Dr Herbert Hooi MBBS LLB(Hons) FACEM FACAM cosmetic MD Sydney PLATELET RICH PLASMA AND SKIN REJUVENATION THE HISTORY AND THE EVIDENCE
Dr Herbert Hooi
MBBS
LLB(Hons)
FACEM
FACAM
cosmetic MD
Sydney
PLATELET RICH PLASMA
AND
SKIN REJUVENATION
THE HISTORY AND THE EVIDENCE
SPEAKER’S DECLARATION OF INTEREST
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Air fares or accommodation expenses supplied by organization or company related to
presentation
NO
Shareholder or director in company associated with presentation NO
Direct or indirect payment received from company or organization associated with presentation NO
Direct or indirect payment received from outside organization or entity to perform investigation
being presented
NO
Past payment for services by company or organization associated with presentation NO
Basic Science
Introduction to PRP
The theory of the effect of PRP on the skin
History of the use of PRP for skin rejuvenation
Clinical evidence
PRP – the small print
Problems
Unresolved debates
References
PLATELET RICH PLASMA
Platelets
and
PRPBASIC SCIENCE
PRP is an autologous product of whole blood,
characterised by higher than physiological
platelet concentrations, platelet Growth
Factors and plasma proteins in a small
volume of plasma
In the literature, there are a number of
different preparations of “PRP”, the names
are used interchangeably but they are not all
equivalent functionally or practically
PLATELET RICH PLASMA (PRP)
The platelet fraction of blood is basically derived
from centrifugation of anti -coagulated whole blood
PRODUCTION OF PRP
Source: http://www.medical-labs.net/blood-plasma-and-buffy-coat-318/
Spinning non-anticoagulated blood produces platelet -rich
fibrin (PRF) (Choukroun 2001)
Small anuclear circulating
cell fragments of the
megakaryocyte in bone
marrow
Secrete numerous Growth
Factors on “activation’
Two main functions –
haemostasis
wound healing
Complex internal structure
WHAT ARE PLATELETS?
Surface Outer glycocalyx with
glycoprotein receptors (1)
Inner lipid bilayer membrane
Subsurface membrane contractile system Actin-myosin systems
Circumferential microtubular coil (2)
Open canalicular system
Organelles α granules (3)
dense granules (4)
lysosomes
Other components Glycogen (5)
Endoplasmic reticulum
Mitochondria
PLATELET STRUCTURE
White JG. Platelet structure. Ch 7, fig 7-24 in Michelson A (ed). Platelets (3e)
Academic Press London
1
2
3
4
5
Platelet α granules contain > 100 dif ferent biologically active
molecules
Coagulation factors and mediators
Fibrinogen and VWF, Factors V, XI, XIa, XIIa, XIII
Prothrombin, HMW kininogens (intrinsic)
Plasminogen and Plasmin inhibitors
Growth factors
PDGF – platelet-derived growth factor
FGF – fibroblast growth factor
VEGF – vascular endothelial growth factor
TGFα, TGFβ1 – transforming growth factors
EGF – epidermal growth factor
PLATELET GROWTH FACTORS
Platelet-derived Growth Factors act as stimulators and
regulators of multiple cellular processes in the wound healing
process such as
mitogenesis (cell division)
chemotaxis (cell migration)
differentiation (stem cells)
increased metabolism
The targets are cells such as fibroblasts, macrophages,
neutrophils, immune cells and mesenchymal stem cells which
all have interacting and cooperative roles in wound healing
PLATELET GROWTH FACTORS
WOUND HEALING
Mendes JJ, Neves J. Diabetic Foot Infections: Diagnosis and Treatment. Jnl Diabetic Foot Infections 2012;4(2): 256-45
Why is “wound healing” important in
cosmetic medicine?
WOUND HEALING
Wound healing is the pathway by which
we achieve (most of, if not all) our
results in cosmetic medicine
Collagen
Hyaluronic acid
New tissue growth (skin, blood vessels, fat)
WOUND HEALING
Fundamental intention of introducing platelets
into tissues is to stimulate a tissue
regeneration or “wound-healing” response, by
inducing
neocollagenesis
angiogenesis
production of extra-cellular matrix (hyaluronic acid)
regeneration of epidermis
regulation of MMPs and their inhibitors and
new tissue formation (skin, blood vessels, fat, bone)
THE BASIC PREMISE OF PRP
Haemostasis Inflammation Tissue regeneration Tissue remodeling
1. Formation
of 3D mesh
& platelets
cohesion
2. Platelets and
leukocytes release
growth factors
3. Migration of
macrophages and
stem cells (cell
adhesion
molecules)
4. Stem cell
proliferation
/ Stimulation
of fibroblasts
5. Stem cell
differentiation /
Proliferation
fibroblasts /
Increased
expression MMPs
RegenLab Switzerland
MECHANISM OF ACTION OF PRP IN VIVO
In practical terms, PRP
Accelerates healing in injured tissue (adjuvant
therapy)
Rejuvenates ageing (but otherwise uninjured)
skin as a consequence of the wound healing
response (primary therapy)
Stimulation of a natural process
Takes time
Individual variation in response
THE BASIC PREMISE OF PRP
HISTORY OF PLATELET
PREPARATIONS AND
SKIN REJUVENATION
1975 - first reference to platelets being used as a healing agent -mixture of autologous platelets, fibrinogen and thrombin was studied as a corneal adhesive (Rosenthal et al 1975)
1976 – platelet factors stimulate fibroblasts (Rutherford 1976)
1982 – wound healing properties of platelets demonstrated in vivo – angiogenesis, neocollagenesis (Knighton 1982)
1986 – platelet-derived growth factors used to treat chronic non-healing wounds (Knighton 1986)
1987 – PRP could be used as part of the process of blood salvage during surgery to reduce the need for blood transfusions (Ferrari et al 1987)
1990 – PRP used to accelerate healing of chronic diabetic lower l imb ulcers (Margolis 2001)
1990 onwards– expanded use of PRP in various fields such as dentistry, maxillofacial surgery, vascular surgery, plastic surgery
1990 onwards – expanding use of “platelet gel” (platelet -r ich fibrin) in tissue healing and bone regeneration in oral and M -F surgery, wound care and cosmetic surgery (Marx 1998, Everts 2006)
HISTORY OF PLATELET USE
2008 – PRP first used on otherwise normal skin to improve skin texture (Radaelli 2010) (Regenlab)
2008 – Kakudo reported that PRP / PPP can stimulate proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts in vitro
2009 – PRFM reported as a dermal fil l ing agent (Sclafani 2009) (activated PRP - Selphyl)
2011 – In vivo histological evidence of PRP effect on human skin (Sclafani 2011) (Selphyl)
2011 – PRP used as adjuvant therapy to accelerate wound healing after laser skin resurfacing (Lee 2011 and Zhu 2013)
2014 – PRP combined with microneedling to improve acne scarring (Nofal 2014, Chawla 2014)
2015 – PRP improves photodamaged skin (Diaz-Ley 2015)
HISTORY OF PRP USE
PRP AND SKIN
THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE
PRP in cosmetic medicine started around 9 years ago
Gaining popularity worldwide – notably via celebrity endorsement!
“Vampire” Facials, Face LiftTM
PRP – COSMETIC MEDICINE
PubMed search (“platelet” “rich” “plasma” “skin”)
337 English language results (Feb 2017)
54 papers identified dealing with PRP and skin rejuvenation
No published clinical in vivo studies until 2008
Radaelli 2010 JDD
Sclafani 2011 AFPS
Diaz-Ley 2015 DT
Abuaf 2016 AD
PRP – COSMETIC MEDICINE
RADAELLI 2010
JDD 2010
Case series
23 patients, age 28-70
3 sessions of Regenlab PRP every month
4ml distributed over the forehead, cheek, NLF and neck
RADAELLI 2010
Subjective grading system – patient and doctor
Improvements in look (87%), wrinkles (52%), tone (83%) at 4 months after initial session
AfterBefore
Archives Facial Plastic Surgery Oct 2011
Method
4 healthy adult volunteers
PRP injected into deep dermis of upper arms (Selphyl)
Serial FT skin biopsies over 10 weeks
Histologic examination
SCLAFANI 2011
SCLAFANI 2011
Minimal inflammation
noted at day 7
Activated fibroblasts
New collagen
Angiogenesis in mid to
deep dermis
Clinically, swelling in
treated area had
resolved but noted
presence of persistent
“fullness” in the skin
SCLAFANI 2011
Fibroblast response
tapering by day 70
Extensive areas of new
collagen and new blood
vessels
Dermal adipocytes
persisted
Patients reported a
“softer” texture of the
treated skin
DIAZ-LEY 2015
Dermatologic Therapy Oct 2015
PRGF-Endoret
3 sessions at 3 week intervals
10 healthy subjects aged 34-59
Punch biopsies done at baseline and at week 12
Subjective grading system
Histological analysis
Increased skin thickness (45%)
Increased numbers of fibroblasts in deep dermis
Increased collagen volume
Decreased areas of solar elastosis
Subjective rating of satisfaction
grading scale 0-4
7/9 were satisfied or very satisfied
All patients with photodamagereported improvement whereas no patient without photodamagereported improvement
DIAZ-LEY 2015
Single session of PRP on one side and saline on the other
side, nappage-microneedle technique
Measured increase in dermal collagen with punch biopsies at
28 days
Saline – 46% (attributed to the microneedling effect)
PRP – 88%
PRP:saline ratio 1.93:1
ABUAF 2016
Annals Dermatology Dec
2016
Regenlab, activated with
calcium
20 randomly chosen
volunteers, aged 40-49,
skin types I -III
ABUAF 2016
ABUAF 2016
PRP – THE SMALL PRINT
“Oils ain’t oils” – not all PRP are created equal
Terminology (Davis et al 2014)
PRP - platelet-rich plasma
PRF - platelet-rich fibrin
P-PRP - pure platelet-rich plasma
L-PRP - leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma
PRGF, plasma rich in growth factors or preparation rich in growth factors
PRFM - platelet-rich fibrin matrix
PC - platelet concentrate
PRC - platelet-rich concentrate
cPRP - concentrated platelet-rich plasma
PG - platelet gel
PRG - platelet-rich gel
PLG - platelet-leukocyte gel
BC-PRP - buffy coat platelet-rich plasma
PRP - THE SMALL PRINT
Problems with PRP for skin rejuvenation in the l iterature
1. There were no clinical studies to start with Initial justification of effects extrapolated from in vitro studies and
studies in other tissues – bone, joint -> practice preceded the evidence!
2. First studies Case studies; lack of controls, patient selection
Subjective grading of effect – confirmation bias
3. Standardisation PRP preparation – PRP / PRF / other?
PRP platelet counts – usually not checked and not reported
Activators
Protocol variation – single session v multiple sessions
4. Other factors Platelet concentration
White cell counts
What about PPP? (Kakudo 2008, Kim 2011)
PRP – THE SMALL PRINT
In an attempt to overcome dif ferent terminology and the lack
of standardisation of studies with respect to platelet
concentration, the manner of activation and the number of
remaining white and red blood cells, a number of
classification systems were proposed
Dohan Ehrenfest 2009 [Oral and M-F Surgery]
Mishra 2012 [Sports medicine]
DeLong (PAW) 2012 [Orthopaedics]
POSEIDO 2013 [Oral and M-F Surgery]
Magalon (DEPA) 2015 [Sports medicine]
Mautner (PLRA) 2015 [Orthopaedics]
No currently accepted single classification system, whether in
orthopaedics, sports medicine, surgery or cosmetic medicine
PRP – THE SMALL PRINT
DOHAN EHRENFEST CLASSIFICATION
Type Form White Cells Example
Systems
P-PRP (Pure PRP) Unactivated – liquid
Activated - gel
Almost none Vivostat PRF
PRGF/Endoret
L-PRP (Leukocyte- and
Platelet-Rich Plasma)
Unactivated – liquid
Activated - gel
Varies SmartPReP
Magellan
Angel / Arthrex
GPS III
Regen
Selphyl
P-PRF (Pure Platelet-
Rich Fibrin)
Activated - gel Minimal Fibrinet*
L-PRF (Leukocyte- and
Platelet-Rich
Fibrin)
Activated - gel Varies Intra-Spin*
• In cosmetic medicine, primary application technique is liquid form
• Majority of available systems on the market produce L-PRP
Definition of Platelet -Rich Plasma
Autologous plasma with platelet concentration above baseline (Marx 2001)
Too Simplistic!
Problems
Whose baseline?
Normal platelet count range is wide (150K -400K/μL)
How much above baseline?
Marx / Everts count >1000K/μL or 5 x baseline
5 x 150K = 750K; 5 x 400K = 2000K (750K < 2x)
Platelet counts often not reported in studies
Other factors involved in therapeutic effect (or lack of)
Platelet poor plasma
Residual white cells
Residual red cells
Manner of activation, if any
PRP – THE SMALL PRINT
Two major types of PRP preparation systems (De Long 2012)
plasma (Regen, Selphyl, Endoret)
buffy coat (Angel, GPS, Harvest, Emcyte)
PLATELET CONCENTRATION
Plasma systems
Intention is to exclude WC –shorter and slower spin times and rates
Platelet concentrations ~ <2x-3x baseline
Buffy coat systems
Intention is to capture as many platelets as possible –also will capture WCs and RCs – longer and higher spin times and rates
Harvest 3-7x
Emcyte 7-10x
Davis 2014
Does this matter?
If some is good, is more always better?
Concept of Therapeutic Index
In context of bone regeneration, concentration of > 1M (1000K or 3 -
6x baseline) required (Marx 2001, Weibrich 2004); however,
concentrations > 6-11x inhibited osteoblast activity (Weibrich 2004)
In vitro evidence suggests that fibroblast proliferation, collagen
production and mesenchymal stem cell proliferation are dose
dependent (Haynesworth 2002, Liu 2002, Everts 2006)
Graziani (2006) studied effect of PRP on osteoblasts and fibroblasts
in vitro, concluded that 2.5x was optimal
PLATELET CONCENTRATION
Issues
Absolute counts not considered
Even if absolute counts reported, the count does not necessarily
indicate a higher GF end-product (especially if comparing individuals
– Cho 2011)
Concentrations (as compared with total platelet yield) can be
manipulated by the end user (by taking off PPP)
Currently, no study of PRP for skin rejuvenation that used
systems yielding higher platelet concentrations
Thus, no direct comparison comparing macroscopic (visible)
effects of lower platelet concentrations v higher platelet
concentrations for skin rejuvenation in vivo has been
performed
No evidence, at present, to suggest that higher platelet counts
are better in the context of skin rejuvenation
PLATELET CONCENTRATION
Effect of including WC in end-product is contestable (esp in
orthopaedic literature)
Neutrophils contain pro-inflammatory molecules such as
MMPs, TNF-α, IL -1β is it logical to think that excluding
neutrophils may lead to better tissue healing?
Higher than baseline WC counts (esp. neutrophils) leads to more
inflammation may be beneficial in situations of open wounds
and infection (Frykberg 2010, Saad Setta 2011, Rappl 2011)
Recall that Platelet GFs are chemotactic – neutrophils will be
attracted to the area anyway in the first phase of wound healing!
Kawazoe (2012) showed that WC-containing PRP enhanced
tissue thickness in a mice auricle model over PRP alone
Dohan Ehrenfest (2012) demonstrated that L -PRF membranes
are more robust than P-PRF membranes and release more GFs
WHITE CELLS (WC)
Published papers have used plasma-type PRP preparations (that
is, with a lower than baseline WC)
Recall that Radaelli, Sclafani, Diaz-Ley, Abuaf all used WC-poor (and
moderate platelet concentration) PRP systems
Sclafani showed histologically that at day 7, there was minimal
inflammation (but … may be end stage of inflammatory phase)
No clinical papers for skin rejuvenation in vivo for the higher
platelet count and white cell -rich buffy coat systems
Superiority of one type of system over another (in regard to
white cell counts and skin rejuvenation) lacks proof at present
WHITE CELLS (WC)
Platelets must be “activated” to release GFs ADP, thrombin, collagen, fibrinogen VWF
Early PRP preparations used bovine thrombin as an activator issues of antigenicity
Current systems use calcium (usually chloride salt) as this is a natural trigger for the clotting cascade autologous thrombin
Rationale– ensures formation of a fibrin network virtually total platelet activation accelerated delivery of growth factors to treated area (all GFs secreted by 4-8 hours)
Does this make a difference? Platelet activation occurs in vivo
“Natural” activation gradual growth factor release over 5-7 days v “activated” release over 4 -8 hours (Harrison 2011)
Exceptions – wounds, fat grafting, ?emphasising angiogenesis, PPP
All published studies use calcium as an activator
ACTIVATION
PPP is often discarded during the process of harvesting PRP –
assumption is that this fraction contributes little, if any,
tissue effect this assumption is likely incorrect
In vitro studies of activated PPP demonstrated mitogenic
effects of human MSCs (hMSCs), fibroblasts and adipocytes
(Koellensperger 2006, Kocaoemer 2007, Kakudo 2008, Cho
2011)
These studies suggest that there are other factors within
plasma (or other cells) that also play a significant part in the
wound healing process apart from platelets
Note that the PPP must be “activated” with calcium chloride,
unactivated PPP has not been shown to have any tissue
effects (Kakudo)
PLATELET POOR PLASMA
PRP is a viable procedure for skin rejuvenation
Simple to use, quick, effective with minimal downtimes but …
Results take time
Set expectations
Clinical evidence demonstrating effectiveness is building
(slowly)
Doesn’t matter what system you use
Platelet concentrations
White cell counts
Don’t discard PPP
SUMMARY
THANK YOU!
C h aw la S . S p l i t Fa c e C o m p a r a t i ve S t u d y o f M ic ro n eed l ing w i t h P R P Ve r su s M ic ro n eed l in g w i t h V i t a m in C in Tr ea t in g At ro p h ic Po s t Ac n e S c a r s . J C u t a n Aes t h et S u r g . 2 014 Oc t - Dec ; 7 ( 4 ) :209 -1 2 .
C h o H S , S o n g I H , Pa r k S -Y, e t a l . I n d i v id u a l va r ia t io n in G row t h Fa c to r C o n c en t r a t ion s in P la te le t -r i c h P la sm a a n d i t s I n f lu en c e o n H u m a n M esen c hy m a l S tem C e l l s . Ko r J L a b M ed 2 011 ; 31 : 21 2 -1 8
C h o u k ro u n J , Ad d a F, S c h o efe r C , Ve r ve l le A . Un e o p p o r t u n i te en p a ro - im p la nto lo g ie : l e P RF. I m p la n to d o n t ie 2 0 01 ; 4 2 : 55 -62 .
C ies l ik - B ie lec ka A , G a z d z ik T S , B ie lec k i T M , C ies l ik T. W hy t h e p la te le t - r i c h g e l h a s a n t im ic ro b ia l a c t i v i t y ? O r a l S u r g Or a l M ed Or a l Pa t h o l Or a l R a d io l E n d o d 2 0 07; 103 : 303 –305 .
Dav is V e t a l . P la te le t -R ic h P r ep a r a t io n s to I m p rove H ea l in g . Pa r t I : Wo r ka b le Op t io n s fo r E ve r y S i z e P r a c t i c e J O r a l I m p la n to l 2 014 Au g ; 4 0 ( 4 ) :500 -10
De L o n g J M et a l . P la te le t - r i c h P la sm a : T h e PAW C la ss i f i c a t io n S y s tem . A r t h ro sc o py 2 01 2 ; 2 8 ( 7 ) : 9 9 8 - 1009
Do h a n E h r en fes t DM , R a sm u sso n L , A lb r ek t sso n T. C la ss i f i c a t io n o f p la te le t c o n c en t ra tes : Fro m p u r e p la te le t - r i c h p la sm a ( P - P R P ) to l eu c o c y te - a n d p la te le t - r i c h f ib r in ( L - P R F ) . Tr en d s B io tec hn o l2 0 09 ; 27: 15S -167.
Do h a n E h r en fes t et a l . D o t h e f i b r in a r c h i tec t u re a n d l e u ko cyte c o n ten t i n f lu en ce t h e g r ow t h f a c to r r e lea se o f p l a te l e t c o n cent r a tes? A n ev i d en ce - ba sed a n swer c o m p a r i n g a p u r e p l a te le t - r i c h p l a sm a ( P - P R P ) g e l a n d a l e u koc yte - a n d p l a te l e t - r i c h f i b r in ( L - P R F( . C u r r P h a r m B i o tec hn o l . 2 01 2 J u n ;1 3(7 ) :1145 - 52 .
D o h a n E h r en fes t e t a l . G u i d e l in es f o r t h e p u b l i ca t io n o f a r t i c les r e l a ted to p l a te le t c o n c en t ra tes ( P l a te le t -R ic h P l a sm a - P R P, o r P l a te le t -R i c h F i b r i n - P R F ) : t h e i n te r na t io n a l c l a ss i f i c a t io n o f t h e P O S E I DO . P O S E IDO 2 01 3; 1 ( 1 ) : 17 - 27
E ver t s PA M et a l . P la te le t - R ic h P la sm a a n d P la te le t G e l : A Rev iew. J o f A m S o c E x t r a - C o r p Tec h n o log y 2 0 06 ; 3 8 : 174 - 1 87
Fer r a r i M , Z ia S , Va lb o n es i M . A n ew tec h n iq u e fo r h em o d i lu t ion , p r ep a r a t io n o f a u to lo g o u s p la te let - r i c h p la sm a a n d in t r a o p er at i ve b lo o d sa l va g e in c a r d ia c su r g e r y. I n t J A r t i f O r g a n s 1 9 87; 10:47 -50 .
REFERENCES
Fr y k b er g RG , Dr i ve r V R , C a r m a n D , e t a l . C h ro n ic wo u n d s t r ea ted w i t h a p hy s io lo g ica l l y r e leva n t c o n c en t r a t ion o f p la te le t - r i c h p la sm a g e l : A p ro sp ec t i ve c a se se r ies . Os to my Wo u n d M a n a g e 2 010 ;56 :36 -44 .
G r a z ia n i F, I va n ovsk i C , C e i S , Du c c i F, To n et t i M , G a b r ie le M . T h e in v i t ro e f fec t o f d i f fe r en t P R P c o n c en t r a t ion s o n o s teo b la s t s a n d f ib ro b la s t s . C l in Or a l I m p la n t s Res 2 QQ6 ; 17: 21 2 -219 .
H ay n eswo r t h S E , Ka d i ya la S , L ia n g L N , e t a l . M i to g en ic s t im u la t io n o f h u m a n m esen c hy m a l s tem c e l l s by p la te le t r e lea se su g g es t a m ec h a n ism fo r en h a n c em ent o f b o n e r ep a i r by p la te le t c o n c en t r a tes . P r esen ted a t t h e 4 8 t h A n n u a l M eet in g o f t h e Or t h o p ed ic Resea r c h S o c ie t y, Da l la s , T X , Feb r u a r y 2 0 02 .
H a r r i so n S , Vavken P, Kevy S , e t a l . P la te le t Ac t i va t io n by C o l la g en P rov id es S u s t a in ed Re lea se o f A n a b o l i c C y to k in es . A m J S p o r t s M ed 2 011; 3 9 : 7 2 9
Ka ku d o n et a l . P ro l i fe r a t ion -P ro m ot in g E f fec t o f P la te le t - R ic h P la sm a o n H u m a n A d ip o se – Der i ved S tem C e l l s a n d H u m a n Der m a l F ib ro b la s t s . P la s t Rec S u r g 2 0 0 8 ; 1 2 2( 5 ) ;1352 -60
Kawa z o e T, K im H H . T i ssu e a u g m en t a t ion by w h i te b lo o d c e l l - c on t a in in g p la te le t - r i ch p la sm a . C e l l Tr a n sp la n t . 2 01 2 ; 21 : 601 -607
Ki l ia n , O . , F lesc h , I . , Wen isc h , S . , e t a l . E f fec ts o f p la te le t g row t h f a c to r s o n h u m a n m esen c hy m a l s tem c e l l s a n d h u m a n en d o t h e l ia l c e l l s i n v i t ro . E u r. J . M ed . Res . 9 : 3 37 , 2 0 04 .
Kim DH et a l . C a n P la te le t -R ic h P la sm a B e Used fo r S k in Re ju ven a t io n ? E va lu a t io n o f E f fec t s o f P la te le t - r i c h P la sm a o n H u m a n Der m a l F ib ro b la s t . A n n Der m a to l 2 011 ; 2 3 ( 4 ) :424 -31
Kn ig h to n DR , H u n t T K , T h a k r a l KK , e t a l . Ro le o f p la te le t s a n d f ib r in in t h e h ea l in g seq u en c e : a n in v i vo s t u d y o f a n g io g en es is a n d c o l la g en sy n t h es i s . An n S u r g . 1 9 82 ;196 :379 –388.
Kn ig h to n DR et a l . C la ss i f i c a t io n a n d t r ea t m en t o f c h ro n ic n o n h ea l ing wo u n d s . S u c c ess f u l t r ea t m en t w i t h a u to lo g o u s p la te le t -d er i ved wo u n d h ea l in g f a c to r s ( P DW H F ) . A n n S u r g . 1 9 86 ; 204 : 322 –330 .
Ko c a o em er, A . , Ke r n , S . , K lu te r, H . , a n d B ieb a c k , K . H u m a n A B se r u m a n d t h ro m b in - a c t i va ted p la te le t - r i c h p la sm a a r e su i t a b le a l te r n a t ives to fe t a l c a l f se r u m fo r t h e ex p a n s io n o f m esen c hy m a l s tem c e l l s f ro m a d ip o se t i s su e . S tem C e l l s 2 5 : 1 27 0 , 2 0 07.
Ko e l len sp erg e r , E . , vo n H e im b u r g , D . , M a r kow icz , M . , a n d Pa l lu a , N . H u m a n se r u m f ro m p la te le t -p o o r p la sm a fo r t h e c u l t u r e o f p r im a r y h u m a n p r ea d ip o c ytes . S tem C e l l s 24 : 1 21 8 , 2 0 06 .
REFERENCES
L ee J W, K im B J , K im M N , M u n S K . T h e e f f i ca cy o f a u to lo g o u s p la te le t r i c h p la sm a c o m b in ed w i t h
a b la t i ve c a r b o n d iox ide f r a c t io n a l r esu r f a c in g fo r a c n e sc a r s : a s im u l t a n eo u s sp l i t - f a ce t r ia l .
De r m a to l S u r g . 2 011 J u l ; 37 ( 7 ) :931 -8 .
L iu Y, Ka lem A , R i s to O , Wa h ls t ro m O. F ib ro b la s t p ro l i fe ra t io n d u e to ex p o su r e to a p la te le t
c o n c en t r a te in v i t ro i s p H d ep en d en t . Wo u n d Rep a i r Reg en . 2 0 0 2 ;5 :336 –340.
M a g a lo n J , e t a l . B M J Op en S p o r t E xe r c M ed 2 016; 2 :e000060. d o i : 10 .11 36/b m jsem -2015 - 000060
M a r g o l i s DJ , Ka n to r J , S a n t a n na J , e t a l . E f fec t i ven ess o f p la te le t r e lea sa te fo r t h e t r ea t m en t o f
d ia b et i c n eu ro p a t h ic fo o t u l c e r s . D ia b etes C a r e 2 0 01 ; 24 :483 –8 .
M a r x R E . P la te le t - r i c h p la sm a ( P R P ) : W h a t i s P R P a n d w h a t i s n o t P R P ? I m p la n t Den t 2 0 01 ;
10 ( 4 ) :225 -28
M a r x R E et a l . P la te le t - r i c h p la sm a : G row t h f a c to r en h a n c em ent fo r b o n e g r a f t s . O r a l S u r g O r a l M ed
Or a l Pa t h o l Or a l R a d io l E n d o d . 1 9 98 ; 8 5 : 638 - 646
M a u t n er K . A C a l l fo r a S t a n d a r d C la ss i f i c a t io n S y s tem fo r Fu t u r e B io lo g ic Resea r c h : T h e R a t io n a le
fo r N ew P R P N o m en c la t u r e . P M & R J 2 015 ; 7 , S 5 3 - S59
M ik h a e l N W, E l - E saw y F M . S k in r e ju ven a t ion w i t h a u to lo g o u s c o n c en t r a ted p la te le t - r i ch p la sm a .
E g y p t ia n J o f Der m a n d Ven er. 2 014 ; 3 4 : 5 - 9
M ish r a A et a l . S p o r t s M ed ic ine A p p l i c a t io ns o f P la te le t R ic h P la sm a . C u r r en t P h a r m B io tec h 2 01 2 ;
1 3 ( 1 ) : 1 - 1 1
M o n te i ro M R . P la te le t r i c h p la sm a in d e r m a to lo gy. S u r g C o sm et Der m a to l 2 01 3 ; 5 ( 2 ) : 1 5 5 9 .
M o o jen DJ , E ve r t s PA , S c h u r e R M , e t a l . A n t im ic ro b ia l a c t i v i t y o f p la te le t - leu koc yte g e l a g a in s t
S t a p hy lo co cc u s a u r eu s . J O r t h o p Res 2 0 0 S; 26: 404 -410 .
N o f a l E , H e lmy A , N o f a l A , A la ka d R , N a s r M . P la te le t - r i c h p la sm a ve r su s C ROS S tec h n iq u e w i t h
10 0 % t r i c h lo ro a cet i c a c id ve r su s c o m b in ed sk in n eed l in g a n d p la te le t r i c h p la sm a in t h e t r ea t m ent
o f a t ro p h ic a c n e sc a r s : a c o m p a r a t i ve s t u d y. Der m a to l S u r g . 2 014 Au g ; 4 0( 8 ) : 864 - 73 .
REFERENCES
R a d a e l l i A , Ro m a n o D , M a r c ia nó A . Fa c e a n d n ec k r ev i t a l i z a t ion w i t h p la te le t r i c h p la sm a ( P R P ) :
c l i n i c a l o u t c o m e in a se r ies o f 2 3 c o n sec u t i ve ly t r ea ted p a t ien t s . J D r u g s Der m a to l . 2 010 ; 9 ( 5 ) :
4 6 6 - 72 .
R a p p l L M . E f fec t o f p la te le t r i c h p la sm a g e l i n a p hy s io lo g ica l l y r e leva n t p la te le t c o n c en t r a t ion o n
wo u n d s in p e r so n s w i t h sp in a l c o r d in ju r y. I n t Wo u n d J 2 011; 8 :1 87 -195 .
Ro sen t h a l A R et a l . Use o f a p la te le t - f ib r in o gen - t h ro m b in m ix t u r e a s a c o r n ea l a d h es i ve :
ex p er im ent s w i t h su t u r e less la m el la r ke r a to p la s t y in t h e r a b b i t . I nves t Op h t h a lm o l . 1 975
N ov ; 14( 11) : 872 - 5
Ru t h er fo r d R B , Ro ss R . P la te le t f a c to r s s t im u la te f ib ro b la s t s a n d sm o o t h m u sc le c e l l s q u iesc en t in
p la sm a se r u m to p ro l i fe r a te . J C e l l B io l 1 976 ; 6 9 : 196 - 203 .
S a a d S et t a H , E l sh a h a t A , E l sh e r b iny K , M a sso u d K , S a fe I . P la te le t - r i c h p la sm a ve r su s p la te le t - po o r
p la sm a in t h e m a n a g em en t o f c h ro n ic d ia b et i c fo o t u l c e r s : A c o m p a r a t i ve s t u d y. I n t Wo u n d J
2 011 ;8 :307 -31 2 .
S c la f a n i A P. A p p l i c a t ion s o f p la te le t - r i c h f ib r in m a t r i x i n f a c ia l p la s t i c su r g e r y. A r c h Fa c ia l P la s t
S u r g 2 0 0 9 N ov ; 2 5( 4 ) : 270 -76
S c la f a n i A P. P la te le t - r i c h f ib r in m a t r i x fo r im p rovem en t o f d eep n a so la b ia l fo ld s . J C o sm et
Der m a to l 2 010;9 (1 ) :66 –71 .
X ia n L J , Roy C h ow d h u r y S , B in S a im A , B t H j I d r u s R . C o n c en t r a t io n -d ep end en t e f fec t o f p la te le t -
r i c h p la sm a o n ke r a t in o c y te a n d f ib ro b la s t wo u n d h ea l in g . C y to t h e r a py. 2 015 M a r ; 17 (3 ) :293 -300 .
Weib r i c h G , H a n sen T, K le i s W, B u c h R , H i t z le r W E . E f fec t o f p la te le t c o n c en t r a t ion in p la te le t - r i c h
p la sm a o n p e r i - im p lan t b o n e r eg en er a t io n . B o n e . 2 0 04 ; 34: 665 –71 .
Z h u J T, X u a n M , Z h a n g Y N et a l . T h e e f f i ca cy o f a u to lo g o u s p la te le t - r i c h p la sm a c o m b in ed w i t h
e r b iu m f r a c t ion a l l a se r t h e r a py fo r f a c ia l a c n e sc a r s o r a c n e . M o l M ed Rep . 2 01 3 J u l ; 8 ( 1 ) :233 -7.
REFERENCES