Menisci lesions: Are the clinical signs relevant? Ph. Landreau Aspetar, Doha, Qatar
Menis
ci le
sio
ns:
Are
the c
linic
al s
igns re
leva
nt?
Ph. L
and
reau
Asp
eta
r, Do
ha, Q
ata
r
Menis
cus In
jurie
s
•M
enis
cus in
jurie
s, b
oth
from
ath
letic
activitie
s a
nd
activitie
s o
f daily livin
g, a
re a
co
mm
on re
aso
n o
f refe
rral
for o
rtho
ped
ic e
valu
atio
n.
•A
nnual in
cid
ence: 6
0 p
er 1
00
,00
0 in
divid
uals
in th
e
genera
l po
pula
tion.
•M
enis
cus te
ars
are
one o
f the m
ost c
om
mo
n in
jurie
s to
the k
nee a
nd
sho
uld
ofte
n b
e in
clu
ded
at th
e to
p o
f the
diffe
rentia
l dia
gno
sis
for p
atie
nts
pre
sentin
g w
ith k
nee
pain
Menis
cus d
iag
no
sis
and
diffe
rentia
l dia
gno
sis
•sho
uld
be e
sta
blis
hed
clin
ically b
y:
•his
tory ta
kin
g,
•p
hys
ical e
xam
inatio
n, a
nd
•p
lain
rad
iog
rap
hs to
pro
vide th
e b
asis
for in
form
ed
co
nsent d
iscussio
ns w
ith
patie
nts
and
to d
ete
rmin
e if s
pecia
l
stu
die
s, s
uch a
s
•M
RI o
r arth
ro C
T, are
req
uire
d fo
r
furth
er e
valu
atio
n.
Sir W
illiam
Osle
r:
“Lis
ten to
your
patie
nt, h
e is
tellin
g
you th
e d
iagnosis
”
Care
ful H
isto
ry Takin
g: S
cenario
•S
ud
den o
nset o
f pain
in th
e s
ettin
g o
f a tw
istin
g in
jury to
the k
nee —
> m
ore
likely to
req
uire
furth
er d
iag
no
stic
testin
g a
nd
, perh
ap
s, s
urg
ical in
terve
ntio
n.
•P
atie
nts
with
an in
sid
ious o
nset o
f pain
with
out p
reced
ing
inju
ry may h
ave
und
erlyin
g a
rticula
r cartila
ge
deg
enera
tion a
nd
join
t wear th
at w
ill mo
re th
an lik
ely
dic
tate
the tre
atm
ent s
trate
gy.
His
tory ta
kin
g
•P
ain
localize
d to
the jo
int-lin
e
•P
rovo
cate
d b
y: Hyp
erfle
xio
n, d
irectio
nal c
hange d
urin
g w
alk
ing, w
hen
cro
ssin
g th
e le
gs, w
hen c
atc
hin
g o
ne’s
foot o
n a
n irre
gula
r surfa
ce
•M
echanic
al s
ymp
tom
s s
uch a
s “c
lickin
g” o
r “catc
hin
g,”
•R
ecurre
nt e
ffusio
ns
•C
om
pla
int o
f “lockin
g” w
ith a
mechanic
al b
lock to
exte
nsio
n
•A
traum
atic
pain
ful k
nee in
a yo
ung p
atie
nt s
hould
be d
istin
guis
hed
from
non-tra
um
atic
chro
nic
knee p
ain
in a
patie
nt o
ver 4
0 ye
ars
of
age
Phys
ical e
xam
inatio
n
•G
ait
•A
lignem
ent
•M
ob
ility
•Laxity
•P
ate
llo-fe
mo
ral
•E
ffusio
n…
•…
and
menis
cus
Jo
int lin
e p
alp
atio
n
•P
ain
or d
isco
mfo
rt is re
pro
duced
by p
alp
atio
n o
f the jo
int
line.
JD
Kelly
McM
urra
y Test
•P
atie
nt s
up
ine.
•The k
nee is
exte
nd
ed
from
a fu
lly flexed
positio
n
while
inte
rnally ro
tatin
g
the tib
ia. T
he te
st is
rep
eate
d w
hile
exte
rnally
rota
ting th
e tib
ia.
•P
op
pin
g a
nd
tend
ern
ess
alo
ng th
e jo
int lin
e
ind
icate
a p
ositive
sig
n
McM
urra
y Test
Ap
ley Te
st
•P
atie
nt in
pro
ne p
ositio
n w
ith
the k
nee fle
xed
to 9
0°.
•T
he tib
ia is
co
mp
ressed
into
the d
ista
l fem
ur a
nd
rota
ted
exte
rnally to
assess th
e m
ed
ial
menis
cus a
nd
inte
rnally to
assess th
e la
tera
l menis
cus.
•T
he te
st is
co
nsid
ere
d p
ositive
if it pro
duces p
ain
, whic
h is
less s
eve
re o
r relie
ved
when
the m
aneuve
r is re
peate
d w
ith
dis
tractio
n o
f the tib
ia.
Ap
ley Te
st
Oth
er te
sts
: Thessaly Te
st
(Eg
e’s
test)
Thessaly Te
st
Rele
vance?
•S
tud
ies: m
eth
od
olo
gic
al q
uality va
ried
from
po
or to
fair
am
ong
stu
die
s, a
ffectin
g te
st p
erfo
rmance.
•G
old
sta
nd
ard
: MR
I, arth
rosco
py.
•N
um
ber o
f ind
ividuals
is va
riab
le
Rele
vance?
•N
ob
le J
, Era
t K. In
defe
nse o
f the m
enis
cus: a
pro
sp
ective
stu
dy o
f 20
0 m
enis
cecto
my p
atie
nts
. J B
one
Jo
int S
urg
Br 1
98
0; 6
2: 7
–1
1:
•C
ontin
uin
g p
ain
gre
ate
r than o
ne m
onth
, effu
sio
n,
lockin
g a
nd
insta
bility to
be s
tatis
tically h
igher in
ind
ividuals
with
menis
cal te
ars
.
Rele
vance?
•A
bd
on P
, Lin
dstra
nd
A, T
ho
rng
ren K
G. S
tatis
tical e
valu
atio
n o
f
the d
iag
no
stic
crite
ria fo
r menis
cal te
ars
. Int O
rtho
p 1
99
0; 1
4:
34
1–4
5:
•A
co
mb
inatio
n o
f patie
nt-re
po
rted
sym
pto
ms in
cre
ased
the
pre
dic
tive va
lue o
f identifyin
g m
enis
cal le
sio
n to
70
–8
0%
.
•In
that s
tud
y, the p
resence o
f med
ial jo
int lin
e te
nd
ern
ess,
knee ‘lo
ckin
g’, d
aily p
ain
and
if the p
atie
nt w
as o
n ‘s
ick
leave
’ from
wo
rk a
ccura
tely p
red
icte
d 6
1%
of th
ose
patie
nts
exhib
iting
a m
enis
cal te
ar c
onfirm
ed
by
arth
rosco
py.
His
tory re
leva
nce
•Fro
m h
isto
ry-takin
g, th
e d
ete
rmin
ants
‘‘ag
e o
ver 4
0
years
,’’ ‘‘co
ntin
uatio
n o
f activity im
po
ssib
le,’’ a
nd
“weig
ht-
bearin
g d
urin
g tra
um
a’’ in
dic
ate
d a
n a
sso
cia
tion w
ith a
menis
cal te
ar a
fter m
ultiva
riate
log
istic
reg
ressio
n
analys
is.
Tests
rele
vance
Tests
rele
vance
•M
eserve
BB
, Cle
land
JA
, Boucher T
R. A
meta
-analys
is e
xam
inin
g c
linic
al
test u
tilities fo
r assessin
g m
enis
cal in
jury. C
linic
al R
ehab
ilitatio
n 2
008 ; 2
2:
143-1
61.
•R
yzew
icz M
, Pete
rson B
, Sip
ars
ky P
N, B
artz R
L. T
he d
iagnosis
of
menis
cus te
ars
: the ro
le o
f MR
I and
clin
ical e
xam
inatio
n. C
lin O
rthop
Rela
t
Res 2
007; 4
55: 1
23–133.
•S
cholte
n R
J, D
eville
WL, O
pste
lten W
, Bijl D
, van d
er P
las C
G, B
oute
r LM
.
The a
ccura
cy o
f phys
ical d
iagnostic
tests
for a
ssessin
g m
enis
cal le
sio
ns o
f
the k
nee: a
meta
-analys
is. J
Fam
Pra
ct 2
001; 5
0: 9
38–944.
•S
olo
mon D
H, S
imel D
L, B
ate
s D
W, K
atz J
N, S
chaffe
r JL. D
oes th
is p
atie
nt
have
a to
rn m
enis
cus o
r ligam
ent o
f the k
nee? V
alu
e o
f the p
hys
ical
exam
inatio
n. J
AM
A 2
001; 2
86: 1
610–1620.
Tests
rele
vance?
•M
eserve
BB
, Cle
land
JA
, Bo
ucher T
R. A
meta
-analys
is
exam
inin
g c
linic
al te
st u
tilities fo
r assessin
g m
enis
cal
inju
ry. Clin
ical R
ehab
ilitatio
n 2
00
8 ; 2
2: 1
43
-16
1:
•Jo
int lin
e te
nd
ern
ess is
the b
est ‘c
om
mo
n’ te
st, fo
llow
ed
by M
cM
urra
y’s a
nd
Ap
ley’s
.
•T
hessaly’s
test re
po
rted
the s
trong
est, b
ut s
am
ple
s w
ere
sm
alle
r (n.4
10
), than th
ose fo
r join
t line te
nd
ern
ess (n
.
13
54
), McM
urra
y’s (n
.12
32
) and
Ap
ley’s
(n.4
79
)
Whic
h te
st?
•A
sin
gle
clin
ical te
st is
no
t suffic
ient to
esta
blis
h a
co
rrect
dia
gno
sis
. Dia
gno
stic
accura
cy is
imp
rove
d if th
e re
sults
of m
ore
than o
ne te
st a
re c
om
bin
ed
.
•G
enera
lly, all c
linic
al te
sts
tend
to b
e le
ss re
liab
le in
the
pre
sence o
f co
nco
mita
nt lig
am
ento
us in
jury (A
CL).
•Furth
erm
ore
, phys
ical e
xam
inatio
n is
less a
ccura
te in
patie
nts
with
deg
enera
tive te
ars
than in
young
patie
nts
with
acute
inju
ries.
Menis
ci le
sio
ns:
Are
the c
linic
al s
igns re
leva
nt?
•D
ifficult to
answ
er
•C
om
bin
atio
n o
f his
tory a
nd
diffe
rent te
sts
•Join
t line te
nd
ern
ess, M
cM
urra
y test, A
ple
y test
•Thessaly te
st?
•Futu
re s
tud
ies s
hould
, where
possib
le, u
tilize la
rger
sam
ple
s o
f ind
ividuals
with
out m
enis
cal le
sio
ns to
bette
r
estim
ate
test s
pecific
ity and
thus m
ore
accura
tely id
entify
op
timal c
linic
al te
sts
.
Thank Y
ou