Die Organisation der Digitalität Zwischen grenzenloser Offenheit und offener Exklusion Leonhard Dobusch Professor für Betriebswirtschaftslehre mit Schwerpunkt Organisation Institut für Organisation und Lernen Antrittsvorlesung Universität Innsbruck, 24. Jänner 2017 Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
64
Embed
Die Organisation der Digitalität: Zwischen grenzenloser Offenheit und offener Exklusion
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Die Organisation der Digitalität Zwischen grenzenloser Offenheit und offener Exklusion
Leonhard Dobusch Professor für Betriebswirtschaftslehre mit Schwerpunkt Organisation
Institut für Organisation und Lernen
Antrittsvorlesung Universität Innsbruck, 24. Jänner 2017
Dieses Werk steht unter der LizenzCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
[E]rst heute, wo die Faszination für die Technologie abgeflaut ist und ihre Versprechungen hohl klingen, wird die Kultur und Gesellschaft in einem umfassenden Sinne durch Digitalität geprägt.
“
Felix Stalder, (2016), "Kultur der Digitalität", S. 20
Bild: Ziko van Dijk, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010-09_CPOV_IMG_3260.JPG, Lizenz: CC-BY-SA 3.0 generic, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.de
Wir erschaffen eine Welt, in der jeder Einzelne an jedem Ort seine oder ihre Überzeugungen ausdrücken darf, wie individuell sie auch sind, ohne Angst davor, im Schweigen der Konformität aufgehen zu müssen.
the popular claim that negative word-of-mouth in social media is mainly caused by commen-ters’ anonymity. In contrast, the results support the idea that non-anonymous aggressive sanc-tions are more effective. Non-anonymity helps to gain recognition [78], increases one’spersuasive power [74], and mobilizes followers [85]. The result is also in line with public voicesthat observe an increasing social acceptance of non-anonymous digital hate speeches [99].
This study also has practical implications. First, it can be expected that in the future, digitalnorm enforcement will intensify. The growing digital civil society adapts to the digital environ-ment that transforms interactions. Social media offer great opportunities for individuals whohave the intrinsic desire to enforce norms and contribute to the formation of latent interestgroups. Second, the regularly demanded abolition of online anonymity and the introduction ofreal-name policies do not necessarily prevent online aggression in social media. Our view is inline with findings from a natural experiment in South Korea where the enacting of a RealName Verification Law in 2007 only reduced aggressive comments for a particular user groups,but not for others [73]. There is, however, no doubt that the battle over online anonymity willintensify over time, particularly when aggressive norm enforcement by the civil society notonly addresses low status, but increasingly high status, actors such as states or corporations.
This study has several limitations that should be kept in mind when interpreting the results.First, the findings are only generalizable to direct, explicitly abusive online aggression but notto indirectly formulated aggression such as cynicism. Also, while we qualitatively checked com-ments in our large dataset, it was not feasible to identify all comments. The amount of aggres-sion in some comments may be therefore wrongly classified.
Fig 6. Online aggression dependent on anonymity of commenters (random-effects). Predictions ofTable 1, Model 1.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155923.g006
Digital Norm Enforcement in Online Firestorms
PLOSONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155923 June 17, 2016 18 / 26
non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals
“
Rost et al. (2016): Digital Social Norm Enforcement: Online Firestorms in Social Media, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155923
The average Wikipedian on the English Wikipedia is (1) a male, (2) technically inclined, (3) formally educated, (4) an English speaker (native or non-native), (5) aged 15–49, (6) from a majority-Christian country, (7) from a developed nation, (8) from the Northern Hemisphere, and (9) likely employed as a white-collar worker or enrolled as a student rather than being employed as a laborer.
Quelle: David Lerner, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_troll.jpg, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Wenn Deine Gruppe aus neun hilfreichen und höflichen Mitgliedern und einem unhöflichen, sexistischen und lauten Mitglied besteht, dann werden die meisten Frauen wegen dieses einen Mitglieds fernbleiben.