Top Banner
EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City
16

EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Tania Matthes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

EPIRA: Impact to Workers

September 24, 2012Cebu City

Page 2: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

The EPIRA IRR, Rule 33, Section 5. mandates “The Preferential Rights

of Employees”Displaced or separated personnel as a result of

the restructuring and privatization of NPC assets shall be given preference in the hiring of manpower requirements of the newly-created offices or the privatized companies: Provided, That the displaced or separated personnel meet the prescribed qualifications. With respect to employees who are not retained by NPC, the DOLE shall endeavor to implement re-training, job counselling, and job placement programs.( But this never happened)

Page 3: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

What happened? Massive job losses due to

retrenchmentWORKERS 1994 1997 2003 2012

NAPOCOR 17,000 13,500

TRANSCO 7,400

NPC 1,500

Residual Force

200

NGCP 4,500

TOTAL 6,200

Page 4: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

GR No. 156208, NPC DAMA vs. NPC, September 17, 2008

• What the Supreme Court says?• NPC employees, who were illegally terminated to

give way to the re-organization of the corporation in 2002, are entitled to separation pay, back-wages, wage adjustments, and other benefits accruing from January 31, 2003 to the date of payment under a validly approved Separation Program.

• The Court said that as a logical and necessary consequence of its earlier decision, the terminated employees have the right to such benefits as it is already impossible for them to be reinstated.

• ADB says (PHP 34.7 B) is part of the cost of the Power Sector Restructuring Program.

Page 5: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

The restructuring lead to a systematic dislocation of regular work!

Retrenchment

Privatization of NAPOCOR and TRANSCO

Illegal dismissal

Non recognition of union

Discrimination on wages

Violation of Trade Union Rights

Multi-skill and multi-tasksRoll back benefits

Probationary of 165 days

Anti union bias

Page 6: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

• SC in G. R. 62386, entitled, BATELEC I Labor Union vs Young, G. R. No. 70880, entitled Bulacan II Electric Coop., vs Penaflor and G. R. 74560, entitled ALECO I vs Trajano, all dated November 9, 1988, which reads:

• “The common issue raised is whether or not employees of electric cooperatives are qualified to form or join labor organizations for purposes of collective bargaining”

• In Cooperative Rural Bank of Davao City, Inc. Vs Pura Ferrer-Calleja, Director, Bureau of Labor Relations, et al., G. R. No. 77951, September 26, 1988, it was held that an employee of a cooperative who is a member and co-owner thereof cannot invoke the right to collective bargaining.

• This drives the workers in the ECs to form “Employees Association” dependent on NEA policies and divisive to labor rights.

Page 7: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

• Creditors Offer - due to obligations owing to them, the creditors will be given first preference to make an offer to manage, operate and invest in ALECO

• Concession/Lease – for a concession/rental fee, allows the investor to manage, operate, repair, decommission and refurbish facilities in the service area (concession), pay obligations, for a term usually within the franchise period

• Investment Management Contract – involves substantial investments in and management of the EC by a private investor, the specific terms of which are governed by a contract

• Management Contract - private sector initiatives similar to Investment Management Contract except that, in this case, only management expertise is infused

NEA Prescription to Curable and Incurable ECs : Corporatization- a Threat to Workers!

7The appropriate initiatives shall be determined by ALECO and the investor with the best offer.

Page 8: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Investor Owned Utilities under EPIRA: Effects to Unions

• 2008, when the consumers petition the high electricity rates of Davao Light Power which are charged to system loss, the union “free light services” were roll-back, now case pending at Court of Appeals;

• Presently, the Mactan Electric Company are arbitrarily terminating regular workers for rendering “flying connection services” to consumers and hazards to safety and accidents are prevalent;

• In both IOUs, in violation of the DO No. 18-A series of 2011; contractual work are rampant ;

• Trend of electricity skilled workers are applying for abroad- a manifestation that the industry is not competitive in terms of wages and benefits.

Page 9: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

While jurisprudence states...• The preservation of the lives of the citizens is a

basic duty of the State, more vital than the corporate profits. (Manila Electric Company vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 78763, Jul. 12, 1989)

• Coupled with the concept of collective negotiation is the right of workers to “participate in policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law.” (1987 Constitution in Art. XIII, Social Justice and Human Rights)

• In most instances, these are denied and violated.

Page 10: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

• Why? Because of corporate control and grave abuse of management discretion…

Page 11: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Scheduled Maintenance and Forced Outage Rate

Operating

outage

Hydro Power Plant Water Availability

Typical Power Generation of Hydro Plants

1

2

Load Variations3

Typical Weekly Load of Mindanao

A disaster to the working class: Loss of Load Expectation of 180-days brownout in 2013 by curtailment at Mindanao (UP NEC Simulation)

Page 12: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Where are the workers?WORKERS ESTIMATED NUMBER

NPC 1,500

TRANSCO Residual Force 200

NGCP 4,500

Electric Cooperatives 24,000

Investor Owned Utilities 19 private companies

Contractual Workers unaccounted

MERALCO Consumers 4 Million

RECs Consumers 8 Million

Page 13: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

If those numbers are translated into a strong united labor front, then unions as vehicle can transform the situation…

Policies therefore, reflects a compromise in a social struggle between workers and employers…

If No Struggle = there is No Threat = and No Compromise

Compromise shifts the balance of power relations!

And Laws are Revised to reflect this shift.

Page 14: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

• In other words, workers have a stake in transforming the power industry.

• To do so, workers need to reclaim power – Political Power!

• But to reclaim political power, we need to:

Unify strong worker

sunions

Unify strong worker

sunions

Unify vigilant & progressiv

e consumer

groups

Unify vigilant & progressiv

e consumer

groups

Unify effective &

efficient manageme

nt

Unify effective &

efficient manageme

nt

Democratic power

governance is

institutionalize

Democratic power

governance is

institutionalize

Page 15: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Is Democratization and Reform of the EC possible? I subscribe Yes...

Based on the ALEO experience:• What was the context?• Why the workers union lead?• How do workers and consumers do it,

their role and significant contribution in the struggle?

• What is the alternative? • The ways forward!

Page 16: EPIRA: Impact to Workers September 24, 2012 Cebu City.

Thank you!