Nelson Mandela Leading Through Sports The use of Rugby in South Africa To What Extent did Nelson Mandela’s use of Rugby Help to Integrate South Africa? Name: Elizabeth Trent
Nelson Mandela Leading Through SportsThe use of Rugby in South Africa
To What Extent did Nelson Mandela’s use of Rugby Help to Integrate South
Africa?
Name: Elizabeth Trent
Abstract
Apartheid had controlled much of South Africa’s history. Nelson
Mandela just like many other people is a subject of its abuse. When
Mandela became President of South Africa he had many problems to take
on. In 1995 Nelson Mandela and his administration had the chance to
change the racial segregation of South Africa. This paper will investigate
the extent of Nelson Mandela’s use of rugby to help integrate South
Africa.
In order to answer this question, the 1995 Rugby World Cup and the
1999 Rugby World Cup are analyzed. The Springboks, the national rugby
team, were considered a white sport. Earlier in South Africa’s history the
Springboks had been banned from participating in international sporting
events in an attempt for them to end apartheid. When Nelson Mandela was
elected, he was able to secure the Rugby World Cup to be hosted in South
Africa. Additionally, the Springboks would be allowed to participate. From
there Nelson Mandela left it up to the people to decide whether or not they
wanted to support the team. To investigate this event Nelson Mandela’s
biography, articles on the Springboks, books about South Africa in the
twentieth century and speeches are used.
2
When examining the use of rugby as a tool to unite South Africa it can
be seen that the 1995 Springbok team was not very representative of the
country. However it can be seen that as time went on the governments
began to once again use rugby as a tool for unification of the country. The
team was increasing its amount of support from both races and by 1999 the
team represented a new South Africa. Nelson Mandela created a new idea
that rugby will always be a symbol for hope in the country.
Word Count: 296
Table of Contents
Page
Abstract 2
Introduction 4
Nelson Mandela and Rugby 6
History of the Springboks 6
Mandela and the Springboks 7
Preparing for the World Cup 8
Springboks in the World Cup 9
Tainted Image 11
Aspirations of South Africa 12
Continuing Change in 1999 13
Integration Over the Years 14
3
Conclusion 15
Bibliography 17
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to show the extent of Nelson Mandela’s
use of rugby in helping to integrate South Africa, following the end of
apartheid. Many people do not think to look past politics when thinking
about events such as the apartheid. The reason for looking at a post
apartheid South Africa is to prove that ruby played a major role in
integrating the country. Looking at rugby as more than a game will show
that sports can have great effects on people and even have the power to
change a nation. The situation in South Africa with rugby is unique and the
sport needs to be given more credit when it comes to ending apartheid.
South African horrors legally began in 1948 with the Prohibition of
Mixed Marriages Act. The Population Registration Act followed, which
4
classified people based on their race. Additionally, the Group Areas Act,
which separated racial groups, and the Suppression of Communism Act1
were passed in 1950.2 The physical separation of blacks and whites began in
1954 in the city of Sophiatown when ethnical ghettos were created and
blacks were forced to live there. Growing up, Nelson Mandela lived in an
ethnic ghetto called Qunu with his family. In response to these newly
passed laws, the first wave of Black Nationalism was seen in Sharpeville. On
March 21, 1960 a riot broke out and 67 Africans died. Following the riot the
African National Congress declared a day of mourning out of consideration
for the dead. 3
Nelson Mandela became active in politics long before obtaining his
law degree. However, his actions began to impact South Africa efficiently
while he was studying at Witwatersrand University, where he earned a law
degree. In 1944 he was elected into the executive committee of the ANCYL
(African National Congress Youth League), and later he became the ANCYL
President in 1951. His problems began when he was first arrested in the
1950s for heading the ANC’s defiance campaign.4 He was put under
banning orders for six months. Mandela became upset with the way things
were planning out and declared that the time for passive resistance was 1 This act made the communist political group illegal and the government could decide who could hold office. The government could outlaw certain people from running for government if they were believed to be a communist. 2 William Beinart, Twentieth-Century South Africa, Oxford University Press, 2001, Pg.xiii-xvii3 Norman Phillips, The Tragedy of Apartheid: A journalist’s Experiences in the South African Riots, Van Rees Press, 1960, Pg. 3-15. 4 Elleke Boehmer, Nelson Mandela: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2008, Pg. 38-39.
5
over. In 1956 he was arrested again, the trial lasted until 1961 and he was
later acquitted. The final straw was on August 5, 1962 when he was
arrested for trying to leave South Africa illegally. He was later charged with
sabotage, the promotion of guerrilla warfare and planning an armed
invasion.5 On June 12, 1964 he was sentenced to life in prison.
While in prison, South African conditions worsened. In 1967 they
passed the Terrorism Act, making it legal to detain someone without a fair
trial. Mandela’s wife Winnie was a victim of this law. On an international
note, the United Nations declared apartheid a crime against humanity, as a
way to help stop the apartheid in South Africa. In an attempt to stop South
Africa, the United Nations Security Council stationed arms embargos. The
message still did not get across to the people of South Africa. A “Release
Mandela” campaign was launched in 1980 sparking an international cry for
the release of the prisoner.6
In 1977 an international attempt to hurt South Africa was seen in the
Gleneagles Agreement, discouraging sporting contact with the country. In
1979 the French government announced South Africa was not welcome to
play rugby in their country. Across the globe, specifically in London,
England, there were many protests to end apartheid.7 People everywhere
were showing their discontent with South Africa and their apartheid ways.
South Africans felt the pain in 1981 when the Springboks, the national 5 Tom Lodge, Mandela: A Critical Life, Oxford University Press, 2006, Pg. 108.6 Rita Barbard, The Cambridge Companion to Nelson Mandela, Cambridge University Press, 2014, Pg. 73.7 Coombes, Annie, History After Apartheid, Duke University Press, 2003, Pg. 279-281.
6
rugby team, went on a tour in New Zealand. They faced many riots, because
New Zealand prided itself on being racially equal. Losing rugby made the
black community happy, because for so long the team represented
apartheid. The divide increased. Mandela was released from prison in 1990.
Nelson Mandela and Rugby
Nelson Mandela was elected president of South Africa in 1994. After
he came into office the hardest job to tackle was the racial divide. He
crossed over the political divide by winning the election, however the social
divide was still prominent.8 Mandela finally came up with an idea to unite
the races rugby. Sports have the power to make people come together and
create a bond. For so long that bond has been only within a person’s race.
His goal was to expand that bond across different races. He set up a
meeting with François Pienaar, the captain of the Springboks.9 In the
meeting, a plan was created to make rugby a sport loved by all races.10
Mandela needed the team to do well, because the base of his leadership
depended on their success. South Africa was chosen to host the Rugby
World Cup and this was a very important time for the country. The world
was nervous about sending their players to a place that for so long
8 The towns in South Africa were mainly created based on race. The blacks lived in ghettos outside of the city, while whites lived in nicer areas. 9 Martin Meredith, Mandela, PublicAffairs, 2010, Pg. 522-55410 François Pienaar said, “He talked about the power sport had to move people and how he had seen this not long after his release in the Barcelona Olympics, which he especially remembered for one particular moment when he said he stood up and he felt the whole stadium reverberating.” John Carlin, Invictus, Penguin Books, Pg. 163
7
discriminated against any race that was not white. Mandela essentially
asked Pienaar to help him rebuild South Africa. Pienaar used this meeting
as a catalyst for the team to work harder and do their best to win the
tournament. When looking at the situation, it was imperative for the sake of
South Africa that the team won.11
History of the Springboks
The Springboks are the national rugby team of South Africa. The
white population of South Africa always only supported the Springboks. In
the black community they represented apartheid and a dark time in history.
As the white Europeans began to throw money at the team, their status
grew from a common to elite sport, furthering the divide. Even in 1995
during the World Cup there was only one black person on the team named
Chester Williams. The black population religiously followed soccer, and
whenever they got the chance they cheered against the Springboks. For the
past few years leading up to the World Cup, the Springboks were not
welcome to play by the international community. The first blow to the
Springboks was in 1977 when the Gleneagles Agreement was signed,
discouraging athletic competition with South Africa. The team’s level of play
began to decrease. This began to create a discontent amongst the white
population of South Africa.
In 1981 the team traveled to New Zealand and when they arrived they
were greeted by an array of riots. The people of New Zealand prided
11 Carlin, Pg. 164
8
themselves on their racial equality and did not believe that South Africa
should get to participate in anything that would further the country until
they ended apartheid.12 Nelson Mandela knew the history of the Springboks
and understood that he needed to win the trust of the white population.
Mandela’s ability to understand the people is one of the reasons he is
regarded as one of the best leaders from South Africa.
Mandela and the Springboks
Nelson Mandela knew that improved relations between the races
would only come from a common goal. For his whole political career,
Mandela did not have the whites support, which was vital for the success of
the country. In 1993 he secured the 1995 Rugby World Cup, allowing South
Africans to support the team they longed to see play internationally.13
Mandela temporarily lost faith that his plan is working when right-
wing extremists killed John Heyns. Heyns was killed because he played a
pivotal part in getting the members of his church to believe apartheid was a
sin. While trying to find the men who committed the crime he came across
positive Intel. While in Pretoria, he heard some men talking about how they
could not do anything to hurt Mandela or his cause because he gave them
back rugby.14 It was from that moment Mandela knew rugby would win the
right wings hearts.
12 “1981 Springbok Tour”, Ministry for Culture and Heritage, <http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/culture/1981-springbok-tour.>13Barnard, Pg. 234+14 The man said, ‘No you cant do that! Look at what they have done for rugby, look at the international rugby they have given us.’
9
In that original meeting with Pienaar, Mandela made it clear rugby
was going to be used for nation building. The ANC15 agreed that hosting the
World Cup would be good for the country. However, they wanted to change
the team name because to the black community it represented the horrors
of apartheid. This idea was leaked to the general public, enraging many
Afrikaners. Afrikaners are white and typically come from a Dutch origin.
Mandela decided to step in and stop them from changing the name with the
sole goal of protecting the current peace with the white population. He
wanted to show that just because black people now had power, they were
not going to destroy the only world the Afrikaners knew.16 By doing this
Mandela was gaining trust from the white community and showing is strong
leadership capabilities.
Preparing for the World Cup
Mandela needed influential rugby lovers like Louis Luyt to change his
views. Luyt was the President of the South African Rugby Football Union.
During the past few exhibition games Luyt was seen waving the old South
African flag and singing the old national anthem. After being approached by
Mandela and others Luyt began to change his ways. He appointed Edward
Griffiths, and Morné du Plessis, who would work with the team on their
appearance. He came up with the Springboks new slogan, “One Team, One
Country”.17
15 The ANC is the African National Congress, and it was the party that Nelson Mandela was apart of. The ANC gain more control over South Africa when Mandela came into power. 16 Meredith, Pg. 22517 Carlin, Pg. 173
10
The next step was for the team to embody their country. Anne Munnik
and Du Plessis taught the team the new national anthem.18 Mandela did not
want the men to be sitting on the sidelines and not be able to sing their own
national anthem. He needed them, white and black, to sing the same song
together. Mandela needed the team to win so that he would not have to face
the backlash of supporting the team from his peers. Secondly he needed the
people of South Africa to be on their best behavior, because the whole
world was waiting for something to go wrong. At the time hosting the Rugby
World Cup was one of the only ways South Africa could show the
international community that they were united.
Springboks in the World Cup
Before the Springboks first game against Australia,19 on May 25,
1995, motivating statement for the team. After that game, the Springboks
took a trip to Robben Island, the prison that held many political prisoners
like Mandela. They learned about South Africa’s past and why change was
so important. Following, Mandela gave a speech on nation building, and
how both the blacks and whites needed to give a little for the good of the
country. Both sides had to be willing to accept the other.
The hard part for the black population was accepting the team as
their own. For so long people taught their children to hate the Springboks.
Mandela made the team visit black camps, such as Zwide. While there, they
were to interact with young children and begin to integrate themselves into
18 Carlin, pg. 174-17519 The Springboks won their game against Australia.
11
a new South Africa, where race does not matter. Mandela’s own bodyguard,
Moonsamy, admitted accepting the team was hard at first. South Africa’s
allegiance to the Springboks would be tested in their next game against a
dark skinned Western Samoans20 team. Typically the black population
cheered against the Springboks, but the team began to see in the stands
and in the streets that all races were cheering for them.21
The Springbok team had made it to the finals of the Rugby World Cup,
and the atmosphere of South Africa was different. Mandela was wearing a
green Springbok’s jersey and entered into a stadium full of people yelling
his name. People were amazed that he was able to forgive and be one with
the people of South Africa.22 Regardless of race everyone was cheering for
the Springboks. Moonsamy said, “We were so tense during the game. We
were so close at the end of it. The black and white groups in our unit: we
were now indistinguishable. All of us going absolutely crazy with relief and
joy.”23 The people of South Africa had found something they had in common
the Springboks. Justice Bekebeke explained that from that moment the
white South Africa he knew was redefined.24 Everything changed from that
winning moment. It was best explained when François Pienaar accepted the
trophy noting, “We didn’t have 62,000 fans behind us. We had 43 million
20 The Springboks won their game against the Western Samoans. 21 Meredith, Pg. 526-52722 Carlin, Pg. 22123 Carlin, Pg. 22224 Ibid, Pg. 225
12
South Africans.”25 From that moment it was evident to the people and the
international community that change would happen.
The only black player on the team was Chester Williams and South
Africa saw this as a problem. This was a byproduct of apartheid and it
showed the white population that they had discouraged many blacks from
participating in rugby at a high level. At schools in Eastern Cape and Xhosa,
which were predominantly black, the people were avid rugby players and
supporters. However, the poor sport facilities in their communities
discouraged them from continuing to play.26 The 1995 Rugby World Cup
showed the community that they needed to open up to the black community
and encourage them to pursue a career in not only professional rugby, but
also any sports.
Tainted Image
Following the Springboks victory their uplifting effect began to fade.
As they switched from a hated team to a professionally loved team, there
were many financial disputes.27 The people of South Africa began to see that
the team they supported were not as concerned with the nation, but the
money they were given. In 1996 it looked as if progress was reversing.
During an All Black team tour, South African fans were seen waving the old
flag. This was seen as the opposite of what the world cup was suppose to
25 Ibid, Pg. 22726 Frankental, Sally and Sichone, Owen, South Africa’s Diverse Peoples: A Reference Sourcebooks, ABC-CLIO, 2005, Pg. 276-27927 Albert Grundlingh, From Redemption to Recidivism?, Sporting Traditions, 1998, Pg. 79
13
do. Du Plessis tried to announce that the Springboks did not play for those
that were returning to the old flag.28
The fans were returning to apartheid behavior. Mandela’s plan
seemed to be falling apart. During all this tension, the international
community began to believe South Africa would never be able to achieve
peace. It seemed that the people did not want to. In 1996 the Springboks
lost to the All Blacks and two key players, François Pienaar and Joel
Stransky were released from the team.29 This was seen as controversial
because during the ’95 World Cup they were seen as the change and
rebuilders of South Africa. Following their release, Du Plessis and Luyt
were dismissed. Many problems arrived when Chester Williams, the sole
black player of the team, would not sign a contract with the South African
Rugby Football Union. The discontent continued when the Springbok head
coach, Andre Markgraaff, resigned.30 To everyone in the world it seemed
that the South Africa in 1995 was not the South Africa in 1997.
Races were once again segregating and the black resistance became
stronger. The people did not believe in the new South Africa, wondering
why South Africa was returning to their old ways. The editor of the Weekly
Mail and Guardian commented on the changes, stating, “When South Africa
characterizes itself as ‘one nation’ it is less a statement of fact than the
28 Ibid, Pg. 8029 “Rugby Football History”, Introduction to Rugby Football to SA, <http://www.rugbyfootballhistory.com/south_africa.html>30 Grundlingh, Pg. 80-81
14
expression of aspiration.”31 This means that the people of South Africa
wanted Rugby to solve all of its problems, so they placed all of their
excitement in the team. Once the euphoria ended they did not know how to
conduct themselves.
In 1996 at Fernwood, a school in South Africa, made it mandatory for
all the boys to try out for rugby. Other sports that were popular amongst
the black population such as soccer and basketball were being neglected.
The school was trying to save their reputation as a “white” school and was
trying to attach rugby to a certain race.32 Again this shows how rugby plays
an important role in heightening the status of different organizations.
However, schools and places like Fernwood were doing it the wrong way.
Nelson Mandela and the Springboks wanted to show the country that the
sport was not suppose to be tied to anyone race but the community as a
whole.
Aspirations of South Africa
No one can take away the Springboks success in 1995. It unified
people even though they did not stay whole for too long, but the old
practices of South Africa could never return. There was too much change in
their society apartheid to re-emerge.33 Rugby was a powerful symbol of
change in South Africa. The sport took the past of South Africa and made it
so the people could never return back. Rugby could never be regarded as
31 Ibid, Pg. 82-8332 Dolby, Nadine, Constructing Race, State University of New York Press, Albany, 2001, Pg. 49-52.33 Carlin, Pg. 252-253
15
just a white sport because all the people of the country had supported the
Springboks together. The spiritual ownership of the team had been
extended to all races and corners of South Africa.
What the Springboks did was not completely reinvent South Africa
and change all of its social policies. The team took the current state of an
internationally hated country and gave it hope. The team made it impossible
for the whites to claim rugby as their own. It gave both races a connection
that now could never be broken. They also made it impossible for South
Africa to return to an apartheid state. Nelson Mandela used the team to
give hope to the people and the idea that they can one day change the way
they live. Rugby in South Africa use to be run by ethnic motives and now it
is run with capitalistic interests.34 This is a positive move because no longer
can only whites participate in rugby; it is based off talent and who can get
the most money.
Continuing Change in 1999
In 1999 the Rugby World Cup was about to be played. South Africa
once again wanted to use the team for nation building. Rian Oberholzer, the
Chief Executive of SARFU, was quoted saying, “We decided at a meeting a
year ago that we wanted the World Cup to be used as a vehicle for nation-
building, something that was done very successfully in 1995.”35 The
government used Nelson Mandela’s voice in the advertisements to improve
national unity, while promoting the 1999 World Cup. The current president, 34 Grundlingh, Pg. 8435 Farquharson, Karen, and Timothy Marjoribanks, Transforming the Springboks: Re-imagining the South African Nation through Sport, 2003. Pg. 64
16
Thabo Mbeki, appeared in front of the public wearing a Springboks jersey,
just like Mandela did. They were once again trying to push for unity among
all South Africans.
When the 1999 World Cup team was announced four black players
were listed.36 The ANC released an official statement about how they wish
the team luck as they carry the aspirations of South Africa.37 This statement
shows that the government was not going to give up because of a rough
patch. They believed that the country could one day achieve full unity. The
media confirmed that the current government was trying to accomplish
what Mandela did through rugby. Even though the country lost its way for a
while after the tournament. The people of South Africa always clung to the
hope that one day they will unite forever.
The country had already been politically integrated. The 1995 World
Cup and the work of Mandela created a lasting legacy. The legacy was not
that he change South Africa using the rugby team during the World cup, it
was the hope he gave the people. As stated above the people resorted to old
ways when they became discouraged. But never went back to apartheid. It
may have been hard to see at the time but Mandela made a lasting change
on the people of South Africa. This legacy was seen in the 1999 World Cup
36Ibid, Pg. 937 “The people of South Africa are wholly behind [coach] Nick Mallett, [captain] Joost van der Westhuizen and the rest of the squad. They carry with them the dreams and aspirations of the whole country in the glorious pursuit of further international honours.” Ibid, Pg. 9
17
because the government was using the team once again and they know that
Mandela was the reason for all this change in the country.
Integration over the Years
In 1995 South Africa had a black president and a black player on the
national rugby team. Society was not coming together. Mandela used the
1995 World Cup rugby team to head his plan for integration. The team was
being used to introduce new ideas and ways of living to South Africa.
December 31, 1994 Mandela gave his New Years address to the people. In
this speech he listed his hopes and goals for South Africa. He wanted to
improve the black communities relationship with the law and the individual
police officers. He wanted to keep their democracy intact and push the
country to a brighter future. Overall, he wanted South Africa to be soldiers
of peace and unity.38
From 1996 to 1999 it seemed the people had lost their way. There was
no observable progress being made. Then for the new World Cup team they
announced that four black players made the team. The team needed to
represent all of South Africa. The SARFU began to give more support to the
black players. Coaches realized that when choosing the national team, it
had to be color-blind. If all white people made the team it had to be because
they were the best of the best.39 When the country could realize that people
were not being cut because of their race but because of their talent then it
38 Nelson Mandela, New Year’s Message by President Nelson Mandela for 1996, December 31, 1995.39 Farquharson, Karen, and Timothy Marjoribanks, Pg. 13
18
would show that they can be more accepting. This was a step in increasing
equality in South Africa.
Conclusion
Nelson Mandela used rugby because it was a potential symbol for
unity. He was using the enemy of his people as a weapon to achieve a larger
goal. He knew that if he took a white dominated sport and opened it up to
the whole country then they would not be able to have anything anymore
that was solely for the white population. Slowly the people would begin to
have similar interests and then they would not be separate. After the World
Cup when the people began to return to old ways, it seemed that all hope
was lost. It seemed all people had was hope and dreams. They wanted
South Africa to change but did not know how to begin. Rugby is, and always
will be, a symbol for change in South Africa. Rugby opened the doors for
many opportunities for social change. If Nelson Mandela had not backed the
Springboks then most likely the change would not have happened. Mandela
took something hated by a group of people and turned it into something
that they could support. He opened up the people’s eyes to the need for
social change and the advancement of South Africa.
While Mandela’s use of rugby did not immediately solve all of South
Africa’s problems, the plan allowed for the country to begin the healing
process. It took many years for the people to accept one another and still
today, a year after Mandela’s death some people are not willing to
integrate. Nelson Mandela as an individual stands for change and loving
19
one another. He was the leader that South Africa needed and was able to
create a lasting change for the people. Sports have a way of speaking to the
people and connecting them all over the globe. The World Cup, in any sport,
allows for all corners of the globe to come together, share cultures and
creates a peaceful universe. The Rugby World Cup did just that, it showed
the international community that South Africa was coming together and
working towards bettering their community.
My goal in this essay was to show that Nelson Mandela and the
Springboks did not change South Africa during any one moment. However,
they changed the country by continuously challenging the boundaries. They
gave the people hope and a reason to change. Essentially Mandela did not
change South Africa; he shaped it into what the people wanted it to be.
Without the people of South Africa knowing, he created a way for them to
unite and become one. While there were some problems along the way,
Mandela created an ideal South Africa that the people needed to strive to
be. It is time to look past the politics and see how sports can change a
country. Sports are typically overlooked when it comes to significant
change. Nelson Mandela gave the people a way to integrate socially
through rugby creating a new community. Sports have the power to change
more than people think and Nelson Mandela showed the world just that.
20
Bibliography
1. "1981 Springbok Tour." The 1981 Springbok Rugby Tour -. Ministry for Culture and Heritage, n.d. Web. 20 Aug. 2014. http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/culture/1981-springbok-tour.
2. Barnard, Rita. "Messiah: The Return." The Cambridge Companion to Nelson Mandela. New York: Cambridge UP, 2014. 234+. Print.
3. Beinart, William. "A State Without a Nation, 1880-1948." Twentieth-century South Africa. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994. 44+. Print.
4. Boehmer, Elleke. "Embodiment of the Law." Nelson Mandela: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. 77+. Print.
5. Carlin, John. Invictus. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print.
6. Coombes, Annie E. History after Apartheid: Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa. Durham: Duke UP, 2003. Print.
7. Dolby, Nadine. Constructing Race: Youth, Identity, and Popular Culture in South Africa. Albany: State U of New York, 2001. Print.
8. Farquharson, Karen, and Timothy Marjoribanks. "Transforming the Springboks: Re-imagining the South African Nation through Sport." Social Dynamics 29.1 (2003): 27-48. Web.
21
9. Frankental, Sally, and Owen Sichone. South Africa's Diverse Peoples: A Reference Sourcebook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2005. Print.
10. Lodge, Tom. "Leading From Prison." Mandela: A Critical Life. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006. 155+. Print.
11. Mandela, Nelson. "New Year’s Message by President Nelson Mandela for 1996." New Year Message. South Africa. 31 Dec. 1995. Speech
12. Meredith, Martin. "Reinventing South Africa." Nelson Mandela. New York: St. Martin's, 1997. 522-54. Print.
13. Phillips, Norman Charles. The Tragedy of Apartheid; a Journalist's Experiences in the South African Riots. New York: D. McKay, 1960. Print.
14. Grundlingh, Albert. "From Redemption to Recidivism? Rugby and Change in South Africa During the 1995 Rugby World Cup and Its Aftermath." Sporting Traditions14.2 (1998): 79+. Web.
15. "RugbyFootballHistory.com." Rugby Football History. N.p., 2007. Web. 06 Dec. 2014.
22