District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback

WebinarNovember 17, 2014

Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness CoordinatorIdaho State Department of Education

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar

• Objectives:– Identify common areas that teacher and

principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision and the elements that are required.

– Review principal and teacher evaluation plan templates.

– Answer questions.

Evaluation Plan SectionsTeacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120• 120.01 Standards• 120.02 Professional Practice• 120.03 Student Achievement• 120.04 Participants• 120.05 Evaluation Policy –

Content• 120.06 Evaluation Policy –

Frequency of Evaluation• 120.07 Evaluation Policy –

Personnel Records• 120.08 Evaluation System

Approval

Principal Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.121• 121.01 Standards• 121.02 Professional Practice• 121.03 Student Achievement• 121.04 Evaluation Policy –

Content• 121.05 Evaluation Policy –

Frequency of Evaluation• 121.06 Evaluation Policy –

Personnel Records• 121.07 Evaluation System

Approval

Needs Revision Common Areas

• Professional Practice• Student Achievement• Evaluation Policy

Needs Revision – Professional Practice

Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.01 & 08.02.02.120.02• 67% based on multiple measures

of professional practice– Aligned to Charlotte Danielson’s

Framework for Teaching Second Edition (4 domains – 22 components)

– Two (2) documented observations with one completed by January 1st.

– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Student Input• Portfolio

Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.01 & 08.02.02.121.02• 67% based on multiple

measures of professional practice– Aligned to Idaho Standards for

Effective Principals (3 domains – 14 components)

– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Teacher Input• Student Input• Portfolio

Needs Revision – Student Achievement

Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.03• 33% based on multiple

measures of student achievement– Based on growth in student

achievement.– Include at least two

measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.

– Identifies the other district determined measure.

Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.03• 33% based on multiple

measures of student achievement– Based on growth in

student achievement.– Include at least two

measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.

– Identifies the other district determined measure.

Other District Determined Student Achievement Measure Examples

• Student Learning Objectives (SLO’s)• Pre and Post Assessments• End of Course Assessments• District-adopted vendor

assessments

Questions?

• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement

• Next part of the webinar will cover evaluation policy and the evaluation plan-policy templates.

Needs Revision – Evaluation Policy

Teacher Evaluation Plan• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.05

Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)

• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.06 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation

• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.07 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records

Principal Evaluation• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.04

Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)

• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.05 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation

• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.06 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records

Evaluation Plan – Policy Templates

• Resource for districts – not a required format/form.

• Includes all areas as required by IDAPA Rule.

• Cannot be submitted as written:– Districts need to define the areas that

are to be planed or determined by the district.

Individualizing Evaluation Rating System

• Shall be based on 67% Professional Practice and 33% Student Achievement–Numerical Summative Rating–Matrix Summative RatingProfession

al Practice(67%)

Student Achieveme

nt(33%)

Summative Evaluation

Rating

Overall Summative RatingMatrix Example

Professional Practice - 67%Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4

Student Achievement - 33%

Unsatisfactory = 1 Unsatisfactory= 1.00

Unsatisfactory= 1.67

Basic= 2.34

Proficient= 3.01

Basic = 2 Unsatisfactory= 1.33

Basic= 2.00

Proficient= 2.67

Proficient= 3.34

Proficient = 3 Unsatisfactory= 1.66

Basic= 2.33

Proficient= 3.00

Distinguished= 3.67

Distinguised = 4 Unsatisfactory= 1.99

Proficient= 2.66

Proficient= 3.33

Distinguished= 4.00

Overall Summative Rating Scale3.50-4.00 = Distinguished

2.50-3.49 = Proficient

2.00-2.49 = Basic

1.00-1.99 = Unsatisfactory

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar

• Common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision:– Professional Practice– Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy

• Evaluation plan templates as resource for districts.

Questions?

• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy– Evaluation Plan-Policy Templates

Thank You!Lisa Colón

Educator Effectiveness [email protected]

(208) 332-6917