Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in the East China Sea Nianzhi Jiao a, , Yanhui Yang a , Ning Hong a , Ying Ma a , Shigeki Harada b , Hiroshi Koshikawa a , Masataka Watanabe b a National Key Laboratory for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China b National Institute of Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050053, Japan Received 5 November 2003; received in revised form 8 December 2004; accepted 7 January 2005 Available online 13 March 2005 Abstract Dynamics of Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus, picoeukaryotes and heterotrophic bacteria in the East China Sea, a marginal sea of the Northwest Pacific, were investigated by flow cytometry in winter 1997 and summer 1998. Temporally, Prochlorococcus were always more abundant in the summer than in the winter, the same was true to Synechococcus except for the oceanic region. In contrast, picoeukaryotes were more abundant in the winter than in the summer. Heterotrophic bacteria were the least variable component among the four groups of picoplankton. Spatially, Prochlorococcus were extremely variable in the sea. They were largely confined to the warm water current areas and absent in the coastal areas in the winter, but present at most locations in the shelf water in the summer. Synechococcus were more abundant in the coastal areas than in the open waters in the summer but inverse in the winter. Compared with other picoplankters, picoeukaryotes showed more responses to water fronts on the shelf. In surface water, the lower boundary temperature for Prochlorococcus to present was around 15.6 1C in the winter but 26.4 1C in the summer, while it could also be found in the stratified deep water where temperature was as low as 14.3 1C in the summer. The higher boundary concentrations of total inorganic nitrogen for Prochlorococcus were about 6.5 mmol L 1 in the winter and about 3.0 mmol L 1 in the summer in the surface layer. The lower boundary salinities for Prochlorococcus were 33.5 psu in the winter and 29.1 psu in the summer. The key limiting factor for the coastward distribution of Prochlorococcus in the East China Sea were considered to be the movements of the Kuroshio Current and the Taiwan Warm Water Currents year around, temperature in winter and freshwater input in summer. Synechococcus correlated to temperature positively and nitrogen negatively in the winter when the high phycourobilin (PUB) to phycoerythrobilin (PEB) ratio strain dominated, and were independent from temperature but were associated with nutrients in the ARTICLE IN PRESS www.elsevier.com/locate/csr 0278-4343/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2005.01.002 Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 592 2187869; fax: +86 592 2187869. E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Jiao).
15
Embed
Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in the East China Sea
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0278-4343/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.cs
�CorrespondiE-mail addre
Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279
www.elsevier.com/locate/csr
Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton and heterotrophicbacteria in the East China Sea
aNational Key Laboratory for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, ChinabNational Institute of Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050053, Japan
Received 5 November 2003; received in revised form 8 December 2004; accepted 7 January 2005
Available online 13 March 2005
Abstract
Dynamics of Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus, picoeukaryotes and heterotrophic bacteria in the East China Sea, a
marginal sea of the Northwest Pacific, were investigated by flow cytometry in winter 1997 and summer 1998.
Temporally, Prochlorococcus were always more abundant in the summer than in the winter, the same was true to
Synechococcus except for the oceanic region. In contrast, picoeukaryotes were more abundant in the winter than in the
summer. Heterotrophic bacteria were the least variable component among the four groups of picoplankton. Spatially,
Prochlorococcus were extremely variable in the sea. They were largely confined to the warm water current areas and
absent in the coastal areas in the winter, but present at most locations in the shelf water in the summer. Synechococcus
were more abundant in the coastal areas than in the open waters in the summer but inverse in the winter. Compared
with other picoplankters, picoeukaryotes showed more responses to water fronts on the shelf. In surface water, the
lower boundary temperature for Prochlorococcus to present was around 15.6 1C in the winter but 26.4 1C in the summer,
while it could also be found in the stratified deep water where temperature was as low as 14.3 1C in the summer. The
higher boundary concentrations of total inorganic nitrogen for Prochlorococcus were about 6.5mmolL�1 in the winter
and about 3.0 mmolL�1 in the summer in the surface layer. The lower boundary salinities for Prochlorococcus were
33.5 psu in the winter and 29.1 psu in the summer. The key limiting factor for the coastward distribution of
Prochlorococcus in the East China Sea were considered to be the movements of the Kuroshio Current and the Taiwan
WarmWater Currents year around, temperature in winter and freshwater input in summer. Synechococcus correlated to
temperature positively and nitrogen negatively in the winter when the high phycourobilin (PUB) to phycoerythrobilin
(PEB) ratio strain dominated, and were independent from temperature but were associated with nutrients in the
e front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
r.2005.01.002
ng author. Tel.: +86592 2187869; fax: +86 592 2187869.
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791266
summer when the low PUB to PEB ratio strain dominated. Heterotrophic bacteria were not significantly affected by
temperature but showed associations with nutrients in the summer. The big seasonal difference in the abundance of
picoeukaryotes was most likely due to species succession.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Prochlorococcus; Synechococcus; Picoeukaryotes; Bacteria; Seasonal variation; East china sea
1. Introduction
Microorganisms have been known to be sig-nificant components of marine ecosystems sincethe discovery of abundant tiny prokaryotes(Hobbie et al., 1977) and formalization of theconcept of the microbial loop (Azam et al., 1983).The discovery of Prochlorococcus, widely distrib-uted bacterial-sized, divinyl chlorophyll containingphotoautotrophs, have added significantly to theunderstanding of functions of marine ecosystems(Chisholm et al., 1988), which have displacedSynechococcus as the most abundant marineautotrophs known. Flow cytometry has beeninstrumental in quantifying picoplankton (Olsonet al., 1988). At least four groups of picoplanktonmay be identified in stained samples: Prochlor-
ococcus, Synechococcus, picoeukaryotes and het-erotrophic bacteria (Marie et al., 1997). Theseorganisms have been studied extensively in oceanicwaters of the Pacific (Campbell and Vaulot, 1993;Blanchot and Rodier, 1996; Campbell et al., 1994,1997), Atlantic (Olson et al., 1990; Buck et al.,1996), Mediterranean Sea (Vaulot et al., 1990),and Arabian Sea (Campbell et al., 1998). On theother hand, few studies dealt with coastal and shelfwaters where ecological conditions are much morevariable seasonally and spatially, and thus moreefforts are needed for a better understanding of thedynamics and regulation mechanisms of pico-plankton in such ecosystems. The East China Seais one of the largest continental shelf seas in theworld. It has nutrient-replete waters in the coastalarea and oligotrophic oceanic waters in the outerregion, and diverse hydrographical and physi-chemical conditions. It is thus an ideal field forecological studies on temporal and spatial dy-namics of biota. However, little is known aboutpicoplankton in the East China Sea. We havepreviously reported the existence of Procholoro-
coccus in the East China sea (Jiao et al., 1998) andrevealed that hydrographic conditions are impor-tant for their distribution in summer (Jiao et al.,2002), but seasonal variations of picoplankton andthe regulating factors remain unclear. Questionsincluding whether or not temperature is critical forthe seasonal difference in the distribution ofProchlorococcus toward the coast? Does nutrientlevel matter with Prochlorococcus in the coastalwater? What are the dynamics of Prochlorococcus
in comparison with other picoplankton groups? Inthis paper, we compared the summer data and thewinter data on the four groups of picoplankton,Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus, picoeukaryotesand heterotrophic bacteria, and discussed thepossible mechanisms controlling their dynamics.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Description of the study area
The East China Sea is a marginal sea of theNorthwest Pacific Ocean. The Yangtze Riverestuary in the west, the Yellow Sea cold watermass in the north, the Taiwan warm Currents inthe south and the Kuroshio Current (from theWestern Equatorial Pacific) in the east give greatimpacts on the sea (Fig. 1, Fig. 2A,a). There areroughly three water systems in the East China Sea:The coastal water system affected strongly by thefresh water input from the Yangtze River ischaracterized by low salinity of below 31 psu(Gong et al., 1996); The Kuroshio Current watersystem located in the outer, deep water region ofthe sea is featured by high temperature and highsalinity (Miao and Yu, 1991); and the transitional(mixing) water system located between the twowhere currents and water masses mix and interact,makes up the majority of the continental shelf
Fig. 1. Location of the East China Sea and the investigation stations. Transects (1, 2, 4, 7 and 9) are indicated by the first digit of the
sampling station numbers.
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1267
water. Thirty-four stations along three transects(1, 2 and 4) and forty-two stations along fivetransects (1, 2, 4, 7 and 9) were investigated inJanuary, 1997 and in July, 1998, respectively (Fig.1). Transect 1 (321N, 122.21E–321N, 1281E) waslocated in the northern part of the sea from theYangtze River estuary to the northeastern regionof the sea near Japan. Transect 2 (281N,127.51E–31.51N, 1291E) was situated on theKuroshio Current along the western edge ofPacific Ocean. Transect 4 (127.51E,281N–122.31E, 311N) was set from the YangtzeRiver estuary through the central and southeastedge of the sea. Transect 7 was from the YangtzeRiver estuary to the northeast of the TaiwanIsland (24.51N, 125.51E) along longitude 125.51E,and transect 9 (27.21N, 1211E–24.751N, 1231E)was set from the southern coast to southeast endof the sea (Fig. 1). During our winter cruise, due tothe shrink of the freshwater plume, the coastal
water, defined as with salinity of below 31 psu(Gong et al., 1996), was not covered by our fixedinvestigation stations. Therefore, only shelf mixingwater and Kuroshio water were discriminated anddiscussed for the winter data.
2.2. Sample collection and flow cytometry
measurement
Water samples were collected at 0, 10, 20, 30, 50,75, 100 and 150m depths using Niskin bottles(Oceanic Co., USA) depending on the waterdepth. Samples for flow cytometry analysis werefixed with glutaraldehyde (final concentration:1%, Vaulot et al., 1989), quick-frozen in liquidnitrogen and stored in a freezer (�20 1C) on boardand replaced in liquid nitrogen in the lab for lateranalysis. The 1997 samples were analyzed with aFACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson)modified for high sensitivity (Dusenberry and
Fig. 2. Distribution of water masses/currents (A, a) (1,Yangtze River; 2, Yellow Sea cold water current; 3, Taiwan Warm Current; 4,
Taiwan Warm Current west branch; 5, Kuroshio Current; 6 Tsujima Warm Current; 7, Yellow Sea Warm Current; 8 coastal current
according to Su, 1989 with modification based on physical data from the present cruises), surface temperature (B, b; unit: 1C), salinity
(C, c; unit: psu), and TIN (D, d; unit: mmolL�1) in February 1997 (left) and July 1998 (right).
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791268
Frankel, 1994), and equipped with a HarvardApparatus SI 100 quantitative pump injector. The1998 samples were run on a FACSCalibur flowcytometer (Becton-Dickinson), equipped with anexternal quantitative sample injector (HarvardApparatus PHD 2000). Procedures were as de-scribed by Olson et al. (1990). The three auto-trophs were distinguished according to theirpositions in plots of red fluorescence (FL3) vs.
901—angle light scatter (SSC), and orange fluor-escence (FL2) vs. SSC. Picoeukaryotes wereidentified by their large size and red fluorescence.SYBR green I (Molecular Probes) was employedas the nucleic acid stain (Marie et al., 1997) forbacteria identification in plots of FL3 vs. greenfluorescence (FL1). Samples for flow cytometryenumeration of autotrophs were run separatelyfrom those for heterotrophic bacteria. Flow
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1269
cytometry data were collected in list mode, andanalyzed with CytoWin 4.1 software (http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/Phyto/cyto.html). Data for nu-trients, temperature, salinity, and transparencywere from the Chinese JGOFS project reports ofthe same cruises.
3. Results
3.1. Physical and chemical conditions
The Kuroshio Current water system was char-acterized by relatively high temperature and lownutrients (Table 1). Conversely low salinity, lowtemperature and high nutrients identified thecoastal water. In the summer, salinity varied fromless than 20 psu in the coastal area to 34.4 psu inthe Kuroshio area. In the winter, however, salinityranged from 31.4 to 34.8 psu and typical coastalwaters were largely out of our investigationstations (Table 1). Surface water temperatureranged from 30 1C in the oceanic water to 25 1Cin the coastal water in the summer and from 22 1Cin the Kuroshio area to 6 1C in the northwest nearcoast area in the winter (Fig. 2B,b; Table 1).Nutrient levels were distinctly higher in the winterthan in the summer. In the summer (Fig. 2d; Table1), total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) were usuallyhigher than 3 mmolL�1, and up to 12.7 mmolL�1 inthe coastal water, from 0.7 to 3.6 mmolL�1 in theshelf mixing water, and from 1.7 to 5 mmolL�1 inthe Kuroshio water; PO4–P were usually higherthan 0.3 mmolL�1 and up to 0.9 mmolL�1 in the
Table 1
Cell abundance and environmental variables in different water system
coastal water, from 0.13 to 0.41 mmolL�1 in theshelf mixing water, and from 0.13 to 0.29 mmolL�1
in the Kuroshio water. In thewinter (Fig. 2D;Table 1), TIN varied from 1.5 to 15.2 mmolL�1
and from 1.7 to 5 mmol L�1 in the shelf mixingwater and the Kuroshio water, respectively; PO4–Pvaried from 0.27 to 0.66 mmolL�1 and from 0.31 to0.49 mmolL�1 in the shelf mixing water and theKuroshio water, respectively. During the winter,water columns were usually well mixed within thesampling depths and nitraclines existed around50m only in the deep-water areas. In the summer,most of the investigation sites were stratified andnitraclines usually developed (Fig. 3).
3.2. Distribution of picoplankton in winter
Synechococcus were ubiquitous in the EastChina Sea, and was most abundant in the south-eastern region around the Kuroshio Current(42� 104 cells mL�1) in the winter. The popula-tions decreased toward the shore and the lowestabundance (o2� 103 cellsmL�1) occurred in thenorthwest near-shore stations 105 and 106 whereboth salinity and temperature were low due to coldwater from the Yellow Sea (Fig. 4A).
Prochlorococcus were present at stations 115(321N, 1271E), 412 (28.751N, 1261E) and eastwardin the sea (Fig. 4B, Fig. 5 Pro). The depth-weighted average cell abundance ranged from1� 103 in the shelf mixing water to 5� 104
cellsmL�1in the Kuroshio water. Populations weremaximal (5.6� 104 cellsmL�1) at 30m of St. 418.From St. 202 (311N, 1291E) and 413 (28.631N,
s of the East China Sea in summer 1998 and winter 1997
Fig. 3. Profiles of temperature (solid lines) and nitrate (dotted lines) and the four picoplankton groups (Syn: Synechococcus; Pro:
Prochlorococcus; Euk: picoeukaryotes; Bact: Hetrotrophic bacteria) at typical stations.
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791270
126.251E) to the southeast, Prochlorococcus abun-dance began to exceed that of other autotrophs. Inthis area the abundance of Prochlorococcus was2–3 times higher than that of Synechococcus, and5–7 times that of picoeukaryotes. Prochlorococcus
were generally more abundant in the KuroshioCurrent and adjacent regions where temperatureswere high but nutrients were low. Picoeukaryoteswere widespread in the East China Sea (Fig. 4C).In the northern part, they dominated the auto-trophic abundance throughout Tr.1. The same wastrue for Tr. 4 through west of St.412 whereProchlorococcus began to present eastward. Inthe oceanic water along the Kuroshio Current(Tr. 2), Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus
populations were greater than that of picoeukar-yotes. However, as one proceeded north, theabundance of the two prokaryotes decreasedrapidly while that of picoeukaryotes remainedabout 6� 103 cellsmL�1 throughout Tr. 2 (Fig. 5).Bacterial populations were typically 4 to 6� 105
cells mL�1, even when autotrophs were relativelyrare (Fig. 4D).
3.3. Distribution of picoplankton in summer
In the summer, the distribution pattern ofSynechococcus was opposite that observed in thewinter. They were more abundant in the coastalareas than in the shelf mixing water and Kuroshiowater. They were most abundant around St.105,St.106, and St. 406 near the Yangtze River estuarywhere the depth-weighted average cell abundancereached a magnitude of 104 cellsmL�1. In the eastand south parts of the sea, Synechococcus wereevenly distributed at a low abundance of about 103
cellsmL�1 (Fig. 4a). Prochlorococcus were presentin almost all the stations investigated, except forthe very northwest part and the Yangtze Riverestuary (Fig. 4b). In general, Prochlorococcus
abundance decreased from the Kuroshio Currentoceanic water to the northwest coastal water. Incontrast to the winter distribution pattern, thesummer coastward invasion of Prochlorococcus
extended further to St.113 (321N, 126.51E) at Tr.1and beyond St.408 (29.881N, 1241E) at Tr.4(Fig. 5). The abundance of Prochlorococcus at St.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
23
26
29
32
23
26
29
32
23
26
29
32
120 123 126 129 13223
26
29
32
Euk
Bact
23
26
29
32
23
26
29
32
Lat
itud
e (N
)
23
26
29
120 123 126 129 132
Longitude (E)
23
26
29
32
Syn
Pro
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D) (d)
(c)
(b)
(a)
Winter Summer
2.5
4.0
5.5
7.0
2.5
4.0
x105
4.5
5.0
4.0 3.54.0
5.5
4.0
7.08.5
2.55.5
0.40.25
0.25
0.250.4
0.40.7
0.55
x103
5.0
3.0
1.04.53.
0
1.0 1.5
x10 4
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
x1040.5
0.5
1.52.5
1.5
0.2 0.40.1
0.60.2
Fig. 4. Distribution of the depth-weighted average cell abundance (cellsmL�1) of Synechococcus (A, a), Prochlorococcus (B, b),
picoeukaryotes (C, c) and heterotrophic bacteria (D, d) in the winter (left) and the summer (right).
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1271
408 and St. 409 reached 7.2� 104 cellsmL�1,which was very close to the maximal abundancerecorded at the Kuroshio Current (St.206:9.8� 104 cellsmL�1, St.804: 7.6� 104 cellsmL�1),and exceeded that of the adjacent stations by asignificant amount. The distribution pattern ofpicoeukaryotes was similar to that of Synechococ-
cus (Fig. 4c), it was most abundant around St.402and St.111 where depth-weighted average cellabundance was at the level of 103 cells mL�1. Near
the Kuroshio Current, depth-weighted average cellabundance of picoeukaryotes dropped to the levelof 102 cellsmL�1. This southeastward decreasingtrend was also found in the distribution of bacteria(Fig. 4d). The high abundance zone of bacteria(St.104, 1.7� 106 cellsmL�1) appeared to beassociated with the Yellow Sea and the YangtzeRiver estuary. The minimum concentration ofbacteria occurred within the Kuroshio Current.Notably, there was a low abundance zone of
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791272
bacteria of 3.5� 105 cells mL�1 around St.409where the highest abundance of Prochlorococcus
was recorded.
3.4. Seasonal variation
Synechococcus were generally more abundant inthe summer than in the winter. Along Tr. 1 (Fig.5A, Syn), for example, its abundance ranged from8.5� 104 cellsmL�1 in the summer to below2� 103 cellsmL�1 in the winter. The most extremeseasonal variation in Synechococcus abundanceoccurred at St.105 where the populations in thesummer were 200-fold those in the winter.Prochlorococcus were generally absent in theregion, but present in the east part of the transectwhere summer populations (up to 2� 104
cellsmL�1 on average) were 7–23 times higherthan in the winter (Fig. 5A, Pro). Picoeukaryotespopulations along Tr.1, increased from an averageof 4.3� 102 cells mL�1 in the summer to 2.1� 103
cellsmL�1 in the winter (Fig. 5A, Euk). Bacterialpopulations were 6-fold higher in the summer(1.2� 106 cellsmL�1) than in the winter in the nearshore area from station 102–107 but similar oreven lower in the summer than in the winter in theoff shore area (from 3.1� 105 in summer to5.9� 105 cells mL�1 in winter).Along transect 4, Synechococcus were more
abundant in the summer (0.43–6.63� 104
cellsmL�1) than in the winter (average of0.22� 104 cellsmL�1), except for station 418 inthe Kuroshio Current. The variability between theseasons ranged from 2-to 18-fold with an average
ARTICLE IN PRESS
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1273
of 8.5-fold. The largest seasonal variations oc-curred near the coast (St.406, Fig. 5C, Syn). Withrespect to geographical distribution, the abun-dance of Prochlorococcus varied more abrupt thanthat of Synechococcus (Fig. 5C, Pro). For instance,Prochlorococcus were undetectable from St. 410coastward in the winter but its concentrationincreased to 7� 104 cellsmL�1 in the summer atthe same station. The averaged abundances ofProchlorococcus along this transect were 4.5� 104
cells mL�1 in the summer vs. 1.8� 103 cellsmL�1
in the winter. Picoeukaryotes cell numbers wereconsistently higher in the winter, and increased5–70-fold from 5.6� 102 cellsmL�1 in the summerto 7.1� 103 cellsmL�1 in the winter (Fig. 5C,Euk). Seasonal difference in bacterial abundancewas the smallest among the four groups ofmicroorganisms (Fig. 5C, Bact).Along transect 2, cell abundances of Synecho-
coccus, bacteria and picoeukaryotes were all higherin the winter than in the summer (Fig. 5B). Thiswas not the case for Prochlorococcus, which weremore abundant in the summer. Along the Kur-oshio Current, seasonal differences in Synechococ-
cus abundance were smaller but variation trendswere opposite to each other in the two seasons(Fig. 5B, Syn). In contrast, the cell abundance ofProchlorococcus basically decreased from south tonorth along the Kuroshio Current in both seasons.Cell abundance of picoeukaryotes varied littlegeographically but the seasonal difference wasconsistently huge throughout the whole transect.In the opposite of Prochlorococcus, bacterialabundance decreased along the Kuroshio fromnorth to south in both seasons.Geographically, distinct patterns can be seen in
all the picoplankton populations. For Synecho-
coccus, there was a gradient in abundance whichwas increasing from the northwest (estuarine area)to the southeast (oceanic warm water) in thewinter but decreasing in the same direction in thesummer (Fig. 4A,a). In contrast, abundance ofProchlorococcus were always higher in the south-eastern region with a further coastward distribu-tion in the summer than in the winter (Fig. 4B,b).Picoeukaryotes and heterotrophic bacteria showedgeographical distribution patterns just in thereflection of that of Prochlorococcus, i.e., more
abundant in the northwestern region than thesoutheastern region of the sea with a strongertrend in the summer and more fluctuations in thewinter (Fig. 4C,c,D,d).The depth profiles of these four groups can be
distinguished between the two seasons. Due tostratification, picoplankton profiles are morecurved and distinct peaks could be recognized inthe summer. In the winter, however, the upperwater columns were mixed very well, and pico-plankton profiles were less variable (Fig. 3).
4. Discussion
Comparing the distribution patterns of pico-plankton and hydrological and physi-chemicalparameters, similarities can be seen between thebiological and environmental variables (Table 1,Figs. 2 and 4). The difference in the intrusionextent of the warm current, Kuroshio Current intothe continental shelf between the two seasonsobviously caused differences in the distribution oftemperature, salinity, nutrients and so on, and thelater consequently resulted in differences in biolo-gical responses between the two seasons.Temperature is reported to be crucial to Pro-
chlorococcus (Olson et al., 1990; Moore et al.,1995). In this study, significant correlationsbetween the abundance of Prochlorococcus andtemperature were found in both the summer(r ¼ 0:49; n ¼ 141; po0:01) and the winter(r ¼ 0:84; n ¼ 57; po0:01) (Fig. 6 Pro). Prochlor-
ococcus were more abundant and less temperature-dependent in the summer. In the surface water, thelowest temperature for Prochlorococcus to presentin the winter was 15.6 1C (Fig. 6 Pro) which wasconsistent with the reported critical temperature(15 1C) for Prochlorococcus to grow (Olson et al.,1990; Buck et al., 1996), suggesting that the winterdistribution of Prochlorococcus in the marginal seawas limited by temperature. In contrast, the lowerboundary temperature for Prochlorococcus in thesummer was 26.4 1C, much higher than 15 1C.While Prochlorococcus could also be found in thestratified deep water where temperature was as lowas 14.3 1C in the summer (Fig. 6 Pro). Therefore,summer coastward distribution of Prochlorococcus
Fig. 6. Seasonal patterns of picoplankton as a function of water temperature. (Triangle symbols are surface water samples; the
temperature ranged from 6.0 to 22.0 1C in the winter and 12.4–30 1C in summer. Numbers at arrows in the top panel were boundary
temperatures for Prochlorococcus, see text).
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791274
in the marginal sea was not limited by watertemperature but other factors. Nutrients have beensuggested to play a role in the distritution ofProchlorococcus (Blanchot et al., 1992; Campbelland Vaulot, 1993). By plotting abundance ofProchlorococcus vs. nutrients, inverse correlationsbetween the two were found in both the winter andthe summer (Fig. 7 Pro). In terms of the nutrientboundaries, Prochlorococcus disappeared whensurface water TIN was greater than 3 mmolL�1
on the way intruding coastward in both theseasons. On the other hand, Prochlorococcus werealso found when surface water TIN was more than6 mmolL�1 in the northeastern region of the seawhere a branch of the Kuroshio Current intrudinginto the nutrient rich water of the Yellow Sea (Fig.2C, and Fig. 7 Pro). Furthermore, Prochlorococcus
were even present under TIN of up to14.6 mmolL�1 in the deep water. These concentra-tions are within the reported nutrient tolerancerange of Prochlorococcus (Chavez et al., 1991;Vaulot and Partensky, 1992). However, half of theTIN in the study area was contributed by nitrate(12.5 mmolL�1 in winter and 2.1 mmol L�1in sum-
mer) that is not really utilized by Prochlorococcus
(Moore et al., 2002; Dufresne et al., 2003).Therefore, for the coastward distribution ofProchlorococcus, nutrients are not necessarilycritical either, just like what Partensky et al.(1999a) pointed out that the role of nutrients inregulating Prochlorococcus is very tricky to eval-uate. Salinity, as a variable in the marginal sea,showed a different boundary values for Prochlor-
ococcus in the two seasons, 33.5 psu in the winterand 29.1 psu in the summer. And a significantcorrelation between Prochlorococcus and salinityin surface layer in the summer (r ¼ 0:58) wasrecorded. Although Prochlorococcus could befound in river month with salinity as low as1.2 psu (Vaulot et al., 1990), the correlationbetween Prochlorococcus and salinity here in thesummer suggesting salinity indicated comprehen-sive impacts of the Yangtze River input on the sea,such as, high heavy metal concentrations by riverinputs may inhibit the growth of Prochlorococcus
(Chisholm et al., 1992). Similar correlationsbetween Prochlorococcus and salinity are alsoobserved in other boundary margin areas (Crosbie
Fig. 7. Seasonal patterns of picoplankton as a function of nutrients (12.7 and 15.2 mmolL�1 are the highest observations in summer
and winter respectively. 6.5 and 3.1 mmolL�1 at arrows in the top panel are the nitrogen thresholds for Prochlorococcus in the surface
water in winter and summer respectively. Triangles are winter samples from deep water with high nutrients).
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1275
and Furnas, 2001; Calvo-ıDaz et al., 2004).Therefore, it appeared that, in addition to theinfluences of warm water currents (Jiao et al.,2002), the coastward distribution of Prochlorococ-
cus in the East China Sea was significantlyregulated by temperature in winter and by fresh-water input and related factors in summer.In open oceans, there are usually two clusters of
Prochlorococcus (typical representatives: SS120and MED4) can be found (Ferris and Palenik,1998; West et al., 2001). We could not discriminateany clusters by flow cytometry in all of the samplesfrom all water depths in the East China Sea.Exploration with16S rDNA analysis of a samplefrom the depth of 50% surface light density of theSt.413 showed that only one cluster, the high lightgenotype II (HL II) was present in the East ChinaSea (data not shown). This is consistent with themolecular observations in the South China Seawhich is another marginal sea of the NorthwestPacific located in the south of the East China Seathat HL II type of Prochlorococcus was the onlypopulation present at both surface and bottom ofthe euphotic zone (Ma et al., 2004). This is also
consistent with that a Prochlorococcus strain fromthe Suruga Bay, Japan, was shown by the 16SrRNA sequence (1147 bp) to be very similar to thatof the GP2 strain (99.6% homology) whichbelongs to High Light-Adapted Clade (Shimadaet al., 1995; Partensky et al, 1999b).Compared with Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus
are reported to be more nutrient-dependent andusually more abundant in winter when mixingenhances the availability of nutrients in theeuphotic zone (Olson et al., 1990; Blanchot et al.,1992; Campbell and Vaulot, 1993; Campbell et al.,1997; Michele et al., 2001). In the case of themarginal sea in this study, there seemed to be aconflict with the above conclusions obtained fromthe oceans. That is, Synechococcus were actuallymore abundant in the summer when nutrients wereless abundant than in the winter. This pattern isconsistent with a previous microscopic observationon Synechococcu in the same sea (Chiang et al.,2002). Thus, there must be some other controllingmechanisms behind the phenomena. Furtherstatistical analysis showed significant correlationsbetween Synechococcus and temperature existing
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–12791276
in the winter, indicating that temperature could bea limiting factor in the cold season as alsosuggested by Chiang et al., 2002. In summer,however, temperature was no longer limiting (Fig.6 Syn), Synechococcus thrived in the northwesternregion where temperature was relative low butnutrients were replete (Fig. 4A,a). Looking at theseasonal differences in the abundance of Synecho-
coccus in the Kuroshio water (oceanic water)where winter average temperature (20.4 1C) wasnot limiting, one would find that the winterabundance were about 4-fold the summer abun-dance. Such difference is quite the same seen atALOHA in the central Pacific (Campbell et al.,1997) and at BATS in the Sargasso Sea (Michele etal., 2001). Since the winter nutrient levels wereabout 2-fold the summer ones in the Kuroshiowater due to winter mixing (Table 1), the higherwinter abundance of Synechococcus was obviouslydue to high availability of nutrient in the winter.This explains the above apparent conflicts, andshows the difference in seasonal dynamics ofSynechococcus between marginal seas and theoceans.From the observed distributions, it appeared
that the summer-dominant population is morenutrient-dependent (positive trend with increasingTIN, Fig. 7 Syn) and temperature-independentwhen temperature is relatively high (Fig. 6 Syn).The winter-dominant population is more tempera-ture-dependent (Fig. 6 Syn) and better suited tosuccessful competition at lower nutrient levels(Fig. 7 Syn). The former resembled the lowphycourobilin (PUB) to phycoerythrobilin (PEB)ratio strain that liked coastal water and the lateracted as the high PUB/PEB ratio strain that likedoceanic water (Wood et al., 1985; Olson et al.,1988; Campbell et al., 1998). Although we couldnot successfully discriminate the two Synechococ-
cus strains in the summer samples, we didobserve them in the winter samples (Fig. 8A).The low and high PUB/PEB ratio strains werepredominant in the coastal and open waters,respectively (Fig. 8B). In the continental shelfwater, the two strains co-existed but they verticallydifferentiated along water depth. The two strainsshared the upper layer of the euphotic zone, but inthe bottom layer of the euphotic zone, the low
PUB/PEB ratio strain disappeared (Fig. 8 upperpennel).Compared with other picoplankters, picoeukar-
yotes were most variable between the two seasons(Fig. 6 Euk, Fig. 7 Euk). The abrupt seasonalvariability was most likely to be caused byseasonal species succession. Recently, molecularstudies have brought to light the great diversity ofpicoeukaryotes (Dıez et al., 2001), and diversecomposition provide the basis for species succes-sion. Meanwhile, nutrient structure changes be-tween the two seasons also add fuel to the fire forthe succession. Nitrogen was relatively limiting inthe summer, whereas phosphorus was relativelylimiting in the winter (Table 1). Analysis ofpigment components by HPLC did show remark-able species succession of phytoplankton in theEast China Sea that diatoms are the mostabundant taxa followed by chlorophytes, crypto-phytes, chrysophytes and prymnesiophytes in thecold season, but in summer, diatom dominancewas observed only at station nearest to the coastand become less abundant sharply toward the midand off shelf (Furuya et al., 2003). We speculatethat the high winter abundance of picoeukaryotes,as assemblages being composed of differentspecies, was most probably contributed by dia-toms which like low temperature. This wasconfirmed by later cruises (2001–2002) to the samearea (Li, 2004).There were no correlations between temperature
and heterotrophic bacteria either in the winter orin the summer. Bacteria showed a positivecorrelation with TIN in the summer but not inthe winter. The seasonal variation in bacterialabundance was the smallest among all the micro-organisms investigated. It was only slightlyaffected by nutrients in the summer (Fig. 7 Bact).Compared to other marginal seas such as the
northwestern Indian Ocean (Veldhuis et al., 1997)and the Gulf of Aqaba in the Red Sea (Lindell andPost, 1995), a striking difference is that theabundance of picoeukaryotes in the East ChinaSea was relatively high in winter and very low insummer, on the contrary, Synechococcus in theouter region of the estuarine area were extremelyabundant in summer. This ‘‘more Synechococcus,less picoeukaryotes’’ pattern characterized the East
Fig. 8. Distribution of the low and high PUB/PEB ratio Synechococcus strains in winter. A. Flow cytograms of the two strains at
different water depths of the continental shelf waters. B. Distribution of the two strains along different transects.
N. Jiao et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 1265–1279 1277
China Sea. Between Prochlorococcus and Synecho-
coccus, the abundance ratio was similar to those inArabian Sea near shore and nitrate replete regions(Campbell et al., 1998) and the Mediterranean Sea(Vaulot et al., 1990), but much less than those in theoligotrophic oceans, by 50–200-fold (Buck et al.,1996; Landry et al., 1996; Campbell et al., 1997).
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the NSFC projectno. 40232021, and MOST projects G2000078500,2001CB409700, 2003DF000040 and2003AA635160 and NSFC projects 40176037,30170189. We are grateful to Prof. SW Chisholm,Dr. E Mann and people at Chisholm Lab at MITfor their kind assistances in flow cytometryanalysis of the 1997 cruise samples and theirvaluable suggestions for the manuscript. We thankthe Chinese JGOFS program and Dr. D Hu forproviding the physical and chemical data.