Page 1
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
Electron Microscopy of Polymers
Techniques and Examples
S. Henning, G.H. Michler*
Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Halle (Saale), Germany*Institute of Physics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
Short course on polymer characterizationStellenbosch, 7 April 2014
Page 2
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
Outline
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 3
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 4
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
Page 5
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
� Micromechanics:
� Micro- and nanoscopic processes during deformation and fracture
Page 6
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� TEM: History and State-of-the-Art
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
1931: first TEM Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll 2010: Cs-corrected HRTEMFEI Titan3 G2 60-300 *
Point resolution: 80 pm(Image corrector)
Cs-corrected HR-TEM image on SWCNTfilled with fullerenes acquired at 80 kV *
*[http://www.fei.com/uploadedFiles/DocumentsPrivate/Content/titan_cubed_g2_ds.pdf]
Page 7
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
� Microscope resolution and structural details
TEM
Page 8
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Comparison of probe design and bulk sample preparation strategies for different micsroscopic techniques
� Morphology
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
Page 9
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Comparison of sample preparation strategies for different micsroscopic techniques
� Micromechanics
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
Page 10
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 11
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
� Limitation of the resolution of light optical microscopy
� Rayleigh-Criterion: Two point sources cannot be resolved if their separation is less than the radius of the Airy disk.
NA … numerical aperture
[images: Swinburne University of Technology at: astronomy.swin.edu.au/ cosmos/R/Rayleigh+Criterion]
Page 12
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
Accelerating voltage V [kV]
Velocity of electrons v [ms-1]
Ratio of electron velocity to light velocity vc-1
Wavelength of electrons λλλλ [pm]
10 5.83 x 107 0.194 12.20
100 1.64 x 108 0.548 3.70
200 2.08 x 108 0.695 2.51
500 2.59 x 108 0.863 1.42
1.000 2.83 x 108 0.941 0.87
3.000 2.97 x 108 0.989 0.36
� Imaging with electrons
� De Broglie
U …accelerating voltage, v … velocity of the electronseo = elementary electric charge = 1.6*10-19 C, m0 = rest mass of the electron = 9.11*10-28 g,c = velocity of light in vacuo = 3*108 ms-1, h = Planck´s constant = 6.625*10-34Js
Page 13
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
� TEM principle: comparison of the path of rays with light optical microscope
Page 14
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast
ρ1 < ρ2
ρρρρ1
d1
ρρρρ2d2
e-e- e- e-100 100 100 100
95 80 10 50
side view of the sample
PS particle
gold particles carbon film
100 nm
Page 15
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast
Images of a sheaf-like lamellar structures in LDPE obtained by different operating modes of the TEM:
a) bright field image,b) dark field image,c) electron diffraction diagram
(cryosection, HVTEM)
Page 16
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.3 Analytical TEM: EELS Investigations
[Werner: Lecture Electron Microscopy; MPI Halle]
Page 17
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.3 Analytical TEM: EELS Investigations
Initial parts of electron energy-loss spectra of 50 nm thick ultra-thin sections of a PFS-PS block copolymer (a) and a PS homopolymer (b)
EFTEM investigation of the PFS-PS block copolymer: zero-loss image (c), electron spectroscopic image at 230 eV
energy-loss (d) and elemental mapping (f) by means of the iron L2,3-edge shown in the corresponding part of the
energy-loss spectrum (e)[PFS … pentafluorstyrol]
Page 18
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.3 The Use of EFTEM: Electron Spectroscopic Imaging
Comparison of TEM images of ABS: a) „conventional“ image, b) image with energy filter in zero loss mode
[Product information, LEO Electron Microscopy]
Page 19
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 20
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution
� Preparation of electron transparent samples from polymer solutions by
� spin-coating
� dip-coating
Page 21
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution
� Examples: Deformation of semithin films formed by dip-coating on glass
Deformed film of Styrol-Butadiene-Blockcopolymer + PS + Alumina nanoparticles
Deformed film of Styrol-Butadiene-Blockcopolymer + PS + Alumina nanoparticles
Page 22
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy
� Preparation of electron transparent samples from bulk materials
A - specimen is cut with controlled speed (downward stroke)B - retractionC - advance of specimen arm determines the specimen thickness
Page 23
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy
� Preparation of electron transparent samples from bulk materials
Dry sectioning Wet sectioning
Page 24
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy
� Preparation of electron transparent samples from bulk materials
� at room temperature for hard samples
� under cryo conditions for soft materials (Tcut < Tg)
� using glass or diamond knives
RMC PowerTome PT-PC with CRX cryo chamber
Diamond knives for dry, wet, and cry applications; different manufacturers
LEICA EM UC7 ultra-microtome
Page 25
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy
� Examples: Hydroxy apatite nanocrystal distribution in cortical bone
Ultrathin section 40 nm, 21 °C, diamond knife, RMC PT-PC; TEM LEO 912
Ultrathin section 40 nm, 21 °C, diamond knife, LEICA Ultracut; TEM LEO 912
Page 26
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy
� Examples: Layered silicate nanoplatelets in PA and PA/ASA blends
Ultrathin section 50 nm, - 80 °C, diamond knife, RMC PT-PC; TEM LEO 912
Ultrathin section 50 nm, - 80 °C, diamond knife, RMC PT-PC; TEM LEO 912
Page 27
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.3 Focused Ion Beam Technology (FIB)
� Preparation of electron transparent samples from bulk materials
FEI Quanta 3D FEG DualBeam: e-, Ga+ Preparation of a lamella Rubber sample, BSE-SEM
Page 28
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Very often, polymer samples are too soft for sectioning at RT, or they are sensitive to electron beam irradiation. Chemical or physical treatment can be used for hardening � „Fixation“
� Polymer samples very often do not show sufficient contrast (similar electron densities of the elements that are present). Heavy elements can be placed selectively into one or more phases of the material giving contrast � “Staining”
� Staining procedures can be applied prior to sectioning (staining of a trimmed block) or after ultramicrotomy (staining of ultrathin sections).
� Staining can be performed by immersion of the sample in the staining agent or in vapour.
� There are one-step procedures and more complex procedures with two or more steps.
Page 29
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Examples
� Polyolefines: chlorosulfonic acid + osmium tetroxidechlorosulfonic acid + uranyl acetateruthenium tetroxide
� Polyamides: formalin + osmium tetroxidetungstophosphoric acid + osmium tetroxideruthenium tetroxide
� Styrol-Butadiene-Copolymers:osmium tetroxideruthenium tetroxide
� Polyurethanes: chlorosulfonic acid + osmium tetroxideruthenium tetroxide
� …
Page 30
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Example: Semicrystalline morphology of HDPE
Two-step staining with chlorsulfonic acid and osmium
tetroxide, ultramicrotome
sections
Page 31
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Example: Semicrystalline morphology of UHMWPE
One-step staining with ruthenium
tetroxide, ultramicrotome
sections Lamellar thickness distribution measured using the TEM image
Page 32
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Example: α- and β- modifications of polypropylene
One-step staining with ruthenium
tetroxide, ultramicrotome
sections
Page 33
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Example: Deformation structures in β- modification of polypropylene
Chevron formation, lamellar separation and nanovoid formation as
essential micromechanical mechanisms during tensile
deformation.
One-step staining with ruthenium tetroxide,
ultramicrotome sections
Page 34
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
3. TEM Preparation
3.4 Fixation and Staining
� Example: Deformation mechanisms in lamellar SBS block copolymers
The effect of thin layer yielding in an
asymmetric styrene-butadiene star block
copolymer
(74 % styrene)
One-step staining with osmium
tetroxide, ultramicrotome
sections
Page 35
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 36
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
� SEM Principle: Instrumentation and signals
Page 37
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
� SEM: Interaction volume
[Sketch modified after Röder, Uni Halle]
Page 38
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Image formation using secondary electrons (SE)
� Inelastic scattering of primary electrons with weakly bonded electrons of the outer shells of atoms in the whole interaction volume
� Due to their low energy (3eV to 50 eV), only SE from volumina close to the surface are able to escape
� Collected and amplified by means of an apropriate detector, SE create a signal carrying information mainly on the surface topography
� The contrast is to a great extent a function of the tilting angle of the sample surface with respect to the incident beam and so-called edge effects
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
Page 39
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
� Image formation using backscattered electrons (BSE)
� Elastic scattering of primary electrons when they interact with sample atoms
� Due a much higher energy than SE (60% to 80% of the energy of the original PE) they are able to escape from deeper regions of the interaction volume
� The signal detected by a semiconductor device is strongly dependent on the average atomic number of the interacting atoms
� Singnal detection can be designed so that contrast of BSE images represents differences in the material composition of the sample (left hand image)
Page 40
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
� Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX)
� Ionization of inner shells, gaps are filled with electrons from outer shells
� The energy difference is emitted as characteristic X-ray emission
� Analysis of elemental composition of the sample
Page 41
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX
� Example: Morphology of flame retarded PP
EDX
Page 42
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� ESEM principle and advantages
� Variable pressure in the chamber due to pressure limiting aperture (PLA)
� „Wet“ samples (with cooling)
� No conductive coating (new detection principles)
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.2 ESEM
Page 43
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Gaseous secondary electron detector
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.2 ESEM
Page 44
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Example: Drying of dental composites, ESEM-GSED
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.2 ESEM
Left: ambient conditions 7 mbar and 277 K, Right: after drying at lower pressure (3 mbar, 277 K)
Page 45
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 46
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Fixation on sample holder, conductive carbon or metal coating
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders
Urinary stent
Bone cement
Page 47
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Fracture or cryofracture, mounting, conductive carbon or metal coating
5. SEM Preparation
5.2 Fracture Surfaces
Pores in acrylic bone cement; fracture surface, SEM
X-ray opacifier particles in acrylic bone cement, SEM
Page 48
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Principle: Transformation of morphological features to topography
5. SEM Preparation
5.3 Etching Techniques
Example for permanganic etching:
Development of a topography at the
surface of a polypropylene sample;
SEM-SE images
Literature on peramganic etching:
e.g. Olley et al., J. Mat. Sci. 28 (1993),
1102-1112
Page 49
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Example: α- and β- modifications of polypropylene
5. SEM Preparation
5.3 Etching Techniques
Comparison of lamellar structures after permanganic
etching;
SEM-SE images
Page 50
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Examples: UHMWPE
5. SEM Preparation
5.3 Etching Techniques
Semicrystalline morphology of UHMWPE; permanganic etching, SEM
Semicrystalline morphology of UHMWPE with graphite; permanganic etching, SEM
Page 51
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
5. SEM Preparation
5.3 Etching Techniques
� Example: Deformation of the α- and β- modifications of polypropylene
Micromechanical mechanisms in PP
observed after tensile deformation
Permanganic etching, SEM-SE
images
Page 52
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
1. Introduction: Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymeric Materials
2. TEM: Principles of Image Formation
2.1 Mass Thickness Contrast; 2.2 Electron Diffraction and Diffraction Contrast; 2.3 Analytical TEM:
EELS
3. TEM Preparation
3.1 Ultrathin Samples from Solution; 3.2 Ultramicrotomy and Cryo-Ultramicrotomy; 3.3 FIB;
3.4 Fixation and Staining
4. SEM: Principles and Imaging Modes
4.1 SE and BSE Signals, EDX; 4.2 ESEM
5. SEM Preparation
5.1 Preparation of Surfaces and Powders; 5.2 Fracture Surfaces; 5.3 Etching Techniques
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation; 6.2 Example
Page 53
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Straining holder model 671, Gatan
� for TEM JEOL JEM 2010, JEM 4000 FX and others
� Sample thickness: 0,1 μm bis 0,5 μm
� Temperature range: -180 °C bis 120 °C
6. in situ Deformation Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation
Page 54
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Tensile and bending devices for AFM and ESEM
� Kammrath & Weiss bending device for deformation at RT
� Kammrath & Weiss tensile device for deformation at RT
� Registration of load-displacement diagrams
6. in situ Techniques
6.1 Instrumentation
Page 55
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Typical results for HDPE/Copolymer blends
6. in situ Techniques
6.2 Examples
SEM TEM AFM
Page 56
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Semithin cryo-section (300 nm), straining holder, TEM
6. in situ Techniques
6.2 Example: Rubber Toughened Polystyrene (HIPS)
Page 57
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� Semithin cryo-section (300 nm), sandwich technique, TEM JEOL JEM 4010
6. in situ Techniques
6.2 Example: in situ straining of a rubber sample
Page 58
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
Comparison to AFM Results
Page 59
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� TEM Micrograph (a) and AFM Phase Image (b) of Ethylene / 1-Hexene Copolymer Blend
Comparison to AFM results
Examples
Page 60
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
� TEM and SEM – modern, developing, challenging techniques
� One of the original keys to nanotechnology
� Resolutions down to 80 pm
� Analytical methods (EDX elemental analyses, EELS chemical analyses, crystallographic analyses, …) – with nanospot resolution!
� Needs some expertise for problem solution, preparation, image interpretation
� Relatively expensive and time consuming (sample preparation, HRTEM image formation, in situ-techniques; TEM installation, maintenance, and operation)
Summary
Page 61
© Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWM
References
• G.H. Michler: Electron Microscopy of Polymers; Springer-Verlag Berlin 2008• G.H. Michler: Kunststoff-Mikromechanik: Morphologie, Deformations- und Bruchmechanismen von
polymeren Werkstoffen; Hanser Verlag 1992• G.H. Michler, F.J. Baltá-Calleja: Nano- and Micromechanics of Polymers; Hanser 2012• L.C. Sawyer, D.T. Grubb, G.F. Meyers: Polymer Microscopy, Third ed.; Springer 2008• L. Reimer: Scanning Electron Microscopy; Springer-Verlag Berlin 1985• L. Reimer: Transmission Electron Microscopy; Springer-Verlag Berlin 1989
Thank you for your attention!