Top Banner
Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes • Geometric configurations • Magneto band structures • Magneto electronic excitations • Conclusions 何何何‚ 何何何 何何 ( 何何何何 ) 何何何何 何何何
23

Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Jan 15, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes

• Geometric configurations• Magneto band structures• Magneto electronic excitations• Conclusions

何彥宏‚ 林明發 教授 ( 指導教授 )

成功大學 物理系

Page 2: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Rx=m a1+n a2 Ry=p a1+q a2 bnmn

nmnmbx

)]2/(3[tan angle chiral

2/)(32

radius

1

22

R

Geometric configurations --- Single-wall carbon nanotube

armchair(m,m)

a1

a2

Page 3: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

intertube distance: 3.39 Å, closed to interlayer spacing of graphite.

Geometric configurations--- Double-walled carbon nanotubes

Page 4: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes

(5,5)-(10,10)

• 3 kinds of symmetric structures, due to translation and rotation symmetry

• 12 atoms in a primitive unit cell: (4 from inner tube) (8 from outer tube)

Page 5: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

the tight-binding model

','

''

''

8884

4844

12555

4111

12122211

exp ,

exp,

exp , :elementmatrix

1212 :nHamiltonia

}{

}{

:ioneigenfunct

'

'

'

'

5

5

1

1

outoutininRRda

outinrrRR

outoutoutoutoutoutrrRR

ininininininrrRR

R

Rik

R

Rik

RikRikWeRRhH

RikRikRRhH

RikRikRRhH

HH

HHH

RRXec

RRXec

ccc

outin

outin

outout

inin

out

in

Page 6: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Intratube & intertube interactions

Vppπ=-2.66 eV (γ0)

Vppσ=6.38 eV

sinsinsincoscoscoscoscos,

:intertube

sin2

sincos2

sin2

cos,

:intratube

22'

22222'

ppppppoutinrr

ppppppininrr

VVVRRh

VVVRRh

Page 7: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Band structures

without intertube interaction:

• symmetric about EF , and EF=0• linear bands intersecting at EF=0 , so metallic• parabolic band with double degenercy

Page 8: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Band structures

with intertube interaction:

• breaks symmetry of band structures• changes energy dispersion• localization of wavefunction: △: inner tube ○: outer tube

Page 9: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Density of states

• linear bands →pleataues

• parabolic bands →square-root divergences

• several low-energy

divergences in S5 system

, 22,

1

2Jz

z

kJE

dk

L

D

Page 10: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Magnetoelectronic properties

quantumflux

2

2 2

2

2

0

0

2222

e

hc

J

rdAc

eJrdkJrdk

Ac

eikik

Vc

Aek

mHV

m

kH

B

J → J+ψ/ψ0

shift angular momentum

Page 11: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Band structures linear band → parabolic band,

form energy spacing.

• induce energy gap

• break state degenercy.

(0.04 ψ0~ 114 Tesla)

Page 12: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Density of states

• linear band

to parabolic band

→ pleataue to divergence

• break degenercy

→ more divergences

Page 13: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

ψ-dependent energy gap

• magnetic flux induces energy gap

• intertube interactions & spin-B interactions reduces energy gap

Page 14: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

e -

e -

φc (J,kz+q;σ,ψ)

φv (J,kz;σ,ψ)

3. Magneto electronic excitations

• energy transfer

• momentum

transfer: Δkz=q

Page 15: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

12212

2112

222

22

112

11

0

''

, ',

1

22'

'

'

2''

2

0

)()(4),(),(

)()(4),(

)()(4),(

4.2

),(),(),;,(

)(),;,(

),;,(2

)),(()),((

,,)2(

2),,(

),,(),(),,(

rrqrKqrIeLqVLqV

qrKqrIeLqV

qrKqrIeLqV

kJEqkLJELqkJ

iLqkJ

LqkJ

kJEfqkLJEf

kJeeqkLJdk

Lq

LqLqVLq

LL

LL

LL

yh

yh

yhh

J hh

BZst

yhh

yhh

yh

yh

iy

hiLiqyy

hi

y

i

Response function

response functioninner: χ1

outer: χ2

Page 16: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Band structures

Response functions

Page 17: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Response functions

Page 18: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

2),,(),,(),,(

)Im(

)Im(),,(

inner tubeat localized A

2

22

2

11

22221112122

22121111111

122

111

2222111222

2212111111

111

LqPLqPLqP

V

VLqP

VVVVVV

VVVVVV

VV

VV

VVVVVV

VVVVVV

VVV

BA

eff

effA

effexeffexexeff

effexeffexexeff

exex

exex

effexeffexexeff

effexeffexexeff

inexeff

2

22

2

11

22221112222

22121111121

121

222

)Im(

)Im(),,(

outer tubeat localized B

eff

effB

effexeffexexeff

effexeffexexeff

exex

exex

V

VLqP

VVVVVV

VVVVVV

VV

VV

Intertube Coulomb interactions: Random-Phase Approximation (RPA)

Page 19: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Loss function

• Intertube interactions enrich electron-hole excitations, thus reduce plasmon intensity

• Plasmons appears at certain q region

Page 20: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Loss function

• Plasmon frequencies almost unchanged

by the magnetic flux

• Plasmon intensity reduced by the magnetic flux

Page 21: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

q-dependent plasmon frequencies

• more plasmon modes

• acoustic plasmons to optical plasmons

Page 22: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

4. Conclusion

• The intertube interactions alter the low energy bands, enrich the low-frequency single-particle excitations.

• The main features of the low-frequency plasmons are dominated by the momentum transfer q, the intertube interactions and the symmetric geometry.

• Double-walled geometry could be determined by the electron-energy loss spectroscopy (EELS).

Page 23: Electronic excitations of double-walled armchair carbon nanotubes Geometric configurations Magneto band structures Magneto electronic excitations Conclusions.

Thanks for your attention !