Top Banner
Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski
29
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility

Peter Natkanski

Page 2: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

The business case for designing a New R&D FacilityThe business case for designing a New R&D FacilityThe Research Biology Center of Novartis Crop Protection in Stein/AGThe Research Biology Center of Novartis Crop Protection in Stein/AG

The business case for designing a New R&D FacilityThe business case for designing a New R&D FacilityThe Research Biology Center of Novartis Crop Protection in Stein/AGThe Research Biology Center of Novartis Crop Protection in Stein/AG

Jost Harr, Ph.D.

R&D Special Projects andPublic Affairs Europe

Novartis Crop Protection AG

Jost Harr, Ph.D.

R&D Special Projects andPublic Affairs Europe

Novartis Crop Protection AG

Page 3: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Decision to build new Research Facility in 1996Decision to build new Research Facility in 1996

Several mergers and acquisitions 1970-Several mergers and acquisitions 1970-1996 1996 Novartis has 5 research Novartis has 5 research sites in Switzerlandsites in Switzerland

Consolidation in preferably one site is Consolidation in preferably one site is desirabledesirable

Contrary to earlier projects, the final one Contrary to earlier projects, the final one had to be accomplished with a had to be accomplished with a veryvery lean budget of CHF 76 Mio (approx. $ 50 lean budget of CHF 76 Mio (approx. $ 50 Mio). Mio).

No compromises on qualityNo compromises on quality

Accommodate the desires and ideas of Accommodate the desires and ideas of users coming from 3 different users coming from 3 different company culturescompany cultures

Page 4: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

UsersUsers UsersUsers

Architect Architect Architect Architect

Management Management Management Management

Engineers Engineers Engineers Engineers

Page 5: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Engineers Engineers Architect Architect

ManagementManagement

UsersUsers

$$$$$$

Y=f(xY=f(x 33))

Page 6: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Some extremely safe ways to failure:Some extremely safe ways to failure:

““User requirements are just wishful User requirements are just wishful thinking”thinking”

““An architect’s concepts are just An architect’s concepts are just dreams”dreams”

““Engineering rules are carved in Engineering rules are carved in stone”stone”

““Management will agree to a higher Management will agree to a higher budget”budget”

Page 7: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Some extremely safe ways to successSome extremely safe ways to success

Future users defineFuture users define their requirements their requirements

Team challengesTeam challenges user requirements user requirements

Architects competeArchitects compete with proposals with proposals

Team challengesTeam challenges architect’s lay-out architect’s lay-out

Team reconcilesTeam reconciles budgetary budgetary constraints, user requirements, constraints, user requirements, design, and engineeringdesign, and engineering

Page 8: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Essential activities and facilities identified by usersEssential activities and facilities identified by users

Laboratories & Offices Laboratories & Offices Potting of test Potting of test

plants Climate chambers plants Climate chambers HQ HQ

Basel Test plant rearing Basel Test plant rearing

Greenhouses Greenhouses

Seeding & Potting Seeding & Potting Lab material Lab material

Soil substrates Soil substrates Supply of lab Supply of lab

material Pathogen rearing material Pathogen rearing

Insect rearing Composting Insect rearing Composting

Radiolab. tests Radiolab. tests

Application rooms Application rooms etc. etc. etc.etc. etc. etc.

Page 9: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Grouping of Activities and FacilitiesGrouping of Activities and Facilities

Composting & trashSoil & substrates

HQ BaselSupply of lab mat.

Greenhouse activities:rearing and testing

Climate chambers Laboratories & offices

Seeding & potting

Application of test compounds

radiolab.tests

Insects

Pathogens

Page 10: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Minimizing distances between facilitiesC

om

postin

g &

trash

Soil &

su

bstra

tes

HQ

Basel

Su

pp

ly o

f lab

mat.

Gre

en

hou

se a

ctiv

ities:

rearin

g a

nd

testin

g

Clim

ate

ch

am

bers

Lab

ora

torie

s &

offi

ces

Seed

ing

& p

ottin

g

Ap

plic

atio

n o

f te

st c

om

pou

nd

s

Path

og

en

s

Insects

rad

iola

b.

tests

Page 11: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Architectural Translation

Lab

ora

torie

s &

offi

ces

Com

postin

g &

tra

sh

Soil &

su

bstra

tes

Su

pp

ly o

f lab

m

at.

Gre

en

hou

se

activ

ities

rearin

g a

nd

te

stin

gC

limate

ch

am

bers

Seed

ing

&

pottin

g

Ap

plic

atio

n o

f te

st

com

pou

nd

s

Page 12: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Composing the Project Team: Subobtimal Association

InternalInternal::

Project ManagerProject ManagerProject EngineerProject EngineerUser RepresentativesUser RepresentativesEngineering SpecialistsEngineering SpecialistsPurchasing SpecialistsPurchasing SpecialistsControllersControllersSite Safety OfficerSite Safety Officer………………………………………………

ExternalExternal::

ArchitectArchitectGeneral ContractorsGeneral ContractorsIndividual ContractorsIndividual ContractorsEngineering SpecialistsEngineering SpecialistsConsultantsConsultants…………………………………………………………………………………………......

Page 13: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Composing the Project Team: Optimal Association

External:External:

ArchitectArchitect General ContractorsGeneral Contractors Engineering SpecialistsEngineering Specialists Individual ContractorsIndividual Contractors ConsultantsConsultants

Internal:Internal:

Project ManagerProject ManagerProject EngineerProject EngineerUser RepresentativesUser RepresentativesEngineering Specialists Engineering Specialists Purchasing SpecialistsPurchasing SpecialistsControllersControllersSite Safety OfficerSite Safety Officer

Page 14: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Managing the Project Key Success Factors

Strong linkage of internal and external Strong linkage of internal and external expertise expertise

Involvement of future users from Involvement of future users from beginning of projectbeginning of project

Delegation of responsibilities Delegation of responsibilities

Severe cost control from purchasing Severe cost control from purchasing through entire implementation phasethrough entire implementation phase

Page 15: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

E.U. von Weizsäckers book E.U. von Weizsäckers book

““Factor 4: double wealth with 50% Factor 4: double wealth with 50% input” input”

was a major theme in the projectwas a major theme in the project

Factors influencing energy consumption:Factors influencing energy consumption:

• Building shell (often leaking in industrial Building shell (often leaking in industrial buildings)buildings)• Air-conditioning Air-conditioning • Using or wasting surplus energyUsing or wasting surplus energy• Exaggerated overall cold temperature Exaggerated overall cold temperature requirements requirements • Lab hoods wasting heat via common Lab hoods wasting heat via common building aerationbuilding aeration

Page 16: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Building shellBuilding shell

• k-value of walls: k-value of walls: 0.3-0.40.3-0.4• k-value of windows: k-value of windows: 1.01.0• k-value overall: approx. k-value overall: approx. 0.70.7

Page 17: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Air conditioningAir conditioning

Users agreedUsers agreed this this was a non-was a non-

issue!issue!

(Of course, this is (Of course, this is not Florida or Cairo!) not Florida or Cairo!)

Advantage:Advantage: all windows can all windows can be opened.be opened.

Page 18: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Using surplus energyUsing surplus energy

Several installations and Several installations and processes generate heat processes generate heat that can be used for that can be used for heating from fall to spring.heating from fall to spring.

• Example 1: Growth lamps Example 1: Growth lamps in glasshouses. Heat in glasshouses. Heat is is kept inside kept inside glasshouse glasshouse through energy shield through energy shield

when lamps are on. when lamps are on. Effectiveness:Effectiveness: 50-60 % 50-60 %

Page 19: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successfule Team Approach

Using surplus energyUsing surplus energy

• Example 2: Growth lamps Example 2: Growth lamps in in climate climate chambers. Heat is re-chambers. Heat is re-gained and is used in gained and is used in

active active floors/ceilings for heating in floors/ceilings for heating in winter. (Strongly winter. (Strongly supporting supporting regular heating system in regular heating system in lab lab building)building)

Page 20: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Using surplus energyUsing surplus energy

• Example 2: Growth lamps Example 2: Growth lamps in in climate climate chambers. Heat is re-chambers. Heat is re-gained and is used in gained and is used in

active active floors/ceilings for heating in floors/ceilings for heating in winter. (Strongly winter. (Strongly supporting supporting regular heating system in regular heating system in lab lab building)building)

Users agreed to open Users agreed to open ceilingsceilings required for required for temperature temperature exchange. Fringe benefit: exchange. Fringe benefit: easy easy access to access to infrastructure! infrastructure!

Page 21: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Using surplus energyUsing surplus energy

• Example 3. Cheapest and Example 3. Cheapest and most most ecological way to ecological way to produce cold: produce cold: Ammonia Ammonia compressors produce compressors produce ice; brine pipes transport ice; brine pipes transport cold cold to anywhere in facility. to anywhere in facility. Advantage:Advantage: produce iceproduce ice

with with cheap electricity at cheap electricity at night or night or when when heat needed!heat needed!

Disadvantage:Disadvantage: coldest coldest temperature guaranteed is temperature guaranteed is

+4+4ooCC

Page 22: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Examples for Successful Team Approach

Using surplus energyUsing surplus energy

• Example 3. Cheapest and Example 3. Cheapest and most most ecological way to ecological way to produce cold: produce cold: Ammonia Ammonia compressors produce compressors produce ice; brine pipes transport ice; brine pipes transport cold cold to anywhere in facility. to anywhere in facility. Advantage:Advantage: produce iceproduce ice

with cheap electricity with cheap electricity at night at night or or when heat when heat needed!needed! Disadvantage:Disadvantage: coldest coldest temperature guaranteed is temperature guaranteed is

+4+4ooCC

Users agreed to min. +4Users agreed to min. +4ooC C (where lower temps. (where lower temps.

required: local required: local solutions )solutions )

Page 23: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Exasmples for Successful Team Approach

Reducing energy lossesReducing energy losses

• Example 4. Lab hoods are energy Example 4. Lab hoods are energy waste machines! Normally hooked waste machines! Normally hooked to central aeration system: to central aeration system: continuous loss of heat in winter.continuous loss of heat in winter.

Users agreed to slightly less Users agreed to slightly less efficient but safe individual hoods. efficient but safe individual hoods. 25% fresh air, 75% recycled 25% fresh air, 75% recycled (filtered) air. (filtered) air. Can be turned off Can be turned off if not in use.if not in use.

Energy loss reduced >75%!Energy loss reduced >75%!

Page 24: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Reasons for success of Project Team

? ? ?? ? ?

Page 25: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Reason for success of Project Team

Internal expertise in key technical areasInternal expertise in key technical areas Internal best-of-class purchasingInternal best-of-class purchasing Internal rigid cost controlling Internal rigid cost controlling Internal continuous challengeInternal continuous challenge Internal rigid time controllingInternal rigid time controlling Involvement of contractors in Project TeamInvolvement of contractors in Project Team Involvement of future usersInvolvement of future users Show-piece function of projectShow-piece function of project

Page 26: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

In a nutshell success came through..

Amalgamating internal and external Amalgamating internal and external forcesforces

Reaching consensus instead of Reaching consensus instead of compromise compromise

Decision making: Decision making: even wrong or suboptimal decisions even wrong or suboptimal decisions were the were the result of thorough result of thorough discussions discussions

Page 27: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

??

??

??PTPT

Engineers Engineers

ManagementManagement

Architect Architect

UsersUsers

Page 28: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

Engineers Engineers

ManagementManagement

y=f(xy=f(x 33-3.1416)

-3.1416) 22

PTPT

UsersUsers

Architect Architect

Page 29: Energy saving in a Reasearch Facility Peter Natkanski.

The Result