Top Banner
ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007
25

ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Stewart Lee
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY

Program Review

Lori Heymans & Paul ChanleySpring 2007

Page 2: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology Program Mission

The ET Program prepares students for careers in the field of electronic technology and/or pursuit of further study at four-year institutions.

Aligns with NECC mission by providing an affordable occupational course of study.

Program graduates earn an Associate Degree in Science, (ASET).

Page 3: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology Program

Occupations Electronic/Electrical Engineering Technicians:

Help design, develop, test and manufacture electronic and electrical equipment.

Solve technical problems in research and development, manufacturing, sales, construction, inspection and maintenance.

Median annual earnings, $46K

Electronic Technician:

Install, repair and maintain electrical and electronic equipment and devices.

Median annual earnings, $40K.

Page 4: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

PROGRAM STRENGTHSElectronic Technology

Page 5: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Course Sequence and Content:

The course work required achieves an associate degree.

Critical thinking, problem solving and “hands-on” lab work are the major focus.

Students build confidence in their skills as they progress through the program.

Page 6: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Course Sequence and Content (cont.):

Co-op work experience opportunities are available.

Graduates are well prepared for full-time employment.

Graduates gain the skills and knowledge to continue their education.

Graduates are prepared to pursue life-long learning.

Page 7: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Lab Equipment and Classroom Environment:

Program has state-of-the-art classroom and laboratory.

Instructors offer multiple avenues to engage the students in learning.

This high tech and “hands-on” environment is a differentiator.

Page 8: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

For example, analyzing an electronic circuit can be approached through:

1. White board presentation and problem solving sessions.

2. Circuit software simulation by instructor, team or individual.

3. Prototype and analyze circuit using rack-mounted electronic lab equipment.

4. Instruction, reflection and discussion during power point presentation.

Page 9: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Faculty:Professional, diverse and dynamic group of instructors who share and collaborate on ideas to improve the program.

Understand needs and stresses of students.

Teaching experience is vast in years, with a good mix of ages among the faculty.

Page 10: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Faculty (Cont):Stay current in technology and new approaches to student engagement through workshops and conferences.

Provide technical and applied mathematic workshops for high and middle school science, technology and math teachers.

Publish and present academic papers for American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE).

Page 11: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Articulation Agreements with Local High Schools:Established articulation agreements between NECC Electronic Technology Program and ten high schools in the Greater Merrimack Valley.

Secured 18 credit articulation agreement between NECC and Whittier Technical High School, (May 2007).

Developed Applied Technical Math articulation agreement between NECC and Haverhill and Methuen High Schools, (May 2007).

Page 12: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Collaborative Partnerships:Faculty serve on advisory boards:

Merrimack College’s Electrical/Computer EngineeringNortheastern University’s Engineering TechnologyMiddlesex Community College Whittier Technical High School

Massachusetts Department of Workforce DevelopmentMVOTECMuseum of Science: PowerUp, (July 2004-present)Museum of Science: ATLAS, (July 2007)

Page 13: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramStrengths

Collaborative Partnerships (cont.):

Massachusetts Department of Education: Summer Content Institutes, (2006 and 2007)

Northeastern University RET Program Nanotechnology, (2006)

NECC Electronic Technology Advisory Board

Page 14: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

PROGRAM CHALLENGESElectronic Technology

Page 15: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramChallenges

Student Enrollment:

Lucent Technology was a great recruiting center.

Robust training program for the workforce, (1998-2003).

Displaced workers enrolled in ET with the support of government grants, (2003-2005).

Solid recruiting/marketing plan needs to be established and implemented to attract more students.

Page 16: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramChallenges

Student Enrollment (cont.):Current marketing and recruiting efforts:

Workshops for local high and middle school teachers Articulation agreements with local high schools Visits to local high schools Technology Day at NECC

Activities need to be expanded and supported by additional marketing and financial resources.

“Best Practices in Student Recruitment” has been developed; needs resources behind it.

Page 17: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramChallenges

Faculty:Several upper courses taught by senior DCE, (retired full-time faculty).

A plan is necessary to reduce the level of dependency on the senior DCE faculty.

Infuse new and current instructors into the upper-level courses.

Utilize senior DCE members as mentors, while the senior members are still teaching at NECC.

Level of urgency high.

Page 18: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

PROGRAM SUMMARYElectronic Technology

Page 19: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramSummary

Strong Job Outlook with Good PaySolid Course Sequence and ContentState-of-the-Art Classroom and Lab EquipmentExperienced, Dedicated FacultyGreat Relationships with Collaborative Partners: Four-Year Institutions, Local High Schools and IndustryNo other Community College in the Greater Boston area offer what we do in ETDifferentiator for NECC

Page 20: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramSummary

Key Action Items:

Market the program aggressively to increase student enrollment.

Maintain quality of high-tech, hands-on teaching through continuous improvement in course content, partnerships and equipment.

Expand job placement and internship/co-op assistance for students.

Page 21: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Electronic Technology ProgramSummary

How does the Electronic Technology Program get it all done with two full-time faculty -- Lori and Paul?

Page 22: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

PROGRAM REVIEW

COMMENTS

Page 23: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Program ReviewComments

Program review requires a large amount of work over time; needs review of faculty reassignment time.

Current model needs to change. " The Program” should be the customer. Data should be evaluated and reports given to the PR project leader.

Workload should be distributed throughout the college. For example: Where were Enrollment Services, Financial Aid, Learning Accommodation inputs to the Review?

Page 24: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Program ReviewComments

The Program Review is a way to reflect more holistically on program strengths, challenges and opportunities.

Page 25: ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY Program Review Lori Heymans & Paul Chanley Spring 2007.

Program ReviewComments

Thank You:Ellen Wentland

Joanne Ronsivalli

Ken Langer

Ginny Anderson

and Our Department for The Support