Top Banner
E-learni ng Futures : Speculat ions for a time yet to come” John G. Hedb 06/26/2022 ESTHER JOY DE ASIS 1
42
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Edtech

04/12/2023

1

“E-learning Futures : Speculations for a time yet to come”John G. Hedb

ESTHER JOY DE ASIS

Page 2: Edtech

04/12/2023 2

0The rest of this paper will examine ideas and strategies that confront Fraser’s claim and which might result in amore effective match between e-learning pedagogies, the affordances of the technologies and the motivation of learners as they achieve effective e-learning outcomes.

Page 3: Edtech

04/12/2023 3

0In fact, it requires a careful process of ensuring collaboration between teachers and experts, gaining successful experience in teaching with the technologies and participating in a community that provides continuous support.

Page 4: Edtech

04/12/2023 4

0Certainly, many instructors have never used e-learning strategies in their student role nor have they had training in, or previous experience of, teaching with e-learning strategies. The rapidly changing context in which e-learning is occurring makes the challenge for these teachers just that little bit harder.

Page 5: Edtech

04/12/2023 5

Obstacles to integrating ICT in the classroom (Vrasidas & Glass, 2005, p. 8)

0 The conservative nature of the traditional culture of schooling and classroom instruction.

0 Teachers’ resistance to changing their traditional teaching approaches.

0 Lack of time for teachers to learn how to use and integrate ICT in their teaching.

0 Lack of technology infrastructure.0 Lack of specific technologies that address the specific

needs of teachers and students.

Page 6: Edtech

04/12/2023 6

0Lack of ongoing support.0Lack of release time and incentives for teacher

innovators.0Incompatibility of traditional teaching with

the constructivist framework fostered by ICT.0Need for teachers to unlearn traditional

teaching beliefs and practices.0Need to prepare teachers to integrate ICT by

integrating ICT in teacher preparation programmes.

0Need for policy, curriculum and assessment reform.

Page 7: Edtech

04/12/2023 7

How should we select e-learning technologies to make a major difference in most teaching and learning contexts

when most of the instances are not radical shifts in approach?

Page 8: Edtech

04/12/2023 8

Clayton Christensen (1997) proposed the idea of disruptive innovations.

0 He claimed that a disruptive innovation or technology is one that eventually takes over the existing dominant technology in the market, despite the fact that the disruptive technology is both radically different from the leading technology and that it often initially performs less successfully than the leading technology according to existing measures of performance, but over time the functionality or the attributes of the new way of doing things replace the older technologies.

Page 9: Edtech

04/12/2023 9

0 The rise of the educational audiovisual movement was supported by the advent of cheap and accessible methods of capturing views of the world and situating challenges and learning in real-world contexts through the use of the photographic image. Then, in the second half of last century, we had a potentially disruptive technology in the Polaroid film process.

Page 10: Edtech

04/12/2023 10

0The recording processes moved from analogue to digital recording mechanisms, suddenly the storage of images in a visually recognizable form was no longer required; they could be deconstructed, manipulated and retrieved at will.

Page 11: Edtech

04/12/2023 11

0 The digital images could also be transmitted with excellent quality

0 anywhere in the world to be reconstructed to the same quality as was sent. Thus

0 digital photographic technologies became disruptive technologies

Page 12: Edtech

04/12/2023 12

To search for the e-learning analogy

0 While curriculum managers may have initially seen e-learning as a potentially

0 disruptive innovation, it does not seem to have replaced the dominant paradigms.

0 e-Learning has enabled the curriculum of the educational institution to be more

0 efficiently recorded and transmitted to learners in many different contexts.

Page 13: Edtech

04/12/2023 13

0 It has enabled every institution to become a potential distance learning provider and it has encouraged many students and teachers to change the meeting times and places that they use on a daily basis.

0 Today students who still meet in formal classes will ask for many aspects of their course to be provided online so that they can access them while managing a complex work and study schedule.

Page 14: Edtech

04/12/2023 14

Early in the use of e-learning technologies there was student resistance to employing any online elements, butmore recently in her survey Alexander (2005) found that students valued:

1. access to information*

knowing you could pre-read or catch up;

2. asking questions*

asking ‘dumb’ questions without embarrassment and ‘seeing’ what other questions people were asking;

Page 15: Edtech

04/12/2023 15

3. benchmarking and comparing*

comparing your interpretations and products with others and understanding assessment demands and rubrics;

4. time and place flexibility*

being able to juggle work, family and study, reducing long commuting times and maximizing the time spent on each activity and at what place that time would be spent.

Page 16: Edtech

04/12/2023 16

0 Most students still claim that it takes significant time to undertake online studies. (In fact, most good online facilitators also claim it takes more time to provide feedback and support online and to move students into effective online learning techniques.)

0 However, even for this disadvantage there are positive elements. Many students report, for example, that if they are studying in a language that is not their first language the recorded nature of many of the interactions ensures that they are able to keep up and understand with reference to dictionaries and mutually supportive self-help groups.

Page 17: Edtech

04/12/2023 17

0 However, the move into e-learning has not been without casualties. In spite of recognizing that there are advantages for teachers and students, several institutions have pulled out of offering courses.

0 The closure of the UK eUniversitiesWorldwide (UKeU) follows the earlier failure of such schemes in the USA, where the low numbers of enrolled students indicate that this is not always what the majority of students seek for their university education.

0 When reporting on the closure of the UKeU the funding body stated that universities favored a blended approach ‘involving a mixture of IT, traditional, work-based and distance learning to meet the diverse needs of students’ (Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2004).

Page 18: Edtech

Here it is important not to equate each technology employed in educational processes as operating in similar functional ways in each of its contexts of use.

0First, we need to be sensitive to the potential affordances of each technology and not simplistically classify their role as learning with text or image, which is a popular definition of multimedia learning (Mayer, 2005, p. 2).

04/12/2023 18

Page 19: Edtech

04/12/2023 19

0Second, we need to explore the complexity and time demands of the task of integrating a particular strategy or tool into a teaching programme.

0Third, we need to be aware of the organizational aspects of the institutions that are offering the learning experience.

Page 20: Edtech

04/12/2023 20

Tools to support e-learning

0At present e-learning seems to be an amalgamation of various web technologies that replicate the strategies available in the face-to-face classroom. Metaphors through which these components of e-learning create similar relationships to face-to-face contexts include discussion forums, online assessment and textbooks.

Page 21: Edtech

04/12/2023 21

0 However, at the tool level the technology affords much more than the elements available to the individual classroom teacher. For instance, in terms of display and representation of ideas the technology has enabled visual and aural information display within software packages.

0 It is now possible to collect data from the field and represent that data in a graph or animated display that explains the ideas visually and succinctly.

0 In fact, Jonassen (1996) has emphasized the role of technologies in supporting the thinking processes of learners, an approach termed cognitive tools or mindtools.

Page 22: Edtech

04/12/2023 22

Bereiter and Scardamalia (2005) suggested what A we need is a ‘dialogic literacy’where:

0 In every kind of knowledge-based, progressive organization, new knowledge and new directions are forged through dialogue. . . . The dialogue in Knowledge Age organizations is not principally concerned with narrative, exposition, argument, and persuasion (the stand-bys of traditional rhetoric) but with solving problems and developing new ideas. (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2005)

Page 23: Edtech

04/12/2023 23

So what should be part of a more disruptive e-learning?

0While many tools can be used as part of the representational framing of ideas, if they are to support a pedagogical structure they often need to be mixed with other components.

Page 24: Edtech

04/12/2023 24

For digital repositories to be considered a disruptive pedagogical innovation their

capabilities and affordances need to be reviewed.

0They have the potential to support learners in the construction of their own knowledge.

0They afford the capacity for personalized project management and for the collection of resources from more than one source, requiring comparisons and contrasting to ensure that the information found meets the learning goal.

Page 25: Edtech

04/12/2023 25

There were several IT literacy issues;students did not validate the information that they

had retrieved from the web or therepository

0 This means that the way the resources and information were presented did not raise any issue of veracity or interpretation concerns for the students.

0 Thus, when designing learning activities there is a need to demand more conflicting but reasonable information in the task.

Page 26: Edtech

04/12/2023 26

0 There was also evidence that most of the groups were able to employ multimodality in the construction of their learning artifacts.

Page 27: Edtech

04/12/2023 27

0students are tasked with the exploration of the resources by themselves, the understanding of the structure of the information, its modes of representation and methods for assuring the quality and appropriateness are not trivial skills, even for well-developed discipline knowledge specialists.

Page 28: Edtech

04/12/2023 28

Learning objects as potentially disruptive

0Other potential successful shifts from sustaining pedagogies to disruptive pedagogies might also exist in terms of learning objects.

Page 29: Edtech

04/12/2023 29

0 However, as mentioned previously, the commonly used objects at this time are often linked more closely to topics within a syllabus, making them less useable in different contexts. Interestingly, while learning object repositories have been developed in several countries, their usage is not as common as might be expected.

Page 30: Edtech

04/12/2023 30

0 Without exploring the range of reasons, the lack of use appears related to the type of objects being hared. Most are content dependent and contain elements that can only be used to teach a specific topic and ‘fit’ into the context for which it was devised. Learning objects represent the increasing modularization of individual elements that can be retrieved from databases and employed in a number of different learning contexts

Page 31: Edtech

04/12/2023 31

0 To create pedagogical experiences that make a significant impact on either teacher or learner it would seem that potentially disruptive pedagogical options need to be adopted.

Page 32: Edtech

04/12/2023 32

This would be likelyto result in:

1. a shift from content management systems (LMS) to digital repositories;

2. a shift from learning objects (with content embedded) to learning activities that are

shareable pedagogical sequences without content;

Page 33: Edtech

04/12/2023 33

3. a shift from information delivery to more interaction support, thus enabling the social construction of meaningful knowledge;

4. a shift in focus from assessment of the end product to assessment of the learning journey, through keeping portfolios of en route products that indicate changes in understanding and reflection;

Page 34: Edtech

04/12/2023 34

0 5. a shift from a focus on facts and principles to a focus on benchmarking of performance against many other examples, either within the class or between similar groups.

Page 35: Edtech

04/12/2023 35

What do we need to add for disruption

0The announcement of a merger by BlackBoard and Web CT (BlackBoard, 2005) has started many educators rethinking how educational institutions should approach their e-learning strategies and how they support links between and among students and teachers.

Page 36: Edtech

04/12/2023 36

0It becomes a time in which new options in technology use might include open source software as an alternative to provide a less expensive learning management software environment or the rethinking of course design so that investment in one propriety system does not prohibit a later move or switch to another that offers a better pedagogical match.

Page 37: Edtech

04/12/2023 37

0 However, a better consideration might be not to overlay the decision with changes in the technology options, but rather to explore the match between pedagogy, tool And motivation to examine why the learner might commit more time and energy to learning. Several authors have suggested that strategies such as games and three dimensional virtual worlds might provide more disruptive pedagogical strategies (Barab et al., 2005).

Page 38: Edtech

04/12/2023 38

0It is acknowledged that these environments do increase the motivation of the participants. The options for learners to construct their own spaces raises further challenges to perform at higher cognitive levels (Lim et al., 2006).

Page 39: Edtech

04/12/2023 39

0In speaking on the topic of technology and engaged learning, Metros (2003) suggested the additional element of engagement. She argued that for students to become engaged with their learning, e-learning should be redesigned to move them through three processes: transfer of ideas, translation of ideas and transcending ideas. She defined these as involving the following.

Page 40: Edtech

04/12/2023 40

0Transfer. Transfer conventional instructional tools, strategies, communication and delivery to a technology-enhanced learning environment.

0Translate. Redefine and shift conventional instructional tools, strategies, communication and delivery to the technology-enhanced learning environment.

0Transcend. Go beyond conventional instructional tools, strategies, communication and delivery to invent new paradigms for teaching and learning.

Page 41: Edtech

04/12/2023 41

Page 42: Edtech

04/12/2023 42