Top Banner
1 Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance Four important factors in analyzing fund performance: 1. Returns 2. Investment Style and Risk 3. Portfolio Composition 4. Turnover and Taxes Examining these factors reflects how a fund performed in the past. Past performance may not guarantee future performance.
25

Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Baby

Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance. Four important factors in analyzing fund performance: 1. Returns 2. Investment Style and Risk 3. Portfolio Composition 4. Turnover and Taxes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

1

Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

Four important factors in analyzing fund performance:

1. Returns

2. Investment Style and Risk

3. Portfolio Composition

4. Turnover and Taxes

Examining these factors reflects how a fund performed in the past. Past performance may not guarantee future performance.

Page 2: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

2

Returns

•Returns can be generated through:

1. Dividend Distributions

2. Capital Gains Distributions

3. NAV through unrealized Capital Gains

•The importance of each component varies with the type

of fund.

•Growth, Capital Appreciation, Foreign funds - realized

and unrealized Capital gains;

•Bond fund, Equity Income fund - Dividend and income

Page 3: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

3

Returns

Returns can be generated through:

1. Dividend Distributions

2. Capital Gains Distributions

3. NAV through unrealized Capital Gains

Page 4: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

4

Returns - Dividends

• Dividends - also called investment income, has two sources:

1. Cash dividends paid stocks (quarterly)

2. Interest payments made by bonds and other fixed income securities (Quarterly or semi- annually).

• Fund distributes income according to its own distribution schedule (monthly, quarterly,….).• Elect to receive cash or reinvest in the fund at its NAV

Page 5: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

5

Returns - Dividends

• Undistributed dividends are placed in a money market fund (Cash like securities) until regularly scheduled payout date.

• Ex-dividend Date : On the day the fund distributes its income, NAV per share declines by the amount of cash payout. The date on which the NAV is reduced is called Ex-dividend date. Board sets the ex-dividend date.

Page 6: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

6

Returns - Capital Gains

• NAV can be affected by

1. Realized Capital Gains;

2. Unrealized Capital Gains.• Realized Gains are any capital gains on securities that a manager has sold out of the fund’s portfolio.• Tax law permits capital gains to be distributed once a year. During the year, fund keeps track of realized capital gains and losses. • Net Capital Gains are distributed. • Elect to reinvest net capital gains, usually at POP.

Page 7: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

7

Returns - Capital Gains

• Unrealized Gains are fund’s paper profits. As market

price of securities rises, the NAV per share also increases.

• Any unrealized losses are also reflected on fund’s NAV.

• Therefore, total return from a mutual fund for a given year is determined by the dividend distributions, net capital gains distributions, and NAV due to unrealized capital gains.

Page 8: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

8

Total Return

• Total return is computed for a given period of time, such

as YTD, 1- year, 3-years, 5-years, 10-years, etc., as

mandated by SEC.

•Total Return = ENAV-BNAV+DIST+DIV

BNAV

– ENAV = NAV at the end of period;– BNAV = NAV at the beginning of period;– DIST = capital gains distributions during the period;– DIV = dividend income during the period.

Page 9: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

9

Total Return

• Based on Washington Mutual Investors Fund’s NAV

(Fig. 5.3):

•Total Return = $32.91-$30.35+$2.6+$0.61 = 19.01%

$30.35

•Annualized Total Return

•Average Annualized Total Return

Page 10: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

10

Total Return

• Discrepancy in computing Average Annualized Total

Return:

• Fig. 5.3- 1996, 1997, 1998 returns are 20.16%, 33.29%

and 19.37%, respectively. Therefore,

–Average Annualized Total Return:

•(20.16+ 33.29+19.37)/3 = 24.28%, but in

Fig 5.1, 3-year average is 22.9%

Page 11: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

11

Total Return and Cost

• On-going expenses such as management fees, custodial

fees, directors’ fees, 12b-1 fees) are deducted each day

when fund computes NAV. Therefore, total return factors

in on going expenses.

• Sales load (back end or front end) and redemption fees

are not factored in. Known as load-adjusted total return.

It is less than total return. Not widely publicized.

• SEC regulations mandate the formulas to be used as

well as how the information must be presented.

Page 12: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

12

Total Return and Cost

• On-going expenses such as management fees, custodial

fees, directors’ fees, 12b-1 fees) are deducted each day

when fund computes NAV. Therefore, total return factors

in on going expenses.

• Sales load (back end or front end) and redemption fees

are not factored in. Known as load-adjusted total return.

It is less than total return. Not widely publicized.

• SEC regulations mandate the formulas to be used as

well as how the information must be presented.

Page 13: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

13

Evaluating Total Return

• Analyze Total Return by:

1. Reviewing the return over 3 or more years; how it has

performed during various bull and bear market cycles.

2. Comparing returns with those of its peers over the same

periods;

3. Comparing return to an appropriate benchmark.

•Review Morningstar Mutual Fund Report

•Review Value Line Mutual Fund Report

Page 14: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

14

Investment Style and Risk

• Large diversified fund protects investors against a

decrease in the price of a single security.

• Mutual funds do not protects their investors against

market or systematic risk.

• Risks associated with a mutual fund are determined by:

1. Fund’s investment objective;

2. Portfolio manger’s investment style.

Page 15: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

15

Investment Style and Risk

•What is Investment Style?

–On what basis does the manger choose the securities;

– How does the fund manager analyze the securities.

• Three primary types of investment style

1. Value

2. Growth

3. Momentum.

Page 16: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

16

Investment Style - Value

•Value Investing

– Invest in companies whose current market value appears to be

below the company’s real worth;

–stock is below the value of comparable companies in the same

business;

• Manger utilize fundamental analysis to assess value;

valuation techniques of the flowing type is often used:

– Price/ Earnings approach

– Price/ Book Value approach

–Dividend Growth approach

Page 17: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

17

Investment Style - Growth• Growth Investing

– Portfolio manager selects company based on expectation of

strong growth;

– underlying belief is that if a company’s earnings growth meets or exceeds analysts’ expectations, the stock price will appreciate.

• Earnings announcements and price volatility:– Stock price volatility is high during the period leading up to quarterly earnings announcements;

– This volatility reflects the price movement of a growth fund; can be a Manger utilize fundamental analysis to assess value;

Page 18: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

18

Investment Style - Growth• Two earnings figures that determine the markets’ and

managers’ reactions:

–1. Earnings figure published by analysts. Usually more

conservative number with build in contingencies surrounding

the company and sector;

–2. Whisper number. Amount analysts expect if all

contingencies are realistically priced.

• If the reported earnings exceeds expectations, price will increase, and vice versa.• If earnings growth is projected to slow down, price will fall.

Page 19: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

19

Investment Style - Growth/Value

• GARP - Growth at a Reasonable Price. A conservative

approach that is a combination of growth and value

styles.

– Primary method is : Price- to -Sales per share approach.

• Fundamental valuation techniques may not be

applicable for such companies.

Page 20: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

20

Investment Style -Momentum Investing

• Momentum Investing:

–Portfolio manager believes that the market value of the stock

will increase rapidly;

–Ignores value measures when selecting stocks; stocks may be

overvalued or undervalued;

– As long as there are strong ‘buy’ recommendations, sales and

earnings continue to grow, exceeding expectations, stock price

will continue to rise;

– Style resembles ‘herd mentality’.

•This style is not in favor now.

Page 21: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

21

Investment Style -Other Considerations

• Other Considerations:

–Socially Responsible Investing:

•Green Funds - focuses on Environmental Issues;•Fund may not invest in companies that exploits workers in foreign countries - case of South Africa.

–Investing based on Insider trading:

• Follow the smart Money:

• Portfolio manager tracks the trading patter of senior executives and other insiders in the company;

• Their activities are reported to the SEC- public knowledge.

Page 22: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

22

Other Risk Considerations

• For Foreign and Global Funds:

– Currency Risk

– Country Risk

•For Bond Funds

– Bond Quality

– Interest Rate Risk

Page 23: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

23

Turnover and Taxes• Turnover measures how often the total holding is changed.

• 100% turnover - holding is changed once a year;• 300% turnover - holding is changed three times a year;

• Low turnover is characteristic of a ‘Buy-hold’ policy;

–Large Cap, Value investing, Bond fund etc.,

• High turnover indicative of active trading strategy:

–Aggressive growth, Capital appreciation, momentum trading

•High turnover creates higher transaction cost. Return must

reflect this added cost.

Page 24: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

24

Turnover and Taxes

•High turnover is not always bad. Turnover should be

judged against the objective of the fund.

• Investors may equate high turnover with market

savvy and intelligence of the fund manager.

• When market performs well, investors ignore

turnover and other cost associated with it. When

market is flat or performing poorly, this cost stands

out.

Page 25: Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance

25

Turnover and Taxes

•High turnover will result in higher realized capital

gains (losses);

•Capital gains must be distributed the year it is

realized; investors may be presented with a high tax

liability;

• Distributed capital gains qualifies for short term or

long term gains depending on the length of holding;

• A fund manager,with an eye toward tax efficiency,

may minimize capital gains by lowering turnover.