -0.4 -1-------...! -0.6 -l-------~

c3 -0.8 +-------

a; -1CJ

e -1.2 +-------CJ

~ -1.4 -+-------

-1.6 --J.- ~

o MCI 2005, 0 3 wI 2020

DCatexol, 3 wI AXIM

.None, 0 wI 15% LMC

• None, 0 wI RS/LMC

• None, 0 wI Rapid Set

.None, 0 wI ASPHALT

6 (3.5) 10(5.9) 6 (3.5) 10(5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content Iblyd3 (kg/m3)

o --r--r--~_

>' -10gc; -20 +------

~ -30 -t-------­

S~ -40 +-----------!

a; -50 +-------CJe -60 -t--------

CJ~ -70 -+------~

-80 --L...- -'

o MCI 2005, 0 3 wI 2020

CCatexol, 3 wI AXIM

II None, 0 wI 15% LMC

.. None, 0 wI RS/LMC

• None, 0 wI Rapid Set

• None, 0 wI ASPHALT

2.5 -r---------------..,

i 2+-----­gS 1.5 +-----l}.Co·iiieo 0.5o

o

OMCI200~03~JCCatexol, 3 wI AXIM

II None, 0 wI 15% LMC

• None, 0 wI RS/LMC

.None, 0 wI Rapid Set

• None, 0 wI ASPHALT

6 (3.5) 10(5.9) 6 (3.5) 10 (5.9)

Chloride Content Ib/yd3 (kg/m3) Chloride Content (lb/yd3

) (kg/m3)

Figure 8. Measurements done on slabs OL/P with special mixtures

14

Page 19: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

o

100 80

..-

·'-

3Ib

/yd

3(1

.8kg

/m3)

.....60

r-t-_

.6lb

/yd

3t: (1

)(3

.5kg

/m3

)(.

)L

.(1

)40

~~~~J---

~~

101

0Ib

/yd

3c..

~~9

kg/m

3)

I-11

III_

I_

I-

_II

-------~-

20

DC

I-5

,4F

erro

gard

90

1,2

Rhe

ocre

teD

CI-

5,4

wI

Fer

roga

rd22

2+,

1P

901,

2w

I90

3

Fig

ure

9.P

erce

nto

fmac

roce

llcu

rren

tmea

sure

men

tsle

ssne

gati

veth

anfo

rth

eco

ntro

lsl

ab.

15

Page 20: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

o

100 80

.-

.1

-31

b/y

d3

(1.8

kg/m

3)....

60.6

lb/y

d3

s: Q)

(3.5

kg/m

3)(.

) ... Q)

40+

D.

II--

rI

l-I

HID

10

lb/y

d3

(5.9

kg/m

3)1

-I

III

....

1III

IIII

20

DC

I-S

,4F

erro

gard

90

1,2

Rhe

ocre

teD

CI-

S,

4w

IF

erro

gard

222+

,1P

90

1,2

wI

903

Fig

ure

10.

Per

cent

age

ofm

acro

cell

pote

ntia

lm

easu

rem

ents

less

nega

tive

than

for

the

cont

rol

slab

.

16

Page 21: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

o

20100 80

I-----I

t-I

I_3-

lb/y

d3.

(1.8

kg/m

3)

60-

_6

lb/y

d3

... c:(3

.5kg

/m3)

(1)

(.)

D10

Ib/y

d3...

L__(5

.9_kg/l!l~)

(1)

40D

.

DC

I-5

,4F

erro

gard

90

1,2

Rhe

ocre

teD

CI-

5,4

wI

222+

,1

PF

erro

gard

90

1,2

wI

903

Fig

ure

11.

Per

cent

age

ofr

esis

tanc

em

easu

rem

ents

less

than

for

the

cont

rol

slab

.

17

Page 22: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

100 o20-~-

80.

--

·'.

3Ib

/yd3

(1.8

kg/m

3)...

60.6

lb/y

d3

c: (I)

(3.5

kg/m

3)(J

D1

0lb

/yd

3I-

I~40

(5.9

kg/m

3)

DC

I-S

,4F

erro

gard

901,

2R

heoc

rete

222+

,1

DC

I-S

,4

wI

PF

erro

gard

90

1,2

wI

903

Fig

ure

12.

Per

cent

age

ofo

pen

circ

uitp

oten

tial

read

ings

byh

alfc

ell

met

erle

ssne

gati

veth

anfo

rth

eco

ntro

lsl

ab.

18

Page 23: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

.... c CD U I- CD a.

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 o

31b/

yd3

(1.8

kg/m

3)

.6lb

/yd

3(3

.5kg

/m3)

01

0lb

/yd

3(5

.9kg

/m3)

,--_

_--

l

DC

I-5

,4F

erro

gard

901,

2R

heoc

rete

DC

I-5,

4w

I22

2+,

1P

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

wI

903

Fig

ure

13.

Per

cent

age

ofo

pen

circ

uitp

oten

tial

read

ings

byP

Rm

onit

orle

ssne

gati

veth

anfo

rth

eco

ntro

lsl

ab.

19

Page 24: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

o

100

80...

6031

b/yd

3i

(1.8

kg/m

3)

~.6

lb/y

d3

I~

40(3

.5kg

/m3)

,01

01

b/y

d3

I

20I

_I

_I

•_

I_

II

l__(5_

.9_~g/

m3)

DC

I-S,

4F

erro

gard

Rhe

ocre

teD

CI-S

,4,

Fer

roga

rd9

01

,222

2+,

14

wI

P9

01

,2w

I90

3

Fig

ure

14.

Per

cent

ofc

orro

sion

rate

mea

sure

men

tsle

ssth

anfo

rth

eco

ntro

lsl

ab.

20

Page 25: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Tab

le1:

Cor

rosi

onin

hibi

tor

adm

ixtu

rem

ixin

gsc

hedu

lean

dm

ixtu

rede

tail

s,re

pai

red

slab

s

Bas

eM

ixP

rope

rtie

sB

oxB

ase

chi,

w/o

ChI

.w

/C

hI.

Typ

eR

epai

rT

ype

Rep

air

Typ

e,do

sage

Rep

air

Mix

Pro

p.N

um

be

rM

ixD

ate

pcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

%S

I.,in

.A

ir,0/0

Rep

air

Mix

Dat

eC

oncr

ete

CIA

,g

cyS

I.,in

.A

ir,%

112

/10/

963

3.5

5.7

4.0

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CN

on

e,O

5.0

6.4

212

/10/

963

3.5

5.7

4.0

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/2/

977%

SF

Non

e,0

4.0

6.5

312

/10/

963

3.5

5.7

3.5

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CD

CI-

S,4

5.0

7.4

412

/10/

963

3.5

5.7

3.5

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/2/

9770

/0S

FD

CI-

S,4

4.0

6.5

512

/11/

963

4.0

6.4

4.0

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CF

erro

gard

901,

25.

06.

06

12/1

1/96

34.

06.

44.

05.

7O

verl

ay4/

2/97

7%

SF

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.0

6.2

712

/11/

963

4.3

5.7

4.3

5.8

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.0

7.8

812

/11/

963

4.3

5.7

4.3

5.8

Ove

rlay

4/2/

977

%S

FR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.3

6.7

912

/13/

963

4.5

6.0

4.0

6.0

Ove

rlay

4/3/

97P

C/P

DC

I-S

,4-

5.4

1012

/13/

963

4.5

6.0

4.0

6.0

Ove

rlay

4/3/

977%

SF

/PD

CI-

S,4

3.3

5.3

1112

/13/

963

3.8

6.4

4.0

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/3/

9770

/0S

F/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

23.

35.

212

12/1

3/96

33.

86.

44.

05.

7O

verl

ay4/

3/97

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

5.5

6.0

1312

/17/

966

2.8

5.6

4.0

5.2

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CN

one,

05.

06.

414

12/1

7/96

62.

85.

64.

05.

2O

verl

ay4/

2/97

70/0

SF

Non

e,0

4.0

6.5

1512

/17/

966

4.5

6.1

4.3

5.4

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CD

CI-

S,4

5.0

7.4

1612

/17/

966

4.5

6.1

4.3

5.4

Ove

rlay

4/2/

977

%S

FD

CI-

S,4

4.0

6.5

1712

/18/

966

4.8

6.6

4.5

5.1

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CF

erro

gard

901,

25.

06.

018

12/1

8/96

64.

86.

64

.55.

1O

verl

ay4/

2/97

7%

SF

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.0

6.2

1912

/18/

966

4.3

6.2

4.5

5.9

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.0

7.8

2012

/18/

966

4.3

6.2

4.5

5.9

Ove

rlay

4/2/

977

%S

FR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.3

6.7

2112

/18/

966

4.3

5.9

4.3

5.3

Ove

rlay

4/3/

97P

C/P

DC

I-S

,4-

5.4

2212

/18/

966

4.3

5.9

4.3

5.3

Ove

rlay

4/3/

977%

SF

/PD

CI-

S,4

3.3

5.3

2312

/18/

966

3.3

5.5

4.8

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/3/

977%

SF

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

3.3

5.2

2412

/18/

966

3.3

5.5

4.8

5.7

Ove

rlay

4/3/

97P

C/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

25.

56.

025

12/2

0/96

105.

55.

95.

06.

1O

verl

ay4/

1/97

PC

Non

e,0

5.0

6.4

2612

/20/

9610

5.5

5.9

5.0

6.1

Ove

rlay

4/2/

9770

/0S

FN

one,

04.

06.

527

12/2

0/96

104.

86.

25.

06.

0O

verl

ay4/

1/97

PC

DC

I-S

,45.

07.

428

12/2

0/96

104.

86.

25.

06.

0O

verl

ay4/

2/97

7%

SF

DC

I-S

,44.

06.

529

12/2

0/96

103.

85.

64.

85.

2O

verl

ay4/

1/97

PC

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

5.0

6.0

21

Page 26: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Bas

eM

ixP

rope

rtie

sB

oxB

ase

chi,

w/o

ChI

.w

/ChI

.T

ype

Rep

air

Typ

eR

epai

rT

ype,

dosa

geR

epai

rM

ixP

rop.

Nu

mb

er

Mix

Dat

epc

yS

I.,in

.A

ir,%

SI.,

in.

Air,

0/0R

epai

rM

ixD

ate

Con

cret

eC

IA,

gcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

%30

12/2

0/96

103.

85.

64.

85.

2O

verl

ay4/

2/97

7%

SF

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.0

6.2

3112

/23/

9610

3.3

5.2

4.5

5.3

Ove

rlay

4/1/

97P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.0

7.8

3212

/23/

9610

3.3

5.2

4.5

5.3

Ove

rlay

4/2/

977%

SF

Rhe

ocre

te22

2+,

14.

36.

733

12/2

3/96

103.

85.

74.

05.

4O

verl

ay4/

3/97

PC

/PD

CI-

S,4

-5.

434

12/2

3/96

103.

85.

74.

05.

4O

verl

ay4/

3/97

7%S

F/P

DC

I-S

,43.

35.

335

12/2

3/96

103.

55.

64.

85.

8O

verl

ay4/

3/97

7%S

F/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

23.

35.

236

12/2

3/96

103.

55.

64.

85.

8O

verl

ay4/

3/97

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

5.5

6.0

371/

7/97

33.

85.

04.

35.

1O

L/P

4/8/

97P

CN

one,

05.

07.

038

1/7/

973

3.8

5.0

4.3

5.1

OL/

P41

8/97

PC

Non

e,0

5.0

7.0

391/

7/97

34.

35.

24.

35.

1O

L/P

418/

97P

CD

CI-

S,4

3.0

7.8

401/

7/97

34.

35.

24.

35.

1O

L/P

418/

97P

CD

CI-

S,4

3.0

7.8

41*

1/8/

973

3.5

5.3

4.5

5.1

OL/

P41

8/97

PC

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.3

6.5

421/

8/97

33.

55.

34.

55.

1O

L/P

4/8/

97P

CF

erro

gard

901,

24.

36.

543

1/8/

973

3.8

5.3

4.5

5.1

OL/

P41

8/97

PC

Rhe

ocre

te22

2+,

13.

37.

74

41/

8/97

33.

85.

34.

55.

1O

L/P

4/8/

97P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

3.3

7.7

451/

9/97

33.

55.

54.

55.

2O

L/P

4/11

/97

PC

/PD

CI-

S,4

2.3

7.7

461/

9/97

33.

55.

54.

55.

2O

L/P

4/11

/97

PC

/PD

CI-

S,4

2.3

7.7

471/

9/97

34.

55.

94.

55.

2O

L/P

4/11

/97

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

5.3

6.2

481/

9/97

34.

55.

94.

55.

2O

L/P

4111

/97

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

5.3

6.2

491/

13/9

76

4.0

5.9

4.0

5.2

OL/

P4/

1197

PC

Non

e,0

5.0

6.4

501/

13/9

76

4.0

5.9

4.0

5.2

OL/

P41

2197

70/0

SF

Non

e,0

4.0

6.5

511/

13/9

76

3.5

5.0

4.0

5.2

OL/

P41

1197

PC

DC

I-S

,45.

07.

452

1/13

/97

63.

55.

04.

05.

2O

L/P

4/2/

977%

SF

DC

I-S

,44.

06.

553

1/14

/97

64.

55.

54.

55.

3O

L/P

4/1/

97P

CF

erro

gard

901,

25.

06.

054

1/14

/97

64.

55.

54.

55.

3O

L/P

4/21

977

%S

FF

erro

gard

901,

24.

06.

255

1/14

/97

64.

55.

64.

55.

3O

L/P

4111

97P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

4.0

7.8

561/

14/9

76

4.5

5.6

4.5

5.3

OL/

P4/

2/97

7%

SF

Rhe

ocre

te22

2+,

14.

36.

757

1/14

/97

65.

05.

74.

85.

4O

L/P

4131

97P

CIP

DC

I-S

,4-

5.4

581/

14/9

76

5.0

5.7

4.8

5.4

OL/

P4/

3/97

7%S

F/P

DC

I-S

,43.

35.

359

1/14

/97

63.

85.

74.

85.

4O

L/P

4131

9770

/0S

F/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

23.

35.

2

22

Page 27: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Bas

eM

ixPr

oper

ties

Box

Bas

ech

i,w

/oC

hI.

wIC

hI.

Typ

eR

epai

rT

ype

Rep

air

Typ

e,do

sage

Rep

air

Mix

Prop

.N

umbe

rM

ixD

ate

pcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

%SI

.,in

.A

ir,%

Rep

air

Mix

Dat

eC

oncr

ete

CIA

,gcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

%60

1/14

/97

63.

85.

74.

85.

4O

L/P

4131

97P

C/9

03Fe

rrog

ard

901,

25.

56.

061

1/15

/97

103.

85.

54.

54.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

7%S

FN

one,

C7.

06.

262

1/15

/97

103.

85.

54.

54.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

7°A>

SFN

one,

07.

06.

263

1/15

/97

103.

85.

14.

54.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

7%S

FD

CI-

S,4

5.3

6.9

641/

15/9

710

3.8

5.1

4.5

4.9

OL/

P41

10/9

770

/0SF

DC

I-S,

45.

36.

965

1/16

/97

104.

55.

64.

33.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

70/0

SFFe

rrog

ard

901

,~4.

56.

266

1/16

/97

104.

55.

64.

33.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

7°A>

SFFe

rrog

ard

901,

24.

56.

267

1/16

/97

104.

55.

54.

33.

9O

L/P

4110

/97

7°A>

SFR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

5.0

6.7

681/

16/9

710

4.5

5.5

4.3

3.9

OL/

P41

10/9

77%

SF

Rhe

ocre

te22

2+,

15.

06.

769

1/17

/97

105.

05.

75.

05.

5O

L/P

4111

/97

70/0

SF/P

DC

I-S,

4-

5.0

701/

17/9

710

5.0

5.7

5.0

5.5

OL/

P41

11/9

77%

SF/P

DC

I-S,

4-

5.0

711/

17/9

710

4.5

5.5

5.0

5.5

OL/

P41

11/9

77°

A>S

F/9

03Fe

rrog

ard

901,

22.

55.

272

1/17

/97

104.

55.

55.

05.

5O

L/P

4111

/97

7%S

F/9

03Fe

rrog

ard

901,

22.

55.

273

1/22

/97

34.

05.

94.

05.

7Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCN

one,

03.

37.

574

1/22

/97

34.

05.

94.

05.

7Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCN

one,

03.

37.

575

1/22

/97

34.

05.

44.

05.

7Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCD

CI-

S,4

4.3

7.7

761/

22/9

73

4.0

5.4

4.0

5.7

Patc

h4/

15/9

7PC

DC

I-S,

44.

37.

777

1/23

/97

34.

36.

04.

55.

2Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCFe

rrog

ard

901,

24.

37.

578

1/23

/97

34.

36.

04.

55.

2Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCFe

rrog

ard

901,

24.

37.

579

1/23

/97

34.

05.

94.

55.

2Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

7.0

6.0

801/

23/9

73

4.0

5.9

4.5

5.2

Patc

h4/

15/9

7PC

Rhe

ocre

te22

2+,

17.

06.

081

1/23

/97

34.

0-

5.0

5.4

Patc

h4/

17/9

7PC

IPD

CI-

S,4

3.8

7.7

821/

23/9

73

4.0

-5.

0'5.

4Pa

tch

4/17

/97

PCIP

DC

I-S,

43.

87.

783

1/23

/97

34.

05.

45.

05.

4Pa

tch

4/17

/97

PC

/903

Ferr

ogar

d90

1,2

6.5

7.8

841/

23/9

73

4.0

5.4

5.0

5.4

Patc

h4/

17/9

7P

C/9

03Fe

rrog

ard

901,

26.

57.

885

1/28

/97

64.

56.

04.

55.

6Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCN

one,

03.

37.

586

1/28

/97

64.

56.

04.

55.

6Pa

tch

4/16

/97

7°A>

SFN

one,

06.

87.

787

1/28

/97

64.

85.

34.

55.

6Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCD

CI-

S,4

4.3

7.7

881/

28/9

76

4.8

5.3

4.5

5.6

Patc

h4/

16/9

77%

SF

DC

I-S,

44.

86.

189

1/29

/97

64.

35.

85.

05.

3Pa

tch

4/15

/97

PCFe

rrog

ard

901,

24.

37.

5

23

Page 28: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Ba

seM

ixP

rop

ert

ies

Bo

xB

ase

chi,

w/o

ChI

.w

IC

hI.

Typ

eR

ep

air

Typ

eR

ep

air

Typ

e,d

osa

ge

Re

pa

irM

ixP

rop.

Nu

mb

er

Mix

Dat

ep

cyS

I.,in

.A

ir,%

SI.,

in.

Air,

%R

ep

air

Mix

Dat

eC

on

cre

teC

IA,

gcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

0/090

1/29

/97

64

.35.

85.

05.

3P

atch

4/16

/97

7%

SF

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

3.8

6.2

911/

29/9

76

4.5

5.9

5.0

5.3

Pat

ch4/

15/9

7P

CR

he

ocr

ete

222+

,1

7.0

6.0

921/

29/9

96

4.5

5.9

5.0

5.3

Pat

ch4/

16/9

770

/0S

FR

he

ocr

ete

222+

,1

7.0

6.2

931/

29/9

76

3.8

5.7

4.8

5.5

Pat

ch4/

17/9

7P

C/P

DC

I-S

,43.

87.

794

1/29

/97

63.

85.

74

.85.

5P

atch

4/17

/97

70/0

SF

/PD

CI-

S,4

951/

29/9

76

4.0

5.5

4.8

5.5

Pat

ch4/

17/9

7P

C/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

26.

57.

896

1/29

/97

64

.05.

54

.85.

5P

atch

4/17

/97

7%S

F/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

24

.36.

297

1/29

/97

104

.56.

25.

05.

8P

atch

4/16

/97

70/0

SF

Non

e,0

6.8

7.7

981/

29/9

710

4.5

6.2

5.0

5.8

Pat

ch4/

16/9

77

%S

FN

one,

06.

87.

799

1/29

/97

104

.06

.35.

05.

8P

atch

4/16

/97

7%

SF

DC

I-S

,44

.86.

11

00

1/29

/97

104

.06

.35.

05.

8P

atch

4/16

/97

7%

SF

DC

I-S

,44

.86.

110

11/

31/9

710

4.5

5.8

5.0

5.5

Pat

ch4/

16/9

770

/0S

FF

erro

gard

901,

23.

86.

210

21/

31/9

710

4.5

5.8

5.0

5.5

Pat

ch4/

16/9

77

%S

FF

err

og

ard

901

,23.

86.

21

03

1/31

/97

104

.56

.05.

05.

5P

atch

4/16

/97

7%

SF

Rh

eo

cre

te22

2+,

17.

06.

21

04

1/31

/97

104

.56

.05.

05.

5P

atch

4/16

/97

7%

SF

Rh

eo

cre

te22

2+,

17.

06.

21

05

1/31

/97

104

.35.

95.

05.

9P

atch

4/17

/97

7%S

F/P

DC

I-S

,41

06

1/31

/97

104

.35.

95.

05.

9P

atch

4/17

/97

7%S

F/P

DC

I-S

,41

07

1/31

/97

104

.86

.05.

05.

9P

atch

4/17

/97

7%S

F/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

24

.36.

210

81/

31/9

710

4.8

6.0

5.0

5.9

Pat

ch4/

17/9

77%

SF

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.3

6.2

12

53/

5/97

64

.86.

64

.05.

4O

L/P

6126

/97

PC

/202

0M

CI

2005

,0.

32.

57.

21

26

3/5/

976

4.8

6.6

4.0

5.4

OL

/P61

27/9

7P

C/A

XIM

Cat

exol

,3

2.0

5.8

12

73/

5/97

65.

06.

24

.05.

4O

L/P

6125

/97

Rap

idS

et

Non

e,0

4.0

3.8

12

83/

5/97

65.

06.

24

.05.

4O

L/P

6123

/97

15%

LMC

Non

e,0

9.0

3.4

129

3/51

9710

5.0

6.4

5.0

5.6

OL

/P61

26/9

7P

C/2

020

MC

I20

05,

0.3

2.5

7.2

13

03/

5/97

105.

06

.45.

05.

6O

L/P

6127

/97

PC

/AX

IMC

atex

ol,

32.

05.

813

13/

5/97

105.

05.

75.

05.

6O

L/P

6125

/97

Rap

idS

et

Non

e,0

4.0

3.8

132

3/51

9710

5.0

5.7

5.0

5.6

OL

/P61

23/9

715

0/0

LMC

Non

e,0

9.0

3.5

13

74/

29/9

76

4.3

6.7

5.0

5.6

OL

/P61

25/9

7R

S/L

MC

Non

e,0

9.0

3.4

13

84/

29/9

76

4.3

6.7

5.0

5.6

OL

/P71

21/9

7A

SP

HA

LT

Non

e,0

NA

NA

13

94/

29/9

76

4.8

7.0

5.0

5.6

OL

/P51

29/9

8P

C/P

DC

I-S

,46.

56

.4

24

Page 29: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Bas

eM

ixP

rope

rtie

sB

oxB

ase

chi,

w/o

ChI

.w

IC

hI.

Typ

eR

epai

rT

ype

Rep

air

Typ

e,do

sage

Rep

air

Mix

Pro

p.N

umbe

rM

ixD

ate

pcy

SI.,

in.

Air,

%S

I.,in

.A

ir,%

Rep

air

Mix

Dat

eC

oncr

ete

CIA

,g

cyS

I.,in

.A

ir,0A

>

140

4/29

/97

64.

87.

05.

05.

6O

LIP

5129

/98

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

4.0

8.5

141

4/30

/97

105.

56.

95.

05.

3O

L/P

6125

/97

RS

/LM

CN

on

e,O

9.0

3.4

142

4/30

/97

105.

56.

95.

05.

3O

LIP

7121

/97

AS

PH

AL

TN

one,

0N

AN

A14

34/

30/9

710

5.5

7.0

5.0

5.3

OLI

P51

29/9

8P

C/P

DC

I-S

,46.

56.

414

44/

30/9

710

5.5

7.0

5.0

5.3

OLI

P51

29/9

8P

C/9

03F

erro

gard

901,

24.

08.

514

5g/

20/9

715

5.0

6.5

6.3

6.0

Ove

rlay

5/28

/98

PC

No

ne

,O1.

58.

014

68/

20/9

715

5.0

6.5

6.3

6.0

Ove

rlay

5/28

/98

70/0

SF

Non

e,0

1.5

5.7

147

8/21

/97

155.

06.

06.

56.

0O

verl

ay5/

28/9

8P

CD

CI-

S,4

3.75

8.5

148

8/21

/97

155.

06.

06.

56.

0O

verl

ay5/

28/9

87°

A>S

FD

CI-

S,4

2.75

7.5

149

8/21

/97

154.

55.

56.

35.

9O

verl

ay5/

28/9

8P

CF

erro

gard

901,

27.

08.

915

08/

21/9

715

4.5

5.5

6.3

5.9

Ove

rlay

5/28

/98

7%

SF

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

2.0

8.0

151

8/21

/97

154.

85.

96.

35.

9O

verl

ay5/

29/9

8P

CR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

2.25

5.6

152

8/21

/97

154.

85.

96.

35.

9O

verl

ay5/

29/9

870

/0S

FR

heoc

rete

222+

,1

2.0

7.0

153

8/21

/97

154.

86.

06.

35.

5O

verl

ay5/

29/9

8P

C/P

DC

I-S

,44.

05.

415

48/

21/9

715

4.8

6.0

6.3

5.5

Ove

rlay

5/29

/98

7%S

F/P

DC

I-S

,43.

06.

415

58/

22/9

715

5.0

6.0

6.0

6.2

Ove

rlay

5/29

/98

PC

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

2.5

7.4

156

8/22

/97

155.

06.

06.

06.

2O

verl

ay5/

29/9

87%

SF

/903

Fer

roga

rd90

1,2

2.0

6.6

*T

heba

seo

fBox

41w

asdr

oppe

dan

dda

mag

edpr

ior

toth

epl

acem

ento

fthe

patc

han

dov

erla

y

25

Page 30: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 2: Corrosion inhibitor admixture mixing schedule and mixture details, full depth slabsHRWR CIA

Box Base Properties Silica Fly dosage, Type DosageNumber Mix Date SI., in. Air, % Fume,°A> Ash,°A> gcy CIA Gcy

109 3/12/97 3.0 6.4 0 0 0 None 0110 3/12/97 4.8 5.8 0 0 0 None 0

111 3/19/97 3.0 6.6 7 0 0.4 None 0

112 3/12/97 5.0 5.1 0 25 0 None 0

113 3/13/97 3.8 5.0 0 0 0 Ferrogard 901 2

114 3/13/97 4.0 5.0 0 0 0 Ferrogard 901 2115 3/13/97 3.5 5.3 7 0 0.3 Ferrogard 901 2116 3/13/97 5.0 6.1 0 25 0 Ferrogard 901 2117 3/17/97 3.3 6.7 0 0 0.4 Rheocrete 222+ 1118 3/17/97 3.3 6.3 0 0 0.4 Rheocrete 222+ 1

119 3/17/97 4.0 8.0 7 0 0.5 Rheocrete 222+ 1120 3/18/97 4.0 6.3 0 25 0 Rheocrete 222+ 1

121 3/18/97 5.0 5.8 0 0 0 DCI-S 3122 3/18/97 5.0 6.0 0 0 0 DCI-S 3123 3/18/97 3.3 5.2 7 0 0.3 DCI-S 2124 3/18/97 5.6 0 25 0 DCI-S 2

133 3/19/97 5.0 7.5 0 0 0 MCI2005 0.2134 4/22/97 5.0 7.0 0 0 0 Catexol 1000 3

135 4/22/97 2.5 6.6 0 0 0 Impasse 1.5136 4/22/97 4.8 5.5 0 0 0 DCI-S 2

Table 3: Mixture proportions for base concretes and full depth slabs, Ib/yd3

Mixture PC 7% SFPortland Cementa 635 591Silica Fume 0 45Fly Ash 0 0Water 286 286Coarse Aggregateb 1925 1925Fine AggregateC 1046 1030

a Type 1/11b #57 crushed granitec silica

Table 4: Mixture proportions for overlays and patches, Ib/yd3

Mixture PC PC + SFPortland Cementa 635 590Silica Fume 0 45Fly Ash 0 0Water 286 286Coarse Aggregateb 1524 1524Fine AggregateC 1419 1403a Type 1/11b #78 crushed granitec silicaNote: slabs 138 and 142 were patched and overlayed withheated asphalt consisting ofNo. 9 crushed stone and CRS2emulsion.

26

Page 31: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 5. Compressive strength of slab and slab repair concrete, psi

Compressive Strength, Ib/ydJ

Concrete Admixture 28 day 12 monthPC Slab None 5490 -PC Slab 3 lb/yd~ 5117 -PC Slab 6 lb/yd~ 4968 -PC Slab 10 lb/yd~ 4913 -PC Slab 15 lb/yd~ - -PC Slab 2 gcy 5930 -PC Slab 3 gcy DCI 5760 -PC Slab 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 4915 -PC Slab 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 6020 -PC Slab 0.2 gcy MCI 2005 5460 -PC Slab 3 gcy Catexol 1000 4320 -PC Slab 1.5 gcy Impasse 4480 -

7% SF Slab None 6310 -7% SF Slab 2 gcy DCI 6230 -7% SF Slab 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 5280 -7% SF Slab 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 7420 -

25% FA Slab None - -25% FA Slab 2 gcy DCI 4560 -25% FA Slab 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 4200 -25% FA Slab 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 4180 -

PC Repair None 5340 6630PC Repair 4 gcy DCI 5340 6160PC Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 4840 5790PC Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 5820 6940PC Repair 0.3 gcy MCI 2005 5040 -PC Repair 3 gcy Catexol 1000 4690 -PC Repair 15%LMC 5310 -

7% SF Repair None 6710 74307% SF Repair 4 gcy DCI 6730 73007% SF Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 5920 69007% SF Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 7130 7910

RS Repair 15%LMC 5590 -RS Repair None 8820 -

Results based on the average of two or more 4 inch by 8 inch cylinders.

27

Page 32: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 6. Permeability to chloride ion of slab repair concrete, coulombs

Permeability, CoulombsConcrete Admixture 28 day at 73 0 F 28 day at 1000 F 90 day 12 month

PC Repair None 4022 6040 - 2365PC Repair 4 gcy DCI-S 7187 10703 - 2816PC Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 6021 6698 - 2612PC Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 3878 4904 - 2138PC Repair 0.3 gcy MCI 2005 - - 5257 -PC Repair 3 gcy Catexol 1000 - - 4349 -PC Repair 15%LMC - - 977 -

7% SF Repair None 1205 1061 - 7367% SF Repair 4 gcy DCI-S 2349 1794 - 10847% SF Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 901 1384 1026 - 8037% SF Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+ 906 664 - 543

RS Repair 150/0 LMC - - 14 -RS Repair None - - 17 -

Results based on the average of two 2 inch by 4 inch cylinders

Table 7. Freeze thaw durability of slab repair concretes

Freeze Thaw Durability, ASTM C666 Proc. A, 300 cyclesConcrete Admixture Surface Rating I Weight Loss, % I Durability Factor, %

PC Repair NonePC Repair 4 gcy DCI-SPC Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 901PC Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+PC Repair 0.3 gcy MCI 2005PC Repair 3 gcy Catexol 1000PC Repair 15%LMC No Data Available

7% SF Repair None7% SF Repair 4 gcy DCI-S7% SF Repair 2 gcy Ferrogard 9017% SF Repair 1 gcy Rheocrete 222+

RS Repair 15%LMCRS Repair None

VA Beach Spans 1, 2, 3 7% SF Failed at 110 cyclesVA Beach Spans 10, 11 7% SF, DCI Failed at 50 cyclesVA Beach, Spans 18, 19 7% SF, DCI Failed at 50 cycles

VA Beach, Spans 20, 21, 22 7% SF, Rheocrete 222 Failed at 50 cyclesVA Beach, Spans 23,24 7% SF, Armatec Failed at 190 cycles

2000/3020VA Beach, Spans 26, 27, 28 7% Sf, DCIIPostrite Failed at 50 cyclesV Irglna Beach data IS from tests of concrete samples made at bndge sIte.

28

Page 33: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 8: Stabilized rnacrocell current (rnA)

Macrocell Current, rnA

Slab # 3/10/98-3/17/98 5/98

1 0.0076 -0.04

2 -0.0036 -0.02

3 0.0015 -0.04

4 -0.0066 -0.03

5 0.0207 -0.06

6 0.0011 -0.05

7 -0.0014 -0.02

8 -0.0073 -0.01

9 0.0136 -0.04

10 -0.0037 -0.04

11 0.0097 -0.04

12 0.0213 -0.05

13 0.0733 -0.22

14 0.0316 -0.13

15 0.0383 -0.11

16 0.0614 -0.21

17 0.0284 -0.12--

18 0.0301 -0.19

19 0.0271 -0.09

20 0.2373 -0.51

21 0.0385 -0.11

22 0.0245 -0.1

23 0.0147 -0.08

24 0.055 -0.21

25 0.1944 -0.58

26 0.168 -0.65

27 0.1266 -0.48

28 0.1203 -0.49

29 0.1562 -0.45

30 0.1353 -0.62

31 0.0527 -0.23

32 0.0886 -0.6

33 0.1739 -0.63

34 0.1763 -0.65

35 0.1385 -0.51

36 0.1349 -0.53

37 -0.0079 0.06

38 -0.0092 0.07

39 -0.0072 0.06

40 -0.0086 0.03

41 -0.0011 -0.04

29

Macrocell Current, rnA

Slab # 3/10/98-3/17/98 5/98

42 -0.0047 -0.02

43 0.0024 -0.05

44 -0.0019 -0.03

45 0 -0.02

46 -0.001 -0.03

47 -0.0036 -0.02

48 0.0027 -0.03

49 0.0073 -0.13

50 0.0001 -0.07

51 0.0171 -0.14

52 0.0046 -0.14

53 0.0143 -0.07

54 0.0023 -0.07

55 0.0295 -0.18

56 -0.0069 -0.09

57 0.0182 -0.08

58 0.0143 -0.08

59 0.04 -0.19

60 0.0175 -0.14

61 0.0388 -0.27

62 0.0245 -0.28

63 0.0665 -0.35

64 0.0235 -0.38

65 0.0135 -0.28

66 0.0267 -0.34

67 0.0219 -0.42

68 0.0399 -0.38

69 0.0342 -0.41

70 0.0293 -0.28

71 0.0384 -0.39

72 0.0288 -0.45

73 -0.0035 0.03

74 -0.0042 0.04

75 -0.0043 0.04

76 -0.0041 0.04

77 -0.0061 -0.01

78 -0.0028 0.02

79 0.0041 0

80 -0.0012 -0.03

81 -0.0024 0.01

82 -0.0043 0.02

Page 34: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Macrocell Current, rnA

Slab # 3/10/98-3/17/98 5/98

83 -0.0063 0.01

84 -0.0037 -0.05

85 0.0132 -0.07

86 -0.0042 -0.25

87 0.0075 -0.1

88 0.0061 -0.11

89 -0.0039 -0.06

90 0.0066 -0.13

91 0.0047 -0.19

92 0.0053 -0.13

93 -0.0012 -0.07

94 0.0054 -0.04

95 0.0022 -0.06

96 -0.0007 -0.04

97 0.0517 -0.38

98 0.0585 -0.48

99 0.0147 -0.34

100 0.0545 -0.37

101 0.0386 -0.46

102 0.0293 -0.38

103 0.04 -0.56

104 0.0687 -0.51

105 0.0531 -0.64

106 0.041 -0.3

107 0.0366 -0.48

108 0.0575 -0.41

109 -0.001 0.04

110 -0.0008 0.06

111 -0.0006 0.06

112 -0.0002 0.05

113 -0.0005 0.04

114 -0.0008 0.05

115 -0.0012 0.05

116 -0.0005 0.06

117 -0.0022 0.04

118 -0.0008 0.06

119 -0.0005 0.06

120 -0.0006 0.06

121 -0.0013 0.04

122 -0.0007 0.06

123 -0.0012 0.06

124 -0.0006 0.06

125 0.0497 -0.32

126 0.0258 -0.22

30

Macrocell Current, rnA

Slab # 3/10/98-3/17/98 5/98

127 0.0801 -0.21

128 -0.0013 -0.05

129 0.0825 -0.4

130 0.0742 -0.38

131 0.1152 -0.4

132 0.0188 -0.19

133 -0.0007 0.06

134 -0.0006 0.06

135 -0.0008 0.06

136 -0.0009 0.06

137 0.0463 -0.2

138 0.407 -1.44

139 0.397 -0.16

140 0.542 -0.36

141 0.1415 -0.73

142 0.2616 -0.81

143 0.17 -0.28

144 0.399 -0.62

145 0.574 -2.98

146 0.631 -2.74

147 0.524 -2.27

148 0.552 -2.45

149 0.685 -3.05

150 0.515 -2.42

151 0.457 -2.33

152 0.562 -2.57

153 0.522 -2.41

154 0.507 -2.27

155 0.619 -2.92

156 0.405 -1.85

Page 35: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 9. Macrocell potential (mY)

Macrocell Potential, mV

Slab Number 5/98

1 -2.78

2 -1.11

3 -2.65

4 -2.22

5 -5.94

6 -5.6

7 -2.23

8 -1.18

9 -5.54

10 -2.98

11 -3.11

12 -6.22

13 -11.13

14 -10.88

15 -7.5

16 -11.2

17 -8.01

18 -13.39

19 -7.55

20 -25.89

21 -9.29

22 -8.59

23 -7.14

24 -12.78

25 -32.88

26 -38.62

27 -29.43

28 -29.37

29 -28.06

30 -33.51

31 -16.37

32 -31.86

33 -40.62

34 -40.16

35 -27.03

36 -30.41

37 -0.03

38 -0.17

39 -0.01

40 -0.02

41 -3.07

Macrocell Potential, mV

Slab Number 5/98

42 -0.06

43 -4.41

44 -2.5

45 -2.12

46 -2.42

47 -1.6

48 -2.53

49 -5.75

50 -5.97

51 -6.08

52 -7.76

53 -3.45

54 -4.15

55 -10.17

56 -6.61

57 -4.43--

58 -7.66

59 -16.06

60 -9.68

61 -22.75

62 -17.93

63 -25.9

64 -24.27

65 -20.13

66 -25.13

67 -3.45

68 -28.38

69 -15.59

70 -18.1

71 -27.08

72 -31.17

73 -0.55

74 -0.22

75 -0.04

76 -0.02

77 -2.2

78 -0.9

79 -1.57

80 -2.22

81 -0.79

82 -0.02

Macrocell Potential, mV

Slab Number 5/98

83 -0.74

84 -2.8

85 -5.18

86 -13.76

87 -5.33

88 -8.59

89 -5.32

90 -9.08

91 -9.54

92 -7.88

93 -4

94 -3.95

95 -4.58

96 -4.43

97 -21.94

98 -43.5

99 -22.7

100 -26.24

101 -28.9

102 -26.33

103 -31.6

104 -53.92

105 -25.68

106 -18.93

107 -9.969

108 -30.89

109 0.03

110 0.06

111 0.06

112 0.04

113 0.04

114 0.06

115 0.05

116 0.05

117 0.03

118 0.06

119 0.06

120 0.05

121 0.03

122 0.06

123 0.06

Macrocell Potential, mV

Slab Number 5/98

124 0.06

125 -17.28

126 -9.45

127 -15.87

128 -4.03

129 -16.86

130 -23.31

131 -30.75

132 -11.87

133 0.06

134 0.05

135 0.06

136 0.06

137 -15.76

138 -70.42

139 -8.26

140 -33.47

141 -31.74

142 -64.91

143 -36.21

144 -43.83

145 -101.47

146 -74.65

147 -77.02

148 -84.72

149 -92.27

150 -87

151 -78.59

152 -84.81

153 -73.47

154 -82.97

155 -24.52

156 -71.88

31

Page 36: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 10: Resistance between top and bottom bars

Resistance (Ohms)

Before Connection After Connection

Slab # 8/7/97 12/2/97 3/16/97 5/98

1 60 120 102 63.52 62 130 105 633 61 120 101 61.54 59 120 100 605 54 109 85 526 55 110 90 54.57 55 110 87 538 56 110 90 54.59 58 120 97 5910 55 110 90 54.511 59 120 94 5912 55 110 87 5513 57 110 90 56.514 61 120 99 6115 57 110 92 5616 57 120 97 5617 50 99 83 4818 53 110 91 5119 54 110 91 49.520 49 96 80 4321 56 110 98 5322 54 105 100 56.523 53 103 97 5524 51 97 92 5125 53 102 96 5426 53 105 97 5127 58 110 110 5428 56 110 100 5229 57 110 110 5130 56 110 104 5031 55 109 105 50.532 54 107 98 48.533 56 110 107 5034 58 110 108 5035 55 108 99 4436 54 106 98 4437 53 99 92 43.538 55 104 97 4639 53 98 92 4440 54 101 96 45

32

Page 37: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Resistance (Ohms)

Before Connection After Connection

Slab # 8/7/97 12/2/97 3/16/97 5/98

41 53 100 94 4542 52 96 90 4543 56 108 98 5744 54 106 96 5545 50 99 90 51.546 53 105 95 5447 53 105 95 5148 53 103 94 5049 50 98 89 4750 79 160 150 6251 49 96 87 4052 70 140 130 5753 50 96 88 40.554 69 130 130 54.555 52 99 91 4256 73 140 130 57

-57 51 98 90 4258 68 130 120 5159 70 140 130 5760 51 97 90 4361 81 110 150 6462 76 150 140 6163 70 130 130 5864 60 140 120 52.565 65 160 140 50.566 64 160 140 5567 68 160 150 5768 69 160 150 5769 62 150 130 5370 62 150 140 5471 64 150 140 5472 63 160 140 53.573 45 110 92 3874 44 106 87 3675 42 104 86 3576 42 104 86 3577 45 110 91 37.578 44 107 88 3779 43 107 87 3680 42 104 85 35.581 43 105 86 3782 42 103 84 3683 44 109 89 38

33

Page 38: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Resistance (Ohms)

Before Connection After Connection

Slab # 8/7/97 12/2/97 3/16/97 5/98

84 42 104 85 3685 43 110 85 28.586 55 150 120 3687 43 110 88 2S:S-88 56 150 120 36.589 44 120 91 3090 57 150 120 3791 45 120 91 29.592 59 160 130 3893 44 120 91 3094 56 150 120 37.595 46 120 97 31.596 57 160 120 3897 61 170 130 4098 70 220 180 5399 60 170 130 40100 67 190 140 45101 59 160 130 42102 62 180 130 45103 60 180 130 43104 90 280 200 65105 56 180 120 40106 60 150 150 48

'-107 59 140 130 42

108 59 140 130 43109 41 102 80 47110 40 87 82 29111 180 410 380 1200112 400 1100 1100 2800113 40 102 83 42114 40 89 85 30115 170 440 410 1200116 260 710 640 2100117 39 99 78 38118 38 82 78 29119 170 440 410 1100120 230 580 530 1900121 33 86 68 31122 33 71 70 25.5123 140 350 320 91124 260 72 660 2100125 39 91 85 29126 41 96 95 32

34

Page 39: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Resistance (Ohms)

Before Connection After Connection

Slab # 8/7/97 12/2/97 3/16/97 5/98

127 57 120 110 39128 45 103 102 35129 42 93 93 34.5130 48 120 120 39131 63 130 130 42132 48 110 110 37133 43 90 85 30134 46 108 104 34135 33 66 64 25136 31 64 62 23.5137 66 140 140 46138 102 82 120 38139 52 73 100 54140 52 73 100 55141 63 130 130 43142 93 190 140 53

-143 63 93 140 62144 62 79 99 50145 60 72 26146 54 62 23147 58 70 25148 56 66 24149 65 70 24150 67 76 26151 68 86 29152 68 75 25153 70 75 25154 70 77 25155 72 77 26156 71 81 27

35

Page 40: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 11: Open circuit potential bar b by Half Cell Meter

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

Before AfterConnection Connection

Slab # 9/30/97 12/1/97-12/8/97 3/16/98 5!'~8

1 -0.186 -0.113 -0.060 -0.066

2 -0.185 -0.007 0.042 -0.008

3 -0.155 -0.099 -0.035 -0.113

4 -0.132 -0.056 0.006 -0.046

5 -0.194 -0.120 -0.043 -0.115

6 -0.136 -0.048 -0.018 -0.126

7 -0.133 -0.089 -0.049 -0.164

8 -0.148 -0.037 -0.004 -0.106

9 -0.178 -0.114 -0.071 -0.19

10 -0.151 -0.057 -0.001 -0.096

11 -0.155 -0.071 -0.025 -0.104

12 -0.212 -0.152 -0.096 -0.227

13 -0.254 -0.186 -0.160 -0.286

14 -0.290 -0.100 -0.077 -0.176

15 -0.265 -0.176 -0.140 -0.259

16 -0.211 -0.118 -0.098 -0.167

17 -0.208 -0.125 -0.081 -0.198

18 -0.170 -0.071 -0.044 -0.118

19 -0.216 -0.174 -0.152 -0.]')8

20 -0.311 -0.241 -0.198 -0.27

21 -0.207 -0.159 -0.119 -0.212

22 -0.218 -0.122 -0.061 -0.014

23 -0.189 -0.096 -0.039 -0.109

24 -0.233 -0.179 -0.093 -0.19

25 -0.314 -0.259 -0.210 -0.294

26 -0.234 -0.161 -0.130 -0.222

27 -0.321 -0.239 -0.180 -0.312

28 -0.269 -0.174 -0.123 -0.234

29 -0.263 -0.194 -0.134 -0.224

30 -0.231 -0.163 -0.132 -0.245

31 -0.269 -0.190 -0.141 -0.275

32 -0.244 -0.165 -0.108 -0.272

33 -0.310 -0.235 -0.208 -0.323

34 -0.278 -0.165 -0.152 -0.232

35 -0.256 -0.160 -0.127 -0.221

36 -0.277 -0.187 -0.153 -0.259

37 -0.096 -0.021 0.033 0.03.-

38 -0.075 -0.018 0.057 -0 n08

39 -0.144 -0.087 0.006 -O.O~

36

Page 41: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

Before AfterConnection Connection

Slab # 9/30/97 12/1/97-12/8/97 3/16/98 5/98

40 -0.129 -0.051 0.013 -0.045

41 -0.136 -0.065 -0.039 -0.14242 -0.154 -0.069 0.057 -0.025

43 -0.176 -0.145 -0.100 -0.146

44 -0.177 -0.135 -0.099 -0.145

45 -0.169 -0.101 -0.058 -0.118

46 -0.168 -0.104 -0.073 -0.126

47 -0.151 -0.076 -0.023 -0.064

48 -0.160 -0.089 -0.068 -0.114

49 -0.199 -0.138 -0.087 -0.205

50 -0.150 -0.054 -0.017 -0.123

51 -0.245 -0.159 -0.115 -0.221

52 -0.189 -0.092 -0.031 -0.118

53 -0.173 -0.086 -0.050 -0.1

54 -0.134 -0.046 -0.015 -0.076

55 -0.200 -0.135 -0.142 -0.2

56 -0.158 -0.054 -0.020 -0.117

57 -0.190 -0.107 -0.071 -0.12

58 -0.194 -0.096 -0.056 -0.1

59 -0.191 -0.113 -0.063 -0.177

60 -0.218 -0.105 -0.069 -0.154

61 -0.186 -0.090 -0.053 -0.159

62 -0.202 -0.108 -0.065 -0.171

63 -0.215 -0.091 -0.078 -0.152

64 -0.210 -0.118 -0.070 -0.184

65 -0.188 -0.110 -0.068 -0.21

66 -0.195 -0.113 -0.078 -0.217

67 -0.178 -0.092 -0.840 -0.232

68 -0.202 -0.143 -0.112 -0.242

69 -0.243 -0.131 -0.105 -0.215

70 -0.207 -0.105 -0.720 -0.172

71 -0.227 -0.111 -0.790 -0.22

72 -0.202 -0.104 -0.600 -0.218

73 -0.093 -0.022 -0.006 -0.098

74 -0.100 -0.032 0.300 -0.058

75 -0.101 -0.016 -0.001 -0.088

76 -0.121 -0.046 -0.009 -0.103

77 -0.149 -0.070 -0.005 -0.17

78 -0.146 -0.057 -0.029 -0.127

79 -0.163 -0.104 -0.064 -0.152

80 -0.179 -0.065 -0.039 -0.16

81 -0.162 -0.085 -0.034 -0.136

37

Page 42: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

Before AfterConnection Connection

Slab # 9/30/97 12/1/97-12/8/97 3/16/98 5/98

82 -0.134 -0.039 0.019 -0.J22

83 -0.149 -0.044 0.400 -0.111

84 -0.152 -0.034 0.130 -0.136

85 -0.169 -0.070 -0.550 -0.159

86 -0.167 -0.039 -0.140 -0.17

87 -0.198 -0.110 -0.063 -0.166

88 -0.172 -0.057 -0.320 -0.135

89 -0.180 -0.072 -0.370 -0.176

90 -0.153 -0.014 -0.025 -0.147

91 -0.212 -0.096 -0.073 -0.177

92 -0.188 -0.083 -0.340 -0.158

93 -0.211 -0.103 -0.058 -0.175

94 -0.183 -0.071 -0.029 -0.081

95 -0.181 -0.071 -0.060 -0.198

96 -0.133 -0.045 0.400 -0.133

97 -0.224 -0.100 -0.071 -0.168

98 -0.205 -0.100 -0.079 -0.198

99 -0.205 -0.054 -0.049 -0.188

100 -0.207 -0.084 -0.074 -0.19

101 -0.219 -0.096 -0.076 -0.215-

102 -0.216 -0.091 -0.054 -0.207

103 -0.237 -0.088 -0.044 -0.231

104 -0.261 -0.124 -0.130 -0.258

105 -0.221 -0.121 -0.112 -0.228

106 -0.242 -0.162 -0.078 -0.204

107 -0.225 -0.137 -0.071 -0.23

108 -0.214 -0.148 -0.088 -0.223

109 -0.074 -0.073 -0.103 -0.16

110 -0.038 -0.047 -0.100 -0.164

111 -0.023 -0.068 -0.170 -0.139

112 -0.048 -0.030 -0.073 -0.154

113 -0.093 -0.128 -0.126 -0.16

114 -0.068 -0.069 -0.100 -0.167

115 -0.078 -0.088 -0.103 -0.163

116 -0.054 -0.100 -0.111 -0.171

117 -0.116 -0.119 -0.109 -0.164

118 -0.093 -0.106 -0.108 -0.147

119 -0.051 -0.084 -0.086 -0.145

120 -0.060 -0.093 -0.089 -0.144

121 -0.085 -0.070 -0.097 -0.1 )6

122 -0.066 -0.077 -0.081 -o.f~

123 -0.030 -0.049 -0.061 -0.126

38

Page 43: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

Before AfterConnection Connection

Slab # 9/30/97 12/1/97-12/8/97 3/16/98 5/98

124 -0.066 -0.076 -0.082 -0.13

125 -0.228 -0.177 -0.083 -0.251

126 -0.193 -0.133 -0.104 -0.242

127 -0.338 -0.338 -0.313 -0.1

128 -0.169 -0.072 -0.004 -0.13

129 -0.235 -0.200 -0.136 -0.183

130 -0.224 -0.192 -0.140 -0.253

131 -0.364 -0.369 -0.318 -0.422

132 -0.221 -0.145 -0.056 -0.196

133 -0.064 -0.073 -0.114 -0.152

134 -0.065 -0.064 -0.089 -0.124

135 -0.077 -0.078 -0.096 -0.137

136 -0.052 -0.630 -0.099 -0.116

137 -0.320 -0.319 -0.298 -0.41

138 -0.403 -0.599 -0.416 -0.026

139 -0.405 -0.386 -0.302 -0.079

140 -0.406 -0.421 -0.368 -0.077

141 -0.370 -0.386 -0.333 -0.466

142 -0.052 -0.323 -0.007 -0.054

143 -0.364 -0.403 -0.171 -0.275

144 -0.460 -0.464 -0.370 -0.258

145 -0.469 -0.383 -0.335 -0.363

146 -0.495 -0.387 -0.334 -0.36

147 -0.508 -0.393 -0.360 -0.368

148 -0.517 -0.397 -0.371 -0.434

149 -0.493 -0.406 -0.404 -0.464

150 -0.483 -0.384 -0.387 -0.445

151 -0.452 -0.366 -0.391 -0.378

152 -0.488 -0.335 -0.322 -0.425

153 -0.522 -0.358 -0.363 -0.408

154 -0.503 -0.333 -0.332 -0.441

155 -0.523 -0.400 -0.416 -0.52

156 -0.509 -0.379 -0.421 -0.463

39

Page 44: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 12: Open circuit potential bar b as measured by PR Monitor

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

I BeforeConnection After Connection

~~- 9/24/97- 12/1/97 - 1/5/98 3/24/98 -~-

Slab # 10/10/97 3/31/98 5/98

1 -0.1738 -0.1287 -0.1281 -0.169

2 -0.0792 -0.0246 -0.0068 -0.0429

3 -0.1385 -0.0959 -0.0897 -0.1692

4 -0.1155 -0.0621 -0.0201 -0.0882

5 -0.1905 -0.1280 -0.0716 -0.1546

6 -0.1315 -0.0866 -0.0415 -0.1104

7 -0.1288 -0.1138 -0.1086 -0.1637

8 -0.1267 -0.0753 -0.0223 -0.0954

9 -0.1756 -0.1171 -0.1120 -0.177

10 -0.1288 -0.0734 -0.0294 -0.1 012

11 -0.1193 -0.0842 -0.0702 -0.1096

12 -0.1781 -0.1491 -0.1218 -0.2037

13 -0.2446 -0.1911 -0.1887 -0.2474

14 -0.1729 -0.1113 0.1065 -0.1511

15 -0.2300 -0.1753 -0.1584 -0.2176

16 -0.1829 -0.1399 -0.1006 -0.1693

17 -0.1973 -0.1267 -0.0884 -0.1771

18 -0.1454 -0.1028 -0.0545 -0.1467

19 -0.1997 -0.1840 -0.1499 -0.2145

20 -0.2841 -0.2613 -0.2699 -0.2457

21 -0.2082 -0.1479 -0.1527 -0.1988

22 -0.1953 -0.1158 -0.0718 -0.1395

23 -0.1584 -0.0990 -0.0689 -0.1181

24 -0.2324 -0.1711 -0.1331 -0.1854

25 -0.2960 -0.2567 -0.2660 -0.3176

26 -0.2193 -0.1549 -0.1616 -0.2223

27 -0.2896 -0.2339 -0.2434 -0.3096

28 -0.2459 -0.1586 -0.1574 -0.228

29 -0.2586 -0.1853 -0.1669 -0.2273

30 -0.2120 -0.1697 -0.1621 -0.2349

31 -0.2416 -0.1987 -0.1715 -0.2564

32 -0.2391 -0.1688 -0.1641 -0.2523

33 -0.2965 -0.2442 -0.2506 -0.3151

34 -0.2608 -0.1804 -0.1855 -0.2309

35 -0.2410 -0.1679 -0.1563 -0.2 ~ 24

36 -0.2637 -0.1969 -0.1881 -0.2673

37 -0.0498 -0.0471 -0.0070 -0.0278~~-

38 i -0.0367 -0.0421 0.0012 -0.0572

39 -0.1161 -0.0462 -0.0418 -0.021

40

Page 45: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)Before

Connection After Connection9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 1/5/98 3/24/98 -

Slab # 10/10/97 3/31/98 5/98

40 -0.0723 -0.0398 -0.0279 -0.0441

41 -0.1127 -0.0750 -0.0715 -0.0988

42 -0.1164 -0.0726 -0.0078 -0.0076

43 -0.1685 -0.1558 -0.1253 -0.1204

44 -0.1634 -0.1322 -0.1376 -0.1209

45 -0.1580 -0.1168 -0.0825 -0.0974

46 -0.1558 -0.1183 -0.1072 -0.1021

47 -0.1320 -0.0662 -0.0516 -0.0651

48 -0.1540 -0.1055 -0.0744 -0.1041

49 -0.1937 -0.1305 -0.1341 -0.1749

50 -0.1417 -0.0616 -0.0403 -0.0874

51 -0.2203 -0.1439 -0.1550 -0.1905

52 -0.1666 -0.0867 -0.0717 -0.0991

53 -0.1676 -0.0963 -0.0684 -0.0843

54 -0.1166 -0.0641 -0.0366 -0.072

55 -0.1932 -0.1492 -0.1904 -0.2217

56 -0.1415 -0.0994 -0.0408 -0.1405

57 -0.1665 -0.1120 -0.1105 -0.1361

58 -0.1586 -0.1038 -0.0871 -0.1121

59 -0.1856 -0.1226 -0.1168 -0.1668

60 -0.2045 -0.1360 -0.1219 -0.1754

61 -0.1609 -0.1177 -0.1150 -0.1614

62 -0.1838 -0.1301 -0.1080 -0.0026

63 -0.1889 -0.1477 -0.1341 -0.1685

64 -0.1732 -0.1032 -0.1338 -0.1704

65 -0.1528 -0.1033 -0.1306 -0.1754

66 -0.1544 -0.1085 -0.1313 -0.1779

67 -0.1411 -0.0958 -0.1316 -0.2166

68 -0.1819 -0.1412 -0.1683 -0.2258

69 -0.2111 -0.1311 -0.1614 -0.184

70 -0.1767 -0.1098 -0.1455 -0.157

71 -0.2007 -0.1277 -0.1437 -0.1888

72 -0.1803 -0.1107 -0.1161 -0.1827

73 -0.0658 -0.0142 -0.0558 -0.0874

74 -0.0803 -0.0346 -0.0387 -0.0472

75 -0.0821 -0.0304 -0.0511 -0.0489

76 -0.0972 -0.0435 -0.0647 -0.0757

77 -0.1154 -0.0719 -0.0861 -0.1452

78 -0.1177 -0.0698 -0.0785 -0.0991

79 -0.1076 -0.1289 -0.1186 -0.1307

80 -0.1553 -0.0897 -0.0943 -0.1308

81 -0.1315 -0.0921 -0.1213 -0.1082

41

Page 46: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)

BeforeConnection After Connection

9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 1/5/98 3/24/98 -Slab # 10/10/97 3/31/98 5/98

82 -0.1041 -0.0627 -0.0569 -0.0981

83 -0.1302 -0.0565 -0.0557 -0.0772

84 -0.1285 -0.0491 -0.0631 -0.123

85 -0.1492 -0.0872 -0.1256 -0.1492

86 -0.1401 -0.0593 -0.0454 -0.1455

87 -0.1686 -0.1283 -0.1125 -0.1575

88 -0.1475 -0.0812 -0.0746 -0.1227

89 -0.1472 -0.0846 -0.0875 -0.1454

90 -0.1202 -0.0308 -0.0698 -0.1064

91 -0.1807 -0.1097 -0.1207 -0.183

92 -0.1454 -0.0910 -0.1021 -0.1375

93 -0.1800 -0.0970 -0.1464 -0.1762

94 -0.1513 -0.0841 -0.0991 -0.0941

95 -0.1518 -0.0829 -0.1340 -0.1781

96 -0.1251 -0.0529 -0.0875 -0.1061

97 -0.1874 -0.1200 -0.1633 -0.161

98 -0.1787 -0.1184 -0.1879 -0.2038

99 -0.1761 -0.0941 -0.1433 -0.1758

100 -0.1835 -0.1113 -0.1691 -0.1671

101 -0.1838 -0.1059 -0.1667 -0.1746

102 -0.1823 -0.0998 -0.1226 -0.1726

103 -0.2077 -0.0977 -0.1733 -0.2039

104 -0.2092 -0.1439 -0.2256 -0.2363

105 -0.1698 -0.1368 -0.1865 -0.2118

106 -0.2466 -0.0939 -0.1822 -0.1694

107 -0.2371 -0.1245 -0.1603 -0.2087

108 -0.2263 -0.1281 -0.1701 -0.19

109 -0.0659 -0.0698 -0.0968 -0.1567

110 -0.0694 -0.0443 -0.0832 -0.1332

111 -0.0609 -0.0578 -0.0776 -0.1333

112 -0.0741 -0.0643 -0.1050 -0.1321

113 -0.0630 -0.0739 -0.1192 -0.1485

114 -0.1061 -0.0582 -0.0975 -0.1013

115 -0.0695 -0.0451 -0.0992 -0.1453

116 -0.0495 -0.0925 -0.1444 -0.1676

117 -0.1028 -0.1302 -0.1480 -0.1721

118 -0.0796 -0.0822 -0.1205 -0.1375

119 -0.0513 -0.0551 -0.0995 -0.1378

120 -0.0590 -0.0598 -0.1288 -0.1354

121 f -0.0580 -0.0695 -0.1023 -0.1445

122 -0.0572 -0.0503 -0.0773 -0.1228

123 -0.0355 -0.0339 -0.0978 -0.1291

42

Page 47: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Open Circuit Potential, V (CSE)Before

Connection After Connection9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 1/5/98 3/24/98 -

Slab # 10/10/97 3/31/98 5/98

124 -0.0496 -0.0716 -0.1172 -0.1269

125 -0.2300 -0.1565 -0.1725 -0.2102

126 -0.2034 -0.1077 -0.1858 -0.219

127 -0.3462 -0.3202 -0.3537 -0.36

128 -0.1806 -0.0788 -0.0898 -0.1178

129 -0.2889 -0.2163 -0.2264 -0.2114

130 -0.2353 -0.1777 -0.2149 -0.2425

131 -0.3702 -0.3379 -0.3708 -0.3911

132 -0.2375 -0.1181 -0.1468 -0.1875

133 -0.0523 -0.0630 -0.1144 -0.1351

134 -0.0536 -0.0591 -0.0973 -0.122

135 -0.0553 -0.0655 -0.1305 -0.1284

136 -0.0523 -0.0666 -0.1034 -0.1196

137 -0.1872 -0.2984 -0.3616 -0.3719

138 -0.3977 -0.5921 -0.4537 -0.4842

139

140

141 -0.3415 -0.3388 -0.3945 -0.4461

142 -0.5222 -0.4638 -1.0289 -0.4953

143

144

145 -0.4007 -0.4053 -0.4182

146 -0.4357 -0.4255 -0.3966

147 -0.4354 -0.4541 -0.3906

148 -0.4402 -0.4749 -0.4167

149 -0.4188 -0.4784 -0.4125

150 -0.4125 -0.4609 -0.3955

151 -0.4386 -0.4678 -0.4194

152 -0.4036 -0.3519 -0.408

153 -0.4693 -0.3837 -0.3958 -0.3969

154 -0.4432 -0.3437 -0.3657 -0.4178

155 -0.4194 -0.4091 -0.4416 -0.4369

156 -0.4245 -0.4088 -0.4590 -0.4177

43

Page 48: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Table 13: Corrosion rate bar b as calculated by PR Monitor

Corrosion Rate, mpy~,-

Before AfterConnection Connection

9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 3/24/98 - 5/98Slab # 10/10/97 1/12/98 3/31/98

1 1.107 0.838 0.700 0.912

2 0.590 0.416 0.256 0.603

3 1.813 0.643 0.538 0.61

4 0.626 0.585 0.206 0.493

5 1.673 0.953 0.838 0.69

6 0.866 0.564 0.417 0.66

7 1.250 0.555 0.663 0.795

8 6.514 0.351 0.506 0.95

9 2.055 0.665 0.452 0.719

10 1.172 0.361 0.259 0.654

11 0.864 0.342 0.501 0.769

12 1.452 0.739 0.486 0.749

13 3.209 1.200 0.865 1.509

14 1.153 0.632 0.453 0.88

15 4.046 1.083 0.846 1.085

16 1.328 0.337 0.400 0.205~

17 2.147 0.872 0.666 0.98

18 2.474 0.329 0.551 1.528

19 3.023 0.822 0.605 0.157

20 0.310 0.320 0.428 0.311

21 0.927 0.546 0.402 0.829

22 1.213 0.445 0.307 0.974

23 2.062 0.576 0.438 1.251

24 2.545 1.144 0.651 1.452

25 13.066 1.186 0.823 1.423

26 4.069 0.337 0.424 1.803

27 17.172 1.569 0.675 1.453

28 1.285 0.317 1.671 0.807

29 4.033 0.935 0.623 1.022

30 1.938 0.366 0.621 1.185

31 3.749 0.484 0.809 1.738

32 1.884 0.241 0.396 1.808

33 2.230 0.683 0.613 1.028

34 0.874 0.381 0.420 0.733-

35 1.813 0.453 0.772 1.473

~ 14.824 0.658 1.061 0.006

37 0.366 0.392 0.682 0.587

38 0.945 0.527 1.022 0.973

39 0.716 0.398 0.496 0.513

44

Page 49: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Corrosion Rate, mpy

Before AfterConnection Connection

9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 3/24/98 - 5/98Slab # 10/10/97 1/12/98 3/31/98

40 0.741 0.419 0.475 0.473

41 1.082 0.409 0.536 0.561

42 2.450 0.372 0.501 0.374

43 0.769 0.002 0.892 0.731

44 0.744 0.002 0.662 2.856

45 0.913 0.535 0.523 0.563

46 0.865 0.426 0.548 0.479

47 0.871 0.407 0.455 0.527

48 0.768 0.416 0.595 0.736

49 1.501 0.698 0.769 0.765

50 0.418 0.217 0.389 0.581

51 1.589 0.428 0.489 0.654

52 0.643 0.199 0.252 0.423

53 1.074 0.543 0.739 1.024

54 0.507 0.267 0.394 0.812

55 1.049 0.716 0.711 1.17

56 0.651 0.190 0.230 0.806

57 1.044 0.378 0.476 0.788

58 0.705 0.212 0.306 0.599

59 0.601 0.220 0.417 0.994

60 1.469 0.643 0.703 1.261

61 0.696 0.256 0.300 0.795

62 0.769 0.208 0.335 0.001

63 0.678 0.195 0.272 0.54

64 0.377 0.003 0.395 0.814

65 0.534 0.006 0.514 1.101

66 0.771 0.003 0.528 1.526

67 0.604 0.003 0.477 0.696I---- >.

68 0.496 0.003 0.950 1.055

69 0.623 0.003 0.433 0.498

70 0.733 0.003 0.318 0.665

71 0.668 0.002 0.548 5.316

72 0.672 0.003 0.536 1.65

73 1.218 0.030 0.698 1.516

74 1.298 0.001 0.641 1.552

75 1.247 0.031 0.632 1.104

76 1.110 0.033 0.605 1.103

77 1.066 0.030 0.601 1.736

78 1.059 0.032 0.523 1.326

79 2.282 0.002 0.744 1.795

80 1.072 0.000 0.682 1.829

81 1.254 0.028 0.479 1.586

45

Page 50: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Corrosion Rate, mpy-

Before AfterConnection Connection

1-------

9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 3/24/98 - 5/98Slab # 10/10/97 1/12/98 3/31/98

82 1.178 0.002 0.517 1.292

83 1.053 0.031 0.589 1.548

84 1.203 0.026 0.658 1.885

85 1.320 0.031 0.697 1.948

86 0.516 0.005 0.350 0.515

87 1.091 0.031 0.681 0.902

88 0.737 0.003 0.465 0.522

89 0.891 0.031 0.696 0.83

90 0.396 0.003 0.790 0.908

91 0.852 0.002 0.954 1.463

92 0.673 0.002 0.724 0.918

93 1.156 0.005 0.743 0.896

94 0.493 0.002 0.462 0.732

95 1.145 0.001 0.743 1.045

96 0.655 0.002 0.587 0.5

97 1.117 0.003 0.729 1.011

98 0.770 0.007 0.688 0.759

99 0.505 0.002 0.448 0.5531----- -

100 0.544 0.002 0.491 0.543

101 0.502 0.004 0.589 1.035

102 0.852 0.005 1.009 1.124

103 0.481 0.002 1.114 2.907

104 1.527 0.004 0.917 1.208

105 0.684 0.002 0.538 0.631

106 0.504 0.122 0.666 0.866

107 0.538 0.786 0.847 0.846

108 1.045 0.480 1.029 1.622

109 1.050 0.444 8.222 1.121

110 0.852 0.720 2.636 1.34

111 0.453 0.193 0.412 0.848

112 0.288 0.197 0.293 0.5

113 0.713 0.000 0.973 0.961

114 0.602 0.404 1.043 1.231

115 0.205 0.247 0.345 1.982

116 0.163 0.214 0.332 0.459

117 0.738 0.495 0.985 1.175

118 0.453 0.437 0.834 1.032~._.

119 0.193 0.256 0.539 0.754

120 0.152 0.197 0.288 0.578

121 0.881 0.555 0.997 1.228

122 0.552 0.728 0.989 1.317

123 0.260 0.315 0.362 0.579

46

Page 51: FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR CONCRETE ... · FIELD EVALUATION OF CORROSIONINHIBITORS FORCONCRETE: INTERIMREPORT 1: EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE SLABS REPAIRED WITHCORROSIONINHIBITORS

Corrosion Rate, mpy

Before AfterConnection Connection

9/24/97 - 12/1/97 - 3/24/98 - 5/98Slab # 10/10/97 1/12/98 3/31/98

124 0.389 0.609 0.341 0.745

125 1.031 0.039 0.816 1.218

126 0.753 0.539 1.101 1.356

127 0.833 0.002 2.187 2.049

128 0.873 0.002 0.780 0.981

129 1.462 0.022 1.088 1.034

130 1.014 0.003 0.953 2.029

131 1.011 0.002 6.660 1.374

132 0.938 0.001 0.944 1.041

133 0.579 0.507 0.738 1.13

134 0.699 0.518 0.810 1.546

135 0.500 0.489 0.784 1.07

136 0.552 0.429 0.806 1.153

137 3.354 0.485 1.807 1.7

138 0.001 0.016 0.000 0.128

139

140

141 0.368 0.789 1.471 1.766

142 0.009 0.001 0.225 0

143

144

145 4.687 2.596 2.459

146 5.082 7.105 2.303

147 5.920 2.936 1.99

148 9.577 3.797 4.291

149 3.915 3.584 2.479

150 3.700 2.857 2.501

151 4.472 3.668 2.249

152 3.572 1.286 2.174

153 5.360 2.617 2.070 2.789

154 5.303 2.329 1.533 3.775

155 7.783 3.984 3.016 2.517

156 6.689 2.001 2.263 2.535

47