Page 1 Government of Rajasthan RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT Watershed Development & Soil Conservation Department Rajasthan, Jaipur District Watershed Development Unit - Sikar Detailed Project Report IWMP (2010-11) - JUGRAJPURA (Sikar-VII) Project Area : 4895 ha. Project Cost : Rs. 734.25 Lacs Submitted by :- Project Implementing Agency Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
182
Embed
Detailed Project Report - Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed-development-a… · Page 5 The watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone 2A .The soil texture is Sandy
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1
Government of Rajasthan
RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT
Watershed Development & Soil Conservation Department
Rajasthan, Jaipur
District Watershed Development Unit - Sikar
Detailed Project Report
IWMP (2010-11) - JUGRAJPURA (Sikar-VII)
Project Area : 4895 ha.
Project Cost : Rs. 734.25 Lacs
Submitted by :-
Project Implementing Agency
Assistant Engineer
Panchayat Samiti, Shrimadhopur
Page 2
DPR TEMPLATE
Index
S.No Topics Page no.
1 Chapter
Location
General Features of watershed (Cost and Area details)
Climatic and Hydrological information
Other Development Schemes in the project area
Details of infrastructure in the project areas
Institutional arrangements (,DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC)
2 Chapter Basic Data ,Analysis and Scope
2.1 Demography Details 2.2 Development Indicators 2.3 Land use 2.4 Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis 2.5 Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status 2.6 Land holding pattern 2.7 Livestock status 2.8 Fodder status 2.9 Farm Implements 2.10 NREGS Status 2.11 Migration details 2.12 Livelihood Details. 2.13 Existing SHG 2.14 Ground Water details 2.15 Drinking Water Status 2.16 Water use efficiency 2.17 Slope details 2.18 Water Budgeting 2.19 Soil Details 2.20 Soil erosion status
3 Chapter Proposed Development Plan
4 Chapter Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
5 Chapter Annual Action Plan
5.1 Project fund 5.2 Convergence Plan
6 Chapter Project outcomes
7 Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities
Page 3
8 Enclosures
8 .1 Maps 1. Location –District, block, village, watershed location map 2. Map of Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map 3. Land Use Land Cover map 4. Existing water bodies, DLT 5. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing) 6. GIS based intervention map 7. Treatment map ie proposed works on revenue map
8.2 Documents of Agreements:
Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval
Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution
Documents related to PRA exercise
Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval
Proceedings of Panchayat Samiti General body for DPR approval
Watershed Committee Registration certificate
Jugrajpura– PIA – DWMA, PIA – WC(in case of NGO as PIA)
Page 4
CHAPTER – I
INTRODUCTION
Location.
JUGRAJPURA Project is located in Srimadhopur Block, of SIKAR district. The project area is
between the latitudes 27O 35’-40’, 70O 25’-30’ & longitudes. It is at a distance of 35 km from its
Block head quarters and 100 Kms from the district head quarters. There are 09 no. of habitations
in the Project area and other details are given below.
6. Name of PIA Assistant Engineer P.S. Srimadhopur
7. Designation Ass. Eng.
8. Address with contact no., website P.S. Srimadhopur
9. Telephone 01575-250033
10. Fax 01575-250033
11. E-mail
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S.No
Name of
WDT
member
M/F Age
Qualification
Experience in
watershed(Yrs)
Description of
professional
training
Role/ Function
1 Lokesh
Nitharwal
M 23 B.Tech.civil B.Tech.civil All Civil work
activity
2 Sitaram M 38 B.Sc. (Ag) two year M.Sc. (Ag) All Agriculture
activity
3
Sriram
M 26 H.Secodary two year L.S.A. All live stock
activites
4 Sunita F 28 Sociology All social
activites
Page 8
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of Gram Sabha for WC
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy
Designation Name M/F SC/ST/ OBC/
General
Landless/ MF/SF/ BF
Name of UG/SHG
Educational qualification
1 W.C. JUGRAJPURA
27.05.11
President Kalu ram / Bhairu ram M OBC
MF Arable land Conservation 10
Secretary Kamlesh /Ram lal M OBC SF Secretary B.A.
Member Banwari lal / Bansidher M GEN
MF Non Arable land Conservation B.A.
Jswant / Mangej M GEN BF Dairy Production 10
Kamla w/o Bhgwan F SC
LL Horticltur Davlopment Shaksar
Kalu ram / Mango ram M SC
SF Agriclture Production 5
Bhgwan / Bansidher M OBC
SF Pastur Devlopment 5
Jaykanwar w/o Virender F GEN
SF Small saving Shaksar
Hnuman / Murlidhr M OBC SF Small saving 5
Sankr lal / Sohn lal M OBC SF Small saving 10
Urmila w/o Mukesh F OBC
MF Small saving Shaksar
Kamlesh / Gopal M OBC MF Small saving. 6
Page 9
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of Gram
Sabha for WC
Date of Registration as a
Society (dd/mm/yyyy
Designation
Name M/F SC/ST/OBC/
General
Landless/MF/SF/ BF
Name of UG/SHG Educational qualification
1
W.C.Ajeetgarh
27.05.11
President
Dinesh / Govind Narayn M
MF Arable land Conservation B.A
Secretary Sobhas / Boduram M OBC
SF Secretary B.A
Member Santosh w/o Bhanwr lal F OBC
MF Non Arable land Conservation 10
Gokul / Bhairu ram M ST SF Horticltur Dev. 5
Nathu Ram / Dhana Ram M OBC
BF Dairy Devlopment 10
Viml / Lachhmi Narayn M SC
SF Agricltur Devlopment 8
Rakesh / Matadin M GEN MF Pastur
Devlopment 5
Kamlesh / Kelash M GEN SF Small saving 10
Mamta w/o Mukesh F SC
LL small saving 10
Chhoti w/o Sadhu Ram F SC
SF small saving 12
Chaitnay / Simabhu Dayal M ST
SF small saving Shaksar
Ramish / Jagdish M LL small saving 8
Babulal / Balu Ram M OBC SF small saving 8
Page 10
Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
S.N.
Name of WCs
Date of Gram
Sabha for WC
Date of Registration as a Society
(dd/mm/yyyy
Designation
Name M/F
SC/ST/OBC/
General
Landless/MF/SF/
BF Name of UG/SHG
Educational qualification
W.C.
Hathora
15.09.2011
President Suresh / M OBC
SF Arable land
Conservation 12
Secretary Govradhan / Mali Ram M OBC
SF Secretary B.A.
Member Bajrang/ Umraw singh M OBC
SF small saving 5
Harshay/ Gopiram M OBC MF Non Arable land
Conservation 8
Hjari lal/ Sudha ram M SC
SF small saving 10
Radhe shyam/ Goi ram M GEN
SF Animal Hus. Shaksar
Gordhan/ Mangu ram M SC
LL small saving 8
Narngi/ Bodhu ram F OBC
BF Non arable land production Shaksar
Lada devi/ Mulchand M OBC
SF small saving 10
Lada devi/ Mulchand F SC
MF Arable land Production 8
Page 11
Problems and scope of improvement in the project area
The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which can be achieved by crop rotation, hybrid seed &
using improved agriculture practices .
976.71 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased to 1163.14 . The productivity gap of major crops in the area as compared with
district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of
practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small
land holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green houses, Agro forestry,
fodder crops)and diversification in Livelihoods(Agriculture, Animal husbandry, self employment)
2489 Quintal fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 792
no of persons migrate due to less opprtunity of employment this migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area
through increase in production and diversification in agriculture and Livelihoods as mentioned above.
Page 12
CHAPTER – II
2.1 .1 DEMOGRAPHY DETAILS AND HOUSEHOLD DETAILS:-
POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD DETAILS:
Village Male Female Total SC ST HH SC HH ST HH
Ajeetgarh 6738 6070 12808 1536 688 1804 216 98
Lisariya 2877 2617 5494 215 231 750 30 33
Diwrala 4875 4453 9328 1461 105 1317 208 15
Jugrajpura 1340 1268 2608 355 0 297 50 0
Mangarh 1445 1283 2728 395 10 401 56 1
Hathora 322 314 636 86 0 95 12 0
Mandusiya 936 913 1876 91 0 252 13 0
Modyari 713 712 1425 111 0 205 15 0
Sipur 399 346 745 163 125 113 23 18
TOTAL 19645
17976
37648 4413
1159 5234
623 165
Page 13
2.1.2 BPL HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 46 10 144 90 291
Lisariya 25 02 56 12 95
Diwrala 82 15 172 57 326
Jugrajpura 62 - 83 30 175
Hathora 08 - 09 02 19
Mandusiya 09 - 28 01 38
Modyari 05 - 02 - 07
Sipur 05 - 14 04 23
TOTAL 242
27
508
196
973
Page 14
2.1.3 MARGINAL FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAIL
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 48 38 521 415 1022
Lisariya 10 11 196 100 317
Diwrala 99 07 440 191 737
Jugrajpura 09 00 111 06 126
Mangarh 15 01 108 70 194
Hathora 03 00 20 15 38
Mandusiya 05 00 50 51 106
Modyari 04 00 35 59 98
Sipur 06 06 16 16 44
TOTAL 199 63 1497 923 2682
Page 15
2.1.4 SMALL FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 17 24 251 228 520
Lisariya 06 08 215 72 301
Diwrala 33 04 236 132 405
Jugrajpura 06 00 84 05 95
Mangarh 09 00 77 48 134
Hathora 02 00 18 11 31
Mandusiya 03 00 40 42 85
Modyari 03 00 21 40 64
Sipur 04 05 12 11 32
TOTAL 83 41 954 589 1667
Page 16
2.1.5 GENERAL (BIG) FARMER HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 05 06 32 16 59
Lisariya 04 06 78 29 117
Diwrala 06 02 28 56 92
Jugrajpura 03 00 37 01 41
Mangarh 04 00 21 20 45
Hathora 01 00 14 05 20
Mandusiya 02 00 32 17 51
Modyari 01 00 18 17 36
Sipur 05 05 12 05 27
TOTAL 31 19 272 166 488
Page 17
2.1.6 ABSTRACT HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Household Details SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Marginal Farmer Household 199 61 1497 922 2679
Small Farmer Household 83 43 954 586 1666
Big Farmer Household 31 19 272 167 489
TOTAL Household 313 123 2723 1675 4834
Table 2.2 Development indicators
S. No. Development Indicators State Project Area
1 Per capita income (Rs.) 16260 5700
2 Poverty ratio 0.22 24.30
3 Literacy (%) 0.604 55.52
4 Sex Ratio 921 992
5 infant mortality rate
6 maternal mortality ratio
The table indicates poor socio economic conditions.
Page 18
Table 2.3 Land Use
Land Use Total area in Ha.
Private Panchayat Government Community Total
Agriculture Land
4641.89 - - -
4641.89
Temporary fallow
39.18 - - -
39.18
Permanent Fallow
6.25 - - -
6.25
Cultivated Rainfed
3658.93 - - -
3658.93
Cultivated irrigated
976.71 - - -
976.71
Net Sown Area
4635.64 - - -
4635.64
Net Area sown more than once
3658.93
- - -
3658.93
Forest Land
- - 510 - 510
Waste Land
- 16.94 64.06 - 81
Pastures - 235.11 - 235.11
Others - - - - -
Total 17617.53 252.05 574.06 - 18443.64
Page 19
2.1.7 MARGINAL FARMER LAND DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 33.60 26.60 364.7 282.39 707.29
Lisariya 7.00 7.70 137.20 70.00 221.9
Diwrala 69.3 4.90 308.00 133.70 515.9
Jugrajpura 6.30 0.00 77.70 4.20 88.2
Mangarh 10.50 0.70 75.60 49.00 135.8
Hathora 2.10 0.00 14.00 10.50 26.6
Mandusiya 3.50 0.00 35.00 35.70 74.2
Modyari 2.80 0.00 24.50 41.30 68.6
Sipur 4.20 4.20 11.20 11.20 30.8
TOTAL 139.30 44.10 1047.9 637.99 1869.29
Page 20
2.1.4 SMALL FARMER LAND DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 17.00 24.00 251.00 234.35 526.35
Lisariya 6.00 8.00 215.00 69.00 298
Diwrala 33.00 4.00 236.00 132.00 405
Jugrajpura 6.00 0.00 84.00 5.00 95
Mangarh 9.00 0.00 77.00 48.00 134
Hathora 2.00 0.00 18.00 11.00 31
Mandusiya 3.00 0.00 40.00 42.00 85
Modyari 3.00 0.00 21.00 40.00 64
Sipur 4.00 5.00 12.00 11.00 32
TOTAL 83 41 954.00 592.35 1670.35
Page 21
2.1.5 GENERAL (BIG) FARMER LAND DETAILS
Village SC ST OBC OTHER TOTAL
Ajeetgarh 11.25 13.50 71.90 36.15 132.80
Lisariya 9.00 13.50 175.50 65.25 263.25
Diwrala 13.50 4.50 63.10 125.85 206.95
Jugrajpura 6.75 0.00 83.25 2.37 92.37
Mangarh 9.00 0.00 47.25 44.88 101.13
Hathora 2.20 0.00 31.50 11.25 44.95
Mandusiya 4.50 0.00 71.90 38.40 114.80
Modyari 2.30 0.00 40.50 38.10 80.90
Sipur 11.25 11.25 27.10 13.50 63.10
TOTAL 69.75 42.75 612.00 375.75 1100.25
The project area has 57.27 ha of fallow land (that 564.72 ha) can be brought under cultivation if some irrigation source can be provided through
Construction of WHS like Khadin, Tanka, Farm ponds etc. and also through demonstration of rainfed varieties of crops. Construction of WHS
can also increase in area under irrigation which is only -19.95%
81ha. % of the project area is under wastelands and can be brought under vegetative cover, with reasonable effort .Activities like Earthen
check dams, Vegetative filter strip, V-ditches, staggered trenches ,WHS (Johad) Afforestation of wastelands and Pasture development will be
taken up on these lands
Pasture development the land use table shows that there is 235.11 hectare pasture land (4.80%)This emphasizes the need for taking up
pastureland development works through sowing of promising species of grasses and plantations
Page 22
Table 2.4 .a Area & Production of major crops
Rainfed
Season Crop sown Varieties Area (ha.) Production
(tons)
Productivity (Kg/ha.)
Kharif
Bajara Desi/ Local 3130 2457 785
Guar Desi/ Local 268 134 500
Cowpea Desi/ Local 161 54 338
Moong Desi/ Local 99 28 281
Area of kharif crops 3658
Irrigated Kharif Groundnut Desi/ Local 366 661 1807
Rabi Wheat Desi/ Local 380 760 2000
Barely Desi/ Local 289 635 2200
Mustard Desi/ Local 307 214 700
Area of rabi crops 976
The farmers are using wcc-175&local seed varieties of Bajra, whereas varieties like raj-171&other hybrid seed can increase the production.
Present crop Rotation
Bajra - Wheat Fallow - Mustered Moong - barely
Moth - Mustered Guar - Wheat Fallow - Mathi
Ground nut Fallow Bajra - Gram Moth - Fallow
Table 2.4.b Abstract of cropped Area(ha)
Area under Single crop 4635.64
Area under Double crop 976.71
Area under Multiple crop -
Page 23
The table 2.4b shows that only 976.71ha is (19.95%) is double cropped area. Also the crop rotation shows that fallow lands are there. This
indicates that there is scope for change in crop rotation in fields where there are fallow lands through Soil and Water conservation measures,
crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture.
Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation can change the area under single cropping to double
and multiple cropping.
Table 2.4.c Productivity Gap Analysis (The table can also be given in bar chart form)
Name of
the crop
Productivity kg/ha
India
Highest
Average
in
Rajasthan
Highest
Average
of Agro
climatic
zone District
Project
Area
Bajra 1042 832 888 950 484
Cluster
bean NA 305 351 394 -
Mung NA 312 322 304 281
Chawla NA 233 361 365 338
Groundnut 1459 1728 1758 1782 1807
Wheat 2802 2749 2913 2746 200
Gram 762 466 975 1032 1000
Mustard 1159 1179 1065 955 700
Barley 2517 2588 2283 2200
Mathi NA 1140 963 913 14
Page 24
These Data’s Sources are Rajasthan Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2009-10 (Average Last 5 year upto 2008-09) & Krishi Marg Darshika 2009.
Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity within state and even within same agro climatic
zones.
The reasons for this variation are
The farmers are using varieties DESI of Bajra whereas the recommended varieties like Pioneer 86m 86, J.K. 26, Pro. Agro 94.44,
provide 35-40 Qut./Ha. yield (write for all crops)
Lack of Availability of good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate quantities and time to the farmers.
Availability of water for cultivation(19.95% is irrigated table2.3)
The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be
carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit.
Demonstration of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation seeds of Forage Crops for further
multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop rotations.
Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)
Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties
Production (Qtl/ha)
Horticulture 3 Amla Desi N-6, Chakya 156
0.5 Citrus Desi Desi 52
4 Beal Desi NB-3,5,9
Vegetables 15 Onion Desi N-53, Dark rad nasik 250
10 Chilly Desi Charanti, F2 10
18 Tind Desi Hybrid 100
Floriculture Marigold Desi Merii 15-16 -
Rose Desi Ganganagar Ageti -
Medicinal Plants 12 Mathi Desi Rmt-1;2 14
Page 25
Table 2.6 Land holding Pattern in project area
Type of Farmer
Total Households
Land holding (ha) irrigation source wise Land holding (ha)Social group wise
Irrigated (source)
Rainfed Total
General SC ST OBC BPL
(i)Large farmer 489 351.86 1320.49 1672.35
592.30 83.02 43.01 954.02
(ii) Small farmer 1666 231.56 868.69 1100.25
375.75 69.75 42.75 612.00
(iii) Marginal farmer 2679 393.29 1476 1869.29
637.99 139.30 44.10 1047.90
(iv) Landless person 402 - - -
- - - - -
(V)No. of BPL households 974 - - -
- - - - --
Total 6210 976.71 3665.18 4641.89 1606.04 292.07 129.86 2613.92
87% land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own 3861 ha of total cultivated area. Horticulture/vegetables could be more
economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility Horticulture/vegetables will be
promoted in a part of land with farm pond/Tanka construction.
The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification and income for large farmers
Horticulture plantation, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, floriculture: As discussed earlier . Horticulture/vegetables could be more
economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. Also the project area has good potential for medicinal & aromatic crops like
Sonamukhi, Isabgol, Ashwagandha, , Mehandi;Alowera etc.
Agro forestry plantation: To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt plantation as wind velocity is high in the project area.
Page 26
Setting of Vermi Compost Units - Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals and fertilizers on human health the emphasis would
be on cultivation of organic produce through motivating farmers and providing assistance for production of organic input, vermi compost.
Production and distribution of quality seed – There is need to ensure that good quality seed is available for cultivators for which adequate
seed production would be initiated in watershed areas with the assistance of private sector and agriculture department technologies
Sprinklers and pipelines for efficient water management practices emphasis on demonstration of sprinklers with adequate financial support
and convergence/private partnership.
Establishment of Green House - For growing off season vegetables seedlings and other horticultural crops under controlled atmospheric
conditions of green house.
Establishment of nurseries: Most of the planting material is procured from other parts of the State/ country. The procurement of planting
material from distant places causes damage to the planting material and often results in untimely supply. Hence nursery development activity in
area.
Innovative hi-tech/ export oriented activities: innovative hi-tech/ export oriented projects like mushroom cultivation, floriculture, etc which are
in negligible existence at present, can be implemented by individual farmers / private companies.
Drip irrigation Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables, green houses and in nurseries for rational use of
irrigation higher yields and quality produce.
Page 27
Table 2.7 Livestock Status - animals/milk production / average yield.
S.No.
Description of animals
Population in No.
Yield(milk/mutton/Wool)
Equ. cow units
Dry matter requirement
per year (7Kg per animal.)
Total requirement
in M.T.
1 Cows 1507 1054 1828 12805
14590.8
Indigenous 868 196.22 868 6076
Hybrid 639 1278 960 6720
2 Buffaloes 2134 4268 3201 22407
3 Goat 5130 1026 1282 8974
4 Sheep 1030 903 kg wool/year 257 1799
5 Camel 95 348 kg wool/year 380 2660
6 Poultry - - - -
7 Piggery - - - -
Total 9896 - 6948 48636
In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following activities will be taken up
Castration
Artificial insemination
Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo
Breeding distribution crossbred rams
Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health, hygiene and feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal health camps ,Urea-Molasses treatment demonstration ,demonstration of improved methods of conservation and utilization of Forage crops are proposed.
Page 28
Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)
S.No Item Unit Area/Quantity
1 Existing Cultivable area under Fodder
Ha 186
2 Production of Green fodder Tonns/year 644
3 Production of Dry fodder Tonns/ Year 1495
4 Area under Pastures Ha 253.11
5 Production of fodder Tonns/year 350
6 Existing area under Fuel
wood
Ha 20
7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day -
8 Silage Pits No -
9 Availability of fodder tonn 2489
10 Deficiency/excess of odder
quintals 12101.8
The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 14590.8 tonn and availability 2489 tonn)
To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and demand there is need for
Increase in area under fodder crops
Increase in productivity of fodder crops
Development of pastures
And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few but productive animals
Page 29
Table 2.9 Agriculture implements
Farm mechanization and seed banks: As discussed earlier 89.88 % land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own only
10.12 % of total cultivated area so owning of big farm implements by individual farmers is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy
farm implements and rent to farmer
1 2 3
S. No Implements Nos.
1 Tractor 51
2 Sprayers-manual/ power
3 Cultivators/Harrows 38
4 Seed drill 38
5 Any Other
Page 30
Table 2.10 NREGA Status - No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employment status.
The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities, enhancing farm level economy, increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition. (As discussed earlier) and diversification in livelihoods .
The existing livelihoods Activities are given below
Page 32
Table 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)
Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income from
the /hh
cultivators 4834 28000
Dairying 863 22000
Poultry 13 40000
Piggery - -
Landless Agri. Labourers
402 27000
Table 2.12(b)Major activities (Off Farm)
Name of activity Households/individuals Average annual income from
the Activities /hh
Artisans 15 30000
Carpenter 20 28000
Blacksmith 10 26000
Leather Craft 32 28000
Porter 13 24000
Mason 214 42000
Others specify (Cycle Repair ,STD,Craft etc)
20 20000
Page 33
2.12.(C) The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihood component through assistance to SHG or individuals
S.No Name of SHG Members Bank With
A/C no.
Activity
involved
Monthly
income
Fund
available
Source of
assistance
Training
received
1. Geeta SHG
Jugrajpura
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh Tailring 500 3000 WD& SC -
2. Shri Syam
Jugrajpura
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh
Milk
Production 500 3500 WD& SC -
3. Ruchi SHG
Diwrala
G.S.B.
Diwrala
Live Stock
(Goat and
Sheep)
200 3200 WD& SC -
4. Kailash SHG
Diwrala
G.S.B.
Diwrala
Live Stock
(Goat and
Sheep)
500 5000 WD& SC -
5. Sital SHG
Hathora
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh
Milk
Production 400 3500 WD& SC -
6. Abhishek SHG
Hathora
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh
Milk
Production 500 2000 WD& SC -
7 Tusar SHG
Hathora
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh
Bundi
bandhey 500 3500 WD& SC -
8 Shiv SHG
Jugrajpura
C.C.B.
Ajeetgarh
Vegetable and
Furit
Preservation
500 5000 WD& SC -
The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be strengthened through trainings and financial assistance
Page 34
1. Technical Features Table 2.14 Ground Water
S.No Source No. Functional depth
Dry Area irrigated
Water availability(days)
i) Dug wells 143 143
ii) Shallow tube wells
iii) Pumping sets
iv) Deep Tube Wells 378 410 57 235
Total 521 410 200 235
Table 2.15 Availability of drinking water
S.No
Name of the village
Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day
Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day
No. of drinking water sources available
No. functional
No. requires repairs
No. defunct
1 Ajeetgarh 3.56 3.25 6 6 -- --
2 Lisariya 3.20 3.00 5 5 - --
3 Diwrala 2.56 3.30 4 3 1 1
4 Jugrajpura 3.30 3.15 2 2 - -
5 Mangarh 3.00 2.90 2 2 - -
6 Hathora 2.90 2.80 1 1 - -
7 Mandusiya 2.90 2.70 1 1 - -
8 Modyari 2.80 2.75 1 1 - -
9 Sipur 3.10 2.90 1 1 - -
Page 35
Table 2.16 Water Use efficiency
Name of major crop
Area (Hectare)
through water saving
devices(Drip/Sprinklers)
through water
conserving agronomic practices#
Any other (pl. specify)
Total
Bajra;Ground nut;Guar;Moong;wheat;barely;Gra
m;Mustered; 729.18
Band&Agronomical
practices 118 Ha -- 847.18
The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water.
Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every operational wells Table 2.17 Slope details.
Slope of Watershed
S.No. Slope percentage
Area in hectares
1 0 to 3% 4364
2 3 to 8% 405
3 8 to 25% 98
4 > 25% 28
As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the problem of water erosion in agriculture fields and protect
washing of top soil and manures/fertilisers
Page 36
Table 2.18 Soil details
Soil Profile
S.No. Major Soil Classes Area in hectares
1 Sandy Soil 4895
2
Soil Depth :
B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares
1 0.00 to 7.50 -
2 7.50 to 45.00 98
3 > 45.00 4797
C Soil fertility Status Kg/ha
N 1.67 – 2.33
P < 23
K < 142
Micronutrients Zink .49 PPM
Iron 3.5 PPM
Cu 0.30 PPM
Mg 7.32 PPM
The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to every farmer every crop season will be provided, which
will include the recommendation for Application micro nutrient and fertilizers
Page 37
Table 2.19 Erosion details
Erosion status in project Area
Cause
Type of
erosion
Area affected
(ha)
Run off(mm/
year) Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)
Water erosion
a Sheet 350
b Rill 2937 60 2.5
c Gully 1708
Sub-Total 5405
Wind erosion 1250 NA 1.5
Total for project 4895
The need is:
To check land degradation
To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock
To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water conservation measures
To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds
To check Faulty agriculture techniques
To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks
To check Deforestation of steep slopes
To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to recharge Ground Water structures life Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank Stabilisation, Loose stone check Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and Anicuts would be taken up.
Page 38
CHAPTER – III
Proposed Development Plan
A Plan has been developed for Treatment & development of project area. in each basic need. such as soil & water conservation. Horticulture. Agroforestry, and Live stock Dry Land Horticulture subsitute of agriculture & cash crop. New varities seeds demostrations water harvesting structure to store water, project plan also includes landless. So it will develop over over seanerio.
A) preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA B)
The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the
habitations of Mau Micro Watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the
implementation of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed.
Grama Sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the watershed committee and approval of DPR.
S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama
5 Ajitagarh 5.58 Four Tinshed nirman hindu samasan gat ajitagarh
4.00 2.50 1.50
Pipe line mohala kusumpura 0.20 - 0.20
Pipe line mohala jogyan 0.705 - 0.705
Pipe line mohala oandeshawari 0.28 - 0.28
Pipe line mohala kusumpura 0.395 - 0.395
Page 40
The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:
S.no Name of the village/Habitation Date on which PRA
conducted
1 Ajeetgarh SET. – OCT.20011
2 Lisariya OCT. – NOV.20011
3 Diwrala NOV. – JAN.20012
4 Jugrajpura JAN. – FEB. 20012
5 Hathora FEB. – MAR.20012
Transact walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out. Socio-economic survey was carried out during Jun-Dec2010(dates) period covering all the households and primary data on demography, Land holdings, Employment status, Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.
State remote sensing department was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by SRSAC are :
Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries.
Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area.
Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area.
Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements).
Land Use / Land cover map.
Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map
Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map
Page 41
CHAPTER - I V :- Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
Name of Watershed :- jagrajpura Name of Grampanchyat 1.Jugrajpura 2.Ajitgarh 3.Hathora 4.lisadiya 5.Diwarala
Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 4895 ha. Project Cost :- 734.25lacks
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5486
2. Treatable Area 4895
3. Arable land 4641.89
(A) Irrigated by Tubewell 1268.81
(B) Un- Irrigated 3373.08
4. Govt. land -
(A) Pasture land 253.11
(B) Govt. land treatable -
Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total cost
Cost from
Project Fund Convergence Fund
Beneficiary
Contribution*
Admn. 73.43
Monitoring 7.34 7.34
Evaluation 7.34 7.34
EPA 29.37 29.37
I & CB 36.71 36.71
DPR 7.34 7.34
Total (A) 161.53 161.53
(B.) Natural resource management(56%) Contour bund/ Field bunding 104.91 104.91
Earthen bund with Waste weir/ Water
Harvesting Structure 70.09 70.09
Tanka 1.19 8 9.52 9.52
Pasture Development 0.026 188 4.90 4.90
Bank Stabilistion / Peripheral Bund 0.00690 458 3.15 3.15
V ditch 0.091 15.92 15.92
Fencing 27.84 27.84
Afforestation 0.00156 18292 28.54 28.54
Drainage line treatment
Page 42
Ground Water Recharge Structure &
Feeder 9.99 4 39.96 39.96
MMS 56 38.37 38.37
LSCD
WHS / Anicut 14 53.18 53.18
GULLY PLUGS(ECD)
29 14.8 14.8
Total (B) 411.18 411.18
( C ) Livelhood(9%)
Seed money revolving fund For SHG 199
49.75 49.75
Grant in Aids for SHGs federation 5
9.83 9.83
Rrevoling fund to individual enterprising 26
6.50 6.50
Total (c) 66.08 66.08
(D) Production measures (10%)
Crop demostration No 0.05 358 14.35 14.35 3.55
Horticulture Orchard No 0.072 28 16.56 16.56 3.60
Hybrid Vegetable Cultation No 0.08 50 3.20 3.20 0.80
Demostraion of spice No 0.06
Nadep Compost No 0.12 36 3.60 3.60 0.72
Agroforestory No 0.0002241 4.33 4.33 1.08
Soil Helth Card of Farmer No 500 0.15 0.15
Zypsum for land reclation No 0.01 236 1.80 1.80
Animal health camp No 0.20 40 8 8
Fodder demostration 0.05 120 6.00 6.00
Purchasing of bulls etc. No 0.40 7 2.80 2.80
Primary health kit for livestock No 0.05 140 7 7
Establish travis in the village No 0.10 9 0.90 0.90
Distribution of mangers No - 4.74 4.74
Micro Enterprise
Total (D) 73.43 73.43 9.75
(E) Consolidation 22.03 22.03
Page 43
Note :- *Tentative and will vary during execution according to beneficiary
sub Total A,B,C,D,E 734.25 734.25
Agriculture extn Dept. ( F ) Convergence with NREGA & Agri. Extn. Department
Drip irrigation near tanka 0.21 50 10.50 7.35 3.15
Only Horticulture (orchad ) 1.00 25 25 17.5 7.5
Khet talai 1.06000 5 5.30 3.71 1.59
Crop Demostration 0.01000 70 0.70 0.49 0.21
Total 41.50 29.05 12.45
Animal Husbandary Department
Animal Health Camps 0.15 40 6.0 4.20 1.80
NREGA
Nadi Excavation & Pal making 10.00 6 60.00 42.00 18.00
Work cat.-4th 1.05 40 60.00 42.00 18.00
Total 120.00 84.00 36.00
Total (E) 167.50 117.25 50.25
Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E,F) 996.63 805.5 117.25 73.88
Page 44
CHAPTER - I V :- Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
Name of Watershed :- jagrajpura Name of Grampanchyat 1.Jugrajpura 2.Ajitgarh 3.Hathora 4.lisadiya 5.Diwarala
Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Effective Project Area :- 4895 ha. Project Cost :- 734.25lacks
S.no. Type of Area Total (ha.)
1. Geographical Area 5486
2. Treatable Area 4895
3. Arable land 4641.89
(A) Irrigated by Tubewell 1268.81
(B) Un- Irrigated 3373.08
4. Govt. land -
(A) Pasture land 253.11
(B) Govt. land treatable
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Grand Total (A,B,C,D,E) 101.79 4.05 3.30 15.60 86.63 29.50 12.70 10.01 101.79
Page 61
CHAPTER – V :- Annual Action Plan
Name of Watershed :- Jugrajpura Effective Project Area :- 930 ha. Name of Grampanchyat :- Ajeetgarh Project Cost :- 139.50 lacks Name of Block :- Shrimadhopur Name of District :- Sikar
Chapter V Annual Action Plan IWMP Jugrajpura
(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA(22%)
Activity
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total
Unit Unit Cost
Quantity
Total cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin