Top Banner
e-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012
20

E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

e-asTTle writing

Fraser14 May 2012

Page 2: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Scores for e-asTTle writing

• Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work for each element.

• The e-asTTle application converts rubric scores to scale scores.

• Scale scores are linked to curriculum levels.

Page 3: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Scale scores

• Scale scores take into account the “difficulty” of the prompt.

• Scale scores form an interval scale.• Scale scores are generally between 1000 and

2000 units.• Very useful for tracking progress over time.

Page 4: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Linking the scale to curriculum levels

• Scale scores are linked to curriculum levels.• Descriptions provided in the literacy learning

progressions used to define this linking.• Curriculum levels are divided into basic,

proficient and advanced stages (B,P,A).

Page 5: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Linking scale scores and curriculum levels

Page 6: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

New Consideration

• Unlike old tool it does NOT show “This student is a 3P”

• Unlike old tool it does NOT show “ This writing is a 3P”

• It DOES show “ This writing/writer shows many competencies of level 3P”

• When marking err on side of caution – needs to be a lot of evidence

• Scaled scores of old tool can track to new.

Page 7: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

The scale

The level of the blue shading indicates the NZ mean at Year 6

The height of the red circle shows the scale score and the “error” range for this student (1600 ± 44 aWS units)

Page 8: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

How precise are these scores?

1600 ± 44The student’s “true” score most probably falls in the range 1556 to 1644 units.

The “± 44” is known as the “measurement error”.

Students who score at very low or very high levels will have greater errors associated with their scores.

The e-asTTle writing score is reported as a range. For instance:

Page 9: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Reporting

• All the same reports are available.• Some changes to:– The Individual learning Pathways Report– Curriculum Levels Report.

Page 10: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Individual Learning Pathways Report

Page 11: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Strengths, Gaps and Achieved

When a score on an element is:• high given the overall score then it is

listed as a Strength.• low given the overall score then it is

listed as a Gap.• about what would be expected given the

overall score then it is listed as Achieved.

Page 12: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

e-asTTle writing scores

Notice:• No scores related to deep and surface

features.• No scale scores for the individual elements.

Page 13: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

The Curriculum Levels Report

Page 14: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

National reference information for e-asTTle writing

National reference information is available for:• Year level• Year level by gender• Year level by ethnicity• Year level by region• Year level by “English at home”• Year level by “schools like us”

Page 15: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

e-asTTle scores by year level

Page 16: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Entering results

Page 17: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.
Page 18: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Annotated exemplar

Page 19: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Characteristics of the annotated exemplars

• The 76 annotated exemplars:- developed from student responses to the 20 prompts- marked using the rubric- cover all prompts (each prompt has at least 3, covering a range of scores—low,

medium, and high)

• The student scripts exemplify: - typical, not ideal, writing- tricky features to score (e.g., possibly off-topic; multiple purposes)

• The annotations:- justify scores

• The generic exemplars:- from the same group of 76- used to check interpretation of individual categories

Page 20: E-asTTle writing Fraser 14 May 2012. Scores for e-asTTle writing Raw rubric scores tell us which is the best descriptive category for the student’s work.

Marking process• Markers need:

- student script- prompt- marking rubric (ideas, structure and language, organisation, vocabulary, sentence

structure, punctuation, and spelling)- structure and language notes- annotated exemplars- glossary and definitions

• A step by step approach:- read through whole script- work through rubric element by element- check writing against category descriptors and notes to identify best fit category (R1, R2 , R3

etc)- use exemplars to clarify and confirm decisions- moderate decisions- record each score on front page of student writing booklet