Top Banner
Non-directive Interve Theories – a case st Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette
4

Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

Iris Ross
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette.

Non-directive Intervention Theories – a case studyDianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi,Narelle, Sam and Yvette

Page 2: Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette.

A case study

Tessa will not workShe’s a quiet and docile child but doesn’t

socialise very much with other students

She never disrupts the classDespite her best efforts, she rarely completes

tasks and really doesn’t seem to care

Quite simply, she’s just not putting in any effort!

How would you deal with this pupil in a “Thomas Gordon” fashion?

Modified from example in Charles (1996), p. 180

Page 3: Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette.

Teacher owns the problemDon’t try to force her to complete the assignmentsUse I-messages to convey teacher concern to TessaEncourage Tessa to talk about assignments; use

active listening skills as she does so; ask her how you can help.

Engage in a collaborative problem solving exploration of why she doesn’t work. Does she have suggestions?

Use I messages to convey to the entire class how everyone complete s the work expected of them in school, without singling out Tessa

The following sequence is suggested

Page 4: Dianna, Kelli, Leanne, Maddi, Narelle, Sam and Yvette.

References C M Charles (1996). Building Classroom Discipline 5th Edition,

Longman, White Plains, New York