Top Banner
Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal Dr Balu Vaidyanathan Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi, Kerala
35

Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Oct 16, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Dr Balu Vaidyanathan

Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences

Kochi, Kerala

Page 2: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

• Congenital heart defects are one of the most

common birth defects in neonates and infants

• Prevalence: 6-10/live births ( 2-3 /1000 critical)

Page 3: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Best human development index in India

Best literacy rates

IMR: 12/1000 live births.

Crude birth rate 14.6

Access to antenatal care 100%

Institutional births 99.5%

The Kerala Scenario

Page 4: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

CHD as a contributor to infant

mortality: Kerala Scenario

• Importance cause of IMR, especially in low IMR

areas ( 4th leading cause of neonatal deaths)

• 60% of critical CHDs die before the first birthday.

• 25% infants deaths in Kerala attributed due to CHD*

* UNICEF - IMA partnership concept note

Page 5: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Severity of CHD: RACHS system

ASD

PDA > 30 d

CoA > 30 d

VSD

TOF

TAPVC > 30 d

BDGS

RV-PA conduit

Fontan

BT shunt

ASO

ALCAPA

Complex ASO

Truncus

IAA repair

Double Switch

Unifocalization

Neonatal Ebsteinsrepair

Truncus with IAAA

Stage 1 Norwood

1

2

3

4

5

6

Simple

Major

Complex

VeryComplex

Page 6: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Moreconserva+veapproachtocomplexCHD

withsubop+maloutcomes

Op+mal

Resource

u+liza+on

Earlyreferralofcorrectable

CHD

CHD Management:Priorities for limited resource healthcare systems

Page 7: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Early diagnosis of CHD –

Changing Paradigms

Triaging based on healthcare priorities

Child

Neonate

Fetus

Page 8: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal
Page 9: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Options for management after Prenatal Diagnosis

Complete Cardiac

diagnosis

In-uteroprognosis

Extra-cardiacfactors

Critical presentation

at birth

Outcomes Institutionalexperience

Costsinitial and recurring

TOP*

Planneddelivery and

post natal care

PlannedComfort

CareGestation

age

* Based on local, regional and national laws and regulations

Page 10: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Targetedstudy

“HighRisk”

Screen

Everyone

Antenatal screening for CHD:

2 Approaches

Page 11: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Indications for Fetal Echocardiography

10-20% of all CHDs occur in high-risk pregnancies

Page 12: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Maternal factors

• Diabetes mellitus: Pre-gestational, first

trimester GDM, HbA1C > 8.5

• Phenylketonuria ( levels > 15 mg/dL)

• Autoimmune disease

• Medication exposure – AEDs, SSRI, NSAID

• Infections

• ART ( ICSI/IVF)

Page 13: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal
Page 14: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Nuchal Translucency

• Measured at 11-14 weeks gestation.

• Cut-off values:

> 3 mm ( 95th centile): 15% CHD

> 3.5 mm ( 99th centile): 20% CHD

• Risk of CHD increases with NT measurement.

Page 15: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Family history of CHD

Family member affected Risk

Mother 3-7%

Father 2-3%

Sibling 3%

> 1 sibling 6-12%

Second degree relative 2%

Third degree relative 1%

Page 16: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Timing of Fetal heart evaluation

Page 17: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal
Page 18: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Ges

tatio

n w

eeks

5.7%

12.7%

16.9%

37.3%

27.1%

AIMS data: 2008-2014Gestational age at referral ( n=2451)

Page 19: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Hunter S, Heads A, Wyllie J, Robson S

“Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the Northern region

of England: Benefits of a training programme for obstetric

sonographers”

Heart 2000;84:294-298

Integrating fetal heart screening with

the anomaly scan:

Cost and time effective approach

Page 20: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Fetal Heart Screening:Cost effectiveness

• Strategies analyzed:4C , 4C + outflows, NC, Fetal echocardiography

• 4C + Outflow tracts – least costly, effective

• Fetal echo – most costly, effective

• 4C+ Nuchal – costly, less effective

Pinto NM et al Cost Effectiveness of Prenatal Screening Strategies for Congenital Heart Disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44(1): 50- 57. doi: 10.1002/uog.13287

Page 21: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Screening Fetal Heart:

3-view technique

Unlikely to miss anything that is worth

detecting.

4 Chamber view

Outflows

(Crossing)

3 vessel

/3VT view

Page 22: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal
Page 23: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Current expectations for adult survival after

correction

SV

Complex CHDs

CoA

AVSD

TOF

TGA

ASD

VSD

PDA

AS,PS

TAPVC

Moons et al

Circulation 2010;122:2264-2272

50-60%

70-80%

< 10%

HLH

> 95%

Survival: 88.6% at 18 years

Page 24: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Impact of Fetal Diagnosis of

Congenital Heart Defects:

A projected Scenario for India

Complex Lesions

• Better screening• Early diagnosis (

< 20 weeks)• Multi system

evaluation• Option of TOP in

relevant cases *• Complex CHD

burden reduce

Critical Correctable Lesions

1. Planned delivery and neonatal care2. In-utero therapy -medical/structural3. Peri-partum cardiac teams4. Improved outcomes5. Financial support

Based on local, regional and national rules and regulations

Page 25: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

230269

341

393 397438 440 450

66 76 90 88 103131 134 151

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

All CHD

Referral PatternsAIMS Data 2008-2015

Page 26: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

41.8

11.2

31

5.1

5

3.5

2.1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Nolivebirth

NND

Deltreated

Delnottrt

Normalized

LostFU

Awaitingdelivery

Pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with CHDAIMS data 2008-2015 ( n= 841)

Page 27: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

32.7

67.3

56.8

43.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Nolivebirths livebirths

Simple

Complex

PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN FETAL CHDImpact Of Type Of CHD

Page 28: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

77.4

67.8

22.822.6

32.2

77.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<20 20-24 >24

Percentage

Nonlivebirths

Livebirths

PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN FETAL CHDImpact Of Gestational Age At Diagnosis

Page 29: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal
Page 30: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Fetal CHD - 996

Del. at AIMS - 261

Cardiac care - 196 Comfort care - 65

Medical - 105 Procedure - 91

Deaths - 29 Alive- 36

Sx - 74 Catheter - 17 Prenatal - 1

Deaths - 3 Alive 88Deaths - 7 Alive -98

Planned deliveries Updated Stats

2008-16

Page 31: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

The Proposal

• Make Fetal heart evaluation mandatory

component of all targeted anomaly

scans

• Timing of scan: 16-20 weeks gestation

• Educate regarding the standard protocol

for conduct and reporting of scan.

• Referral of cases which fail screening to

higher level of expertise.

Page 32: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Action Plan

• Form a core advisory group – experts from

fields of cardiology, Obstetrics, Radiology

and Fetal Medicine.

• Training module and workshops – in Govt

medical colleges/academic

institutions/district hospitals

• Advanced training for selected doctors who

wish for higher level of expertise( ToTs)

• Maintain a database of all records, follow-

up of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Page 33: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Training Modules: Format

• Duration: Half day.

• Awareness about CHD, indications for fetal echo.

• Technique of screening : lectures, Live demos, Hands-on training using locally available equipment.

• Educate on reporting fetal heart evaluation.

• Basic tips for counseling if anomaly detected

• Guidelines for referral.

Page 34: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

Suggested downstream plan if an

anomaly is detected …

• System for referral to the nearest pediatric

cardiology expert.

• Counseling and pregnancy management

planning.

• Option of planned delivery for correctable,

critical problems.

• Support for heart surgery after birth.

Page 35: Fetal Heart Evaluation for all pregnancies: A Proposal

70340 28773