Face Negotiation Theory Written by: Stella Ting- Toomey
Oct 24, 2014
Face Negotiation Theory
Written by: Stella Ting-Toomey
Development of FNTFace - Negotiation Theory (FNT) was developed by Stella Ting-Toomey (1985), a communication professor at California State University, Fullerton“Face” according to sociologist Erving Goffman is “the positive social value of a person effectively
claims for her/himself by the line others assume s/he has taken during a particular contact.”
Theorist Background
Born in Hong Kong She move to the U.S. in the summer of 1972, to attend
the University of Iowa. She was attende at three U.S. universities
1. Iowa2. New Jersey3. Southern California
Professor at California State University at Fullerton (CSUF)
Mother to a biracial child.
What is Face Negotiation Theory?
Concept that deals with how different people and cultures place importance and value on identity and how conflict is handled by those within those cultures.
Idea of “face” as representative of the identity a person has and how the culture someone is in places importance on the individual and society.
Deals with how people gain “positive” or “negative” face, based on how others perceive them.
1. Culture
• Represent the two major differences between the Collectivist and Individualistic cultures.
• Three important differences between the two. i. Perceive one-selfii. Personal goalsiii. Duty
1. Two-thirds of the world’s are born into collectivist cultures, while just under
2. One-third of the world’s• population lives in the individualistic culture
Collectivistic Culture
Collectivistic A collectivist culture is a people tend to view themselves as
members of groups and usually consider the needs of the group to be more important than the needs of individuals
a) Familiesb) Work unitsc) Tribesd) Nations
Individualistic Culture
Freewheeling• our self-concern with individual rights, not group
responsibilities Moral stance
• Attitude or view point that helps you make a decision
2. Different Self-Images within culture
People within a culture differ on the relative importance they place on individual self-sufficiency or group solidarity
1. Interdependent2. Independent
Step to which people conceive of themselves as relatively independent from, or connected to others.
Interdependent Self-Image in Collectivistic Culture
Collectivism emphasizes the interdependence of every human being.
Political Religious Economic Social outlook
Interdependent self-construal define themselves in terms of their relationships with others.
Independent Self-Image in Individualistic Culture
Concept of self is prevalent within individualistic cultures
self-reliance autonomy competition personal control individual goals
Independent Self-Image in Individualistic Culture
Relational reality of self-image
Overlap shows that an Individual might have more interdependent than a person raised in Collectivistic with a relative high independent self-construal.
Face-work Every culture is always
negotiating face. FNT states that people
from individualistic, low context cultures interact differently from collectivistic, high context cultures.
High/Low Context Cultures
3. Face Concern
Individualistic Collectivistic
1. Self-Face Maintenance 1. Mutual-Face Maintenance
2. Other-Face Maintenance
Public self-image that every member of society wants to claim for himself/herself.
Differs depending on differences in cultural and individual identities.
Four Types of Face-work:Face-restoration - protecting your own autonomy
Face-saving - protecting the autonomy of another person Face-giving - protecting another's need for inclusion
Face-assertion - protecting your own need for inclusion
4. Conflict Management The ways which various
cultures view face and their individual role in face-work will determine the approach to conflict management.
FNT maintains that inter-cultural conflict can be reduced by recognizing, understanding, accepting, and adapting to the differences with another's culture.
Face MovementsObliging- accommodatingCompromising- bargaining
Avoiding- withdrawingIntegrating- problem-solving
Dominating- competing
Summary of FNT Communication in all cultures is based on maintaining and
negotiating face. Face is problematic when identities are questioned. Differences in individualistic vs. collectivistic and small vs. large
power distance cultures profoundly shape face management. Individualistic cultures prefer self oriented face-work, and
collectivistic cultures prefer other oriented face-work. Behavior is also influenced by cultural variances, individual,
relational, and situational factors. Competence in intercultural communication is a culmination of
knowledge and mindfulness.