Top Banner
Engineering, Education & Modeling LER 590 - UE Week 2: From Math & Science to Modeling & Design David E. Goldberg IESE, IFoundry, and School of Labor and Employment Relations University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA [email protected]
29

Engineering Education & Modeling

May 17, 2015

Download

Education

Lecture 2 of the course Understanding Enginees by David E. Goldberg reviews how engineers are educated and the use of models in engineering. The course is taught in Labor and Employment Relations at the University of Illinois to masters students in human resources.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Engineering Education & Modeling

Engineering, Education & ModelingLER 590 - UE Week 2: From Math & Science to Modeling & Design

David E. GoldbergIESE, IFoundry, and School of Labor and Employment RelationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana, Illinois 61801 [email protected]

Page 2: Engineering Education & Modeling

Engineering: Education vs. Practice

• Math-science death march in first two years of engineering education is misleading.

• Implies: Meaningful models come from math & science alone.

• Young engineers confused on first jobs.• 2 problems:

– Don’t use appropriate models.– Don’t think they’re doing engineering.

• Need better understanding of (1) origins of engineering education, (2) types & breadth of engineering modeling.

Page 3: Engineering Education & Modeling

Roadmap

• What is engineering?• Engineering education, early days.• Engineering education today.• What is a model?• Legacy of Newton: equations versus words & images.• Matching models to problems.• What are models used for.• Tech visionaries as broad spectrum modelers.• Toulmin’s model of arguments as unifying approach.• Return to flour physics.• Simulated engineering experience 2 – SEE-2.

Page 4: Engineering Education & Modeling

© David E. Goldberg 2009

What is Engineering?

• You’re sitting in class at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

• Has one of the best engineering schools on the planet.

• What is engineering?• How would you define

it?

Mechanical Building & Drill Hall 1871

Page 5: Engineering Education & Modeling

© David E. Goldberg 2009

A Definition?

• Here: Engineering is the social practice of conceiving, designing, implementing, producing, & sustaining complex artifacts, processes, or systems appropriate to some recognized need.

• Artifacts primary object.• Science & math are among tools used for artifact conception &

support.• Social practice Engineered by and for people.• Social side as important as the physics.• Some engineered objects are physical, but all engineered objects are

social.

Page 6: Engineering Education & Modeling

Engineering Education: Origins

• France: Corps du Genie (1676) school, 1749; Corps des Ponts et Chausees (1747) Ecole de Ponts et Chausees (1775), 1st formal engineering school in world. 1794, Napoleon created Ecole des Travaux Publics Ecole Polytechnique: Heavy math.

• Britain: Royal Military Academy (Woolrich, 1741), but most works through apprenticeship, practical, enterprising men.

• US: hybrid, adopted French texts & curriculum, but English tradition held sway as well.

• 1778 Engineering department in US forces, 1779 as corps. Military school at West Point 1794 USMA in 1802

• Mechanics institutes: 1850 around 6000 including Franklin Institute. • 1824 Rensselaer School 1835 Rensselaer Institute • University of Virginia, 1833 courses in Civil Engineering• University of Alabama, 1837 civil engineering in connection with

railroads.

Page 7: Engineering Education & Modeling

Engineering Education Today

• Use Illinois curricula for IIGs.• Get into your IIGs.• Review curricula from your discipline.• Analysis: Hours, categories, distribution,

advanced technical content.• Comparison: Other degree types (LAS, ?).• Thoughts about preparation for world of work.

Page 8: Engineering Education & Modeling

What is a Model?

• A model is a system that represents one or more facets of some other system.

• Typical model facet combinations:– Drawing or solid model geometry.– Prototype geometry & operation.– Graph variation of variable with independent variable(s)

(time, space, etc.).– Equilibrium equation select state variables at steady

state.– Dynamic equation variation of select state variables with

time.– Computer simulation similar to equations.

Page 9: Engineering Education & Modeling

Models & Engineering Knowledge• Models capture what engineers

know about what exists or could exist.– Study of knowledge: Epistemology.– Study of existence: Ontology.

• What engineers know and how they know it?

• Walter Vincenti’s book takes examples from aeronautical history.

• Discusses distinctions between engineering knowledge and scientific-mathematical knowledge.

Page 10: Engineering Education & Modeling

Newton & Engineering Models

• Invented calculus (so did Leibniz).• In 1687 published Philosophiae

Naturalis Principia Mathematica.• Changed world.• Remarkable agreement between

equations & measurements.• Many engineering models use his

equations (F=ma) directly.• Represents an ideal of scientific

knowledge that others attempt to emulate.

• Highest status accorded to those who use these kinds of models.

• Does status = efficacy? Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727)

Page 11: Engineering Education & Modeling

Words, Language and Engineering Models

• Newton-style models dominate engineering equations.• Engineers often use natural language in modeling.• Many first models are verbal.• Types of verbal models:

– Single word or noun phrase.– Description of an object/process.– Feature list.– Dimension list.– Set of engineering specifications, standards, or

claims.

Page 12: Engineering Education & Modeling

Images and Engineering Modeling

• History of drawings and visual representations of engineered objects is long.

• Downgrading of engineering visualization and drawing since Cold War.

• Ferguson’s book argues this was/is educational mistake.

Page 13: Engineering Education & Modeling

Diagrams as Models

• Diagrams can be models.

• Drawings can be models.

• The Back of the Napkin connects visual thinking and verbal thinking in important way.

Page 14: Engineering Education & Modeling

How to Match Models to Engin Problems

• What characterizes an appropriate model in engineering?

• What do you think?• Take out a piece of paper

and write down 3 attributes that suggest you have a good model.

• 2 minutes.

Page 15: Engineering Education & Modeling

An Economy of Models

• Engineers think in terms of models.• Have many models with different precision-

accuracy and different costs.• Can we distinguish appropriate engineering

model usage from that of scientist?• The economics of modeling. • Engineers use models in economic context

model usage must support objectives within available resources.

Page 16: Engineering Education & Modeling

Fundamental Modeling Tradeoff • Error versus cost of modeling

ε, Error

C, Cost of Modeling

Engineer/Inventor

Scientist/Mathematician

Page 17: Engineering Education & Modeling

Spectrum of Models

Low Cost/High Error

High Cost/Low Error

Unarticulated Wisdom

Articulated QualitativeModel

DimensionalModels

FacetwiseModels

Equations of Motion

Page 18: Engineering Education & Modeling

What Are Models Good For?

• Many uses for models:– Description: describe the ways things are

(were).– Prediction: describe the ways things will be.– Prescription: describe the way things should

be. • Key variables: time and change.• Usually assumes have extant object to model.

Page 19: Engineering Education & Modeling

Research on Tech Visionaries as Clue

• Helpful to look at extreme exemplars of success.

• Price, Vojak, & Griffin have done work on tech visionaries (TVs).

• TV creates bottom line revenue from new products & services.

• TVs are consummate broad-spectrum modelers.

• Use qualitative-quantitative models as necessary to bring monster products/services to market. Ray Price

Page 20: Engineering Education & Modeling

Key Distinction: Imagined vs. Existing

• Modeling of imagined or desired objects versus extant objects (recall category creatory vs. enhancer).

• To model imagined or desired objects, what can we draw upon?– Existing objects that fail in some regard.– Similar or related objects.– Analogically related objects.– Creatively concocted objects.

• Problem of the tabula rasa: How to model that which does not exist.

• In category creation, more modeling will be to the left (qualitative versus quantitative).

• Category enhancement: improvements require more precision. More modeling to the right (quant over qual).

Page 21: Engineering Education & Modeling

• How can we model the burnt-flour-as-mold problem?

• Newton’s laws?• Need framework to tie

different models together.

Inside a Tortilla Factory 21

Page 22: Engineering Education & Modeling

Help from Argumentation Theory

• 1958 book by philosopher Stephen Toulmin formed basis of argumentation theory.

• How do people really make arguments?

• How do people give reasons for what they think or do?

• Form of reasoning ties together formal and informal engineering reasoning.

Page 23: Engineering Education & Modeling

Formal Reasoning: Logic

• Modus ponens (modus ponendo ponens: mode that affirms by affirming): – if p then q– p is true– therefore q is true

• Method of mathematical logic & formal reasoning.

• Note: Once premises and rules in place, formal logic derives conclusions mechanistically.

Aristotle (384-322 BCE)

Page 24: Engineering Education & Modeling

Toulmin: Elements of a Human Argument

• Like modus ponens:– Claim. A single statement advanced for the adherence of

others.– Grounds. A statement about persons, conditions, events, or

things that says support is available to provide a reason for a claim.

– Warrant. A general statement that justifies using the grounds as a basis for the claim

– Backing. Any support (specific instance, statistics, testimony, values, or credibility) that provides more specific data for the grounds or warrant.

– Qualifier. A statement that indicates the force of the argument (words such as certainly, possibly, probably, usually, or somewhat).

• Warrants can be generalizations, cause, sign, analogy, authority.• Backing can be anecdote, stats, testimony, credibility, and values.

Rieke, R. D & Sillars, M. O. (1997). Argumentation and critical decision making. New York: Longman.

G → C↑

B

W

Q↑

B

Page 25: Engineering Education & Modeling

Back to the Tortillas: Burnt Flour Model

Grounds. Dusting flour is spread onto the moving dough on a continuous tortilla line.

Warrant. Excess flour can become airborne and burn in the oven, deposit on tortilla.

Claim. Burnt black flour deposits is mistaken for mold, resulting in quality complaints

Qualifier. Sometimes

Backing. Client story & increased flour results in increased spot problem.

Page 26: Engineering Education & Modeling

Tradeoff: Improve Backing or Solve Problem

• In resource limited environment, often face decision:– Should you improve warrant and backing?– Or should you work on solving the problem?

• Difficult choice: If you assume correctness of warrant/backing & you are wrong, will it prevent you from solving problem.

• In tortilla problem students took explanation as true because it didn’t affect investigation.

Page 27: Engineering Education & Modeling

SEE-2: Lighting an LED

• Illinois & the Light-Emitting Diode (LED).

• Nick Holonyak, Jr. invented LED in 1962 at GE.

• BS, MS, PhD (1954) from UIUC.• John Bardeen’s first PhD student

at Illinois • Also invented semiconductor

laser.• Holder of 41 patents & Nick Holonyak, Jr, (b. 1954)

Page 28: Engineering Education & Modeling

Summary

• Engineering students are convinced that math and physics are the main (only?) tools of engineering.

• Real engineers use a spectrum of models from qualitative to quantitative.

• Economy of modeling separates engineering from scientific practice.

• Toulmin’s model of arguments introduced & example from flour physics given.

Page 29: Engineering Education & Modeling

Bottom Line

• Modeling is critical engineering activity, but don’t let emphasis on math-science mislead.

• Great engineers and tech visionaries are broad-spectrum modelers.

• Use simplest models that will advance design objectives (economy of modeling).

• Unify models by using Toulmin’s model of arguments & use explicitly to tradeoff model improvement vs. design.

• Will consider implications for HR & corporate training later.